Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T06:51:27.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An examination of vortex convection effects during blade-vortex interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

M.B. Horner ,
E. Saliveros  and
R.A.McD. Galbraith
M.B. Horner
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
E. Saliveros
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
R.A.McD. Galbraith
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The experimental results of a parallel Blade-Vortex Interaction (BVI) study are presented. The quality of all pressure data reflects improvements in the Glasgow University BVI facility and in the method of reducing and presenting data. Pressure histories clearly track the passage of a vortex-associated disturbance across the aerofoil. Tracking this disturbance permits an examination of vortex convection velocities, and also allows for a correlation between vortex trailing edge passage and force and moment perturbations.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 96 , Issue 960: European Edition , December 1992 , pp. 373 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1992 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Scheiman, J. and Ludi, L.H. Qualitative evaluation of effect of helicopter rotor-blade tip vortex on blade airloads NASA TN D-1637, May 1963.Google Scholar
2. Brotherhood, P. and Riley, M.J. Flight experiments on aerodynamic features affecting helicopter blade design, Vertica, 1978, 2, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
3. Schmitz, F.H., Boxwell, D.A., Lewy, S. and Dahan, C. Model-to full-scale comparisons of helicopter blade-vortex interaction noise, 38th Annual National Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Anaheim, California, May 1978.Google Scholar
4. Surendraiah, M. An Experimental Study of Rotor Blade-Vortex Interaction, M.S. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, December, 1969.Google Scholar
5. Padakannaya, R. Experimental study of rotor unsteady airloads due to blade vortex interaction, NASA CR-1909, November 1971.Google Scholar
6. Caradonna, F.X., Laub, G.H. and Tung, C. An experimental study of rotor-vortex interaction, NASA TM-86005, November 1984.Google Scholar
7. Caradonna, F.X., Lautenschlager, J.L. and Silva, M.J. An experimental study of rotor-vortex interactions, AIAA Paper 88-0045, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 1988.Google Scholar
8. Caradonna, F.X., Strawn, R.C. and Bridgeman, J.O. An experimental and computational study of rotor-vortex interactions, 14th European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Milano, Italy, September, 1988.Google Scholar
9. Ham, N.D. Some preliminary results from an investigation of blade-vortex interactions, J Am Helicopter Soc, April 1974, 19, pp. 45–48.Google Scholar
10. Ham, N.D. Some conclusions from an investigation on blade-vortex interaction, J Am Helicopter Soc, October 1975, 20, pp 26–31.Google Scholar
11. Seath, D.D. Vortex-airfoil interaction tests, 2nd Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Palo Alto and Moffet Field, California, September 1972.Google Scholar
12. Seath, D.D., Kim, J.M. and Wilson, D.R. An investigation of the parallel blade-vortex interaction in low-speed wind tunnel, AIAA Paper 87-1345, AIAA 19th Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 1987.Google Scholar
13. Booth, E.R. Jr. and Yu, J.C. Two-dimensional blade-vortex flow visualisation investigation, AIAA J, September 1986, 24, (9).Google Scholar
14. Booth, E.R. Jr. Surface pressure measurement during low speed two-dimensional blade vortex interaction, AIAA Paper 86-1856, AIAA 10th Aeroacoustics Conference, Seattle, Washington, July 1986.Google Scholar
15. Meier, G.E.A. and Timm, R. Unsteady vortex airfoil interaction, AGARD CP - 386, May 1985.Google Scholar
16. Kokkalis, A. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Description of, and preliminary results from, a new blade-vortex interaction test facility, 12th European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Garmisch — Partenkirchen, Federal Republic of Germany, September 1986.Google Scholar
17. Kokkalis, A. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Results from the glasgow university blade-vortex interaction facility, 13th European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Aries, France, September 1987.Google Scholar
18. Straus, J., Renzoni, O. and Mayle, R.E. Airfoil pressure measurements during a blade-vortex interaction and a comparison with theory, AIAA Paper 88-0669, AIAA 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 1988.Google Scholar
19. Horner, M.H., Saliveros, E., Kokkalis, A., and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Results from a Set of Low Speed Blade-Vortex Interaction Experiments, Glasgow University Aero Report 9109, July 1991. To be published externally.Google Scholar
20. Horner, M.H., Saliveros, E. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. An experimental investigation of the oblique blade-vortex interaction, 17th European Rotorcraft and Powered Lift Aircraft Forum, Berlin, Germany, September 1991.Google Scholar
21. Sears, W.R. Aerodynamics, noise and the sonic boom, AIAA J, April 1969, 7, (4).Google Scholar
22. Panaras, A. Numerical modelling of the vortex-airfoil interaction, AIAA J, January 1987, 25, (1).Google Scholar
23. Lee, D.J. and Smith, C.A. Distortion of vortex core during blade/Vortex interaction, AIAA Paper 87-1243, AIAA 19th. Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics & Lasers Conference Honolulu, Hawaii, June 1987.Google Scholar
24. Jones, H.E. and Caradonna, F.X. Full potential modelling of blade-vortex interactions, Vertica, 1988, 12, (1/2), pp. 129–145.Google Scholar
25. Saliveros, E.. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Collected Data from Blade Vortex Interaction Tests Using a Single Blade, Non-Lifting Rotor; Vol. I: 94% Span, Glasgow University Aero Report 9007, Glasgow University, March 1990.Google Scholar
26. Saliveros, E.. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Collected Data from Blade Vortex Interaction Tests Using a Single Blade, Non-Lifting Rotor; Vol. II: 86% Span, Glasgow University Aero Report 9008, Glasgow University, March 1990.Google Scholar
27. Saliveros, E.. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Collected Data from Blade Vortex Interaction Tests Using a Single Blade, Non-Lifting Rotor; Vol. III: 78% Span, Glasgow University Aero Report 9009, Glasgow University, March 1990.Google Scholar
28. Saliveros, E.. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Collected Data from Blade Vortex Interaction Tests Using a Single Blade, Non-Lifting Rotor; Vol. IV: 70% Span, Glasgow University Aero Report 9010, Glasgow University, March 1990.Google Scholar
29. Saliveros, E.. and Galbraith, R.A.McD. Collected Data from Blade Vortex Interaction Tests Using a Single Blade, Non-Lifting Rotor; Vol. V: 62% Span, Glasgow University Aero Report 9011, Glasgow University, March 1990.Google Scholar