Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-7vqc4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-09T12:58:22.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of nocturnal grazing and supplementation on diet selection, eating time, forage intake and weight changes of cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

A. A. Ayantunde ,
S. Fernández-Rivera ,
P. H. Y. Hiernaux ,
H. van Keulen ,
H. M. J. Udo  and
M. Chanono
A. A. Ayantunde
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), ILRI/ICRISAT, B P 12404, Niamey, Niger Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), Department of Ruminant Nutrition, Runderweg 2, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
S. Fernández-Rivera
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), ILRI/ICRISAT, B P 12404, Niamey, Niger
P. H. Y. Hiernaux
Affiliation:
International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), ILRI/ICRISAT, B P 12404, Niamey, Niger
H. van Keulen
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility (AB-DLO), PO Box 14, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
H. M. J. Udo
Affiliation:
Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. Chanono
Affiliation:
Ministére de l’Agriculture et l’Elevage, Centre du Multiplication de Betail, Toukounous, Niger
Get access

Abstract

Sixty-four Azawak male calves were used to study the effect of nocturnal grazing (NG) and supplementation (S) in the dry season on forage and water intake, faecal output, eating time and weight changes of cattle in the Sahel. Treatments were factorial combinations of four levels of NG (0, 2, 4 and 6 h/day) and two levels of S (0 and 608 g dry matter (DM) per animal per day). All animals were allowed to graze 10 h during the day and were weighed every 2 weeks during the 70-day experimental period. Eight oesophageally fistulated steers were used in a cross-over design to sample the diet (forage) selected during the day and at night by supplemented and non-supplemented animals. Extrusa crude protein and in vitro organic matter digestibility were not influenced by supplementation (P > 0·05). Time spent eating during the day or at night were not affected by supplementation but total eating time increased by 39·4 (s.e. 2·1) min/h of NG. Forage intake increased with increase in NG, while total food intake (forage + supplement) increased with supplementation (82·4 v. 92·1 (s.e. 2·4) g DM per kg M0·75 per day). The supplemented animals also drank more water than the non-supplemented (26·2 v. 24·8 l per animal per day). Average live-weight change (LWC) increased by 24·4 (s.e. 8·7) and 9·3 (s.e. 6·2) g/h of NG in non-supplemented and supplemented animals, respectively. Supplementation improved LWC (–107 v. 99 g/day, s.e. 14, P < 0·05). Night grazing improves dry season performance and its effect decreases when cattle are supplemented.

Keywords

cattlefeeding behaviourfood intakenoctural activitysupplementary feeding

Information

Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 333 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achard, F. and Chanono, M. 1995. [Animal performance of a livestock production system in Toukounous in the Sahelian Niger.] Sécheresse 6: 215–222.Google Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, A. A. 1998. Influence of grazing regimes on cattle nutrition and performance and vegetation dynamics in Sahelian rangelands. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Ayantunde, A. A., Hiernaux, P., Fernández-Rivera, S., van Keulen, H. and Udo, H. M. J. 1999. Selective grazing by cattle on spatially and seasonally heterogeneous rangeland in Sahel. Journal of Arid Environments 42: 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvet, H., Friot, D. and Gueye, I. S. 1976. [Minerals supplementation, nutrition and weight changes in Sahelian zebu cattle in the dry season.] Revue d’Élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 29: 59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, C. W. and Stubbendieck, J. 1986. Range research: basic problems and techniques. Society for Range Management, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
Dicko-Touré, M. S. 1980. The contribution of browse to cattle fodder in the sedentary system of the Office du Niger. In Browse in Africa: the current state of knowledge (ed. Le Houérou, H. N.), pp. 313–319. International Livestock Center for Africa, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Fall, A., Pearson, R. A., Lawrence, P. R. and Fernández-Rivera, S. 1997. Nutrition of draught oxen in semi-arid west Africa. 2. Effect of work on intake, apparent digestibility and rate of passage of food through the gastro-intestinal tract in draught oxen given crop residues. Animal Science 64: 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Rivera, S., Ayantunde, A., Hiernaux, P. H. Y. and Turner, M. 1996. Nocturnal grazing effects on the nutrition of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 74: (suppl. 1) 200 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Fernández-Rivera, S., Williams, T. O., Hiernaux, P. and Powell, J. M. 1995. Faecal excretion by ruminants and manure availability for crop production in semi-arid West Africa. In Livestock and sustainable nutrient cycling in mixed farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa, volume II: technical papers (ed. J. M. Powell, , Fernández-Rivera, S., Williams, T. O. and Renard, C.), pp. 149–169. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Ickowicz, A. 1995. [Assessing the vegetation dynamics in pastoral production systems in the Sahelian Chad.] Thése d’Université, Paris XII-Créteil.Google Scholar
Judkins, M. B., Krysl, L. J., Wallace, J. D., Galyean, M. L., Jones, K. D. and Parker, E. E. 1985. Intake and diet selection by protein supplemented grazing steers. Journal of Range Management 38: 210–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khombe, C. T., Dube, I. A. and Nyathi, P. 1992. The effects of kraaling and stover supplementation during the dry season on body weight and manure production of Mashona steers in Zimbabwe. African Livestock Research 1: 18–23.Google Scholar
King, J. M. 1983. Livestock water needs in pastoral Africa in relation to climate and forage. International Livestock Centre for Africa report no. 7. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, H. and Schneider, W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feeding stuffs from gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro . Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93: 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Powell, J. M., Fernández-Rivera, S., Hiernaux, P. and Turner, M. D. 1996. Nutrient cycling in integrated rangeland/cropland systems of the Sahel. Agricultural Systems 52: 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlecht, E. 1995. The influence of different levels of supplementation on feed intake and nutrient retention of zebu cattle in Sahelian agro-pastoral systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hohenheim.Google Scholar
Smith, C. A. 1961. Studies on the Northern Rhodesia Hyparrhenia veld. III. The effect on growth and grazing behaviour of indigenous cattle of restricting their daily grazing times by night kraaling. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56: 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT for personal computers. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Vallentine, J. F. 1990. Grazing management. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
Villalobos, G., Adams, D. C., Klopfenstein, T. J., Nichols, J. T. and Lamb, J. B. 1997. Grass hay as a supplement for grazing cattle. I. Animal performance. Journal of Range Management 50: 351–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar