Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T03:17:33.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Style or Isochrestic Variation? A Reply to Sackett

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Polly Wiessner
Polly Wiessner*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Humanethologie, 8131 Seewiesen, W. Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Isochrestic behavior as Sackett describes it is recognized to be one of the important sources of variation in material culture. The behavioral bases for isochrestic variation and for what I describe as stylistic variation are contrasted and some of their implications for variation in material culture are discussed. Kalahari San projectile points are then reexamined within the framework of isochrestic and stylistic behavior using both historical and contextual data. It is concluded that variation in San projectile points better fits the expectations of stylistic than isochrestic behavior, at least with our current understanding of isochrestic behavior.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 50 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 160 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Conkey, Margaret W. 1978 Style and Information in Cultural Evolution: Toward a Predictive Model for the Paleolithic. In Social Archaeology,, edited by Redman, Charles L., Mary Jane Berman, Curtin, Edward V., Langhorne, William T. Jr., Versaggi, Nina M., and Wanser, Jeffery C., pp. 61–85. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Conkey, Margaret W. 1980 Context, Structure, and Efficacy in Paleolithic Art and Design. In Symbol as Sense,, edited by Foster, M. L. and S. Brandes, pp. 225–248. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Crook, John H. 1981 The Evolutionary Ethology of Social Processes in Man. In Group Cohesion,, edited by H. Kellerman, pp. 86–108. Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
Deacon, J. 1982 The Later Stone Age in the Southern Cape, South Africa. Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 1979 Economic and Social Stress in Material Culture Patterning. American Antiquity 44: 446–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, Ian 1982a Symbols in Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 1982b (editor) Symbolic and Contextual Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 1982c The Present Past. B. T. Batsford, London.Google Scholar
Kummer, Hans 1978 Analogs of Morality among Nonhuman Primates. In Morality as a Biological Phenomenon,, edited by Stent, Guenther S., pp. 33–52. Life Sciences Research Report 9, Abakon, Berlin.Google Scholar
Neumann, G. H. 1977 Vorurteile und Negativeinstellungen Behinderten gegenuber—Entstehung und MSglichkeiten des Abbaues aus der Sicht der Verhaltensbiologie. Die Rehabilitation 16(2): 101—106.Google Scholar
Plog, Stephen 1980 Stylistic Variation in Prehistoric Ceramics: Design Analysis in the American Southwest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sackett, James R. 1982 Approaches to Style in Lithic Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59–112.Google Scholar
Sackett, James R. 1984 Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity 50: 000–000.Google Scholar
White, J. Peter, Modjeska, Nicholas, and Hipuya, Irari 1977 Group Definitions and Mental Templates: An Ethnographic Experiment. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution and Complexity,, edited by Wright, R. V. S., pp. 380–390. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Camberra Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly 1983 Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 48: 253–276.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly 1984 Reconsidering the Behavioral Basis of Style. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,, 3(3): 190–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wobst, H. Martin 1977 Stylistic Behavior and Information Exchange. In Papers for the Director: Research Essays in Honour of Griffin, James B.,, edited by Cleland, Charles E.. Anthropology Papers 61: 317–342. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar