Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T11:04:08.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Valuation of Agriculture's Multi-site Environmental Impacts: An Application to Pheasant Hunting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

LeRoy Hansen ,
Peter Feather  and
David Shank
LeRoy Hansen
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Peter Feather
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
David Shank
Affiliation:
Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pheasant hunting benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) were approximately $80 million/year in 1991 in states where the CRP appears most critical to pheasant populations. To obtain this benefit measure, the demand for pheasant hunting was estimated using a recently developed multi-site demand model, a national survey on recreation, and environmental data processed through a geographic information system (GIS). Thus not only is the resulting evaluation of the CRP's environmental impacts more accurately assessed than through the use of the generalized, supply-demand equilibrium models of previous work, but, more importantly, the environmental benefits of program acreage can be compared across field locations allowing subtle changes in policy to be assessed and the design and operation of a program to be optimized.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , October 1999 , pp. 199 - 207
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, R.M., Bergland, O., Musser, W.N., Johnson, S.L., and Musser, L.M. 1989. “User Fees and Equity Issues in Public Hunting Expenditures: The Case of Ring-Necked Pheasants in Oregon.” Land Economics 65(4): 376–85.Google Scholar
Bart, Jonathan, Hofschen, Matthias, and Peterjohn, Bruce G. 1995. “Reliability of the Breeding Bird Survey: Effects of Restricting Surveys to Roads.” The Auk 112(3): 758–61.Google Scholar
Basore, Nancy S., Best, Louis B., and Wooley, James B. 1987. “Arthropod Availability to Pheasant Broods in No-Tillage Fields.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 15(2): 229–23.Google Scholar
Creel, Michael D. and Loomis, John B. 1990. “Theoretical and Empirical Advantages of Truncated Count Data Estimators.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American J. of Agricultural Economics 72(2): 434–441.Google Scholar
Englin, Jeffery and Shonkwiler, J.S. 1995. “Estimating Social Welfare Using Count Data Models: An Application to Long-run Recreation Demand Under Conditions of Endogenous Stratification and Truncation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, Peter, Hellerstein, Daniel, and Hansen, LeRoy. 1999. “Economic Valuation of the Environmental Benefits and the Targeting of Conservation Programs: The Case of the CRP.” Agr. Economic Report No. 778, Econ. Res. Serv., U.S. Dept. of Agr., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Feather, Peter, Hellerstein, Daniel, and Tomasi, Theodore. 1995. “A Discrete-Count Model of Recreational Demand.” J. of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 214–27.Google Scholar
Haab, Timothy C. and McConnell, Kenneth E. 1996. “Count Data Models and the Problem of Zeros in Recreation Demand Analysis.” American J. of Agricultural Economics 78: 89–102.Google Scholar
Hansen, LeRoy T. and Hallam, Arne. 1991. “National Estimates of the Recreational Value of Streamflow.” Water Resources Research 27(2): 167–75.Google Scholar
Hellerstein, Daniel. 1992. “The Treatment of Nonparticipants in Travel Cost Analysis and Other Demand Models.” Water Resources Research 1999–2004.Google Scholar
Hill, H.R. 1976. “Feeding Habits of the Ring-necked Pheasant Chick, Phasianus Colchicus, and the Evaluation of Available Foods.” Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Jahn, Laurence R. 1998. “The Potential for Wildlife Habitat Improvement.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43(l): 67–69.Google Scholar
Kimmel, R.O., Berner, A.H., Welsh, R.J., Haroldson, B.S., and Malchow, S.B. 1992. “Population Responses of Grey Partridge (Perdix Perdix), Ring-Necked Pheasants (Phasianus Colchicus), and Meadowlarks (Sturnella Sp.) to Farm Programs in Minnesota.” Gibier Faune Sauvage 9: 797–806.Google Scholar
Knopf, F.L. 1993. “Conserving the Biotic Integrity of the Great Plains.” In Conservation of Great Plains Ecosystems Western Governors’ Association, Denver, CO and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Kansas City, KS.Google Scholar
Link, William A. and Sauer, John R., “Estimating Population Change from Count Data: Application to the North American Breeding Bird Survey.” Ecological Applications 8(2): 258–68.Google Scholar
Messick, J.P., Bizeau, E.G., Benson, W.W., and Mullins, W.H. 1974. “Aerial Pesticide Applications and Ring-necked Pheasants.” Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 679–85.Google Scholar
Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources. 1985. “The Pheasant in Minnesota.” Section of Wildlife.Google Scholar
Osborn, Tim. 1997. New CRP Criteria Enhance Environmental Gain in Agricultural Outlook, AO-245, U.S. Dept. of Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Osborn, C. Tim. 1993. “The Conservation Reserve Program: Status, Future, and Policy Options.” J. of Soil and Water Conservation 48(4): 271–78.Google Scholar
Osborn, C. Tim and Konyar, Kazim. 1990. “A Fresh Look at the CRP.” Agricultural Outlook, AO-166 U.S. Dept. of Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Osborn, C.T., Llacuna, F., Linsenbigler, M. 1995. “The Conservation Reserve Program: Enrollment Statistics for Signup Periods 1-12 and Fiscal Years 1986-93.” Statistical Bulletin-925. U.S. Dept. of Agr., Econ. Res. Serv., Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Ribaudo, Marc, Colacicco, Daniel, Langner, Linda L., Piper, Steven, and Schaible, Glenn D. 1990. “Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program.” AER-627. U.S. Dept. Agr. Econ. Res. Serv., Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Sauer, John R., Peterjohn, Bruce G., and Link, William A. 1994. “Observed Differences in the North American Breeding Bird Survey.” The Auk 111(l): 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, David W. and Whittaker, Gerald. 1996. “Multivariate Applications of the ASH Regression.” Communications in Statistics 25(11): 2521–30.Google Scholar
Shulstad, Robert N. and Stoevener, Herbert H. 1978. “The Effects of Mercury Contamination in Pheasants on the Value of Pheasants in Oregon.” Land Economics 54(1): 39–49.Google Scholar
South Dakota Dept. of Game, Fish and Parks. 1988. “Pheasants for Everyone.”Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, NEWS. “Clinton Administration Accepts 16.1 Million Acres for Enrollment in CRP.” Release No. 0168.97Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1989a. “Habitat Management for Ring-Necked Pheasants in Kansas.” Soil Conservation Service, Salina, Kansas. Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1899b. “Conservation Reserve Program: Progress Report and Preliminary Evaluation of the First Two Years.” Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1986. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. “Conservation Reserve Program; Interim Rule.” Federal Register 7 DFR 704, Issue 51 (49) 8: 780–87.Google Scholar
U.S. Dept. of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1993. “1991 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.” U.S. Gov. Printing Office.Google Scholar
Walsh, Richard G., Johnson, Donn M., and McKean, John R. 1988. Review of Outdoor Recreation Demand Studies With Nonmarket Benefit Estimates, 1968-1988. Colorado State Water Resources Research Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins. Technical Rpt. 54.Google Scholar
Warner, Richard E., and Etter, Stanely L. 1986. “The Dynamics of Agriculture and Ring-Necked Pheasant Populations in the Corn Belt.” Journal of the World Pheasant Association 11: 76–89.Google Scholar
Warner, Richard E., and Etter, Stanely L. 1985. “Farm Conservation Measures to Benefit Wildlife, Especially Pheasant Populations.” In Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference, Wildlife Management Institute. 135–41.Google Scholar
Warner, Richard E., Etter, Stanley L., Blair Joselyn, G., and Ellis, Jack A. 1984. “Declining Survival of Ring-Necked Pheasant Chicks in Illinois Agricultural Ecosystems.” Journal of Wildlife Management 48(1): 82–88.Google Scholar
Warner, Richard E. 1984. “Effects of Changing Agriculture on Ring-Necked Pheasant Brood Movements in Illinois,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 48(3): 1014–18.Google Scholar
Warner, Richard E. “Use of Cover by Pheasant Broods in East-Central Illinois.” Journal of Wildlife Management 43(2): 334–46.Google Scholar