Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-lr6j9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-30T00:10:30.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Perceptions of Women’s Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

KATELYN E. STAUFFER Open the ORCID record for KATELYN E. STAUFFER [Opens in a new window]
KATELYN E. STAUFFER*
Affiliation:
University of South Carolina, United States
*
Katelyn E. Stauffer, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of South Carolina, United States, kstauffer@sc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theoretical work argues that citizens gain important symbolic benefits when they are represented by gender-inclusive institutions. Despite the centrality of this claim in the literature, empirical evidence is mixed. In this article, I argue that these mixed findings are—in part—because many Americans hold beliefs about women’s inclusion that are out of step with reality. Leveraging variation in survey respondents’ beliefs about women’s representation, I examine how these perceptions influence attitudes toward Congress and state legislatures. In both cases, I find that believing women are included is associated with higher levels of external efficacy among both men and women. Using panel data, I then show that when citizens’ underestimations (overestimations) are corrected, their levels of efficacy increase (decrease), shedding further light on this relationship. The findings presented in this research add new theoretical insights into when, and how, Americans consider descriptive representation when evaluating the institutions that represent them.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 115 , Issue 4 , November 2021 , pp. 1226 - 1241
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, Paul R., and Aldrich, John H.. 1982. “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America.” American Political Science Review 76 (3): 502–21.Google Scholar
Ahler, Douglas J., and Sood, Gaurav. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences.” Journal of Politics 80 (3): 964–81.Google Scholar
Alexander, Amy C. 2012. “Change in Women’s Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women’s Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 437–64.Google Scholar
Alexander, Amy C., and Jalalzai, Farida. 2020. “Symbolic Empowerment and Female Heads of States and Government: A Global, Multilevel Analysis.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 8 (1): 24–43.Google Scholar
Aronow, Peter M., and Miller, Benjamin T.. 2016. “Policy Misperceptions and Support for Gun Control Legislation.” The Lancet 387 (10015): 223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00042-8.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Carrillo, Nancy. 2007. “More is Better: The Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy.” Politics & Gender 3 (1): 79–101.Google Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2018. “Someone Like Me: Descriptive Representation and Support for Supreme Court Nominees.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (1): 127–42.Google Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2019a. “Michelle Obama as a Political Symbol: Race, Gender, and Public Opinion toward the First Lady.” Politics & Gender 15 (3): 431–59.Google Scholar
Badas, Alex, and Stauffer, Katelyn E.. 2019b. “Voting for Women in Nonpartisan and Partisan Elections.” Electoral Studies 57: 245–55.Google Scholar
Balch, George I. 1974. “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept ‘Sense of Political Efficacy.’” Political Methodology 1 (2): 1–43.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2018. “Women Cabinet Ministers in Highly Visible Posts and Empowerment of Women: Are the Two Related?” In Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe, eds. Alexander, Amy C., Bolzendahl, Catherine, and Jalalzai, Farida, 229–255. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., and Burchard, Stephanie M.. 2012. “Engendering’ Politics: The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (7): 767–90.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–50.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Ringquist, Evan J., Fording, Richard C., and Hanson, Russell L.. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 327–48.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., Fording, Richard C., Ringquist, Evan J., Hanson, Russell L., and Klarner, Carl E.. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Reappraisal.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 10 (2): 117–35.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2014. “Do Female Politicians Empower Women to Vote or Run for Office? A Regression Discontinuity Approach.” Electoral Studies 34: 190–204.Google Scholar
Brown, Nadia E., and Gershon, Sarah Allen. 2017. “Examining Intersectionality and Symbolic Representation.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (3): 500–05.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C., and Ono, Yoshikuni. 2020. “Ignorance is Bliss? Age, Misinformation, and Support for Women’s Representation.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (4): 838–59.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Gurin, Gerald, and Miller, Warren. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Stokes, Donald E., and Miller, Warren E. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2006. “See Jane Run: Women Politicians as Role Models for Adolescents.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 233–47.Google Scholar
Carnahan, Dustin, Bergan, Daniel E., and Lee, Sangwon. 2020. “Do Corrective Effects Last? Results from a Longitudinal Experiment on Beliefs toward Immigration in the U.S.” Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-020-09591-9.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Mazur, Amy G.. 2012. “Hanna Pitkin’s ‘Concept of Representation’ Revisited.” Politics & Gender 8(4): 508–12.Google Scholar
Clayton, Amanda, O’Brien, Diana Z., and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2019. “All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 113–29.Google Scholar
Cowley, Philip. 2014. “Descriptive Representation and Political Trust: A Quasi-natural Experiment Utilising Ignorance.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 20 (4): 573–87.Google Scholar
Craig, Stephen C., Niemi, Richard G., and Silver, Glenn E.. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust: A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12 (3): 289–314.Google Scholar
Delli-Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott, and Norrander, Barbara. 2009. “The Gender Gap in Latin America: Contextual and Individual Influences on Gender and Political Participation.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 141–62.Google Scholar
Dolan, Julie, and Kropf, Jonathan S.. 2004. “Credit Claiming from the U.S. House: Gendered Communication Styles?” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9 (1): 41–59.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2006. “Symbolic Mobilization? The Impact of Candidate Sex in American Elections.” American Politics Research 34 (6): 687–704.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2011. “Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 73 (1): 97–107.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2014. When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics.” Political Psychology 38 (S1): 127–50.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2014a. “How the Gender of U.S. Senators Influences People’s Understanding and Engagement in Politics.” Journal of Politics 76 (4): 1017–31.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim, and Kenney, Patrick. 2014b. The Changing Face of Representation: The Gender of US Senators and Constituent Communications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hinojosa, Magda, and Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2020. Seeing Women, Strengthening Democracy: How Women in Politics Foster Connected Citizens. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, and Zhao, Yangzi. 2020. “Political Misinformation.” Annual Review of Political Science 23: 77–94.Google Scholar
Jones, Philip Edward. 2014. “Does the Descriptive Representation of Gender Influence Accountability for Substantive Representation?” Politics & Gender 10 (2): 175–99.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A.. 2008. “When Politics is Not Just a Man’s Game: Women’s Representation and Political Engagement.” Electoral Studies 27 (1): 105–15.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. 2010. “Engaging Citizens: The Role of Power-Sharing Institutions.” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 990–1002.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, Ramsay, Clay, and Lewis, Evan. 2003. “Misperceptions, the Media, and the Iraq War.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 569–98.Google Scholar
Ladam, Christina, Harden, Jeffrey J., and Windett, Jason H.. 2018. “Prominent Role Models: High-Profile Female Politicians and the Emergence of Women as Candidates for Public Office.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (2): 369–81.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Politics of Presence? Congresswomen and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 81–99.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1990. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Shan-Jan Sarah, and Banaszak, Lee Ann. 2017. “Do Government Positions Held by Women Matter? A Cross-National Examination of Female Ministers’ Impacts on Women’s Political Participation.” Politics & Gender 13 (1): 132–62.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
McGregor, Shannon C. 2018. “Personalization, Social Media, and Voting: Effects of Candidate Self-Personalization on Vote Intention.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 1139–60.Google Scholar
McGregor, Shannon C., Lawrence, Regina G., and Cardona, Arielle. 2017. “Personalization, Gender, and Social Media: Gubernatorial Candidates’ Social Media Strategies.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (2): 264–83.Google Scholar
Meier, Petra, and Verge, Tánia. 2017. “Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in the Study of Symbolic Representation: An Introduction.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5 (3): 478–81.Google Scholar
Morgan, Jana, and Buice, Melissa. 2013. “Latin American Attitudes toward Women in Politics: The Influence of Elite Cues, Female Advancement, and Individual Characteristics.” American Political Science Review 107 (4): 644–62.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan. 2010. “Why the ‘Death Panel’ Myth Wouldn’t Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate” The Forum 8 (1): Article 5.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Philip H. III 1983. “The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note.” Western Political Quarterly 36 (3): 400–09.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth, and Harrell, Jessica. 2010. “The Impact of Descriptive Representation on Women’s Political Engagement: Does Party Matter?” Political Research Quarterly 63 (2): 280–94.Google Scholar
Richardson, Lilliard E. Jr., and Freeman, Patricia K. . 1995. “Gender Differences in Constituency Service among State Legislators.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (1): 169–79.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2003. “Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women.” Political Behavior 25 (4): 367–88.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Mishler, William. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” Journal of Politics 67 (2): 407–28.Google Scholar
Sides, John, and Citrin, Jack. 2007. “European Opinion about Immigration: The Role of Identities, Interests and Information.” British Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 477–504.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Katelyn E. 2018. “The Sum of Its Parts? Women’s Collective Representation and American Evaluations of Political Institutions.” Ph.D. diss. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Stauffer, Katelyn E. 2021. “Replication Data for: Public Perceptions of Women’s Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy.” Harvard Dataverse. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QYZGEI.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Uhlaner, Carole Jean, and Scola, Becki. 2016. “Collective Representation as a Mobilizer: Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Their Intersections at the State Level.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16 (2): 227–63.Google Scholar
Valdini, Melody E. 2019. The Inclusion Calculation: Why Men Appropriate Women’s Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verge, Tánia, Wiesehomeier, Nina, and Espírito-Santo, Ana. 2020. “Framing Symbolic Representation: Exploring How Women’s Political Presence Shapes Citizens’ Political Attitudes.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 3 (2): 257–76.Google Scholar
Weissberg, Robert. 1978. “Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 72 (2): 535–47.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2015. “Candidate Gender and the Political Engagement of Women and Men.” American Politics Research 43 (5): 872–96.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2018. “Feelings of Political Efficacy in the Fifty States.” Political Behavior 40 (3): 763–84.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2020. “Descriptive Representation and the Political Engagement of Women.” Politics & Gender 16: 339–62.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Stauffer et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/QYZGEI
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Stauffer et al. supplementary material

Stauffer et al. supplementary material

Download Stauffer et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 578.6 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.