Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-qr8hc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-22T22:41:03.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of social conditions during rearing on the sexual behaviour of the domestic boar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. H. Hemsworth ,
R. G. Beilharz  and
D. B. Galloway
P. H. Hemsworth
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
R. G. Beilharz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
D. B. Galloway
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Summary

Three groups of six young male pigs (boars) were reared from 20 days to 7 mo of age under one of the following social conditions: a mixed sex group; an all-male group; or social restriction, without physical and visual contact with other pigs. The sexual behaviour of the boars was studied from 7 to 13 mo of age. The total number of copulations and the sum of all the courting behaviour activities were significantly greater (P<0·01) for the boars reared in the all-male and the mixed sex groups than for those reared in social restriction. Growth rate to 30 weeks of age, testicle size and semen quality were not affected by rearing treatment.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 245 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Beach, F. A. 1968. Coital behaviour in dogs. III. Effects of early isolation on mating in males. Behaviour 30: 218–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folman, Y. and Drori, D. 1965. Normal and aberrant copulatory behaviour in male rats (R. norvegicus) reared in isolation. Anim. Behav. 13: 427–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galloway, D. B. 1966. The examination of bulls for breeding soundness. Victorian vet. Proc. 24: 36–39.Google Scholar
Gerall, A. A. 1963. An exploratory study of the effect of social isolation variables on the sexual behaviour of male guinea pigs. Anim. Behav. 11: 274–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerall, H. D. 1965. Effect of social isolation and physical confinement on motor and sexual behaviour of guinea pigs. J. pers. soc. Psychol. 2: 460–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerall, H. D., Ward, I. L. and Gerall, A. A. 1967. Disruption of the male rat's sexual behaviour induced by social isolation. Anim. Behav. 15: 54–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, J. L. 1957. The morphology of boar spermatozoa. Jl R. microsc. Soc. 76: 84–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, L. V. 1968. The effects of isolation from birth on the social behaviour of guinea pigs in adulthood. Anim. Behav. 16: 58–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holst, S. J. 1949. Sterility in boars. Nord. Vet.-Med. 1: 87–120.Google Scholar
Lagerlöf, N. 1934. [Morphological investigation of variations in the sperm and testicles of bulls with impaired fertility.] Ada path, microbiol. scand. Suppl. 19.Google Scholar
Lagerlöf, N. and Carlquist, H. 1962. The semen of boars of the Yorkshire breed between the ages of five and nine months. Proc. IVth int. Congr. Anim. Reprod., The Hague, 1961, 4, pp. 818–821.Google Scholar
Signoret, J. P. 1970. Swine behaviour in reproduction. Proc. Symp. Effect of Disease and Stress on Reproductive Efficiency in Swine. University of Nebraska College of Agriculture, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Valenstein, E. S., Riss, W. and Young, C. W. 1955. Experiential and genetic factors in the organization of sexual behaviour in male guinea pigs. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48: 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenstein, E. S. and Young, W. C. 1955. An experiential factor influencing the effectiveness of testosterone propionate in eliciting sexual behaviour in male guinea pigs. Endocrinology 56: 173–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, W. C., Goy, R. W. and Phoenix, C. H. 1968. Hormones and sexual behavior. Science, N. Y. 143: 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. 1958. The effects of early avoidance training and rearing conditions upon the sexual behaviour of the male rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 51: 764–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed