Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-lvrpm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-10T08:11:35.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Kathleen M. McGraw
Kathleen M. McGraw
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public officials are not passive bystanders in the electoral process. Rather, they actively try to shape or manage citizens' perceptions of events (particularly those involving negative outcomes) through explanations or accounts. I argue that consideration of citizens' understandings of political accountability and how these are shaped by public officials represent critical missing components of models of electoral behavior. The distinction between excuses and justifications provides a valuable conceptual framework for understanding the impact of political accounts on a variety of judgments and psychological processes. I examine satisfaction with various excuses and justifications and their impact on subsequent evaluations of the official.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 1133 - 1157
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., Lanoue, David, and Ramesh, Subha. 1988. “Economic Conditions, Causal Attributions, and Political Evaluations in the 1984 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 50:848–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1956. “A Plea for Excuses.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1970. Philosophical Papers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1980. “The Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political Accounts.” Journal of Politics 42:792–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bies, Robert J. 1987. “The Predicament of Injustice: The Management of Moral Outrage.” Research in Organizational Behavior 9:289–319.Google Scholar
Carlsmith, J. Merrill, Ellsworth, Phoebe C., and Aronson, Elliott. 1976. Methods of Research in Social Psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1977. Political Language: Words That Succeed and Policies That fail. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 1985. “Economic Self-Interest and the Vote: Evidence and Meaning.” In Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes: The United States and Western Europe, ed. Eulau, Heinz and Lewis-Beck, Michael. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fincham, Frank D., and Jaspers, Jos M. 1980. “Attribution of Responsibility: From Man the Scientist to Man As Lawyer.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 13, ed. Berkowitz, Leonard. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “Is Negative Voting an Artifact?” American Journal of Political Science 33:423–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, Robert J. 1982. “In Defense of Mulüplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations.” American Journal of Political Science 26:797–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1976. Verbal Behavior and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1984. “The Perplexing Borders of Justification and Excuse.” Columbia Law Review 84:1897–1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1987. Conflicts of Law and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V. Lee. 1980. “Intuitive Psychologist or Intuitive Lawyer? Alternative Models of the Attribution Process.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41:767–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. 1968. Punishment and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, John. 1976. “Attribution of Freedom.” In New Directions in Attribution Research, ed. Harvey, John, Ickes, William J., and Kidd, Robert F.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hastie, Reid, and Park, Bernadette. 1986. “The Relationship Between Memory and Judgment Depends on Whether the Judgment Task Is Memory-Based or On-line.” Psychological Review 93:258–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1956. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. Tory, and King, G. A. 1981. “Accessibility of Social Constructs: Information-processing Consequences of Individual and Contextual Variability.” In Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, ed. Cantor, Nancy and Kihlstrom, John F.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1987. “Television News and Citizens' Explanations for National Affairs.” American Political Science Review 81:815–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto. 1989. “How Citizens Think About National Issues: A Matter of Responsibility.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 878–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Kinder, Donald R. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1987. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 2d ed.Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1982. “Availability and the Simulation Heuristic.” In Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, ed. Kahneman, Daniel, Slovik, Paul, and Tversky, Amos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choice, Value, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39:341–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keppel, Gregory. 1982. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald T. 1986. “Presidential Character Revisited.” In Political Cognition, ed. Lau, Richard R. and Sears, David O.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressman's Voting Decisions. 2d ed.New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kluegel, James R., and Smith, Eliot R. 1986. Beliefs About Inequality: Americans' Views of What Is and What Ought To Be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., and Kinder, Donald R. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Popular Support through Priming: Reagan, the Iran-Contra Affair, and the American Public.” American Political Science Review 84:497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1982. “Negativity in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 4:353–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1985. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science 29:119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. 1989. “Construct Accessibility and Electoral Choice.” Political Behavior 11:5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, McGraw, Kathleen M., and Stroh, Patrick. 1989. “An Impression-driven Model of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review 83:399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M. 1987. “Guilt Following Transgression: An Attribution of Responsibility Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:247–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGraw, Kathleen M. 1990. “Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications.” British Journal of Political Science 20:119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Best, Samuel, and Timpone, Richard. 1991. “Blame Management Strategies: Effectiveness in the Context of Negative-Sum and Zero-Sum Policy Outcomes.” State University of New York, Stony Brook. Typescript.Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Lodge, Milton, and Stroh, Patrick. 1991. “Processes of Candidate Evaluation: On-Line or Memory-based? A Review and Synthesis of Four Experiments.” State University of New York, Stony Brook. Typescript.Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., and Pinney, Neil. 1990. “The Effects of General and Domain-specific Expertise on Political Memory and Judgment Processes.” Social Cognition 8:9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Timpone, Richard, and Brock, Gabor. 1991a. “Justifying Controversial Political Decisions: Home Style in the Laboratory.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M., Timpone, Richard, and Brack, Gabor. 1991b. “Managing Blame with a Cushion of Support.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P., and Malanchuk, Okansa. 1986. “Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates.” American Politial Science Review 80:521–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peffley, Mark. 1985. “The Voter As Juror: Attributing Responsibility for National Outcomes.” In Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes, ed. Eulau, Heinz and Lewis-Beck, Michael. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1978. “Political Corruption in America: A Search for Definitions and a Theory; or, If Political Corruption Is in the Mainstream of American Politics, Why Is It Not in the Mainstream of American Politics Research?” American Political Science Review 72:974–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratkanis, Anthony. 1989. “The Cognitive Representation of Attitudes.” In Attitude Structure and Function, ed. Pratkanis, Anthony R., Breckler, Steven J., and Greenwald, Anthony G.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy, Aldrich, John H., Borgida, Eugene, and Sullivan, John L. 1991. “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal.” In Information and Democratic Processes, ed. Ferejohn, John A. and Kuklinski, James H.Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Schlenker, Barry R. 1980. Impression Management. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Schonbach, Peter. 1990. Account Episodes: The Management or Escalation of Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Marvin B., and Lyman, Stanford M. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33:46–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semin, Gun, and Manstead, Anthony S. R. 1983. The Accountability of Conduct. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Shaver, Kelley G. 1985. The Attribution of Blame: Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Sigelman, Carol K., and Walkosz, Barbara. N.d. “The Public and the Paradox of Leadership: An Experimental Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R., and Higgins, Raymond L. 1988. “Excuses: Their Effective Role in the Negotiation of Reality.” Psychological Bulletin 104:23–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiner, Ivan D. 1970. “Perceived Freedom.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Berkowitz, Leonard. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Stoker, Laura. 1990. “Judging Presidential Character: The Demise of Gary Hart.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104:23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedeschi, James T., and Reis, Harry. 1980. “Predicaments and Verbal Tactics of Impression Management.” In Ordinary Language Explanations of Social Behavior, ed. Antaki, Charles. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1985. “Toward an Intuitive Politician Model of Attribution Processes.” In The Self and Social Life, ed. Schlenker, Barry. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1980. “Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands.” American Political Science Review 74:905–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211:453–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, Tom R. 1982. “Personalization of Attributing Responsibility for National Problems to the President.” Political Behavior 4:379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6:371–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, R. Kent. 1988. Automatic Government: The Politics of Indexation. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Weiner, Bernard. 1990. “Excuses in Everyday Interaction.” University of California, Los Angeles. Typescript.Google Scholar
Weiner, Bernard, Amirkhan, James, Folkes, Valerie S., and Verette, Julie A. 1987. “An Attributional Analysis of Excuse Giving: Studies of a Naive Theory of Emotion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:316–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, Bernard, Figueroa-Munoz, Alice, and Kakihara, Craig. 1991. “The Goals of Excuses and Communication Strategies Related to Causal Perceptions.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17:4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajonc, Robert B. 1968. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs 9:1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.