Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:28:05.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cost, benefit and value in the organization of early European copper production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Stephen Shennan
Stephen Shennan*
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31–34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, England, s.shennan@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How can archaeologists evaluate the ‘cost of production’ in prehistory? Stephen Shennan explores ethnographic examples, Ricardo's Law of Comparative Advantage and archaeological evidence from the eastern Alps in a stimulating discussion of Bronze Age production and exchange.

Keywords

Alpscopperminingexchangecentral EuropeBronze AgeRicardo's law

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Antiquity , Volume 73 , Issue 280 , June 1999 , pp. 352 - 363
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altman, J.C. 1987. Hunter gatherers today: an Aboriginal economy in North Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Biel, J. 1987. Vorgeschichtliche Hõhensiedlungen in Süd-württemberg-Hohenzollern. Stuttgart: Konrad Theiss. Forschungen und Berichte zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg 24.Google Scholar
Brockway, G.P. 1993. The end of economic man. New York (NY): Norton.Google Scholar
Collis, J. 1984. The European Iron Age. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Curdy, P., Leuzinger-Piccand, C. & Leuzinger, U.. 1998. Ein Felsabri auf 2600 m ü M. am Fusse des Matterhorns – Jäger, Handler und Hirten im Hochgebirge, Archädologie der Schweiz 21(2): 65–71.Google Scholar
Eibner, C. 1993. Die Pongauer Siedlungskammer und der Kupferbergbau in der Urzeit, in. Günther, W. Eibner, C. Lippert, A. & Paar, W., 5000 Jahre Kupferbergbau Mühlbach am Hochkönig-Bischofshofen: 10–26. Mühlbach & Bischofshofen: Gemeindeamt.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, A. 1989. The earliest periods of copper metallurgy in Feinan, Jordan, in Hauptmann, et al. (ed.): 119–35.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, A., Pernicka, E. & Wagner, G.A. (ed.). 1989. Old World Archaeometallurgy: 119–135. Bochum: Am Deutschen Bergbau-Museum.Google Scholar
Iovanovic, B. 1991. La metallurgie énéolithique du cuivre dans les Balkans, in Mohen, J.P. & Eluère, C. (ed.), Découverte du métal: 93–102. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Lenerz-De Wilde, M. 1995. Prämonetäre Zahlungsmittel in der Kupfer- und Bronzezeit Mitteleuropas, Fundberichte aus Baden-Württemberg 20: 229–327.Google Scholar
Lippert, A. 1992. Der Gõtschenberg bei Bischofshofen. Wien: Ósterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Menke, M. 1982. Studien zu den frühbronzezeitlichen Metall-depots Bayerns, Jahresbericht der bayerischen Bodendenkmalpflege 19/20: 5–305.Google Scholar
Moesta, H., Rüffler, R. & Schnau-Roth, G.. 1989. Zur Verfahrenstechnik der bronzezeitlichen Kupferhütten am Mitterberg. Mössbauer- und mikroscopische Studien, in Hauptmann, et al. (ed.): 141–54.Google Scholar
Moosleitner, F. 1991. Bronzezeit im Saalfeldener Becken. Salzburg: Amt der Salzburger Landesregierung.Google Scholar
Primas, M. 1986. Die Sicheln in Mitteleuropa I. Munich: C.H. Beck. Prahistorische Bronzefunde XVIII, 2.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1972. The emergence of civilisation. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ridley, M. 1996. The origins of virtue. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M.J. 1979. Local and long-distance trade and incipient state formation on the Bamenda Plateau in the late 19th century, Paideuma 25: 1–19.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1968. Note on the original affluent society, in Lee, R. & DeVore, I. (ed.), Man the hunter: 85–9. Chicago (IL): Aldine.Google Scholar
Service, E.R. 1962. Primitive social organisation. New York (NY): Random House.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J. 1993a. Settlement and social change in Central Europe, 3500–1500 ÌC, Journal of World Prehistory 7: 121–61.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J. 1993b. Commodities, transactions and growth in the Central European Early Bronze Age, Journal of European Archaeology 1.2: 59–72.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J. 1995. Bronze Age copper producers of the eastern Alps. Bonn: Habelt. Universitatsforschungen zur prahistorischen Archädologie 27.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J. 1998. Producing copper in the eastern Alps in the second millennium BC, in Knapp, B. Pigott, V. and Herbert, E. (ed.), Social approaches to an industrial past: 191–204. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shennan, S.J. In press. Trends in der Bevõlkerungszahl von Mitteleuropa 4000–1500 v.Chr. und ihre Bedeutung, in Lippert, A. Schultz, M. Shennan, S.J. & Teschler-Nicola, M. (ed.), Mensch und Umwelt im Neolithikum und in der Frühbronzezeit in Mitteleuropa. Ergebnisse interdisziplinarer Zusammen-arbeit zwischen Archädologie, Klimatologie, Biologie und Medizin. Göttingen. Fortschritte in der Palaopathologie und Osteoarchaologie 3.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1993. What would a Bronze Age world system look like? Relations between temperate Europe and the Mediterranean in later prehistory, Journal of European Archaeology 1.2: 1–58.Google Scholar
Spufford, P. 1988. Money and its use in Medieval Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigger, B.G. 1995. Expanding middle-range theory, Antiquity 69: 449–58.Google Scholar
Vandkilde, H. 1996. From stone to bronze. Aarhus: Jutland Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
Viazzo, P. 1989. Upland communities: environment, population and social structure in the Alps since the sixteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warnier, J.P. 1985. Bamenda Précolonial. Thèse de Doctorat d’État, Paris.Google Scholar
Wood, J.W. 1998. A theory of preindustriai population dynamics, Current Anthropology 39: 99–135.Google Scholar