Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vpjdr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-26T01:09:34.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transitions by Agreement: Modeling the Spanish Way

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Josep M. Colomer
Josep M. Colomer
Affiliation:
Autonomous University of Barcelona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several nonrevolutionary cases of transition to democracy are modeled. Different preferences and strategic choices between the alternatives of continuity, reform, and rupture of the authoritarian regime are used to define conventional distinctions between hard-liners, soft-liners, and opposition more precisely. Six groups of actors emerge. Using game theory, the interactions among these actors are formally analyzed. The possibility of political pact in the first phase of change is identified with the possibility of cooperation between players in games in which the equilibrium is a deficient outcome. Three models of transition by agreement are established: agreed reform within the ruling bloc, controlled opening to the opposition, and sudden collapse of the authoritarian regime. Each of these models entails differences in the pace of change and in the limits of the pact and can be associated with different cases of transition in Southern Europe, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 1283 - 1302
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Black, Duncan. [1958] 1987. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. 1990. El arte de la manipulación política: Votaciones y teoría de juegos en la política española. Barcelona: Anagrama.Google Scholar
Gunther, Richard. 1985. “Constitutional Change in Contemporary Spain.” In The Politics of Constitution Change in Industrial Nations, ed. Banting, Keith G. and Simeon, Richard. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1963. Journeys toward Progress: Studies of Economic Policy-making in Latin America. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1978. Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1981. Informe sociológico sobre el cambio político en España 1975–1981. Madrid: Euramérica.Google Scholar
Maravall, José Maria, and Santamaría, Julián. 1986. “Political Change in Spain and the Prospects for Democracy.” In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, ed. O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C., and Whitehead, Laurence, eds. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore: Johns Hopfens University Press.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol, and Guyer, Melvin. 1966. “A Taxonomy of 2 × 2 Games.” General Systems 9: 203–14.Google Scholar
Share, Donald, and Mainwaring, Scott. 1986. “Transitions through Transaction: Democratization in Brasil and Spain.” In Political Liberalization in Brazil, ed. Selcher, Wayne. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.