Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T10:26:07.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pre-slaughter handling, exercise and the presence of a dog on lamb welfare and meat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2016

M. A. Sutherland ,
G. M. Worth ,
A. D. Stuart ,
P. M. Dobbie  and
S. Clerens
M. A. Sutherland*
Affiliation:
AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
G. M. Worth
Affiliation:
AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
A. D. Stuart
Affiliation:
AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
P. M. Dobbie
Affiliation:
AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
S. Clerens
Affiliation:
AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
*
†E-mail: mhairi.sutherland@agresearch.co.nz
Get access

Abstract

Before slaughter, lambs may experience several stressors such as feed and water deprivation, handling and transport that have the potential to negatively impact welfare and meat quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of pre-slaughter handling, exercise and the presence of a dog on the behaviour and physiology of lambs and meat quality at slaughter. At 6 months of age, 60 lambs (n=20 lambs/replicate; three replicates) were allocated to one of the two treatment groups (n=30 lambs/treatment): low (LOW) intensive handling or high (HIGH) intensive handling. LOW lambs were moved short distances, quietly and without the use of a dog before transport. HIGH lambs were moved quickly, long distances and with a dog present before transport. Lamb behaviour (standing, lying, rumination and panting) was recorded for 1 h before (post-treatment) and after transport (post-transport), and for 30 min before slaughter (pre-slaughter). Blood samples were collected before (baseline), after transport (post-transport) and at exsanguination (at slaughter) to assess cortisol, lactate and non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations. At slaughter, lamb carcases (M. longissimus lumborum) were evaluated for pH levels, drip and cook loss, and tenderness. HIGH lambs spent more time standing (P<0.001) and panting (P<0.001) and less time lying (P<0.001) and ruminating (P<0.001) post-treatment than LOW lambs, but more (P<0.001) time ruminating post-transport. All lambs spent more time standing (P<0.001) and less time lying (P<0.001) and panting (P<0.001) post-transport and pre-slaughter than post-treatment. Cortisol concentrations were greater (P<0.001) in lambs post-transport and at slaughter compared with baseline values. Lactate concentrations were lower (P=0.002) in HIGH than LOW lambs. In addition, NEFA concentrations were higher (P<0.001) post-transport and at slaughter in HIGH compared with LOW lambs. Ultimate pH was higher (P<0.001) in HIGH than LOW lambs and pH declined quicker (P=0.012) in LOW than HIGH lambs. Cook loss, drip loss and shear force were lower (P⩽0.05) in HIGH than LOW lambs. The HIGH intensive pre-slaughter handling regime used in the present study caused stress in lambs and increased ultimate pH that could potentially negatively impact welfare, product quality and consistency.

Keywords

animal welfarehandlinglambsmeat qualitytransport
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 10 , Issue 8 , August 2016 , pp. 1360 - 1367
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Apple, JK, Dikeman, ME, Minton, JE, McMurphy, EM, Fedde, MR, Leith, DE and Unruh, JA 1995. Effects of restraint and isolation stress and epidural blockade on endocrine and blood metabolite status, muscle glycogen metabolism, and incidence of dark-cutting longissimus muscle of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2295–2307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beausoleil, NJ, Stafford, KJ and Mellor, DJ 2005. Sheep show more aversion to a dog than to a human in an arena test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 91, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, JJ, Can, LA and Warner, RD 2004. The effect of exercise stress, adrenaline injection and electrical stimulation on changes in quality attributes and proteins in semimembranosus muscle of lamb. Meat Science 68, 469–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, AR, Graafhuis, AE and Chrystall, BB 1989. The cumulative effect of nutritional, shearing and preslaughter washing stresses on the quality of lamb meat. Meat Science 25, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, DM, Goode, JA, Hall, SJG, Lloyd, DM and Parrott, RF 1996. Hormonal and physiological effects of a 15 h road journey in sheep: comparison with the responses to loading, handling and penning on the absence of transport. British Veterinary Journal 152, 593–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caroprese, M, Annicchiarico, G, Schena, L, Muscio, A, Migliore, R and Sevi, A 2009. Influence of space allowance and housing conditions on the welfare, immune response and production performance of dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Research 76, 66–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chrystall, NB and Devine, CE 1991. Quality assurance for tenderness. Meat Industries Research Institute of New Zealand (MIRINZ) Publication, technical report No. 872. Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Cockram, MS, Murphy, E, Ringrose, S, Wemelsfelder, F, Miedema, HM and Sandercock, DA 2012. Behavioural and physiological measures following treadmill exercise as potential indicators to evaluate fatigue in sheep. Animal 6, 1491–1502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De la Fuente, J, Sánchez, M, Pérez, C, Lauzurica, S, Vieira, C, González de Chávarri, E and Díaz, MT 2010. Physiological response and carcass and meat quality of suckling lambs in relation to transport time and stocking density during transport by road. Animal 4, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, CE, Graafhuis, AE, Muir, PD and Chrystall, BB 1993. The effect of growth rate and ultimate pH on meat quality of lambs. Meat Science 35, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekiz, B, Ekiz, EE, Kocak, O, Yalcintan, H and Yilmaz, A 2012. Effect of pre-slaughter management regarding transportation and time in lairage on certain stress parameters, carcass and meat quality characteristics in Kivircik lambs. Meat Science 90, 967–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, DM and Warner, RD 2008. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Science 80, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fulkerson, WJ and Tang, BY 1979. Ultradian and circadian rhythms in the plasma concentration of cortisol in sheep. Journal of Endocrinology 81, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geesink, GH, Mareko, MHD, Morton, JD and Bickerstaffe, R 2001. Effects of stress and high voltage electrical stimulation on tenderness of lamb M. longissimus. Meat Science 57, 265–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herskin, MS, Munksgaard, L and Ladewig, J 2004. Effects of acute stressors on nociception, adrenocortical responses and behavior of dairy cows. Physiology and Behavior 83, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honikel, KO 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science 49, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honikel, KO 2014. Chemical and physical characteristics of meat: pH measurement. In Encyclopaedia of meat sciences, 2nd edition (ed. M Dikeman and C Devine), pp. 262–266. Academic Press, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, CF and Bond, TE 1971. Bioclimatic factors and their measurement: a guide to environmental research on animals. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. p. 77.Google Scholar
Knowles, TG, Brown, SN, Warriss, PD, Phillips, AJ, Dolan, SK, Hunt, P, Ford, JE, Edwards, JE and Watkins, PE 1995. Effects on sheep of transport by road for up to 24 h. Veterinary Record 136, 431–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liste, G, Miranda-de la Lama, GC, Campo, MM, Villarroel, M, Muela, E and María, GA 2011. Effect of lairage on lamb welfare and meat quality. Animal Production Science 51, 952–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfarlane, PG and Marer, JM 1966. An apparatus for determining the tenderness of meat. Food Technology 20, 134–135.Google Scholar
Martin, P and Bateson, P 1993. Measuring behaviour. An introductory guide, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meat & Livestock Australia 2002. Preventing dark cutting in livestock: on-farm guide. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited, Sydney, Australia. p. 7.Google Scholar
Newton, KG and Gill, CO 1981. The microbiology of DFD fresh meats: a review. Meat Science 5, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholson, T, Osman, TEA and Belkhiri, M 1988. Inhibition of rumination in sheep by α-adrenoreceptor antagonists. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 11, 276–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrott, RF, Hall, SJG and Lloyd, DM 1998. Heart rate and stress hormone responses of sheep to road transport following two different loading procedures. Animal Welfare 7, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, GV 1983. The effect of swimming lambs and subsequent resting periods on the ultimate pH of meat. Meat Science 9, 237–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pethick, DW, Harman, N and Chong, JK 1987. Non-esterified long-chain fatty acid metabolism in fed sheep at rest and during exercise. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 40, 221–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-De-La-Torre, JL, Velarde, A, Diestre, A, Gispert, M, Hall, SJG, Broom, DM and Manteca, X 2001. Effects of vehicle movements during transport on the stress responses and meat quality of sheep. Veterinary Record 148, 227–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sañudo, C, Campo, MM, Olleta, JL, Joy, M and Delfa, R 2007. Methodologies to evaluate meat quality in small ruminants. In Evaluation of carcass and meat quality in cattle and sheep (ed. C Lazzaroni, S Gigli and D Gabiña), pp. 81–104. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Schwartzkopf-Genswein, KS, Faucitano, L, Dadgar, S, Shand, P, González, LA and Crowe, TG 2012. Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review. Meat Science 92, 227–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonetta, G, Walker, DW and McMillen, IC 1991. Effect of feeding on the diurnal rhythm of plasma cortisol and adrenocorticotrophic hormone concentrations in the pregnant ewe and sheep fetus. Experimental Physiology 76, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, RD, Ferguson, DM, McDonagh, MB, Channon, HA, Cottrell, JJ and Dunshea, FR 2005. Acute exercise stress and electrical stimulation influence the consumer perception of sheep meat eating quality and objective quality traits. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, RZ, Liu, HW, Zhou, DW, Sun, HX and Zhao, CS 2011. The effects of transportation on physiological responses and meat quality in sheep differing in age. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3742–3751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimerman, M, Domingo, E, Grigioni, G, Taddeo, H and Willems, P 2013. The effect of pre-slaughter stressors on physiological indicators and meat quality traits on Merino lambs. Small Ruminant Research 111, 6–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar