Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T00:23:11.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Design and construction of a bespoke system for the detection of buried, iron-rich meteorites in Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2020

John W. Wilson Open the ORCID record for John W. Wilson [Opens in a new window] ,
Liam A. Marsh ,
Wouter Van Verre ,
Michael C. Rose ,
Geoffrey Evatt ,
Andrew R.D. Smedley  and
Anthony J. Peyton
John W. Wilson*
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
Liam A. Marsh
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
Wouter Van Verre
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
Michael C. Rose
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, CambridgeCB3 0ET, UK
Geoffrey Evatt
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
Andrew R.D. Smedley
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
Anthony J. Peyton
Affiliation:
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Manchester, ManchesterM13 9PL, UK
*
john.wilson@manchester.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Iron-rich meteorites are significantly underrepresented in collection statistics from Antarctica. This has led to a hypothesis that there is a sparse layer of iron-rich meteorites hidden below the surface of the ice, thereby explaining the apparent shortfall. As standard Antarctic meteorite collecting techniques rely upon a visual surface search approach, the need has thus arisen to develop a system that can detect iron objects under a few tens of centimetres of ice, where the expected number density is of the order one per square kilometre. To help answer this hypothesis, a large-scale pulse induction metal detector array has been constructed for deployment in Antarctica. The metal detector array is 6 m wide, able to travel at 15 km h-1 and can scan 1 km2 in ~11 hours. This paper details the construction of the metal detector system with respect to design criteria, notably the ruggedization of the system for Antarctic deployment. Some preliminary results from UK and Antarctic testing are presented. We show that the system performs as specified and should reach the pre-agreed target of the detection of a 100 g iron meteorite at 300 mm when deployed in Antarctica.

Keywords

electromagneticironmetal detectionmeteorites
Type
Physical Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 58 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bell, T.H., Barrow, B.J. & Miller, J.T. 2001. Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensors. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 10.1109/36.927451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bintanja, R. 1999. On the glaciological, meteorological, and climatological significance of Antarctic blue ice areas. Reviews of Geophysics, 37, 10.1029/1999RG900007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R.S. 1957. The electrical conductivity of ice. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 53, 10.1039/ TF9575300687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, M. & Scott, D.D. 1998. Metal detector use in archaeology: an introduction. Historical Archaeology, 32, 10.1007/BF03374273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbyn, J. 1980. Pulse induction metal detector. Wireless World, 86, 40–44.Google Scholar
Craig, J. 2004. Metal detection. In Edwards, M., ed. Detecting foreign bodies in food. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 47–62.Google Scholar
Evatt, G., Coughlan, M., Joy, K., Smedley, A., Connolly, P. & Abrahams, I. 2016. A potential hidden layer of meteorites below the ice surface of Antarctica. Nature Communications, 7, 10.1038/ncomms10679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. 2003. The origin and significance of Antarctic meteorites. Geochemistry, 63, 10.1078/0009-2819-00031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ip, W.H. & Herbert, F. 1983. On the asteroidal conductivities as inferred from meteorites. The Moon and the Planets, 28, 10.1007/BF01371671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lever, J.H. & Weale, J.C. 2012. High efficiency fuel sleds for polar traverses. Journal of Terramechanics, 49, 10.1016/j.jterra.2012.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, L.A., Ktistis, C., Järvi, A., Armitage, D.W. & Peyton, A.J. 2013. Three-dimensional object location and inversion of the magnetic polarizability tensor at a single frequency using a walk-through metal detector. Measurement Science and Technology, 24, 10.1088/0957-0233/24/4/045102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medek, R., Nicolics, J. & Schrottmayer, D. 2001. High sensitive pulse inductive eddy current measurement for mine detection systems. In 24th international spring seminar on electronics technology. Concurrent engineering in electronic packaging. ISSE 2001. Conference proceedings (cat. no.01ex492). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 207–211.Google Scholar
Nelson, C.V. 2004. Metal detection and classification technologies. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 25, 62–67.Google Scholar
Sweet, K. 2008. Aviation and airport security: terrorism and safety concerns, 2nd ed.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 336 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar