Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:28:00.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy absorption structures design of civil aircraft to improve crashworthiness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

Y. Ren  and
J. Xiang
J. Xiang*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
*
xiangjw@buaa.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To improve the crashworthiness of civil aircraft, the design concept of energy absorption structure for civil aircraft is investigated. Two typical different design principles could be identified. The first category includes Helicopter and Light fixed-wing Aircraft (HLA), and Transport, Mid-size and Commuter type Aircraft (TMCA) are classified into the second group. Frame, strut and bottom structure are the three kinds of energy absorption structure for TMCA. The strut layout of conventional civil aircraft is studied and some energy absorption devices are adopted. High efficiency energy absorption structures such as the foam and sine-wave beam are employed as the bottom structure for both of HLA and LMCA. The finite element method is used to analyse and design energy absorption structure in aircraft crashworthiness problem. Results show that the crashworthiness of civil aircraft could be largely improved by using proper strut layout and excellent energy absorption device. The stiffness combination of frame and strut should be considered to get better global aircraft deformation. Supporting platform and failure model are the two core problems of bottom energy absorption structure design. Foam and sine-wave beam under the lifted frame could improve the crashworthiness of civil aircraft.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1202 , April 2014 , pp. 383 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Brown, T. Crashworthiness of aircraft for high velocity impact, CRAHVI Project Report, Aeronautics Days, June 2006.Google Scholar
2. Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 25 – airworthiness standards: transport category airplanes. US Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 2003.Google Scholar
3. Jackson, K.E. and Fasanella, E.L. NASA Langley Research Center impact dynamics research facility research survey, J Aircr, 2004, 41, (3), pp 511–522.Google Scholar
4. Perez, J.L., Benitez, L.H., Oliver, M. and Climent, H. Survey of aircraft structure dynamics nonlinear problems and some recent solutions, Aeronaut J, 2011, 115, (1173), pp 653–668.Google Scholar
5. Shanahan, D.F. Basic principles of crashworthiness, RTO HFM Lecture Series, Madrid, Spain, 2004.Google Scholar
6. Lyle, K.H., Jackson, K.E. and Fasanella, E.L. Simulation of aircraft landing gears with a nonlinear dynamic finite element code, J Aircr, 2002, 39, (1), pp 142–147.Google Scholar
7. Kindervater, C.M., Kohlgruber, D. and Johnson, A. Composite vehicle structure crashworthiness – A status of design methodology and numerical simulation techniques, Int J Crashworthiness, 1999, (4), pp 213–230.Google Scholar
8. Delsart, D., Joly, D., Mahe, M. and Muller, G.W. Methodologies for the design of crashworthy composite commercial aircraft fuselage, 24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 2004.Google Scholar
9. Jackson, K.E., Fasanella, E.L. and Kellas, S. Development of a scale model composite fuselage concept for improved crashworthiness, J Aircr, 2001, (38), pp 95–103.Google Scholar
10. Ren, Y.R. and Xiang, J.W. A comparative study of the crashworthiness of civil aircraft with different strut configurations, Int J Crashworthiness, 2010, (15), pp 321–330.Google Scholar
11. Hughes, K., Campbell, J. and Vignjevic, R. Application of the finite element method to predict the crashworthy response of a metallic helicopter under floor structure onto water, Int J Impact Eng, 2008, (35), pp 347–362.Google Scholar
12. Hughes, K., Campbell, J. and Vignjevic, R. Appplication of the finite element method to predict the crashworthy response of a metallic helicopter underfoor structure onto a hard surface, Int J Crashworthiness, 2007, 12, pp 173–195.Google Scholar
13. Saren, A.K., Fasanella, E.L., Sparks, C., Jackson, K.E. and Mullins, B.R. Jr Comparison of hard surface and soft soil impact performance of a crashworthy composite fuselage concept, American Helicopter Society 58th Annual Forum, Canada, 2002.Google Scholar
14. Michielsen, A.L.P.L., Wuggebraad, J.F.M. and Ubels, L.C. Design, test and analysis of tensor skin panels for improved crashworthiness in case of water impact, NLR-TP-98356, 1998.Google Scholar
15. Cronkhite, J.D. and Berry, V.L. Crashworthy airframe design concepts, NASA Contractor Report 3603, 1982.Google Scholar
16. Jackson, K.E. and Fasanella, E.L. Crashworthy evaluation of a 1/5 scale model composite fuselage concept, NASA/TM-1999-209132, 1999.Google Scholar
17. Meng, F.X., Zhou, Q. and Yang, J.L. Improvement of crashworthiness behaviour for simplified structural models of aircraft fuselage, Int J Crashworthiness, 2009, (13), pp 1–15.Google Scholar
18. Taher, S.T., Mahdi, E., Mokhtar, A.S., Magid, D.L., Ahmadum, F.R. and Arora, P.R. A new composite energy absorbing system for aircraft and helicopter, Composite Structure, 2006, 75, pp 14–23.Google Scholar
19. Ren, Y.R. and Xiang, J.W. Influence of geometrical factors on the crashworthiness of open shells, AIAA 2010-2880, 2010.Google Scholar
20. Shoji, H., Miyaki, H., Iwasaki, K. and Miegishi, M. Crashworthiness research on cabin structure at JAXA, 5th Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference, New Jersey, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
21. Heimbs, S., Strobl, F., Middendorf, P. and Guimard, J.M. Composite crash absorber for aircraft fuselage applications, WIT Trans. Built Environ, 2010, 113, pp 3–14.Google Scholar
22. Ren, Y.R. and Xiang, J.W. The crashworthiness of civil aircraft using different quadrangular tubes as cabin-foor as cabin-foor struts, Int J Crashworthiness, 2011, 16, (3), pp 253–262.Google Scholar
23. Carden, H.D., Boitnott, R.L. and Fasancella, E.L. Behaviour of composite/metal aircraft structural elements and components under crash type load – what are they telling us?, NASA Technical Memorandum 102681, 1990.Google Scholar
24. Adams, A., Thorbole, C.K. and Lankarani, H.M. Scale modeling of aircraft fuselage: an innovative approach to evaluate and improve crashworthiness, Int J Crashworthiness, 2010, 15, (1), pp 71–82.Google Scholar
25. Jones, L.E., Robinson, M., Fasanella, E.L. and Boitnott, R.L. Experimental and analytical study of the effects of foor location on response of composite fuselage frames, AIAA-9202473-CP, 1992.Google Scholar
26. Kumakura, I., Minegishi, M. and Iwasaki, K. Impact simulation of simplified structural models of aircraft fuselage, AIAA 2000-01-5586, 2000.Google Scholar
27. Woodson, M.B., Johnson, E.R. and Haftka, R.T. Optimal design of composite fuselage frames for crashworthiness, Int J Crashworthiness, 1996, 1, (4), pp 369–380.Google Scholar
28. Perez, J.G., Johnson, E.R. and Boitnott, R.L. Design and test of semicircular composite frames optimized for crashworthiness, AIAA 98-1703, 1998.Google Scholar
29. Li, Q.M., Mines, R.A.W. and Birch, R.S. The crush behaviour of Rohacell-51WF structural foam, Int J Solids Structure, 2000, 37, (43), pp 6321–6341.Google Scholar
30. Kermanidis, T., Labeas, G., Apostolopoulos, C. and Michielsen, L. Numerical simulation of composite structures under impact, WIT Trans. Built Environ, 1998, 32, pp 591–600.Google Scholar
31. Wiggenarrd, J.F.M. and Santoro, D. Development of a crashworthy composite fuselage concept for a commuter aircraft, NLR-TP-2001-108, 2001.Google Scholar
32. Delsart, D., Joly, D., Mahe, M. and Winkelmuller, G. Evaluation of finite element modeling methodologies for the design of crashworthy composite commercial aircraft fuselage, 24th International congress of the aeronautical sciences, Japan, 2004.Google Scholar
33. Zheng, J.Q., Xiang, J.W., Luo, Z.P. and Ren, Y.R. Crashworthiness design of transport aircraft subfoor using polymer foams, Int J Crashworthiness, 2011, 16, (4), pp 375–383.Google Scholar