No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
It's bigger on the inside: mapping the black box of motivation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2025
Abstract
Many motivational constructs are opaque “black boxes,” and should be replaced by an explicit account of the underlying psychological mechanisms. The theory of motivational systems has begun to provide such an account. I recently contributed to this tradition with a general architecture of motivation, which connects “energization” and “direction” through the goal-setting activity of emotions, and serves as an evolutionary grounded map of motivational processes.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss: Vol. I: Attachment (revised ed.). Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cittern, D., & Edalat, A. (2014). An arousal-based neural model of infant attachment. In 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB) (pp. 57–64). IEEE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2023a). A general motivational architecture for human and animal personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 144, 104967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Giudice, M. (2023b). Motivation, emotion, and personality: Steps to an evolutionary synthesis. PsyArXiv, 1–24. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/3ry7bGoogle Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2024). The motivational architecture of emotions. In Al-Shawaf, L. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolution and the emotions (pp. 99–132). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5, 292–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenrick, D. T., & Lundberg-Kenrick, D. E. (2022). Solving modern problems with a stone-age brain: Human evolution and the seven fundamental motives. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohl, J. (2020). Parenting – a paradigm for investigating the neural circuit basis of behavior. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 60, 84–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohl, J., Babayan, B. M., Rubinstein, N. D., Autry, A. E., Marin-Rodriguez, B., Kapoor, V., … Dulac, C. (2018). Functional circuit architecture underlying parental behaviour. Nature 556, 326–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohl, J., & Dulac, C. (2018). Neural control of parental behaviors. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 49, 116–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petters, D., & Beaudoin, L. (2017). Attachment modelling: From observations to scenarios to designs. In Érdi, P., Bhattacharya, S., & Cochran, A. L. (Eds.), Computational neurology and psychiatry (pp. 227–271). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseman, I. (2011). Emotional behaviors, emotivational goals, emotion strategies: Multiple levels of organization integrate variable and consistent responses. Emotion Review 3, 434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarantino, A. (2014). The motivational theory of emotions. In D'Arms, J. & Jacobson, D. (Eds.), Moral psychology and human agency: Philosophical essays on the science of ethics (pp. 156–185). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, M. E. (2001). System theory of motivational development. In Wright, J. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 10120–10125). Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
A critique of motivation constructs to explain higher-order behavior: We should unpack the black box
Related commentaries (25)
Adopt process-oriented models (if they're more useful)
Almost, but not quite there: Research into the emergence of higher-order motivated behavior should fully embrace the dynamic systems approach
Beyond reductionism: Understanding motivational energization requires higher-order constructs
Connecting theories of personality dynamics and mental computational processes
Definitional devils and detail: On identifying motivation as an animating dynamic
Don't throw motivation out with the black box: The value of a good theory revisited
Endogenous reward is a bridge between social/cognitive and behavioral models of choice
Expectancy value theory's contribution to unpacking the black box of motivation
Exploring novelty to unpack the black-box of motivation
Higher-order motivational constructs as personal-level fictions: A solution in search of a problem
Human motivation is organized hierarchically, from proximal (means) to ultimate (ends)
It's bigger on the inside: mapping the black box of motivation
Mental computational processes have always been an integral part of motivation science
Motivation needs cognition but is not just about cognition
Motivational constructs: Real, causally powerful, not psychologically constructed
Motivational whack-a-mole: Foundational boxes cannot be unpacked
Needed: Clear definition and hierarchical integration of motivation constructs
Postcard from inside the black box
Predictive processing: Shedding light on the computational processes underlying motivated behavior
Resurrecting the “black-box” conundrum
The ins and outs of unpacking the black box: Understanding motivation using a multi-level approach
The role of metacognitive feelings in motivation
The unboxing has already begun: One motivation construct at a time
There's no such thing as a free lunch: A computational perspective on the costs of motivation
When unpacking the black box of motivation invites three forms of reductionism
Author response
Response to the critiques (and encouragements) on our critique of motivation constructs