Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-03T16:29:06.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corner speed versus optimum turn speed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. Kutschera  and
P. M. Render
A. Kutschera
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
P. M. Render
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Work has been carried out by Kutschera on how to assess, at the conceptual design stage, the performance of fighter aircraft. As part of this work, Kutschera reviewed a number of existing and proposed metrics for assessing aircraft performance. Reference 4 also describes how the performance of an aircraft can be quantified by three types of metric. The first type are steady state or point performance metrics, such as turn rate plots and energy manoeuvrability diagrams. The second type are manoeuvrability metrics and the last are agility metrics.

Information

Type
Technical Note
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 107 , Issue 1073 , July 2003 , pp. 443 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Kutschera, A. and Render, P. Performance assessment of thrust vectoring controlled post stall manoeuvrable fighter aircraft using minimal input data, paper number AIAA-99-4020, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, Oregon, USA, August 1999.Google Scholar
2. Kutschera, A. and Render, P. Design tools For performance assessment Of fighter aircraft incorporating new technologies, NATOresearch and technology agency, Advanced vehicle technology symposium, 18-22 October 1999, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
3. Kutschera, A. and Render, P. Advanced fighter aircraft performance assessment, Aeronaut J, August 2002, 106, (1062), pp 443–451.Google Scholar
4. Kutschera, A. Advanced Fighter Aircraft Performance Assessment, PhD Thesis, Loughborough University, 2001.Google Scholar
5. Raymer, D.P. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, AIAA Educational Series, 1992.Google Scholar