Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mwwwr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T05:05:19.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Future air traffic management — passing the key tests

Part of: The AJ Air Traffic Management Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. Brooker
P. Brooker*
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Air traffic management (ATM) for commercial traffic will need tomeet major challenges in the coming years. The industry is facedwith many questions, for example:

  • What ATM system can we realistically expect to have in 2010,2020 and beyond?

  • What safety improvements should we target for?

  • What business analyses are needed to drive innovation forward?

  • What are the key questions to be answered about the balance of responsibility between air and ground?

  • How do we best address ‘gate-to-gate’ ATM issues?

  • What are the systems architecture problems?

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 106 , Issue 1058 , April 2002 , pp. 211 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Air Traffic Management Strategy for the Years 2000+: Volumes 1 and 2 (Road Map), 1999, Eurocontrol.Google Scholar
2. Hunter, R.D. and McCulloch, R.A. Future ATM operational concepts for Europe, Air Traffic Technology International ’99, 1999, UK & International Press, Dorking, UK. .Google Scholar
3. Air traffic management - revolutionary concepts that enable air traffic growth while cutting delays, 2001, The Boeing Company, Ref 291063.Google Scholar
4. European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, Single European sky: report of the High Level Group, European Communities, 2000.Google Scholar
5. Bainbridge, L. Ironies of automation, Automatica, 1983, 19, pp 775–779.Google Scholar
6. Reason, J. Human Error, 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
7. 45th Air Traffic Control Association conference proceedings 2000, Air Traffic Control Association, USA. 2000.Google Scholar
8. Profit, R. Systematic Safety Management in the Air Traffic Services, 1995, Euromoney Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar