Hostname: page-component-7857688df4-fzltz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-18T11:35:12.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progeny test results on Hereford bulls weight-recorded on the farm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

C. Smith ,
D. E. Steane  and
C. Jordan
C. Smith
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding Research Organisation, and Meat and Livestock Commission
D. E. Steane
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding Research Organisation, and Meat and Livestock Commission
C. Jordan
Affiliation:
Animal Breeding Research Organisation, and Meat and Livestock Commission
Get access

Abstract

Regressions of progeny growth rate and slaughter age on bull weight for age (400-day) record were estimated from data on 63 Hereford bulls. The bulls had been weight-recorded by the Meat and Livestock Commission and subsequently progeny-tested by the Milk Marketing Board on 1300 crossbred British Friesian steers. Interpretation of the regressions led to estimates of 16 to 35% (± 9 to 17%) for the ‘effective’ heritability of400-day weight. These are lower than the average in the literature and may indicate that farm records with natural rearing of bulls are less reliable than tests with uniform rearing and feeding conditions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 49 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Dalton, C. and Morris, C. A. 1978. A review of central performance testing of beef bulls and of recent relevant research in New Zealand. Livest. Prod. Sci. 5: 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessells, W. J. and Francis, A. L. 1968. The crossbred progeny test of beef bulls. Expl. Husb. 16: 1–12.Google Scholar
Okantah, S. A. 1978. A study of central performance tested beef bulls. In MLC Res. Conf., Loughborough.Google Scholar
Pabst, W., Kilkenny, J. B. and Langholz, H. J. 1976. Genetic and environmental factors influencing calf performance in pedigree beef cattle in Britain. 2. The relationship between birth, 200-day and 400-day weights and the heritability of weight for age. Anim. Prod. 24: 41–48.Google Scholar
Preston, T. R. and Willis, M. B. 1970. Intensive Beef Production. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Russell, W. S. 1973. Compreg User's Guide. IU/RC Series Report No. 5. Program Library Unit, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar