Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-9c7xm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T22:03:49.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sustainable archaeology: soothing rhetoric for an anxious institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2019

Richard M. Hutchings Open the ORCID record for Richard M. Hutchings [Opens in a new window]  and
Marina La Salle
Richard M. Hutchings*
Affiliation:
Institute for Critical Heritage and Tourism (ICHT), 330 Spruce Avenue, Gabriola Island, British Columbia V0R 1X1, Canada
Marina La Salle
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Vancouver Island University (VIU), 900 Fifth Street, Nanaimo, British ColumbiaV9R 5S5, Canada
*
*Author for correspondence (Email: rmhutchings@icht.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The primary objective of sustainable archaeology is to maintain the profession of archaeology—that is, to sustain itself. An effort to rebrand the discipline as virtuous, sustainable archaeology is self-serving and reflects larger institutional anxieties around an unethical past and an uncertain future. An example of futurist rhetoric and doublespeak, sustainable archaeology exists because archaeology is unsustainable.

Keywords

ethicsfuture-makingfuture studiesheritage futuressustainabilitysustainable archaeology

Information

Type
Debate
Information
Antiquity , Volume 93 , Issue 372 , December 2019 , pp. 1653 - 1660
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baptista, J.A. 2014. The ideology of sustainability and the globalization of a future. Time & Society 23: 358–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X11431651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, L.D., Huijbens, E.H. & Larsen, H.G.. 2016. Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. The Canadian Geographer 60: 168–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F., Armitage, D. & Doubleday, N.. 2007. Synthesis, in Armitage, D., Berkes, F. & Doubleday, N. (ed.) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance: 308–27. Vancouver: UBC.Google Scholar
Brightman, M. & Lewis, J.. (ed.). 2017. The anthropology of sustainability: beyond development and progress. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H.P. 2002. Global warming: the implications for sustainable archaeological resource management. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 5: 241–45. https://doi.org/10.1179/135050303795870004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, T. & Benden, D.. 2017. A checklist for sustainable management of archaeological collections. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5: 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2016.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbinder, S.D. 2017. The literature of the Anthropocene: four reviews. Capitalism Nature Socialism 28(1): 139–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2016.1245918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, N., Cannon, A. & Welch, J.. 2018. Objects as stepping stones: sustainable archaeology. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 42: 4–12.Google Scholar
Flatman, J. 2009. Conserving marine cultural heritage: threats, risks and future priorities. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11: 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1179/135050309X12508566208245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gnecco, C. 2018. Development and disciplinary complicity: contract archaeology in South America under the critical gaze. Annual Review of Anthropology 47: 279–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Ruibal, A. 2018. Ethics of archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 47: 345–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-045825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, N. 2019. Tim Scott smashes the black GOP ‘bargain’ over King. CNN 12 January. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/11/politics/tim-scott-steve-king-black-gop/index.html (accessed 8 September 2019).Google Scholar
Högberg, A., Holtorf, C., May, S. & Wollentz, G.. 2017. No future in archaeological heritage management? World Archaeology 49: 639–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2017.1406398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. 2017. Maritime heritage in crisis: Indigenous landscapes and global ecological breakdown. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315400020Google Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. 2019. Meeting the shadow: resource management and the McDonaldization of heritage stewardship, in Wells, J. & Stiefel, B. (ed.) Human-centered built environment heritage preservation: theory and evidence-based practice: 67–87. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. In press. Disciplinary complicity: the university, material culture studies and environmental crisis, in De Cunzo, L. & Roeber, C.D. (ed.) Cambridge University Press handbook of material culture studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. & Dent, J.. 2017. Archaeology and the late modern state: introduction to the special issue. Archaeologies 13: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-017-9311-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2015a. Archaeology as disaster capitalism. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19: 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-015-0308-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2015b. Why archaeologists misrepresent their practice—a North American perspective. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 2: S11–17. https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v2i2.28206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2017. Archaeology as state heritage crime. Archaeologies 13: 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-017-9308-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, R.M. & Salle, M. La. 2018. Salvaging archaeology: why cultural resource management is not part of the ‘new public archaeology’. Antiquity Project Gallery 92(365): e10. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.222Google Scholar
King, T.F. 2009. Our unprotected heritage: whitewashing the destruction of our natural and cultural heritage. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast.Google Scholar
La Salle, M. & Hutchings, R.M.. 2018. ‘What could be more reasonable?’ collaboration in colonial contexts, in Labrador, A.M. & Silberman, N.A. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of public heritage theory and practice: 223–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190676315.013.22Google Scholar
Majewski, T. 2017. The business of CRM: achieving sustainability and sustaining professionalism, in McManamon, F. (ed.) New perspectives in cultural resource management: 164–78. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781317327349-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNiven, I.J. & Russell, L.. 2005. Appropriated pasts: Indigenous peoples and the colonial culture of archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira.Google Scholar
Smith, L. 2004. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203307991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spennemann, D.H.R. 2007a. Futurist rhetoric in US historic preservation: a review of current practice. International Review on Public and Non Profit Marketing 4: 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03180757Google Scholar
Spennemann, D.H.R. 2007b. The futurist stance of historical societies: an analysis of position statements. International Journal of Arts Management 9: 4–15.Google Scholar
Sustainable Archaeology. n.d. About. Available at: http://sustainablearchaeology.org/about.html (accessed 8 September 2018).Google Scholar
Tainter, J.A. 2000. Problem solving: complexity, history, sustainability. Population and Environment 22: 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006632214612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilk, R.R. 1985. The ancient Maya and the political present. Journal of Anthropological Research 41: 307–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.41.3.3630596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, L. 2018. Changing archaeology's ‘brand’ would be helpful. Antiquity 92: 523–24. https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2018.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar