Hostname: page-component-65b85459fc-jtdgp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-21T01:23:04.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An interdisciplinary workflow for the comprehensive study of ancient quarried landscapes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2025

Rebecca Levitan*
Affiliation:
Department of Classics, King’s College London, UK
Evan Levine
Affiliation:
Faculty of Theology and School of Archaeology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Demetrios Athanasoulis
Affiliation:
Ephorate of Antiquities of the Cyclades, Athens, Greece
Irini Legaki
Affiliation:
Ephorate of Antiquities of the Cyclades, Athens, Greece
Jessica Paga
Affiliation:
Department of Classical Studies, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, USA
Rosie Campbell
Affiliation:
Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium Institut des Civilisations, Arts et Lettres, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Hallvard Indgjerd
Affiliation:
Museum of Cultural History, University of Oslo, Norway
Jean Vanden Broeck-Parant
Affiliation:
Institut des Civilisations, Arts et Lettres, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Vasiliki Anevlavi
Affiliation:
Austrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
Thorsten Jakobitsch
Affiliation:
Austrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria
Florence Liard
Affiliation:
Institut des Civilisations, Arts et Lettres, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
*
Author for correspondence: Rebecca Levitan rebecca.levitan@kcl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quarries are information-rich anthropic landscapes, but their unique characteristics often limit the effectiveness of traditional archaeological documentation strategies. Here, the authors present a novel interdisciplinary method for the documentation and analysis of these landscapes, focusing on two ancient marble quarries on the Mediterranean island of Naxos. The workflow, combining lidar, photogrammetry, sculptural and architectural study, geoscience, ecological study and archaeological survey, provides a means for the systematic documentation of quarry landscapes in the Mediterranean and beyond, and aims to promote an understanding of premodern extractive activities not as isolated occurrences but as important aspects of interconnected, evolving landscapes.

Information

Type
Method
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd

Introduction

Quarry studies in Mediterranean archaeology have experienced recent advances in fieldwork methodology, digital documentation and scientific analysis have facilitated the generation of a rich assemblage of data from these long-neglected spaces. Recent regional studies have focused on quarries in Greece (Russell Reference Russell2017), Turkey (Scardozzi Reference Scardozzi, Gutiérrez García-Moreno, Pilar Lapuente Mercadal and Rodà de Llanza2012), Sicily (Calderone et al. Reference Calderone, Lercari, Tanasi, Busch, Hom and Lanteri2024) and the Andes (Earle & Cruz Quiñones Reference Earle and Cruz Quiñones2023), while catalogues and gazetteers of ancient quarries (Russell Reference Russell2013; Kokkorou-Alevras et al. Reference Kokkorou-Alevras2014) offer substantial updates in our knowledge of their locations and distributions, accompanied by the integration of archaeometry and other quantitative approaches including chemical and petrographic analysis (Bloxam Reference Bloxam2011).

Robust contextualisation of these quarries within their broader landscapes and sociohistorical settings is, however, often lacking and there is a growing awareness of the need for more theoretically informed frameworks around the study of stone extraction (Lyes Reference Lyes, Lamesa, Whitaker, Gattiglia, Sciuto and Porqueddu2023). Nuanced treatments of ancient quarries in the pre-Roman Aegean are particularly uneven, and most studies focus on quarrying as a means of engagement with artistic and architectural output. While interest in ethnographic and anthropological approaches to stone working is growing, most notably as these approaches relate to the development of architectural energetics (e.g. Taelman Reference Taelman, Vermeulen and Zuiderhoek2021), quarry studies have so far minimised their potential for addressing larger archaeological questions, notably in sociological, economic, industrial and environmental terms (Barker et al. Reference Barker, Courault, Domingo and Maschek2023).

This article presents one novel, interdisciplinary and low-cost method for the study of quarried landscapes in the Cycladic region of the Mediterranean undertaken by the Naxos Quarry Project (NQP), including proof of concept at the marble quarries of Apollonas and Melanes on the island of Naxos (Figure 1). In contrast to most quarry studies, which rely on singular methods of documentation, our integrated approach combines lidar, photogrammetry, architectural and sculptural study, geochemical sampling, ecological study and regional archaeological survey to offer a new workflow for the systematic documentation of quarries and the integration of these data within broader, ongoing archaeological discussions in the Cyclades and beyond.

Figure 1. Map of Naxos showing study areas, major sites, kouroi (archaic sculptures) and marble geology (figure by E. Levine).

Naxos and project overview

Naxos is the largest island in the interconnected Cycladic archipelago, offering a resource-rich landscape that has long set it apart from its smaller, more arid neighbours. As such, the island presents a deep history of occupation from the Pleistocene (c. 200 000 BP) to the present, illuminated by archaeological fieldwork at the Stelida Peninsula (Carter et al. Reference Carter2019) and the south-east coast (Renfrew et al. Reference Renfrewin press), evidence for prehistoric occupation near Chora (Foutou Reference Foutou and Rougemont1983; Cosmopoulos Reference Cosmopoulos1998; Vlachopoulos Reference Vlachopoulos, Gorogianni, Girella and Pavuk2016), monumental Archaic temples at Portara (Gruben Reference Gruben1997), Sangri (Lambrinoudakis & Ohnesorg Reference Lambrinoudakis and Ohnesorg2020) and Yria (Lambrinoudakis Reference Lambrinoudakis1991), and the medieval fortified settlement of Kastro Apalirou (occupied eighth–thirteenth centuries AD) (Hill et al. Reference Hill, Roland, Ødegård, Indgjerd, Crow and Hill2018) (Figure 1). Naxos is perhaps best known for its role as the earliest site of systematic marble extraction in Greece, beginning in the Early Bronze Age (c. 3200 BC, Dixon Reference Dixon, Renfrew, Philaniotou, Brodie, Gavalas and Boyd2013). Naxian artists and architects of the Archaic Period (c. 700–480 BC) fundamentally reshaped the materiality of Aegean art and architecture at home and abroad (Sheedy & Pike Reference Sheedy and Pike2025).

The island is home to several sources of coarse-grained white marble as well as the only Aegean source of emery, a natural abrasive that played a critical role in marble working (Palagia Reference Palagia and Palagia2006: 260). In the Archaic Period, Naxian marble workers were technological and artistic pioneers who developed techniques to harness and exploit their local natural resources (Figure 2). While scholars have explored and studied the quarries of Melanes and Apollonas, significant questions regarding the relationship between the ancient quarries, settlements and nearby sanctuaries, the routes by which extracted marble was transported and the chronology and sequence of quarry use remain unanswered (Alevras Reference Kokkorou-Alevras2013: 116).

Figure 2. Elevations of Archaic marble Naxian dedications at Delphi (left) and Delos (centre) and local monuments on Naxos (right) (figure by R. Levitan).

Previous work on Naxos has illustrated the presence of quarrying and stone working within a complex network of interrelated anthropic features (Kokkorou-Alevras Reference Kokkorou-Alevras1992; Lambrinoudakis & Sfyroera Reference Lambrinoudakis and Sfyroera2010; Kokkorou-Alevras Reference Kokkorou-Alevras2013, Kokkorou-Alevras et al. Reference Kokkorou-Alevras2014, Reference Kokkorou-Alevras1992; Korres Reference Korres and Lambrinoudakis2021). No intensive or extensive survey work had, however, taken place at either site that could claim to understand the full extent of quarrying activity, nor the particular material records of this practice. This article presents the approach developed by NQP to address these challenges and lacunae, offering an avenue for the archaeological documentation of quarries as features within complex diachronic landscapes.

Methods

Recording strategy

Since large quarries are fundamentally negative or extractive features that challenge traditional archaeological documentation techniques designed for the built environment, we developed a multiscalar method to document evidence for both ancient stone working and the reuse of these spaces over time (Figure 3). We follow Heldal and Bloxam’s (Reference Heldal and Bloxam2008) concept of a ‘quarryscape’: an area of at least 1m2 with clear signs of quarrying activity. Such signs include cuttings in the rock for the insertion of posts or splitting wedges (with spade-shaped, triangular and rectangular types predominating), channelling and pointillé (closely placed circular punch strokes). In many cases, multiple methods for stone extraction were identified within the same quarry area. Each identified quarry area was numbered, photographed and surveyed with a real-time kinematic differential GPS (RTK DGPS), and resultant data were recorded in a project database alongside a detailed description of the area. Several complex quarry areas were earmarked for further low-altitude drone lidar survey and photogrammetry to facilitate interpretation, alongside traditional autopsic approaches.

Figure 3. NQP workflow for the documentation of quarried landscapes (figure by R. Levitan).

Organisation of these data necessitated a recording strategy that unified collection, storage and analysis in a single database. Rather than simply acting as a data repository, the NQP database was designed to promote reflexive interpretation and collaborative analysis (Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Lukas and Berggren2015; Boyd et al. Reference Boyd2021: 62). The entire project—from data collection, to GIS, to analysis—is housed in a bespoke PostgreSQL relational database accessed through a browser-based frontend for ease of access in both the field and laboratory. The system is open source and can be modified for other archaeological projects (Indgjerd Reference Indgjerd2025).

Regional study

The topographic profile and spatial extent of open-air quarries make them well suited for 3D modelling and remote-sensing documentation, although the correct scale and resolution depends on the type of quarry, topography and vegetation. For the purposes of NQP, manned airborne lidar scanning (ALS) provided insufficient resolution to penetrate local vegetation and record subtle evidence for human activity (see similar complexities in Calderone et al. Reference Calderone, Lercari, Tanasi, Busch, Hom and Lanteri2024). Instead, drone lidar and photogrammetry documentation was employed to create topographic overviews of two study areas, around the Melanes quarries in the centre of the island and the Apollonas quarries at the north-east coast (see Figure 1). Flights were performed at a range of altitudes and parameters, and several data classification methods were employed to maximise vegetation penetration and surface documentation (Levine et al. Reference Levine, Indgjerd, Kristensen and Samdalin press).

The use of two aerial documentation methods—lidar and photogrammetry—allowed for a combination of processing techniques and a comparison in their efficacy. In the employment of lidar, the most substantial gains were seen in areas of higher and more open vegetation, while the differences in efficacy between the two methods were smaller in areas with dense, low vegetation. At both the Melanes and Apollonas quarries, we found that enhanced detail could be extracted from photogrammetry using point-cloud processing and visualisation otherwise reserved for lidar data, offering the opportunity to highlight subtle changes in surface topography, like toolmarks, necessary for the documentation and interpretation of quarry areas (Kokalj & Somrak Reference Kokalj and Somrak2019). Aerial recording produced orthomosaics, which were used to identify areas for intensive or extensive fieldwalking.

Documentation

Fieldwalking was used to identify diachronic evidence of human activity, including agricultural terracing, field walls, quarry areas, sculpture, architecture and surface ceramics (Figure 4). Both study areas were segmented into 100 × 100m tracts, with field walkers spaced 20m apart, walking in a cardinal direction and documenting all archaeological evidence along a 2m-wide transect (offering a 10% sample). Each transect was subdivided into five segments of 20m in length, gridding each tract into 25 smaller survey units.

Figure 4. Examples of the topography and vegetation at Apollonas (top) and Melanes (bottom) (figure by E. Levine).

Three-dimensional digital documentation offered an accurate and efficient recording strategy for features of particular interest, including structures, sculptures and fragments of worked marble (Figure 5, nos. 1–3). Handheld lidar scans for 31 architectural and sculptural fragments were collected with an iPhone 13 Pro and processed with the free Scaniverse application. Data were exported as georeferenced .las files and processed .obj textured meshes. This method was effective at documenting objects at various scales, including a large (> 7.5m) architectural fragment, greater than double-life-size (> 5.5m) sculptures abandoned at the Melanes quarry and a colossal (> 11m) sculpture in the Apollonas quarry. Focused studies of these objects are currently in preparation.

Figure 5. Areas of geological sampling and ecological study (left) and recorded features (right) at Apollonas: 1) slipways; 2) quarry beds; 3) wedge cuttings for block extraction; and 4) inscriptions. Photogrammetry (5, visualised as a slope index) and lidar assisted in the identification of these features (figure by authors).

Lidar scans were particularly useful to test data collection accuracy in comparison to photogrammetry models of the sculptures, which we were able to ground-truth via close visual examination. Similarly, both photogrammetry and lidar modelling were effective in clarifying the iterative reinscription of a known boundary inscription in Apollonas (IG XII 5, 43; Figure 5, no. 4). Further processing and analysis of the dense point clouds from aerial recording resulted in useful visualisations, and we found that slope analysis of high-resolution digital terrain models proved effective at highlighting evidence for quarrying (Figure 5, no. 5).

Surface ceramics underwent in situ macroscopic analysis and recording, focused on establishing both their spatial distribution and macroscopic characteristics (fabric, shape and decoration). In-field ceramic documentation was used to establish the range of chronological and functional activities in a given area, modelled on previous survey projects with similar datasets (Haggis & Mook Reference Haggis and Mook1993; Knodell et al. Reference Knodell, Fachard and Papangeli2017).

Environmental study proved particularly effective in understanding the afterlives and reuse of these quarries. NQP undertook geobotanical investigation following the Braun-Blanquet (Reference Braun-Blanquet1964) method, a phytosociological recording that estimates the abundance and dominance of species within a relevé (vegetation sample plot). The quarry area of Apollonas presented diverse vegetation, and two relevés were investigated at different elevations to ensure representative results. In Melanes, where the vegetation is mostly homogenous, two relevés were also investigated to facilitate comparison between the two quarries. For each relevé, a plot between 9 and 20m2 was documented with DGPS and all identifiable plant taxa within the designated area were recorded. After creating this list of plant species, the cover-abundance of each species was estimated using the Braun-Blanquet scale, allowing identification of the range of plant communities present. These results form the basis for a full description of each study area, including climate, soil pH and soil hydration. Comparison of these data to broader trends on the island highlights the long-term environmental and botanical implications of intensive quarrying, abandonment and subsequent transition to agricultural landscapes, illustrating how premodern extractive industries continue to impact local environments and drive both micro- and macro-environmental change.

The final stage of documentation was a systematic geological sampling of each quarry. In total, 136 samples were collected from Apollonas and Melanes for petrographic and chemical analysis, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and stable isotope analysis (oxygen and carbon). Across the Mediterranean, macroscopic and isotopic studies have been used to build robust databases that illuminate marble provenance (e.g. Craig & Craig Reference Craig and Craig1972; Attanasio et al. Reference Attanasio, Brilli and Ogle2006). As Naxian marble deposits display a heterogeneous chemical signature (Herz Reference Herz, Herz and Waelkens1988), we used petrographic and geochemical analyses to develop a detailed understanding of the geological profile of each Naxian quarry, allowing for the more precise identification of provenance for objects documented during survey and for objects in museum collections (Anevlavi & Prochaska Reference Anevlavi, Prochaska and Fragoulopoulos2021).

Results and discussion

Fieldwork verified that the topography, vegetation and archaeological evidence were markedly different between Apollonas and Melanes. The former displayed lower vegetation, steeper slopes and more visible worked bedrock, while Melanes, as an area of active cultivation, contains both ancient and modern cultural landscapes with a larger variety in vegetation zones. Approaching these industrial zones as complex and diachronic quarrying areas engendered a more robust analysis, thereby enriching our overall understanding of the quarries, as well as the tools and techniques of stone extraction.

At Apollonas, this method allowed the NQP team to identify and study eight large areas of intensive quarrying, offering a clear definition of the extent and limits of extraction along an exposed spine of marble bedrock. In addition to the identification of two premodern poorly preserved structures located within the quarry, dozens of partially quarried blocks and numerous architectural fragments, we also isolated several stretches of previously undocumented slipways made from marble lapilli (marble chips) and debitage from the quarrying process. Documentation of these slipways offers insight into the process of stone extraction on Naxos, exhibiting how quarry workers shaped their local topography to develop routes to the coast, facilitating the seaborne transportation of large stone blocks.

By contrast, the landscape of Melanes displays a dense pattern of occupation and agricultural cultivation within dormant quarries, alongside the ready spoliation and modification of discarded and incomplete material, from monumental roof tiles to sculptural fragments. At Melanes, we focused on refining our fieldwalking method for vegetated landscapes with intense topography alongside the targeted documentation of 31 quarry areas. This documentation revealed a substantially wider area of intense quarrying than previously known, which, when analysed alongside the results of the lidar survey, enabled the definition of the maximal limits of stone extraction from the site. As at Apollonas, we were also able to identify a series of slipways that led from the quarry to a nearby river, from which material was subsequently transported westward toward the coast.

Fieldwalking at Melanes highlighted one of our most surprising results: these landscapes, which present exceptionally dense, multifaceted evidence for anthropic activity, were almost entirely devoid of surface pottery. It is not immediately evident whether this dearth of surface ceramics is due to a taphonomic phenomenon that has obscured ceramics at the site (e.g. soil deposition behind terraces) or whether it represents a true lack of systematic occupation at spaces of marble extraction before the Early Modern period (c. 1800–1900).

By contrast, geobotanical investigation revealed rich and varied vegetation profiles at both Melanes and Apollonas. In areas where soil accumulation obscures geology, the presence of particular plant species, influenced by soil pH, reflects the composition of underlying bedrock and quarry debitage. For example, the western limits of quarrying at Melanes are clearly indicated by the presence of Erica manipuliflora (autumn heather), which commonly occurs on schist bedrock soils but is absent in calcareous marble soil (Jakobitsch et al. Reference Jakobitsch, Anevlavi, Levitan and Levinein press). Systematic study of vegetation in abandoned quarry landscapes therefore reveals how centuries of marble extraction affect soil characteristics, creating unique microhabitats with rare plant species (e.g. Ophrys omegaifera subsp. israelitica). Apart from helping identify areas of quarrying, this aspect of the study deepens our understanding of quarry zones as bio-cultural landscapes, highlighting their transformation from extractive sites to refuges of biodiversity, and offering a window into the long-term impact of premodern industry.

Conclusion

NQP’s work combines modern tools with established methods for the systematic in-person documentation of stone quarrying. Although developed in response to the particular challenges and features of Naxian quarries, NQP’s three-step sequence of aerial documentation, fieldwalking and specialist documentation, and analytical study is easily reconfigured for other quarries and landscapes of extraction more broadly. Similarly, employment of a recording method built on the documentation of holistic units of quarried areas allows for an integration of data from these stages and facilitates diachronic interpretation. This method highlights the benefits of studying premodern quarries through an interdisciplinary approach that encourages scholars to integrate features directly related to stone extraction into broader sociohistorical, economic and ecological themes. Although this study is ongoing, our preliminary results clearly demonstrate the numerous advantages of such a multiscalar approach to quarry documentation.

Attention to broader contexts allows the archaeology of quarries to be better situated within the spatial, functional and temporal networks of human activity. Doing so encourages an understanding of quarries not as isolated features but as important aspects of interconnected evolving landscapes. NQP’s interdisciplinary workflow thereby offers a substantive documentation strategy for ancient quarries and provides an avenue for archaeologists working on sites of extraction, in the Mediterranean and beyond, to more substantively incorporate these spaces into broader conversations on ancient landscape modification, resource extraction and premodern economies.

Funding statement

This project was supported by a Petros Goneos Memorial Fund awarded by the Cycladic Foundation, and additional support funded by King’s College London, Arts and Humanities Research Fund.

References

Anevlavi, V. & Prochaska, W.. 2021. Naxian marble: the area where the story begins, in Fragoulopoulos, V. (ed.) Náxos: Archaía, Vyzantiní, Latinokratoúmeni, Neóteri, Sýnchroni: praktiká tou 6ou epistimonikoú synedríou “I Náxos diá mésou ton aiónon”: ypó tin aigída tis Akadimías Athinón, Damariónas, Náxou, 30 Avgoústou - 2 Septemvríou 2018: 329–38 . Naxos: Municipality of Naxos (in Greek).Google Scholar
Attanasio, D., Brilli, M. & Ogle, N.. 2006. The isotopic signature of classical marbles. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Barker, S., Courault, C., Domingo, J.A. & Maschek, D.. 2023. From concept to monument: time and costs of construction in the ancient world: papers in honor of Janet Delaine. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Bloxam, E. 2011. Ancient quarries in mind: pathways to a more accessible significance. World Archaeology 43: 149–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2011.579481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, M.J. et al. 2021. Open area, open data: advances in reflexive archaeological practice. Journal of Field Archaeology 46: 6280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1859780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3. Aufl. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Calderone, D., Lercari, N., Tanasi, D., Busch, D., Hom, R. & Lanteri, R.. 2024. Tackling the thorny dilemma of mapping southeastern Sicily’s coastal archaeology beneath dense Mediterranean vegetation: a drone-based LiDAR approach. Archaeological Prospection 32: 139–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.1956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. et al. 2019. Earliest occupation of the Central Aegean (Naxos), Greece: implications for hominin and Homo sapiens’ behavior and dispersals. Science Advances 5. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax0997 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cosmopoulos, M.B. 1998. Reconstructing Cycladic prehistory: Naxos in the early and middle Late Bronze Age. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 17: 127–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, H. & Craig, V.. 1972. Greek marbles: determination of provenance by isotopic analysis. Science 176: 401403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.176.4033.401 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, J. 2013. The petrology of the walls, in Renfrew, C., Philaniotou, O., Brodie, N., Gavalas, G. & Boyd, M.J. (ed.) The Sanctuary on Keros and the origins of Aegean ritual practice: 309–23. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Earle, J.E. & Cruz Quiñones, J.P.. 2023. Extraction strategies and technological tradition at late pre-Hispanic quarries, southern Peru (ca. 1000–1532 CE). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2023.101498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foutou, V. 1983. Les sites de l’époque Néolithique et de l’Age du Bronze à Naxos, in Rougemont, M. (ed.) Les Cyclades: matériaux pour une étude de géographie historique: 1566. Paris: Centre National de la Récherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Gruben, G. 1997. Naxos und Delos: Studien zur archaischen Architektur der Kykladen. Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 112: 262416.Google Scholar
Haggis, D. & Mook, M.. 1993. The Kavousi coarse wares: a Bronze Age chronology for survey in the Mirabello area, east Crete. American Journal of Archaeology 97: 265–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/505660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heldal, T. & Bloxam, E.. 2008. QuarryScapes guide to ancient stone quarry landscapes. Available at: http://www.quarryscapes.no/text/Publications/QS_del11_wp9.pdf (accessed 10 September 2024).Google Scholar
Herz, N. 1988. The oxygen and carbon isotopic data base for classical marble, in Herz, N. & Waelkens, M. (ed.) Classical marble: geochemistry, technology, trade: 305–14. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-015-7795-3_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D., Roland, H., Ødegård, K. & Indgjerd, H.. 2018. Section 2: Kastro Apalirou, Naxos, in Crow, J. & Hill, D. (ed.) Naxos and the Byzantine Aegean: insular responses to regional change: 83156. Athens: Norwegian Institute at Athens.Google Scholar
Indgjerd, H.R. 2025. ikaros-arch/ikaros: Ikaros Recording Platform for survey and excavation (v2.0-beta). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15219181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobitsch, T., Anevlavi, V., Levitan, R. & Levine, E.I.. In press. Ancient quarries, modern vegetation: interpretations of plant communities inhabiting the Archaic quarry landscapes of Melanes and Apollonas, Naxos Island (Greece), in I Náxos dia mésou ton aiónon: proceedings of the 7th Panhellenic Conference. Naxos: Municipality of Naxos.Google Scholar
Knodell, A., Fachard, S.A. & Papangeli, K.. 2017. The Mazi Archaeological Project 2016: survey and settlement investigations in northwest Attica (Greece). Antike Kunst 60: 146–63.Google Scholar
Kokalj, Ž. & Somrak, M.. 2019. Why not a single image? Combining visualizations to facilitate fieldwork and on-screen mapping. Remote Sensing 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11070747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokkorou-Alevras, G. 1992. The ancient marble quarries of Naxos. Arhaiologiko Ephemeris 1992: 101–27.Google Scholar
Kokkorou-Alevras, G. 2013. Αρχαίο λατομϵίο μαρμάρου στον Απόλλωνα της Νάξου, in Πρακτικά του Δ’ Πανϵλληνίου Συνϵδρίου μϵ θέμα “Η Νάξος δια μέσου των αιώνων”: Κωμιακή 4-7 Σϵπτϵμβρίου 2008. Athens: Δήμος Νάξου και Μικρών Κυκλάδων (in Greek).Google Scholar
Kokkorou-Alevras, G. et al. 2014. Corpus archaíon latomeíon: Latomeía tou elladikoú chórou apó tous proistorikoús eos tous mesaionikoús chrónous. Athens: University of Athens (in Greek).Google Scholar
Korres, M. 2021. Archaía latomeía melánon náxou kai kolossiká agálmata, in Lambrinoudakis, V.K. et al. (ed.) Éxochos állon: Timitikos Tomos gia tin kathigitria Eva Simantoni-Bournia: 315–44. Athens: Ministry of Culture and Sports (in Greek).Google Scholar
Lambrinoudakis, V. 1991. The Sanctuary of Iria on Naxos and the birth of monumental Greek architecture. Studies in the History of Art 32: 172–88.Google Scholar
Lambrinoudakis, V. & Ohnesorg, A.. 2020. Das Heiligtum von Gyroulas bei Sangri auf Naxos. Athens: Melissa.Google Scholar
Lambrinoudakis, V. & Sfyroera, A.. 2010. Syntírisi kai anádeixi tou archaíou ydragogeíou Melánon Náxou: archaíou ieroú stis pigés ton Melánon kai agalmáton sta archaía latomeía tis periochís. Athens: University of Athens (in Greek).Google Scholar
Levine, E.I., Indgjerd, H., Kristensen, S. & Samdal, M.. In press. High resolution drone lidar for Mediterranean archaeology: point classification, feature detection, and the potential for culture heritage management. Journal of Greek Archaeology.Google Scholar
Lyes, C.J. 2023. Theorising ancient quarries: how far have we come? in Lamesa, A., Whitaker, K., Gattiglia, G., Sciuto, C. & Porqueddu, M.E. (ed.) From quarries to rock-cut sites. Echoes of stone crafting: 6379. Leiden: Sidestone.Google Scholar
Palagia, O. 2006. Marble carving techniques, in Palagia, O. (ed.) Function, materials, and techniques in the Archaic and Classical period: 243–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. et al. In press. The Southeast Naxos Survey: the Sanctuary at Keros and terrestrial and maritime networks of the Aegean Early Bronze Age, in Cyclades through Time: Space and People: 5168. Athens: Society for Cycladic Studies.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2013. Gazetteer of stone quarries in the Roman world. Available at: https://oxrep.classics.ox.ac.uk/docs/Stone_Quarries_Database.pdf (accessed 10 September 2024).Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2017. Stone quarrying in Greece: ten years of research. Archaeological Reports 63: 7788. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0570608418000078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardozzi, G. 2012. Ancient marble and alabaster quarries near Hierapolis in Phrygia (Turkey): new data from archaeological surveys, in Gutiérrez García-Moreno, A., Pilar Lapuente Mercadal, M. & Rodà de Llanza, I. (ed.) Interdisciplinary studies on ancient stone: proceedings of the Ninth Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity (ASMOSIA) Conference (Tarragona 2009): 573–83. Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica.Google Scholar
Sheedy, K.A. & Pike, S.. 2025. The colossal Archaic Naxian statues in the Sanctuary of Apollo on Delos. American Journal of Archaeology 129: 2557. https://doi.org/10.1086/732757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taelman, D. 2021. Transport and trade: an energy expenditure approach for the distribution of marble in Central Adriatic Italy in Roman times, in Vermeulen, F. & Zuiderhoek, A. (ed.) Space, movement and the economy in Roman cities in Italy and beyond: 242–64. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, J., Lukas, D. & Berggren, Å.. 2015. Digital recording and reflexive methodology at Çatalhöyük. Çatalhöyük 2015 Archive Report: 195.Google Scholar
Vlachopoulos, A. 2016. Neither far from Knossos nor close to Mycenae. Naxos in the Middle and Late Bronze Age Aegean, in Gorogianni, E., Girella, L. & Pavuk, P. (ed.) Beyond Thalassocracies: understanding processes of Minoanisation and Mycenaeanisation in the Aegean: 116–34. Oxford: Oxbow.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of Naxos showing study areas, major sites, kouroi (archaic sculptures) and marble geology (figure by E. Levine).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Elevations of Archaic marble Naxian dedications at Delphi (left) and Delos (centre) and local monuments on Naxos (right) (figure by R. Levitan).

Figure 2

Figure 3. NQP workflow for the documentation of quarried landscapes (figure by R. Levitan).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Examples of the topography and vegetation at Apollonas (top) and Melanes (bottom) (figure by E. Levine).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Areas of geological sampling and ecological study (left) and recorded features (right) at Apollonas: 1) slipways; 2) quarry beds; 3) wedge cuttings for block extraction; and 4) inscriptions. Photogrammetry (5, visualised as a slope index) and lidar assisted in the identification of these features (figure by authors).