Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T21:29:20.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unsteady aerodynamic effects of trailingedge controls on delta wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

D. J. Pilkington
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK
N. J. Wood
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK

Abstract

Effective control of combat aircraft at high angles ofattack requires the flight control system to operateto higher frequencies and gains. This increases thepossibility of excitation of the structural modes byaltering the aeroservoelastic stability of thecomplete system. This paper details the results oftests carried out on a rigid, 55° leading edge sweepdelta wing, half model fitted with a half spanelevon operated through a closed loop controlsystem. The effects of steady elevon deflections upto 40° angle of attack are described. The unsteadypressures resulting from elevon oscillations atfrequency parameters up to a value equivalent to thefirst wing bending mode of a typical combat aircrafthave been measured. The effect of the elevonoscillation on the elevon itself and on the bendingmode have been estimated by calculating the unsteadyhinge and root bending moments about the wing root.The lower surface, unsteady elevon effects werefound to be independent of incidence and frequencyparameter. The amplitude of response of the weakvortex on the upper surface of the wing reducedrapidly with frequency parameter. Above an incidenceof 10°, the vortex breakdown was above the wing andled to a further reduction in the vortex response.The vortex response lagged the elevon motion.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1995 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Postgraduate researcher

* *

Senior lecturer

References

1. Caldwell, B. Structural coupling, AGARD Conference on Active Control Technologies, May 1994, to be published.Google Scholar
2. Ross, A.J. Control derivatives, AGARD LS-114, May 1981.Google Scholar
3. Orlik-rückemann, K.J. Unsteady aerodynamics and dynamic stability at high angles of attack, Lecture 8, AGARD LS 121, December 1982.Google Scholar
4. Lang, J.D. and Francis, M.S. Unsteady aerodynamics and dynamic aircraft manoeuvrability, Paper 29, AGARD CP 386, November 1985.Google Scholar
5. Williams, W.G. and Lockenour, J.L. Stability and control status for, current fighters, Chapter 5, AGARD AR 82.Google Scholar
6. Kelly, T. Private communication on results of comparison between Davies code and tests conducted in the University of Bath 30 inch open working section tunnel, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Mabey, D.G., Mcowat, D.M. and Welsh, B.L. Aerodynamic characteristics of moving trailing-edge controls at subsonic and transonic speeds, Paper 20, AGARD CP 262, 1979.Google Scholar
8. Bergh, H., and Tijdeman, H. Theoretical and Experimental Results for the Dynamic Response of Pressure Measuring Systems, NLR Report No. F238, 1965.Google Scholar
9. Bergh, H. and Tijdeman, H. The influence of main flow on the transfer function of tube-transducer systems used for unsteady pressure measurements, NLR Report No. mp 72023u, 1972.Google Scholar
10. Visser, K.D. and Washburn, A.E. Transition behaviour on flat plate delta wings, AIAA-94-1850-CP, 12th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Colorado Springs, June 20-22, 1994.Google Scholar
11. Greenwell, D.I. and Wood, N.J. Determination of vortex burst location on delta wings from surface pressure measurements, AIAA J, November 1992, 30, (11), p 2736.Google Scholar