Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:58:18.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neo-environmental determinism and agrarian ‘collapse’ in Andean prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Clark L. Erickson
Clark L. Erickson*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, 33rd and Spruce Street, Philadelphia PA 19104-6398, USA cerickso@sas.upenn.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In early anthropology, environmental determinism was used to explain race, human demography, material culture, cultural variation and cultural change. As anthropological interpretation evolved, simplistic reductionist thinking was replaced with more complex socio-cultural explanations. Despite these theoretical advances,environmental determinism continues to be invoked to explain Andean prehistory.

Keywords

landscapesdroughtclimate changeSouth America

Information

Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 281 , September 1999 , pp. 634 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbott, M.G., Binford, M.W., Brenner, M., Curtis, J.H. & Kelts, K.R.. 1997. A 3,500 “Cyr high-resolution sediment record of lake level changes in Lake Titicaca, Bolivia/Peru, Quaternary Research 47(2): 169–80.Google Scholar
Albarracín-Jordan, J. 1996. Tiwanaku: arqueología regional y dinámica segmentaria. La Paz: Editores Plural.Google Scholar
Albarracín-Jordan, J. & Mathews, J.E.. 1990. Asentamientos Prehispánicos del Valle de Tiwanaku. La Paz: Producciones CIMA. Tomo 1.Google Scholar
Ashmore, W. & Knapp, A.B. (ed.). 1999. The archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: making space. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Binford, M., Kolata, A., Brenner, M., Janusek, J., Seddon, M., Abbott, M. & Curtis, J.. 1997. Climate variation and the rise and fall of an Andean civilization, Quaternary Research 47: 235–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, P. & Brookfield, H.C.. 1987. Land degradation and society. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Botkin, D. 1990. Discordant harmonies: A new ecology for the twenty-first century. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Browman, D.L. (ed.). 1987. Arid land use strategies and risk management in the Andes: a regional anthropological perspective. Boulder (CO): Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cardich, A. 1985. The fluctuating upper limits of cultivation in the central Andes and their impact on Peruvian prehistory, Advances in World Archaeology 4: 293–333.Google Scholar
Crumley, C.L. (ed.). 1994. Historical ecology: cultural knowledge and changing landscapes. Santa Fe (NM): School of American Research.Google Scholar
Dejoux, C. & Iltis, A. (ed.). 1992. Lake Titicaca: a synthesis of limnological knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, C.L. 1993. The social organization of prehispanic raised field agriculture in the Lake Titicaca Basin, in Scarborough, V. & Isaac, B. (ed.), Economic aspects of water management in the prehispanic new world: 369–426. Greenwich (CT): JAI Press. Research in Economic Anthropology Supplement 7.Google Scholar
Erickson, C.L. 1996. Investigación arqueológica del sistema agrícola de los camellones en la Cuenca del Lago Titicaca del Perú. La Paz: PIWA y el Centro de Información para el Desarollo.Google Scholar
Erickson, C.L. In press. The Lake Titicaca Basin: a pre-Columbian built landscape, in Lentz, D.L. (ed.), Pre-Columbian new world ecosystems. New York (NY): Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Erickson, C.L. N.d. Waru Waru: Ancient Andean agriculture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graffam, G. 1992. Beyond state collapse: rural history, raised fields, and pastoralism in the South Andes, American Anthropologist 94(4): 882–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolata, A.L. 1993. The Tiwanaku. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kolata, A.L. (Ed). 1996. Tiwanaku and its hinterland. Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kolata, A.L. & Ortloff, C.. 1996. Agroecological perspectives on the decline of the Tiwanaku state, in Kolata, (ed.): 181–202.Google Scholar
Levieil, D.P. & Orlove, B.. 1990. Local control of aquatic resources: community and ecology in Lake Titicaca, Peru, American Anthropologist 92: 362–82.Google Scholar
Morlon, P. (ed.). 1992. Comprender la agricultura campesina en los Andes centrales: Perú-Bolivia. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos.Google Scholar
Monheim, F 1963. Contribucción a la climatología e hidrologia de la Cuenca del Lago Titicaca. Puno: Universidad Técnica del Altiplano.Google Scholar
Nuñez, M. 1984. Manejo y control de totorales en el Titicaca, Boletín del Instituto de Estudios Aymaras Serie 2, número 19, Abril: 4–19. Chucuito, Peru.Google Scholar
Posnansky, A. 1945. Tihuanacu: The eradle of American man. New York (NY): J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Puleson, A. 1976. Environment and empire: climatic factors in prehistoric Andean culture change, World Archaeology 8: 121–32.Google Scholar
Seddon, M.T. 1994. Excavations in raised fields of the Rio Catari sub-basin, Bolivia. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Shimada, I., Schaaf, C.B., Thompson, L.G. & Moseley-Thompson, E.. 1991. Cultural impacts of severe droughts in the prehistoric Andes: Applications of a 1,500-year ice core precipitation record, World Archaeology 22: 247–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, C. 1994. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, K.S. 1994. Human geography and the ‘new ecology’: the prospect and promise of integration, Annals of the American Association of Geographers 84(1): 108–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar