Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:21:27.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk factors associated with the incidence of ketosis in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

L. K. Rasmussent ,
B. L. Nielsen ,
J. E. Pryce ,
T. T. Mottram  and
R. F. Veerkamp
L. K. Rasmussent*
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PE
B. L. Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PE
J. E. Pryce
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PE
T. T. Mottram*
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PE
R. F. Veerkamp*
Affiliation:
Animal Biology Division, Scottish Agricultural College Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PE
*
† Present address: Quadstone Ltd, 16 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RA.
‡ Present address: Department of Animal Heath and Welfare, Research Centre Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark.
‖ Present address: Silsoe Reaserch Institute, Wrest Park, Silsoe, Bedfordshie MK45 4HS.
Present address: ID-DLO, PO Box 65, NL-8200 AB, The Netherlands.
Get access

Abstract

Various dairy cattle production and health characteristics were studied with a view to identify easily available and measurable factors associated with the incidence of ketosis. The analyses were carried out using data from the Langhill Dairy Cattle Research Centre. Two approaches were used to assess the relative risk to cows of getting ketosis: one using information known at the beginning of lactation and one using information collected as the lactation progressed. In both approaches analyses were carried out using different amounts of the available information to simulate differences between recording systems. In the first approach the following were found to relate significantly to the level of recorded ketotic incidents: parity; ketosis in the previous lactation; calving condition score; 305-day milk yield in the previous lactation; and the average milk protein percentage in the previous lactation. The effects of these were quantified. In the second approach, where the change in ketosis incidence rate over the weeks of lactation was investigated, the average dry-matter intake in the previous week and changes in live weight and body condition score over the previous week were found to have a significant effect on the probability of getting ketosis in the coming week. The risk assessments varied depending on the information used and a flexible approach is recommended if potential risk factors are to be successfully incorporated into decision support systems.

Keywords

dairy cowsketosisrisk assessment

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , April 1999 , pp. 379 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baird, G. D. 1982. Primary ketosis in the high-producing dairy cow: clinical and subclinical disorders, treatment, prevention, and outlook. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 1–10.Google Scholar
Bendixen, P. H., Vilson, B., Ekesbo, I. and Astrand, D. B. 1987. Disease frequencies in dairy cows in Sweden. IV. Ketosis. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 5: 99–109.Google Scholar
Bigras-Poulin, M., Meek, A. H., Martin, S. W. and McMillan, I. 1990. Health problems in selected Ontario Holstein cows: frequency of occurrences, time to first diagnosis and associations. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 10: 79–89.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. R., Erb, H. N., Sniffen, C. J., Smith, R. D. and Kronfeld, D. S. 1985. Path analysis of dry period nutrition, postparrum metabolic and reproductive disorders, and mastitis in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 2347–2360.Google Scholar
Dohoo, I. R., Martin, S. W., Meek, A. H. and Sandals, W. C. D. 1983. Disease, production and culling in Holstein-Friesian cows. I. The data. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1: 321–334.Google Scholar
During, F. and Ernst, E. 1988. Factors affecting intervals between date of calving and incidence of health disorders in diseased dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 20: 203–221.Google Scholar
Esslemont, R. J. 1993. Fertility and health indices: the use of herd health schemes. DAISY report no. 3, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. F. and Hackett, C. A. 1997. Specialized regression techniques. Generalized additive models and generalized linear models. BioSS, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Frank, T. J., Schultz, L. H. and Hardie, A. R. 1980. Effect of dry period overconditioning on subsequent metabolic disorders and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 63: 1080–1090.Google Scholar
Gröhn, Y. T. 1996. Interrelationship between milk yield and disease in dairy cows. Cornell nutrition conference for feed manufacturers, Rochester, NY, 22–24 October 1996.Google Scholar
Gröhn, Y. T., Eicker, S. W. and Hertl, J. A. 1995. The association between previous 305-day milk yield and disease in New York State dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 1693–1702.Google Scholar
Gröhn, Y. T., Erb, H. N., McCulloch, C. E. and Saloniemi, H. S. 1989. Epidemiology of metabolic disorders in dairy cattle: association among host characteristics, disease, and production. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 1876–1885.Google Scholar
Gröhn, Y. T., Thompson, J. R. and Bruss, M. L. 1984. Epidemiology and genetic basis of ketosis in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 3: 65–77.Google Scholar
Hogeveen, H. 1994. Knowledge-based methods for automated mastitis diagnosis on dairy farms. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1993. Genstat 5.3. Rothamsted Experimental Station NAG, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lean, I. J., Bruss, M. L., Troutt, H. F., Galland, J. C, Farver, T.B., Rostami, J., Holmberg, C. A. and Weaver, L. D. 1994. Bovine ketosis and somatotropin: risk factors for ketosis and effects of ketosis on health and production. Research in Veterinary Science 57: 200–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindström, U.B., Bonsdorff, M.von and Syväjärvi, J. 1984. Factors affecting bovine ketosis and its association with non-return rate. Journal of the Scientific and Agricultural Society of Finland 55: 497–507.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. A. and Somerville, S. H. 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. East of Scotland College of Agriculture, bulletin no. 6. Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. T., Freeman, A. E. and Kuck, A. L. 1991. Genetics of health traits in Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 1092–1100.Google Scholar
Mäntysaari, E. A., Quaas, R. L. and Gröhn, Y. T. 1991.Clinical ketosis, phenotypic and genetic correlations between occurrences and with milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3985–3993.Google Scholar
Markusfeld, O.. 1990. Risk of recurrence of eight periparturient and reproductive traits of dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 9: 279–286.Google Scholar
Oltenacu, P. A., Frick, A. and Lindhe, B. 1990. Epidemiological study of several clinical diseases, reproductive performance and culling in primiparous Swedish cattle. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 9: 59–74.Google Scholar
Østergaard, S. and Sørensen, J. T. 1998. A review of the feeding-health-production complex in a dairy herd. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 36: 109–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryce, J. E., Esslemont, R. J., Thompson, R., Veerkamp, R. F., Kossaibati, M. A. and Simm, G. 1997. Estimation of genetic parameters using data from a health and fertility management recording system. Animal Science 66: 577–584.Google Scholar
Rowlands, G. J., Lucey, S. and Russell, A. M. 1986. Susceptibility to disease in the dairy cow and its relationship with occurrences of other diseases in the current or preceding lactation. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 4: 223–234.Google Scholar
Solbu, H. 1983. Disease recording in Norwegian dairy cattle: disease incidences and non-genetic effects on mastitis, ketosis and milk fever. Zeitschrift für Tierzuechtung und Zuechtungsbiologie 100: 139–157.Google Scholar
Treacher, R. J., Reid, I. M. and Roberts, C. J. 1986. Effect of body condition at calving on the health and performance of dairy cows. Animal Production 43: 1–6.Google Scholar
Uribe, H. A., Kennedy, B. W., Martin, S. W. and Keltőn, D. F. 1995. Genetic parameters for common health disorders of Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78: 421–430.Google Scholar
Veerkamp, R. F., Simm, G. and Oldham, J. D. 1995. Genotype by environment interaction: experience frosm Langhill. In Breeding and feeding the high genetic merit dairy cow (ed. Lawrence, T. L. J. Gordon, F. J. and Carson, A.), British Society of Animal Science occasional publication no. 19, pp. 59–66 Google Scholar