Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T22:10:13.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of plunging amplitude on the performance of a wind turbine blade section

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

M. R. Soltani  and
F. Rasi Marzabadi
M. R. Soltani
Affiliation:
Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
F. Rasi Marzabadi
Affiliation:
Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In many engineering applications (e.g. helicopters, turbines, compressors), lifting surfaces experience unsteady motion or are perturbed by unsteady incoming flows. Horizontal axis wind turbine rotors experience large time dependent variations in angle-of-attack as a result of control input angles, blade flapping, structural response and wake inflow. In addition, the blade sections encounter substantial periodic variations in local velocity and sweep angle. Thus, the unsteady aerodynamic behaviour of the blade sections must be properly understood to enable accurate predictions of the air loads and aero elastic response of the rotor system.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 111 , Issue 1123 , September 2007 , pp. 571 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Leishman, J., Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, Cambridge Press, 2000.Google Scholar
2. Huyer, S.A., Simms, D. and Robinson, M.C.. Unsteady aerodynamics associated with a horizontal-axis wind turbine, AIAA J, July (34), 7, 1996, pp 1410–1419.Google Scholar
3. Robinson, M.C., Galbraith, R.A.McD., Shipley, D. and Miller, M.. Unsteady aerodynamics of wind turbines, Paper 95-0526, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 1995.Google Scholar
4. Leishman, J.. Challenges in modeling the unsteady aerodynamics of wind turbines, AIAA 2002–0037, 21st ASME Wind Energy Symposium and 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, January 2002.Google Scholar
5. Ho, Chin-Ming, and Chen, Shin-Hsing, Unsteady wake of a plunging aerofoil, AIAA J, 1980, 11, (19), pp 1492–1494 Google Scholar
6. Hansen, A.C. and Butterfield, C.P.. Aerodynamics of horizontal-axis wind turbines, Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1993.Google Scholar
7. Gormont, R.E.. A mathematical model of unsteady aerodynamics and radial flow for application to helicopter rotors, USAAMRDL, Technical Report 72-67, May 1973.Google Scholar
8. Beddoes, T.S.. A synthesis of unsteady aerodynamic effects including stall hysteresis, Vertica, 1976, (1), pp 113–123.Google Scholar
9. Gangwani, S.T.. Synthesized aerofoil data method for prediction of dynamic stall and unsteady airloads, Vertica, 1984, (8), pp 93–118.Google Scholar
10. Leiss, U.. A consistent mathematical model to simulate steady and unsteady rotor blade aerodynamics, Proceedings of the 10th European Rotorcraft Forum, Hague, Netherlands, Paper 7, 1984.Google Scholar
11. Carta, F.A.. A comparison of the pitching and plunging response of an oscillating aerofoil, NASA CR-3172, 1979.Google Scholar
12. Ericson, L.E. and Reding, J.P.. Unsteady flow concepts for dynamic stall analysis, AIAA J of Aircr, August 1984, 8, (21), pp 601–606.Google Scholar
13. Mcalister, K.W., Carr, L.W. and McCroskey, W.J.. Dynamic stall experiments on the NACA 0012 Aerofoil, NASA TP-1100, January 1978.Google Scholar
14. Ericsson, L.E., and Reding, J.P.. Shock-induced dynamic stall, J of Aircr, May 1984, (21), pp 316–321.Google Scholar
15. Carr, L.W.. Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall, AIAA J, 1988, 1, (25), pp. 6–17.Google Scholar
16. Fukushima, T. and Dadone, L.U.. Comparison of dynamic stall phenomena for pitching and vertical translation motions, NASA CR-2793, July 1977.Google Scholar
17. Tyler, J.C. and Leishman, J.G., An analysis of pitch and plunge effects on unsteady aerofoil behaviour, Presented at the 47th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, May 1991.Google Scholar
18. Soltani, M.R., Rasi, F., Sedighi, M. and Bakhshalipour, A.. An experimental investigation of time lag in pressure-measuring systems, AIAC-2005-028, presented a the 2nd Ankara International Aerospace Conference, Ankara, Turkey, 22–25 August, 2005.Google Scholar
19. Horowitz, P. and Hill, W., The Art of Electronics, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
20. Barlow, J.B., Rae, W.H. and Pope, A., Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1999.Google Scholar
21. Thomas, G.B., Roy, D.M. and John, H.L.V. Mechanical Measurements, Fifth edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1993.Google Scholar
22. Soltani, M.R., Rasi Marzabadi, F. and Sedighi, M.. Surface pressure variation on an aerofoil in plunging and pitching motions, ICAS 2006-3.10.1, 25th ICAS Congress, Hamburg, Germany, 3–8 September 2006.Google Scholar
23. Soltani, M.R. and Rasi Marzabadi, F.. Effect of reduced frequency on the aerodynamic behaviour of an aerofoil oscillating in a plunging motion, Submitted to the Journal of Scientica Iranica, 2006.Google Scholar
24. Theodoresen, T.. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter, NACA TR-496, 1935.Google Scholar