Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-ms8jb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-21T11:12:07.700Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors affecting the time to first suckling in dairy calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

S. A. Edwards
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AJ
Get access

Abstract

The time from birth to first suckling was recorded for 161 dairy calves. Of these calves, 0·32 failed to suckle within the first 6h of life. The most important factor determining the time to first suckling was the udder conformation of the dam but delays were also attributable to abnormal maternal behaviour, especially in heifers, and poor calf vigour, especially after difficult calvings. Delayed suckling was more common as the parity of the dam increased. Heifers' calves that were sired by a Sussex bull stood up earlier and suckled earlier than those sired by a Friesian bull. Offspring of different Friesian sires differed in the time to first standing and suckling. Delayed suckling became more common as the calving season progressed. Calves born within a group of animals suckled no later than calves born in individual calving pens but 0·15 of those calves first suckled from a cow other than their dam.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 1982 , pp. 339 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Albright, J. L., Brown, C. M., Traylor, D. L. and Wilson, J. C. 1975. Effects of early experience upon later maternal behaviour and temperament in cows. Proc. 70th A. Meet. Am. Dairy Sci. Ass., Kansas.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. and Williams, D. 1966a. Teat-seeking activity in lambs during the first hours of life. Anim. Behav. 14: 166–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexander, G. and Williams, D. 1966b. Teat-seeking activity in new-born lambs: the effect of cold. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blauvelt, H. 1955. Dynamics of the mother-newborn relationship in goats. In Group Processes, Vol. 1 (ed. Schaffner, B.), pp. 221–258. J. Macey Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. A. and Broom, D. M. 1979. The period between birth and first suckling in dairy calves. Res. vet. Sci. 26: 255–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, S. A. and Broom, D. M. 1982. Behavioural interactions of dairy cows with their newborn calves and the effects of parity. Anim. Behav. 30: 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, R. J. 1978. The effect of immunoglobulin levels on calf performance and methods of artificially feeding colostrum to the new born calf. Annls Rech. Vet. 9: 347–352.Google Scholar
Fey, H. 1971. Immunology of the newborn calf: its relationship to colisepticaemia. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 176: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, J. M. and Barger, I. A. 1974. Observations of bovine parturition. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 10: 314–317.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. and Bouissou, M. F. 1975. The behaviour of cattle. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals. 3rd ed. (ed. Hafez, E. S.), pp. 203–245. Baillière Tindall, London.Google Scholar
Kruse, V. 1970a. Yield of colostrum and immunoglobulin in cattle at the first milking after parturition. Anim. Prod. 12: 619–626.Google Scholar
Kruse, V. 1970b. Absorption of immunoglobulin from colostrum in newborn calves. Anim. Prod. 12: 627–638.Google Scholar
Leech, F. B., Macrae, W. D. and Menzies, D. W. 1968. Calf Wastage and Husbandry in Britain 1962–63. Animal Disease Surveys, Report No. 5. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Lomba, F., Fumiere, J., Tshibangu, M., Chauvaux, G. and Bienfet, V. 1978. Immunoglobulin transfer to calves and health problems in large bovine units. Annls Rech. Vét. 9: 353–360.Google ScholarPubMed
McEwan, A. D., Fisher, E. W. and Selman, I. E. 1970. Observations on the immune globulin levels of neonatal calves and their relationship to disease. J. Comp. Path. 80: 259–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1971. Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock. No. 1, Cattle. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Scheurmann, E. O. 1974. Untersuchungen über Aktivitat und Ruheverhalten bei neugebornen Kälbern. Zuchthygiene 9: 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selman, I. E., McEwan, A. D. and Fisher, E. W. 1970a. Studies on natural suckling in cattle during the first eight hours post partum. I. Behavioural studies (dams). Anim. Behav. 18: 276–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selman, I. E., McEwan, A. D. and Fisher, E. W. 1970b. Studies on natural suckling in cattle during the first eight hours post partum. II. Behavioural studies (calves). Anim. Behav. 18: 284–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill, London.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. 1950. Observations on behaviour in young calves. Bull. Anim. Behav. 8: 5–10.Google Scholar