Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-14T20:59:32.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of complex internal grid pattern variations on the subsonic aerodynamic characteristics of grid-fins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2025

V. Yadav Open the ORCID record for V. Yadav [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Misra ,
G. N. Joshi Open the ORCID record for G. N. Joshi [Opens in a new window]  and
M. Tripathi Open the ORCID record for M. Tripathi [Opens in a new window]
V. Yadav
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India
A. Misra
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India
G. N. Joshi*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India
M. Tripathi
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
*
Corresponding author: G. N. Joshi; Email: joshiganapati@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This CFD study investigates the aerodynamic characteristics of various internal grid patterns of grid fins without missile bodies, focusing on their influence on aerodynamic performance in subsonic flight regimes. Research examines four distinct grid fin lattices through comprehensive numerical simulations at Mach numbers 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5, for varying high angles of attack ranging between 0o ≤ α ≤ +45o. For validation, comparison between current numerical results and a previous experimental study results was carried out (good agreement within 9.8% error). The numerical results reveal that the diamond cell pattern demonstrates increased lift generation but incurs higher drag, while the square pattern minimises drag and pitching moment, favouring weight-efficient designs. The hexagonal grid fin excels in stall delay and post-stall performance, enhancing manoeuverability and stability at the expense of increased pitching moments. The triangular pattern offers balanced aerodynamic performance with high aerodynamic efficiency at lower speeds, making it versatile for various applications. The analysis offers key insights into grid cell pattern’s aerodynamic effects, aiding grid fin design optimisation for improved aerodynamic efficiency and controllability across various flight conditions and high angles of attack.

Keywords

grid fingrid patternsubsonicCFDaerodynamic efficiencycontrol surfacemissile

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , First View , pp. 1 - 29
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aerospace.web. Missile Grid Fins. Available from: https://aerospaceweb.org/question/weapons/q0261.shtml [Cited: March 12, 2019.]Google Scholar
R-77. Available at https://web.archive.org/web/20041204170726/http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-12.htm Google Scholar
Fl295. GBU-43/B MOAB. Available from: http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-43/B_MOAB [online] Feb. 12, 2019.Google Scholar
SpaceX. Falcon 9, Hawthorne, California, USA, 2015. Available from: http://www.spacex.com/falcon9 (Accessed on 21 October 2017.)Google Scholar
Savelsberg, R. and Kiessling, J. North Korea’s Musudan Missile: a performance assessment, 38 North, Stimson Center, Washington, DC, USA, 2016. Available from: http://38north.org/2016/12/musudan122016 (Accessed on 21 October 2017.)Google Scholar
Jones, A. Available from: https://spacenews.com/china-launches-first-long-march-8-from-wenchang-spaceport/ (Accessed on 30 July 2019.)Google Scholar
Munawar, S. Analysis of grid fins as efficient control surface in comparison to conventional planar fins, in 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Bonn, International Council of Aeronautical Sciences, 2010, Vol. 1, pp 1732–1737.10.2514/6.2009-5845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, W. and Miller, M. Grid fins-a new concept for missile stability and control, in AlAA, 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, 11 January 1993–14 January 1993, p 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J. Numerical study on choked flow over grid-fin configurations, J. Spacecr. Rockets, 2009, 46, (5), pp 949–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, M., Mahesh, M.S. and Misra, A. High angle of attack analysis of cascade fin in subsonic flow, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Research in Aerospace Engineering: MRAE-2016. Singapore, Springer Singapore, 2018, pp 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, M., Sucheendran, M.M. and Misra, A. Experimental analysis of cell pattern on grid fin aerodynamics in subsonic flow, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng., 2020, 234, (3), pp 537–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theerthamalai, P. Aerodynamic characterization of grid fins at subsonic speeds, J. Aircr., 2007, 44, (2), pp 694–698.10.2514/1.27653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiroshima, F. and Tatsumi, K. Grid pattern effects on aerodynamic characteristics of grid fins. Paper ICAS 2004-2.11.R, in 24th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, 29 August–3 September 2004, Yokohama, Japan, The International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), 2004, pp 1–8.Google Scholar
Dinh, V.S., Dinh, C.T. and Pham, V.S. Numerical study on aerodynamic characteristics of the grid fins with different grid patterns, Phys. Fluids, 2023, 35, (12), pp 123117-1–123117-21.10.1063/5.0176292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, A. Investigation of Grid and Cascade fins for Missile Flight Stabilization. PhD thesis, Indian Inst. of Technology, Kanpur, India, April 2009.Google Scholar
Dan, W. and Yong, Y. Numerical study on drag reduction for swept-back, swept-front, delta grid fin with blunt and sharp leading edges, in AIAA Modelling and Simulation Technologies Conference, National Harbor, MD, 13–17 January 2014, p 0638. eISBN: 978-1-62410-318-6.Google Scholar
Miller, M. and Washington, W. An experimental investigation of grid fin drag reduction techniques, in AIAA, 12th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Colorado Springs, CO, 20 June 1994–23 June 1994, p 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debiasi, M., Yan, Z. and Chng, T.L. Swept-back grid fins for transonic drag reduction, in 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Chicago, IL, 28 June 2010–01 July 2010, p 4244. eISBN: 978-1-62410-141-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, W.D., Booth, P. and Miller, M.S. Curvature and leading edge sweep back effects on grid fin aerodynamic characteristics. AIAA Paper 93-3480-CP, in 11th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Monterey, CA, USA, AIAA, 1993, pp 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Y., Cai, J., Debiasi, M. and Chng, T.L. Numerical study on drag reduction for grid-fin configurations, in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, 05 January 2009–08 January 2009, p 1105. eISBN: 978-1-60086-973-0.10.2514/6.2009-1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debiasi, M. and Zeng, Y. Forces and moments generated by swept-back grid fins with sharp leading edges, J Aircr, 2016, 53, (6), pp 1964–1968.10.2514/1.C033504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debiasi, M. Measurements of the forces and moments generated by swept-back grid fins. AIAA Paper 2012–2909, in 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, AIAA, 25–28 June 2012, 2012, pp 1079–1089.10.2514/6.2012-2909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, A., Misra, A. and Ghosh, K. Cascade fins: an alternate tail stabilization unit, in AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA, August 2008, p 6884.10.2514/6.2008-6884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohankumar, R.S., Premkumar, P.S., Ravichandran, S., Aravindkumar, K.S. and Raagavendhar, T.K. Design optimization of grids in grid fins for spacecrafts, Int. J. Veh. Struct. Syst., 2022, 14, (7), pp 897–900.Google Scholar
Tripathi, M., Sucheendran, M.M. and Misra, A. Effect of chord variation on subsonic aerodynamics of grid fins, in Design and Development of Aerospace Vehicles and Propulsion Systems: Proceedings of SAROD 2018, Springer, Singapore, 2021, pp 105–128.10.1007/978-981-15-9601-8_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, M., Misra, A. and Sucheendran, M.M. Numerical simulations of high angle of attack subsonic flow past cascade fin for varying number of planar members, FELIP Int. J. Eng. Anal. Simul. Addit. Manuf. (IJEASAM), 2018, 1, (1), pp 21–32.Google Scholar
Tripathi, M., Misra, A. and Sucheendran, M.M. Effect of planar member cross-section on cascade fin aerodynamics, J. Spacecr. Rockets, 2019, 56, (3), pp 744–760.10.2514/1.A34238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, M., Sucheendran, M.M. and Misra, A. Effect of aspect ratio variation on subsonic aerodynamics of cascade type grid fin at different gap-to-chord ratios, Aeronaut. J., 2020, 124, (1274), pp 472–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, V., Joshi, G.N., Misra, A. and Tripathi, M. Effect on aerodynamic efficiency of cascade fin due to presence of locally swept planar members at subsonic speed, in Sahoo, S. and Yedla, N. (Eds), International Conference on Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering Research and Development. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022, pp 361–372.Google Scholar
Bisht, P.S., Yadav, V. and Joshi, G.N. Computational analysis of cascade fins with varied chord ratios of planar members in subsonic regime, J. Aeronaut. Astronaut. Aviat., 2024, 56, (3), pp 651–657.Google Scholar
Frey, P.J. and George, P.L. Mesh generation: application to finite elements, Hermes Science, Europe, 2000.Google Scholar
Ariff, M., Salim, S.M. and Cheah, S.C. Wall y+ approach for dealing with turbulent flow over a surface mounted cube: part 1—low Reynolds number, in Seventh International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries. Melbourne, Australia, CSIRO Publishing, 2009, pp 1–6.Google Scholar
Eymard, R., Gallouët, T. and Herbin, R. Finite volume methods, Handbook Numer. Anal., 2000, 7, pp 713–1018.Google Scholar
Pope, S.B. Turbulent flows, Meas. Sci. Technol., 2001, 12, (11), pp 2020–2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington, W.D. and Miller, M.S. Experimental investigations of grid fin aerodynamics: A synopsis of nine wind tunnel and three flight tests, in Proceedings of RTO (NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION), AVT Symposium on Missile Aerodynamics, 1998, pp 10-1. Papers presented and discussions recorded at the Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Symposium held in Sorrento, Italy, 11–14 May 1998. At NATO Research and Technology Organization.Google Scholar
Tripathi, M., Sucheendran, M.M. and Misra, A. Flow field characterization and visualization of grid fin subsonic flow, J. Fluids Eng., 2019, 141, (10), p 101401.10.1115/1.4043168CrossRefGoogle Scholar