Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sdd8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-16T01:46:51.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theory of Games and the Problem of International Cooperation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

R. Harrison Wagner
R. Harrison Wagner*
Affiliation:
The University of Texasat Austin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Prisoner's Dilemma game, Rousseau's image of the Stag Hunt, and the concept of a security dilemma have all been used to support the argument that much international conflict is the result of anarchy at the global level rather than the aggressive intentions of governments. This article argues that the Prisoner's Dilemma and the Stag Hunt are usually inadequate models of the problem they have been used to illuminate, and that a security dilemma as commonly defined need not have the implications that are ascribed to it. It also argues that developing more adequate models of the general problem of enforcing agreements in a condition of anarchy will help us to understand better why international cooperation is more easily achieved in some areas than in others.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 330 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Axelrod, R.The emergence of cooperation among egoists. American Political Science Review, 1981, 75, 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, S. J., David, M. D., & Straffin, P. D.The geometry of the arms race. International Studies Quarterly, 1979, 23, 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, D.The crude analysis of strategic choices. RAND P-2183. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1960.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C.Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players, parts 1–3. Management Science, 1967–1968, 14, 159–182; 320–334; 486–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. C.A solution theory for noncooperative games and its implications for cooperative games. In Ordeshook, P. C. (Ed.), Game theory and political science. New York: New York University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A.National power and the structure of foreign trade. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945.Google Scholar
Howard, N.Paradoxes of rationality: theory of metagames and political behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hunter, D. E.Some aspects of a decision-making model in nuclear deterrence theory. Journal of Peace Research, 1972, 3, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, R.Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 1978, 30, 167–214.Google Scholar
Nicholson, M.Oligopoly and conflict. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Schelling, T.The reciprocal fear of surprise attack. In The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Schelling, T.Hockey helmets, concealed weapons, and daylight saving: a study of binary choices with externalities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1973, 17, 381–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A.Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1977, 4, 317–344.Google Scholar
Shubik, M.Game theory, behavior, and the paradox of the prisoner's dilemma: three solutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1970, 14, 181–193.Google Scholar
Snyder, G. H.“Prisoner's dilemma” and “chicken” models in international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 1971, 75, 66–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, G. H., & Diesing, P.Conflict among nations: bargaining, decision making, and system structure in international crises. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Taylor, M.Anarchy and cooperation. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O.Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Wagner, R. H.Deterrence and bargaining. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1982, 26, 329–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O.Anarchy and social choice: reflections on the international polity. World Politics, 1978, 30, 241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, O.Compliance and public authority: a theory with international applications. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Young, O.International regimes: problems of concept formation. World Politics, 1980, 32, 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.