Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T22:33:17.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pearls, not Problems: Exploring Transformative Education in Indigenous Australian Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2012

Elizabeth Mackinlay  and
Katelyn Barney
Elizabeth Mackinlay*
Affiliation:
School of Education, The University of Queensland, Australia
Katelyn Barney
Affiliation:
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Unit, The University of Queensland, Australia
*
address for correspondence: Elizabeth Mackinlay, School of Education, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. E-mail: e.mackinlay@uq.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This article explores the shift in terminology that occurred in a 2-year Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC)-funded curriculum renewal project that set out to broadly explore current teaching and learning practice in Indigenous Australian studies (www.teaching4change.edu.au). While we started with the term ‘Problem-Based Learning’, it became clear as the project progressed that the terminology we were using was not politically or pedagogically appropriate. As the data began to reveal, the research team became increasingly uncomfortable with the colonial underpinnings and associations of the term ‘Problem-Based Learning’ (PBL), and began to explore the possibility of redefining what we do as something else entirely. A key outcome of the project was that PBL became PEARL, to describe the Political, Embodied, Active, and Reflective aspects of this teaching and learning approach in Indigenous Australian studies. The shift from PBL to PEARL was unexpected, but has resulted in exciting possibilities for migrating and extending theories of teaching and learning in Indigenous Australian studies into critical pedagogy, critical race theory and transformative education. Drawing on critical pedagogy, critical race theory and transformative education theory, this article explores the rationale behind the shift in terminology from PBL to PEARL. We also draw on student data from focus groups, questionnaires and lecturer reflection to examine the ways the results from this project hold great potential for the further implementation of PEARL into primary and secondary classrooms, specifically in relation to pedagogical practice in embedding Indigenous perspectives.

Keywords

Indigenous Australian studiesteaching and learningtertiary educationPEARL

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnes, R. (1990). Race consciousness: The thematic content of racial distinctiveness in critical race scholarship. Harvard Law Review, 103, 1864–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird Rose, D. (1997). Rupture and the ethics of care in colonized space. In Bonyhady, T. & Griffiths, T. (Eds.), Prehistory to politics: John Mulvaney, the humanities and the public intellectual (pp. 190–215). Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Boler, M. (2004). Teaching for hope: The ethics of shattering world views. In Liston, D. & Garrison, J. (Eds.), Teaching, learning and loving: Reclaiming passion in educational practice (pp. 117–131). New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, H., & Taylor, I. (Eds.). (2005). Effective learning and teaching in social policy and social work. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darder, A., Bartodano, M.P., & Torres, R.D. (2009). Critical pedagogy: An introduction. In Darder, A., Bartodano, M.P., & Torres, R.D. (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 1–20). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fox, C. (2004). Tensions in the decolonisation process: Disrupting preconceptions of postcolonial education in the Lao People's democratic republic. In Hickling-Hudson, A., Matthews, J., & Woods, A., Disrupting preconceptions: Postcolonialism and education (pp. 91–106). Flaxton, Australia: Post Pressed.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Bergman Ramos, Trans. M.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Garde-Hansen, J., & Calvert, B. (2007). Developing a research culture in the undergraduate curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8 (2), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, M. (2009). In search of a critical pedagogy. In Darder, A., Baltodano, M.P. & Torres, R.D. (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 84–96). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., . . . Wearne, D. (1996). Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case for mathematics. Educational Researcher, 25, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howell, N.E., Lane, I.F., Brace, J.J., & Shull, R.M. (2002). Integration of problem-based learning in a veterinary medical curriculum: First-year experiences with application-based learning exercises at the University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 29 (3), 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education? In Taylor, E., Gillborn, D., & Ladson-Billings, G. (Eds.), Foundations of critical race theory in education (pp. 17–36). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Margetson, D. (1997). Why is problem-based learning a challenge? In Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (Eds.), The challenge of problem-based learning (pp. 36–44). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
McClaren, P. (2009). Critical pedagogy: A look at the major concepts. In Darder, A., Baltodano, M.P., & Torres, R.D. (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (2nd ed., pp. 61–83). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 50, 5–23.Google Scholar
Ochoa, T.A., & Robinson, J.M. (2005). Revisiting group consensus: Collaborative learning dynamics during a problem-based learning activity in education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28 (1), 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, E., Morrell, A., & O'Connor, M.A. (Eds.). (2002). Expanding the boundaries of transformative learning: Essays on theory and practice (pp. xv–xx). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, E., Fournier, E., Haigh, M., Muniz, O., Trafford, J., & Vajoczki, S. (2006). Problem-based learning in geography: Towards a critical assessment of its purposes, benefits and risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30 (1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S.M., & Hurlbert, J.M. (2004). Problem-based learning: An exercise on Vermont's legalisation of civil unions. Teaching Sociology, 32 (1), 79–93.Google Scholar
Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P., Mennin, S., & Webb, G. (2001). Introduction. In Schwartz, P., Mennin, S., & Webb, G. (Eds.), Problem-based learning: Case studies, experience and practice (pp. 1–12). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S.A. (2009). Creating space for transformative learning. In Fisher-Yoshida, B., Geller, K.D., & Schapiro, S.A. (Eds.), Innovations in transformative learning: Space, culture and the arts (pp. 111–114). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Slater, J., Fain, S., & Rosatto, C. (Eds.) (2002). The Freirean legacy: Educating for social justice (p. 1). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Tandogan, R.O., & Orhan, A. (2007). The effects of problem-based learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3 (1), 71–81.Google Scholar
White, M., Michaud, G., Pachev, G., Lirenman, D., Kolenc, A., & FitzGerald, J. (2004). Randomized trial of problem-based versus didactic seminars for disseminating evidence-based guidelines on asthma management to primary care physicians. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 24 (4), 237–243.Google Scholar