Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-rcs6z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T05:59:16.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some effects of including differently processed barley in the diet of the growing pig: 2. In vivo gastric pH changes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. L. J. Lawrence
T. L. J. Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Field Station, Neston, Wirral, Cheshire, L64 ITE
Get access

Summary

1. In vivo gastric pH changes were studied, in 6 pigs fitted with permanent gastric cannulae, under ‘basal conditions’ (i.e. when no food was given) and when diets containing 85% of differently processed barley were given either twice daily or at frequent intervals of time in an attempt to simulate ad libitum feeding systems. Before inclusion in the diet the 85% of barley had either received no processing (i.e. was given as the whole grain) or had been processed in one of the five following ways: (a) ground through a (1·56 mm) screen (b) ground through a (4·68 mm) screen (c) ground through a (9·36 mm) screen (d) coarsely crimped (e) cold rolled.

2. Relative to the ‘basal’ determinations the systems of feeding which gave food at frequent intervals of time induced higher overall mean pH values than did those which gave food twice daily, while between the six differently processed diets those containing the smaller particles of barley tended to give higher overall mean pH values than did those containing the coarser particles.

3. The validity of the results is discussed in the context of the techniques used and some possible implications in terms of animal health are briefly discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 1970 , pp. 151 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Huber, W. G. and Wallin, R.F. 1966. Gastric secretion and ulcer formation in the pig. In Swine in Biomedical Research (ed. Bustad, L. K. and McClellan, R. O.). Frayne Printing Co, Seattle.Google Scholar
Kidder, D. E., Manners, M. J. and McCrea, M. R. 1961. The passage of food through the alimentary tract of the piglet. Res. vet. Sci. 2: 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. 1970. Some effects of including differently processed barley in the diet of the growing/finishing pig. 1. Growth rate, food conversion efficiency, digestibility and rate of passage through the gut studies. Anim. Prod. 12: 139–150.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C., Perry, T. W., Curtin, T. M., Featherstone, W. R. and Beeson, W. M. 1966. Influence of various nutritional factors and physical form of feed on oesophagc-gastric ulcers in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 1019–1023.Google Scholar
Mahan, D. C., Pickett, R. A., Perry, T. W., Curtin, T. M., Beeson, W. M. and Feather-Stone, W. R. 1964. Influence of ration particle size on the incidence of ulcers in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 23: 882. (Abstr. 149).Google Scholar
Maner, J. H., Pond, W. G., Loosli, J. K. and Lowrey, R. S.Effect of isolated soya bean protein and casein on the gastric pH and rate of food passage in baby pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 21: 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, C. V., Reese, N. A., Muggenburg, B. A., Reimann, E. M., Kowalczyk, T., Grummer, R. H. and Hoekstra, W. G. 1967. Effect of oat hulls and other oat fractions on the development of gastric ulcers in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 1312–1318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, C. V., Reimann, E. M., Hoekstra, W. G., Kowalczyk, T. and Grummer, R. H. 1967. Effect of dietary particle size on gastric pH and pepsin activity of fistulated swine. J. Anim. Sci. 26: 1498 (Abstr. 131).Google Scholar
Reimann, E. M., Maxwell, C. V., Hoekstra, W. G., Grummer, R. H., Muggenburg, B. A. and Kowalczyk, T. 1966. Effect of ration particle size on the composition of swine gastric contents. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 1247 (Abstr. 24).Google Scholar
Reimann, E. M., Maxwell, C. V., Kowalczyk, T., Benevenga, N. J., Grummer, R. H. and Hoekstra, W. G. 1968. Effect of fineness of grind of corn on gastric lesions and contents of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 27: 992–999.Google Scholar
Rovelstad, R. A., Owen, C. A. and Magath, T. B. 1952. Factors influencing the continuous recording of in situ pH of gastric and duodenal contents. Gastroenterology 20: 609–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rune, S. J. 1968. An electrode for pH measurements in the gastro-intestinal tract. Scand. J. Gastroent. 3: 91–94.Google Scholar
Smith, William H. and Halls, S. 1968. The production of oedema disease and diarrhoea in weaned pigs by the oral administration of Escherichia coli: Factors that influence the course of the experimental disease. J. med. Microbiol. 1: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed