Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T14:51:09.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Refinement of gerbil housing and husbandry in the laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2023

E Waiblinger  and
B König
E Waiblinger*
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour, Zoologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
B König
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour, Zoologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: Eva.Waiblinger@access.unizh.ch or eva.waiblinger@tierschutz.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus) are a widely used model species in parasitology and epilepsy research. Under standard laboratory housing conditions gerbils develop stereotypic digging, a behavioural abnormality, which is caused by the lack of a burrow in the laboratory cage. Here we show that gerbils reared with access to an opaque artificial burrow (nest-box with access tube) develop significantly less stereotypic digging than those reared with transparent artificial burrows. Subadult gerbils also preferred opaque artificial burrows to transparent ones. Based on these findings we developed an artificial burrow system that could be integrated into laboratory Makrolon Type IV cages to prevent the development of stereotypic digging in gerbils by addressing their behavioural needs. Faecal cortisol levels were measured as a non-invasive method of comparing stress reactions in gerbils given access to the new integrated artificial burrow system or to an equivalent transparent burrow. Behavioural differences were observed between gerbils in the two housing conditions, but faecal cortisol levels were unaffected. We conclude that simple refinement of housing is effective in improving gerbil welfare in the laboratory.

Keywords

animal welfarecortisolgerbilhousingrefinementstereotypies
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 13 , Issue S1: Science in the Service of Animal Welfare: Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium, Edinburgh, 2-4 April 2003 , February 2004 , pp. S229 - S235
Copyright
© 2004 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agren, G, Zhou, Q and Zhong, W 1989 Ecology and social behaviour of Mongolian gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus, at Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, China. Animal Behaviour 37: 11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, J 1974 Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49: 227–267CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, C E and Estep, D Q 1994 Laboratory caging preferences in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Laboratory Animals 28: 232–238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannikov, A G 1954 The places inhabited and natural history of Meriones unguiculatus. In: Bannikov A D (ed) Mammals of the Mongolian People's Republic pp 410–415. USSR Academy of.Google Scholar
Sciences — Committee of the Mongolian People's Republic: Moscow, USSR.Google Scholar
Brosius, G and Brosius, F 1996 SPSS Base System and Professional Statistics. International Thomson Publishing GmbH: Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Brunner, C 1993 Digging behaviour in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) in a semi-natural enclosure. Masters Thesis, Zoologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Campbell, T, Lin, S, DeVries, C and Lambert, K 2003 Coping strategies in male and female rats exposed to multiple stressors. Physiology and Behavior 78: 495–504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, J J and Nicol, C J 1996 Stereotypic behaviour in wild caught and laboratory-bred bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus). Animal Welfare S: 245–257.Google Scholar
Fenske, M 1996 Dissociation of plasma and urinary steroid values after application of stressors, insulin, vasopressin, ACTH, or dexamethasone in the Mongolian gerbil. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes 104: 441–446CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, A F and Broom, D M 1990 Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Ballière Tindall: London, UKGoogle Scholar
Gerber, P 1998 The sociophysiology of the pair-bond in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). PhD Thesis, Anthropologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Hendrie, C A and Pickles, A R 2000 Short-term individual housing in female gerbils as a putative model of depression. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 26: 103.112Google Scholar
Mason, G 1991 Stereotypies: a critical review. Animal Behaviour 41: 1015–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, L 1998 The influence of a transparent artificial burrow system on the ontogeny of digging behaviour in Mongolian gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Masters Thesis, Zoologisches Institut, Universität Zürich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Rampon, C, Tang, Y P, Goodhouse, J, Shimizu, E, Kyin, M and Tsien, J Z 2000 Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CAI NMDARI-knockout mice. Nature Neurosciences 3: 238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, T J and Polioudakis, E 1977 The behaviour of Mongolian gerbils in a semi-natural environment, with special reference to ventral marking, dominance and sociability. Behaviour 61: 205–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susic, V and Masirevic, G 1986 Sleep patterns in the Mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. Physiology and Behavior 37: 257–261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touma, C, Palme, R and Sachser, N 2004 Non-invasive monitoring of stress hormones in mice: a technique opening new perspectives in biomedical and animal welfare research. Poster abstract. In: KirkWood, J K, Roberts, E A and Vickery, S (eds) Proceedings of the UFAW International Symposium ‘Science in the Service of Animal Welfare’, Edinburgh, 2003. Animal Welfare 13: 5257 (Suppl)Google Scholar
Van Den Broek, F A R, Klompmaker, H, Bakker, R and Beynen, A C 1995 Gerbils prefer partially darkened cages. Animal Welfare 4: 119–123Google Scholar
Wechsler, B 1993 Verhaltensstörungen und Wohlbefinden: ethologische Überlegungen. In: Buchholtz, C, Goetschel, A E, Hassenstein, B, Loeffler, K and Von Loeper, E (eds) Leiden und Verhaltensstörungen bei Tieren pp 50–64. Birkhäuser: Basel, Switzerland [Chapter title translation: Behavioural disorders and well-being: ethological reflections. Book title translation: Suffering and behavioural disorders in animals.]Google Scholar
Wiedenmayer, C 1996 Effects of cage size on the ontogeny of stereotyped behaviour in gerbils. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 47: 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedenmayer, C 1997a Causation of the ontogenetic development of stereotypic digging in gerbils. Animal Behaviour 53: 461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedenmayer, C 1997b Stereotypies resulting from a deviation in the ontogenetic development of gerbils. Behavioural Processes 39: 215–221CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiedenmayer, C and Brunner, C 1993 Is stereotyped behaviour in gerbils determined by housing conditions? In: Nichelmann, M, Wierenga, H K and Braun, S (eds) International Congress on Applied Ethology, Berlin pp 276–278. Humboldt-Universität: Berlin. GermanyGoogle Scholar
Winterfeld, K T, Teucert-Noodt, G and Dawirs, R R 1998 Social environment alters both ontogeny of dopamine innervation of the medial prefrontal cortex and maturation of working memory in gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Journal of Neuroscience Research 52: 201–2093.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H, Chapman, R and Rutland, C 1998a Effects of feed and environmental enrichment on the development of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60: 69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würbel, H, Freire, R and Nicol, C J 1998b Prevention of stereotypic wire-gnawing in laboratory mice: effects on behaviour and implications for stereotypy as a coping response. Behavioural Processes 42: 61–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Würbel, H, Stauffacher, M and Von Holst, D 1996 Stereotypies in laboratory mice — quantitative and qualitative description of the ontogeny of “wire-gnawing” and “jumping” in Zur:ICR and Zur:ICR nu. Ethology 102: 371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar