Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-gtc7z Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-21T15:10:45.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epilogue: why the history of archaeology matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Tim Murray
Tim Murray*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3083, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years the history of archaeology has been enjoying something of a vogue in different research traditions, resulting in a wealth of new studies and publications. In the English-speaking world, our store of biographies and national histories has been considerably expanded by the five-volume Encyclopedia of archaeology (Murray 1999; 2001). The Bulletin of the History of Archaeology has provided a much needed forum for research, and the AREA project — Archives of European Archaeology — has begun to explore a range of resources bearing on the history of archaeology in Europe. At the same time, archaeologists have continued to justify and to advocate the significance of ‘novel’ approaches to archaeology through partial histories of the discipline (the most recent being those associated with the revival of ‘Darwinian archaeologies’ such as Lyman et al. 1997).

Information

Type
Special section: Ancestral Archives: Explorations in the History of Archaeology
Information
Antiquity , Volume 76 , Issue 291 , March 2002 , pp. 234 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd. 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blanckaert, C. (ed.). 2001. Les poliliques de l’anthropologie. Discours el pratiques en France (1860–1940). Paris: L’Harmaltan.Google Scholar
Christenson, A. (ed.). 1989. Tracing archaeology’s past: the historiography of archaeology. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Cordey, R. & Roebroeks, W.. 2001. Does disciplinary history matter? An introduction, in Corbev, R. & Roebroeks, W. (ed.), Studying human origins. Disciplinary history and epistemology: 1–8. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Diaz-Andreu, M. & Stig Sørensen, M.-L.. 1998. Excavating women. A history of women in European archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fahnestock, P. J. 1984. History and theoretical development: the importance of a critical historiography of archaeology, Archaeological Review From Cambridge 3: 7–18.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. 1996. Hunters and collectors: the antiquarian imagination in Australia. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, S. 1997. The archaeology of ethnicity. London: Routledge Google Scholar
Kehoe, A. & Emmerichs, M.. 1999. Studies in the professionalization of archaeology. Albuquerque (NM): University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Lemaine, G., Macleod, R., Mulkay, M. & Weingart, P. (ed.). 1976. Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. L., O’Brien, M. J. & Dunnell, R. C. (ed.). 1997. The rise and fall of culture history. New York (NY): Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mukkay, T. 1987. Remembrances of things present: appeals to authority in the history and philosophy of archaeology. Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Mukkay, T. 1989. The history, philosophy and sociology of archaeology: The case of the Ancient Monuments Protection Act 1882, in Pinsky, V. & Wylie, A. (ed.), Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: 55–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mukkay, T. 1998. Excavating the cultural traditions of nineteenth century English archaeology: the case of Robert Knox, in Gustafsson, A. & Karlsson, H. (ed.), Glyfer och arkeologiske rum — en vänhok til Jarl Nordbladh: 501–15. Göteborg: University of Göteborg.Google Scholar
Mukkay, T. (Ed.). 1999. Encyclopedia of archaeology. The great archaeologists. Oxford/Santa Barbara (CA): ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Mukkay, T. 2001. Encyclopedia of archaeology. History and discoveries. Oxford/Santa Barbara (CA): ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. 1995. Towards a social history of archaeology in the United States. Fort Worth (TX): Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Reyman, J. (ed.) 1992 Rediscovering our past: essays on the history of American archaeology. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Schnapp, A. 1996. The discovery of the past: the origins of archacologv. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1985. Writing the history of archaeology: a survey of trends, in Stocking, G. W., Jr., Objects and others: Essays on museums and material Culture: 218–315. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1989. A history of archaeological thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 2001. Historiography, in Murray (ed.) (vol. 2): 630–39.Google Scholar
Van Riper, A. B. 1993. Men among the mammoths: Victorian science and the discovery of human prehistory. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar