Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-15T12:07:29.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to Succeed in Seriation without Really Trying

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert D. Drennan
Robert D. Drennan*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 1979 , pp. 171 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Ascher, Marcia 1959 A mathematical rationale for graphical seriation. American Antiquity 25:212–214.Google Scholar
Cowgill, George L. 1972 Models, methods, and techniques for seriation. In Models in archaeology, edited by Clarke, David L., pp. 381–424. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Drennan, Robert D. 1976 A refinement of chronological seriation using nonmetric multidimensional scaling. American Antiquity 41:290–302.Google Scholar
Hole, Frank, and Shaw, Mary 1967 Computer analysis of chronological seriation. Rice University Studies 53(3).Google Scholar
Johnson, Le Roy Jr. 1972 Introduction to imaginary models for archaeological scaling and clustering. In Models in archaeology, edited by Clarke, David L., pp. 309–380.Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Meighan, Clement W. 1959 A new method for the seriation of archaeological collections. American Antiquity 25:203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meighan, Clement W. 1977 Recognition of short time periods through seriation. American Antiquity 42:628–629.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. 1963 Sampling techniques. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Conover, W. J. 1974 Some reasons for not using the Yates continuity correction on 2 x 2 contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69:374–376.Google Scholar
Grizzle, J. E. 1967 Continuity correction in the x Mest for 2 x 2 tables. The American Statistician 28:28–32.Google Scholar
Kish, L. 1967 Survey sampling. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Lovis, W. A. 1976 Quarter sections and forests: an example of probability sampling in the northeastern woodlands. American Antiquity 41:364–372.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. W. 1975 Archaeological research as cluster sampling. In Sampling in archaeology, edited by Mueller, James W., pp. 33–41. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Plackett, R. L. 1964 The continuity correction in 2 x 2 tables. Biometrika 51:327–337.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1975 Non-site sampling in archaeology: up the creek without a site? In Sampling in archaeology, edited by Mueller, James W., pp. 61–81. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar