Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-vhqbp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T05:58:38.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The electrical conductivity inside the bovine vaginal wall†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

F. Feldmann ,
E. Aizinbud ,
H. Schindler  and
Hanna Broda
F. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Reproduction, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
E. Aizinbud
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Reproduction, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
H. Schindler
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Reproduction, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Hanna Broda
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Reproduction, Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Electrical conductivity was measured during the oestrous cycle of cows with electrodes implanted in the vaginal wall. Conductivity was considerably higher during oestrus than during the preceding or following cycle stage. Conductivity was also high in the fresh surgical wound, whereas the healing process was accompanied by a decrease.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , February 1978 , pp. 61 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aizinbudas, L. B. and Doviljtis, P. P. 1962. [An electrometrical method of ascertaining the precise time to inseminate cows.] Zhivotnovodstvo, Mosk. 24(11): 68–70.Google Scholar
Aizinbudas, L. B., Karazya, R., Liudzius, L., Norvaishas, K. and Jurgaitis, A. 1972. [The electrical resistance of the mucous membranes under normal and pathological conditions.] Proc. 2nd Conf. Pathophysiol. Baltic Repub. and Bielorussian SSR, Vilnius-Kaunas, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
Bostedt, H., Bonengel, H., Gunzler, D., Reissinger, H., Hofer, F. and Brunold, K. 1976. [State of the ovary and electrical resistance of vaginal secretion in cattle during the oestrous period.] Tierärztl. Umsch. 31: 211–215.Google Scholar
Cole, H. H. 1930. A study of the mucosa of the genital tract of the cow, with special reference to the cyclic changes. Am. J. Anat. 46: 261–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. F. and Levin, R. J. 1974. An electrical method of detecting the optimum time to inseminate cattle, sheep and pigs. Vet. Rec. 95: 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldmann, F., Aizinbud, E. and Schindler, H. 1976. [Electrical conductivity in the vagina of ewes during oestrus synchronization.] Zuchthygiene 11: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, E., Freytag, R. and Leidl, W. 1972. [An appliance for measuring electrical resistance of vaginal mucus for oestrus diagnosis in cattle.] Zuchthygiene 7: 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schams, D. and Butz, H. D. 1972. [Chronological correlations between oestrous signs, electrical resistance changes in vaginal mucus, pre-ovulatory excretion of LH and ovulation in cattle.] Zuchthygiene 7: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwann, H. P. 1963. Determination of biological impedance. In Physical Techniques in Biological Research (ed. Oster, G.), vol. VI, pp. 323–406. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sokolovskaja, I. I. 1970. [The electrometric method of determining the optimal time for inseminating animals in the heat period.] Zhivotnovodstvo, Mosk. 32(11): 71–74.Google Scholar
Stolla, R., Günzler, O., Schätzle, M. and Wolpert, E. 1973. [Optimum time for conception in heifers after synchronization of oestrus with chlormadinone acetate (CAP).] Berl. Münch, tieräxrztl. Wschr. 86: 384–387.Google Scholar
Van Der Veen, P. H., Go, K. G., Zuiderveen, F., Buffer, D. and Van Der Meer, J. 1973. Electrical impedance of cat brain with cold-induced edema. Expl. Neurol. 40: 675–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar