Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T00:54:27.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aeroelastic design and flight testevaluation of the Ranger 2000 trainingaircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. Schweiger
Affiliation:
Daimler Benz Aerospace, Military Aircraft Munich, Germany
F. Weiss
Affiliation:
Daimler Benz Aerospace, Military Aircraft Munich, Germany
S. K. Dobbs
Affiliation:
Rockwell International — North American Aircraft , Seal Beach, California, USA

Abstract

The paper describes the aeroelastic analysis for thedesign, the ground verification tests and the flighttest programme, for the Ranger 2000 trainingaircraft, developed jointly by Dasa and RockwellInternational between 1991 and 1994, as a competitorfor the next generation US Air Force and Navy JointPrimary Advanced Training System (JPats). Specialefforts with respect to the aeroelastic stabilitywere required for the T-tail configuration, for thedesign of the manual flight control system, and forthe establishment of sufficient mass balance for thecontrol surfaces. Several ground vibration testswere performed for the complete aircraft and forindividual components for all major designimprovements during the flight test evaluation. Tominimise the required time for these tests, highlymodular test equipment was required. For anefficient flutter flight test programme a reliableexcitation system was chosen. This system consistsof slotted rotating cylinders, mounted on smallvanes, which can be attached to any aerodynamicsurface. This equipment creates defined unsteadyaerodynamic forces to excite the eigenmodes of thestructure.

Quasi-on-line frequency and damping data evaluationbetween consecutive flight test points was madepossible by installing the required hardware andsoftware directly at the flight test quick-lookcontrol room, for the direct use of telemetry data.With this approach only a small number of dedicatedflutter flights was required.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Krammer, J. Practical architecture of design optimisation software for aircraft structures taking the MBB-Lagrange code as an example, AGARD Lecture Series 186, Integrated design analysis and optimisation of aircraft structures, May 1992.Google Scholar
2. Gödel, H. Recent developmnts in structural optimisation with respect to dynamic and aeroelastic problems, In proceedings of the International forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, June 1991.Google Scholar
3. Giesing, J.P., Kalmann, T.P. and Rodden, W.P. Subsonic steady and oscillatory aerodynamics for multiple interfering wings and bodies, AFFDL-TR-71-5, 1991.Google Scholar
4. French, M., Noll, T., Cooley, D., Moore, R. and Zapata, F. Flutter investigation involving a free floating aileron, AIAA-87-0909.Google Scholar
5. Weiss, F., Schweiger, J. and Hönlinger, H. Meeting on advanced aeroelastic testing and data analysis, Rotterdam, May 1994.Google Scholar
6. Bak, D.J. Rotating cylinder excites in-flight vibration modes. Design News, March 1989.Google Scholar