Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-bt4hw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:27:35.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stocking density and stress induction affect production and stress parameters in broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

A Villagrá ,
JL Ruiz de la Torre ,
G Chacón ,
M Lainez ,
A Torres  and
X Manteca
A Villagrá*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Animal, Polígono La Esperanza n 100, 12400, Segorbe, Castellón, Spain
JL Ruiz de la Torre
Affiliation:
Unidad de Fisiología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain
G Chacón
Affiliation:
Dpto. Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/ Miguel Servet n 177, 50013, Zaragoza, Spain
M Lainez
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Animal, Polígono La Esperanza n 100, 12400, Segorbe, Castellón, Spain
A Torres
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ciencia Animal, ETSI Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV), Camino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain
X Manteca
Affiliation:
Unidad de Fisiología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain
*
* Contact for correspondence and requests for reprints: villagra_ara@gva.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyse the effects of three different stocking densities on the production, stress and fear parameters of female broilers during a 46-day production period. Chickens were randomly distributed among nine floor pens in groups of 30 broilers with different space allowances for each treatment; namely eight, 20 and 30 chicks m−2. Chicken growth rate was monitored from day eleven to 46 and indicators of stress, including haematocrit, heterophil/lymphocyte ratio and concentrations of plasma corticosterone, as well as tonic immobility, were measured on days 22 and 46. On day 46, the incidence of foot and skin lesions was assessed, and stress was induced to analyse the response of broilers to each stocking density. High stocking densities cause acute stress in broilers; the effects of low and intermediate stocking densities, however, are not so evident, particularly in relation to tonic immobility and response to acute stress.

Keywords

animal welfarebroilerfearhealth statusstocking densitystress induction

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Welfare , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , May 2009 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
© 2009 Universities Federation for Animal Welfare

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altan, O, Pabuccuoglu, A, Altan, A, Konyalioglu, S and Bayraktar, H 2003 Effect of heat stress on oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and some stress parameters in broilers. British Poultry Science 44(4): 545–550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appleby, MC, Mench, JA and Hughes, BO 2004 Welfare environmental influences. Poultry Behaviour and Welfare pp 158–175. CABI Publishing: Oxon, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessei, W 2004 Stocking density. In: Weeks, CA and Butterworth, A (eds) Measuring and Auditing Broiler Welfare pp 133–143. CAB International: Wallingford, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessei 2006 Welfare of broilers: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 62: 455–46510.1079/WPS2005108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilcik, B, Keeling, LJ and Newberry, RC 1998 Effect of group size on tonic immobility in laying hens. Behavioural Processes 43(1): 53–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bizeray, D, Estevez, I, Leterrier, C and Faure, JM 2002 Influence of increased environmental complexity on leg condition, performance, and level of fearfulness in broilers. Poultry Science 81(6): 767–773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borges, SA, da Silva, AVF, Majorka, A, Hooge, DM and Campo, JL and Redondo, A 1996 Tonic immobility reaction and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio in hens from three Spanish breeds laying pink eggshells. Poultry Science 75(2): 155–159Google Scholar
Campo, JL, Gil, MG, Torres, O and Davila, SG 2001 Association between plumage condition and fear and stress levels in five breeds of chickens. Poultry Science 80(5): 549–552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummings, KR 2004 Physiological responses of broiler chickens to heat stress and dietary electrolyte balance (sodium plus potassium minus chloride, milliequivalents per kilogram). Poultry Science 83(9): 1551–1558Google Scholar
Dawkins, MS, Donnelly, CA and Jones, TA 2004 Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427(6972): 342–344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jong, IC, van Vorst, AS, Erkens, JHF, Ehhardt, DA and Blokhuis, HJ 2001 Determination of the circadian rhythm in plasma corticosterone and catecholamine concentrations in growing broiler breeders using intravenous cannulation. Physiology & Behavior 74(3): 299–30410.1016/S0031-9384(01)00562-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jong, IC, van Voorst, S, Ehlhardt, DA and Blokhuis, HJ 2002 Effects of restricted feeding on physiological stress parameters in growing broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 43(2): 157–168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dozier, WA, Thaxton, JP, Branton, SL, Morgan, GW, Miles, DM, Roush, WB, Lott, BD and Vizzier-Thaxton, Y 2005 Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science 84(8): 1332–133810.1093/ps/84.8.1332CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dozier, WA, Thaxton, JP, Purswell, JL, Olanrewaju, HA, Branton, SL and Roush, WB 2006 Stocking density effects on male broilers grown to 1.8 kilograms of body weight. Poultry Science 85(2): 344–351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekstrand, C, Carpenter, TE, Andersson, I and Algers, B 1998 Prevalence and control of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers in Sweden. British Poultry Science 39(3): 318–324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faure, JM, Val-Laillet, D, Guy, G, Bernadet, MD and Guemene, D 2003 Fear and stress reactions in two species of duck and their hybrid. Hormones and Behavior 43(5): 568–572CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feddes, JJR, Emmanuel, EJ and Zuidhof, MJ 2002 Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake, and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Science 81(6): 774–779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallup, GGJ 1977 Tonic immobility: The role of fear and predation. Psychology Record 1: 41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, WB and Siegel, HS 1983 Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Diseases 27(4): 972–979CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross WB and PB Siegel 1993 General principals of stress and welfare. In: Grandin, T (ed) Livestock Handling and Transport pp 21–33. CAB International: Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
Hall, AL 2001 The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal Welfare 10(1): 23–40Google Scholar
Heiblum, R, Aizenstein, O, Gvaryahu, G, Voet, H, Robinzon, B and Snapir, N 1998 Tonic immobility and open field responses in domestic fowl chicks during the first week of life. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 60(4): 347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, PM, Jones, EKM and Picard, M 2005 Assessing the welfare consequences of providing litter for feed-restricted broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 46(5): 545–552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, RB and Faure, JM 1981 Sex and strain comparisons of tonic immobility (righting time) in the domestic chick and the effects of various methods of induction. Behavioural Processes 6: 47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, RB 1990 Is the experimenter an influential variable in studies in tonic immobility in the domestic fowl? Biology Behaviour 15: 93–103Google Scholar
Jones, TA, Donnelly, CA and Dawkins, MS 2005 Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities. Poultry Science 84(8): 1155–1165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leone, EH and Estevez, I 2007 Separating the effects of group size, stocking density and pen size in broilers. Poultry Science 86(S1): 126Google Scholar
Littin, KE and Cockrem, JF 2001 Individual variation in corticosterone secretion in laying hens. British Poultry Science 42(4): 536–546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, AM and Jamroz, C 1961 Atlas of Avian Hematology. Agriculture Monograph 25. USDA: Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
Martrenchar, A, Huonnic, D, Cotte, JP, Boilletot, E and Morisse, JP 2000 Influence of stocking density, artificial dusk and group size on the perching behaviour of broilers. British Poultry Science 41(2): 125–130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLean, JA, Savory, CJ and Sparks, NHC 2002 Welfare of male and female broiler chickens in relation to stocking density, as indicated by performance, health and behaviour. Animal Welfare 11(1): 55–73Google Scholar
Puron, D, Santamaria, R, Segura, J and Alamilla, J 1995 Broiler performance at different stocking densities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 4: 55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puvadolpirod, S and Thaxton, JP 2000 Model of physiological stress in chickens 1. Response parameters. Poultry Science 79(3): 363–36910.1093/ps/79.3.363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ravindran, V, Thomas, DV, Thomas, DG and Morel, PCH 2006 Performance and welfare of broilers as affected by stocking density and zinc bacitracin supplementation. Animal Science Journal 77(1): 110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanotra, GS, Lawson, LG and Vestergaard, KS 2001 Influence of stocking density on tonic immobility, lameness and tibial dyschondroplasia in broilers. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 4(1): 71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS® Institute Inc 2001 SAS Users’ Guide: Statistics Version 8.2. SAS Institute Inc: Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare (SCAHAW) 2000 The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). European Commission. Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General. SANCO.B.3/AH/R15/2000Google Scholar
Shanawany, MM 1988 Broiler performance under high stocking densities. British Poultry Science 29(1): 43–5210.1080/00071668808417025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silverin, B 1998 Stress responses in birds. Poultry and Avian Biology Reviews 9(4): 153–168Google Scholar
Stub, C and Vestergaard, KS 2001 Influence of zinc bacitracin, light regimen and dustbathing on the health and welfare of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 42(5): 564–568CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaxton, JP, Dozier, WA, Branton, SL, Morgan, GW, Miles, DW, Roush, WB, Lott, BD and Vizzier-Thaxton, Y 2006 Stocking density and physiological adaptive responses of broilers. Poultry Science 85(5): 819–824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, DG, Ravindran, V, Thomas, DV, Camden, BJ, Cottam, YH, Morel, PCH and Cook, CJ 2004 Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 52(2): 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar