Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-tw422 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-19T19:58:01.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brikettfabrik Witznitz: specific indeterminacy – designing for uncertainty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2008

Florian Beigel  and
Philip Christou
Florian Beigel
Affiliation:
Architecture Research UnitUniversity of North London6-40 Holloway RoadLondon N7 8JL, United Kingdom
Philip Christou
Affiliation:
Architecture Research UnitUniversity of North London6-40 Holloway RoadLondon N7 8JL, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

A two stage international landscape and urban regeneration design competition was held last year for the site of a former Brikettfabrik at Witznitz near Borna in the south Leipzig region of Germany. The design of the winning entry was based on architectural, urban and landscape design strategies developed over the past five years. This paper opens with an introduction to these ideas and related theoretical precedents. There follows a description of the project's context and of the design itself.

Information

Type
design
Information
arq: Architectural Research Quarterly , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Winter 1996 , pp. 18 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ARCH+ (1996). ‘Europan 4, Urban Housing Projects for an Accelerated Age’, ARCH+ No. 133, 09 1996.Google Scholar
Andre, C. (1996). Carl Andre Sculptor 1996, Oktagon Verlag, Stuttgart, 1996, p. 48.Google Scholar
Becher, B. and Becher, H. (1994). Fabrikhallen, Schirmer/Mosel, München, Paris, London, 1994.Google Scholar
Beigel, F. and Christou, P. (1994). ‘The Idea of Landspace – from Interpolis to Interior’, MAMA, Magasin für Modem Arkitektur, Stockholm, Issue No. 8, 1994, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
Beigel, F. (1996a). ‘Exteriors into Interiors, Hans Scharoun's Idea of Stadtlandschaften’, Korean Architects, no. 141, 05 1996, pp. 118–125.Google Scholar
Beigel, F. (1996b). Korean Architects, no. 141, special issue on the works of Florian Beigel, 05 1996, pp. 116–193.Google Scholar
Broome, J. (1986). ‘The Segal Method’, The Architects' Journal, 5 11 1986, pp. 31–68.Google Scholar
Bru, E. (1992). ‘A new landscape’, Quaderns no. 193, pp. 46–96. and ‘Untested Territories’, Quaderns no. 193, pp. 82–85.Google Scholar
Bru, E. (1989). ‘The urban void’, Quaderns no. 183, 10–12 1988, pp. 50–57.Google Scholar
Finch, P. (1996). ‘Fitting low energy housing into urban topography’, The Architects' Journal, 7 03 1996, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
Gerster, G. (1990). Amber Waves of Grain, Harper. Weldon. Owen in assoc. with the American Farmland Trust, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Heinichen, W. (1996). ‘Seenlandschaft Südraum Leipzig – Vision und Realität’, Südraum Journal no. 2, published by Christlichen Umweltseminar Rota e.V. und PRO LEIPZIG e.V., Leipzig, 1996, pp. 72–75.Google Scholar
Heinichen, W. and Uhlig, G. (1994). ‘Der Teamwettbewerb Südraum Leipzig Konzeption – Durchfuhrung – Ergebnisse’ Südraum Leipzig Eine Region im Wandel, Schäfer Verlag, Leipzig, 1994, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
Herzog, J. and de Meuron, P. (1994). El Croquis No. 60, Madrid, 1994, pp. 52–59.Google Scholar
Koolhaas, R. and Walker, P. and , team (1994). ‘Die Stadt der Vernetzungen’, Südraum Leipzig Eine Region im Wandel, Schäfer Verlag, Leipzig, 1994, pp. 32–43.Google Scholar
Koolhaas, R. and Mau, B. (1995). S, M, L, XL, 010 Publishers, Rotterdam, 1995, p. 969.Google Scholar
Kraft, S. (1996). ‘Die Stadt über der Stadt?’, ARCH+, 09. 1996, pp.18–22. English summary pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
Lewison, J. (1993). Ben Nicholson, Tate Gallery, London, 1993, p. 234. Netherlands Architecture Institute, (1996). Reference OMA – The sublime search of an architectural generation, N.A.I. Rotterdam, 1996.Google Scholar
Price, C. (1984). Cedric Price AA Works 2, Architectural Association, London, 1984, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
Price, C. (1996a). ‘Magnetism Personified’, Building Design, 24 05 1996, pp. 12–15.Google Scholar
Price, C. (1996b). ‘Anticipating the unexpected’, The Architects' Journal, 5 09 1996, pp. 27–39.Google Scholar
Scalbert, I. (1996). ‘Siedlung Halen: between standards and individuality’, arq, Autumn 1996, pp.14–24.Google Scholar
Segal, W. (1970). ‘Walter Segal's houses’, The Architects' Journal, 30 09. 1970, pp. 769–780.Google Scholar
Smithson, R. (1979a). ‘Entropy Made Visible’, The Writings of Robert Smithson, New York University Press, New York, 1979, pp. 189–196.Google Scholar
Smithson, R. (1979b). ‘Frederick Law Olmsted and the Dialectical Landscape’, The Writings of Robert Smithson, New York University Press, New York, 1979, pp. 117–128.Google Scholar
de Sola-Morales, I. (1996). Terrain Vague, Quaderns No. 212, 1996, pp. 34–43.Google Scholar
Spetz, R. (1996). ‘The making of Territory’, MAMA, Magasin für Modern Arkitektur, Stockholm, Issue No. 14, 1996, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar
Borna, Stadt (1996). Stage one competition brief (translated from German by Beigel, F.). Städtebaulicher ldeenwettbewerb Nachnutzung der Brikettfabrik Witznitz’ Auslobung, 10. 1996.Google Scholar
Viaplana, A., and Pinon, H. (1987). ‘Plaza de Sants, Barcelona’, El Croquis No. 28, 04 1987, pp. 54–75.Google Scholar