Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T17:48:58.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence on optimal structural designsof the modelling processes and designconcepts

Part 1: All composite, sandwich wing designconcepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. T. Anastasiadis
Affiliation:
Hellenic Aerospace Industry, Tanagra, Greece
A. J. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Science, College of Aeronautics, Cranfield University, UK

Abstract

The paper examines the influence on optimal structuraldesigns of changing the finite element selection,the structural design criteria and the designconcepts for an unmanned air-vehicle wing. Thus,single and twin-spar designs are considered with anumber of composite design configurations. Theresults indicate that some of the design criteriahave little influence on the optimal designs whilstfinite element selection can be significant.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Krammer, J. Practical architecture of design optimisation software for aircraft structures taking the MBB-Lagrange code as an example, AGARD-LS-186, Agard, Paris, May 1992, pp 21 to 2-16.Google Scholar
2. Cornault, C. and Petiau, C. Structural optimisation of aircraft, AGARD-LS-186, Agard, Paris, France, May 1992, pp 31 to 3-17.Google Scholar
3. Sobieski, J. Multidisciplinary design and optimisation, AGARD-LS-186, Agard, Paris, France, May 1992, pp 41 to 4-15.Google Scholar
4. Kellerer, H. Influence of structural modelling and design variable linking on the results of structural optimisation of a wingbox structure under stress constraints, Diplomarbeit, Technische University, Munchen, July 1992.Google Scholar
5. IBM/Caeds(V3R1M1), Computer aided engineering design system, IBM Corporation, Los Angeles, U.S.A.Google Scholar
6. MSC/Nastran(V67.5), The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, Los Angeles, USA.Google Scholar
7. Dobler, W., Erl, P. and Rapp, H. Optimization of sandwich structures with respect to local instabilities with MBB-Lagrange, Presented at the NATO/DFG Advanced Study Institute, Berchtesgaten, Germany, 23 Sept-4 Oct 1991.Google Scholar