Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-znhjv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T13:14:43.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representing Silence in Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2020

MÓNICA BRITO VIEIRA Open the ORCID record for MÓNICA BRITO VIEIRA [Opens in a new window]
MÓNICA BRITO VIEIRA*
Affiliation:
University of York
*
Professor, Department of Politics, University of York, mbv501@york.ac.uk.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Democratic representation focuses on voice: it conceives voice as that which is represented and as the prime mode of representing. This article argues that this focus is problematic and turns instead to silence to ask a fundamental question: Can representation empower citizens from their silent positions? I approach the question in three parts. First, I offer a new conceptualization of silence, arguing that silence is best understood as the site of a potential or actual presence. Second, I use criteria of domination and displaced involvement to assess attempts to enfranchise silence within the transmission-belt model of representation. Third, I critically engage and strengthen constructivist views of representation by developing these criteria to assess the legitimacy of claims to represent—speak about and for—silent constituencies—namely, the claim to represent an (alleged) silent majority.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 114 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 976 - 988
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Research for this paper has been funded by a British Academy Mid-Career Fellowship for a project on The Politics of Silence (MD 160009). Earlier versions of the paper have been discussed in the White Rose Political Theory Workshop and in the Edinburgh Political Theory Research Group. I amgrateful for the comments and suggestions provided by participants at both events. I am especially indebted to my colleagues, Neil Carter, Mihaela Mihai, Mathias Thaler, Filipe Carreira da Silva, and Matthew Festenstein for feedback on the paper. Finally, I would like to thank the APSR reviewers for their time and careful reading. Their questions, comments, and suggestions have helped me clarify my argument and improve the paper.

References

REFERENCES

Acheson, Kris. 2008. “Silence as Gesture.” Communication Theory 18 (4): 535–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda. 1991. “The Problem of Speaking for Others.” Cultural Critique 20: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanasiou, Athena. 2017. Agonistic Mourning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry. 2016. Unequal Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jason, and Hill, Lisa. 2014. Compulsory Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mónica, Brito Vieira, and Runciman, David. 2008. Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mónica, Brito Vieira. 2015. “Founders and Re-founders: Struggles of Self-authorized Representation.” Constellations 22 (4): 500–13.Google Scholar
Mónica, Brito Vieira. 2017. “Performative Imaginaries: Pitkin versus Hobbes on Political Representation.” In Reclaiming Representation, ed. Vieira, Mónica Brito, 25–49. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mónica, Brito Vieira. 2019. “Silent Agency.” In “The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities”. Contemporary Political Theory 18 (3): 441–5.Google Scholar
Carreras, Miguel. 2016. “Compulsory Voting and Political Engagement (beyond the Ballot Box).” Electoral Studies 43: 158–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavarero, Adriana. 2005. For More than One Voice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, Stephen. 2013. How Voters Feel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1972. Democracy in the United States. Second edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dassonneville, Ruth, Hooghe, Mark, and Miller, Peter. 2017. “The Impact of Compulsory Voting on Inequality and the Equality of Vote.” West European Politics 40 (3): 621–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devenney, Mark. 2019. “The Improper Politics of Representation.” In The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation, eds. Lisa Disch, Mathijs van de Sande, and Nadia Urbinati, 224–238. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Towards a Mobilization Conception of Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2012. “Democratic Representation and the Constituency Paradox.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2015. “The Constructivist Turn in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End?” Constellations 22 (4): 487–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, Amanda, and Nelson, Michael J.. 2014. “Ignorance or Opposition?” Political Research Quarterly 67 (3): 547–61.Google Scholar
Enroth, Henrik. 2017. “The Construction of What? From Weak to Strong Constructivism in the Study of Political Representation.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Fiumara, Gemma. 1990. The Other Side of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fortner, Michael. 2015. Black Silent Majority. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossen, Thomas. 2019. “Constructivism and the Logic of Political Representation.” American Political Science Review 113 (3): 824–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. History of Sexuality. Volume I. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gray, Sean. 2018. “Silence and Democratic Institutional Design.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Gray, Sean. 2019. “Interpreting Silence: A Note of Caution.” In “The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities.” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (3): 431–5.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. 1993. “Exit, Voice and the Fate of the German Democratic Republic.” World Politics 45 (2): 173–202.Google Scholar
Jakee, Keith, and Sun, Guang-Zhen. 2006. “Is Compulsory Voting More Democratic?” Public Choice 129: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam. 1993. The Power of Silence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jungkunz, Vincent. 2012. “The Promise of Democratic Silences.” New Political Science 34 (2): 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Langton, Rae. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (4): 293–330.Google Scholar
Loevlie, Elisabeth. 2003. Literary Silences in Pascal, Rousseau, and Beckett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manza, Jeff, and Cook, Fay L. 2002. “A Democratic Polity?: Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States.” American Politics Research 30 (6): 630–67.Google Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2008. “The Insufficiency of Non-Domination.” Political Theory 36 (1): 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNay, Lois. 2012. “Suffering, Silence, and Social Weightlessness.” In Embodied Selves, eds. Gonzalez-Arnal, Stella, Jagger, Gill, and Lennon, Kathleen, 230–49. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Montanaro, Laura. 2012. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 74 (4): 1094–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muers, Rachel. 2004. Keeping God’s Silence. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1993. The Spiral of Silence. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Kevin. 2006. Reflexive Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 2002. “Enfranchising: An Argument for Freedom of Speech.” In Rules, Reasons and Norms, ed. Pettit, Philip, 366–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2017. “Americans Widely Support Paid Family and Medical Leave, but Differ Over Specific Policies.”Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson. 1963. Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy. 2008. On the Side of Angels. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 2013. The Dream of a Common Language: Poems 1974-1977. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Rollo, Toby. 2017. “Everyday Deeds: Enactive Protest, Exit, and Silence in Deliberative Systems.” Political Theory 45 (5): 587–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollo, Toby. 2019. “Two Political Ontologies and Three Models of Silence: Voice, Signal, and Action.” In “The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities.” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (3): 435–41.Google Scholar
Runciman, David. 2007. “The Paradox of Political Representation.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1): 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabl, Andrew. 2015. “The Two Cultures of Democratic Theory: Responsiveness, Democratic Quality, and the Empirical-Normative Divide.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (2): 345–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña-Portillo, María. 2003. The Revolutionary Imagination in Americas and the Age of Development. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlozman, Kay, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2010. “Weapon of the Strong?” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2010. “Shouts, Murmurs and Votes.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (4): 448–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweber, Howard. 2016. “The Limits of Representation.” American Political Science Review 110 (1): 382–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Susie. 2017. “A Sociology of Nothing.” Sociology 52 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Shane P. 2019. “Compulsory Voting and Parties Vote Seeking Strategies.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 37–52.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and Interpretation of Culture, eds. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Superti, Chiara. 2015. “Vanguard of the Discontent.” Accessed March 11, 2019. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Vanguard-of-Discontent-%3A-Comparing-Individual-Blank-Superti/539a07f56a8f4660053102e9703ebad8012714fe.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000. Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L., and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark. 2011. “Voting with Your Feet.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 683–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris-Marion. 2011 . Responsibility for Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.