Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T01:14:08.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trajectory optimisation for a rocket-assisted hypersonic boost-glide vehicle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2017

S.T.I. Rizvi ,
H. Linshu ,
X. Dajun  and
S.I.A. Shah
S.T.I. Rizvi*
Affiliation:
School of Astronautics, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, P.R. China
H. Linshu
Affiliation:
School of Astronautics, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, P.R. China
X. Dajun
Affiliation:
School of Astronautics, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, P.R. China
S.I.A. Shah
Affiliation:
National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
*
rizvi.aeng@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this work, trajectory optimisation has been performed for a wing-body rocket assisted vehicle to compute the bestset of performance parameters including burn-out angle, angle-of-attack, bank-angle and throttle command that would result in optimal down-range and cross-range performance of the re-entry vehicle. An hp-adaptive Pseudospectral method has been used for the optimisation by combining the launch and rocket rocket-assisted re-entry stages. The purpose of the research is to compute optimal burn-out condition, angle-of-attack, bank-angle and optimal thrust segments that would maximise the down-range and cross-range performance of the hypersonic boost glide vehicle, under constrained heat rate environments. The variation of down-range/cross-range performance of rocket rocket-assisted hypersonic boost glide vehicle with bounds on diminishing heat rate has also been computed.

Keywords

trajectory optimisationhypersonic boost-glidewaveriderwing-body configurationpseudospectral methodoptimal control

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 121 , Issue 1238 , April 2017 , pp. 469 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Crockrell, C.E., Huebner, L.D. and Finley, D.B. Aerodynamic performance and flow field characteristics of two wave-rider derived hypersonic cruise vehicles, AIAA 33rd Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, 1995, Reno, Nevada, US, AIAA Paper 95–0736.Google Scholar
2. Whitmore, S.A. and Dunbar, B.J. Orbital space plane: Past, present, and future, IAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition, 2003, Dayton, Ohio, US, AIAA-2718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Surber, T.E. and Oslen, D.C. Shuttle orbiter aerodynamic development, J Spacecraft, 1978, 15, pp 40–47.Google Scholar
4. Ley, W., Klaus, W. and Willi, H. Handbook of Space Technology, vol. 22, 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Munich, GmbH.Google Scholar
5. Zimmermann, F. and Calise, A.J. Numerical optimization study of aeroassisted orbital transfer, J Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1998, 21, pp 127–133.Google Scholar
6. Gogu, C., Matsumura, T., Haftka, R.T. and Rao, A.V. Aeroassisted orbital transfer trajectory optimization considering thermal protection system mass, J Guidance Control and Dynamics, 2009, 32, pp 927-938.Google Scholar
7. Hull, D.G. and Speyer, J.L. Optimal reentry and plane change trajectories, J Astronautical Sciences, 1982, 30, pp 117–130.Google Scholar
8. Zhou, H., Chen, W. and Yin, X. Hypersonic vehicle trajectory design based on optimal control theory, Sixth International Symposium on Instrumentation and Control Technology: Sensors, Automatic Measurement, Control, and Computer Simulation, 2006, pp 63582L-63582L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ross, I.M. and Nicholoson, J.C. Optimality of the heating-rate-constrained aero cruise maneuver, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 1998, 35, pp 361–364.Google Scholar
10. Clarke, K.A., Performance optimization study of a common aero vehicle using Legendre pseudospectral method, vol. MS, 2003, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US.Google Scholar
11. Jorris, T.R. Common aero vehicle autonomous reentry trajectory optimization satisfying waypoint and no-fly zone constraints, 2007, School of Engineering and Management, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, Ohio, US.Google Scholar
12. Li, Y., Cui, N. and Rang, S. Trajectory optimization for hypersonic boost glide missile considering aeroheating, Aircr Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2009, 81, pp 3–13.Google Scholar
13. Li, Y. Optimal attack trajectory for hypersonic boost glide missile in maximum reachable domain, International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, 2009, Changchun, China.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Rizvi, S.T.I., He, L. and Xu, D. Optimal trajectory analysis of hypersonic boost-glide waverider with heat load constraint, Airc Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2015, 87, pp 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Rizvi, S.T.I., He, L. and Xu, D. Optimal trajectory and heat load analysis of different shape reentry vehicles for medium range application, DefenceTechnology, 2015, 11, pp 450-361.Google Scholar
16. Darby, C.L. and Rao, A.V. Minimum-fuel low-earth-orbit aeroassisted orbital transfer of small spacecraft, J Spacecraft and Rockets, 2011, 48, pp 618–628.Google Scholar
17. He, L. Launch Vehicle Design, 2004, BUAA Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
18. Bertin, J.J. Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics, Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics, 1994, AIAA Education Series, Washington, DC, US, pp 257–262.Google Scholar
19. Scott, C.D., Ried, R.C., Maraia, R.J., Li, C.P. and Derry, S.M. An AOTV Aeroheating and Thermal Protection Study, volume 96, 1985, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, New York, US.Google Scholar
20. Tauber, M.E. A review of high speed convective heat transfer, computational methods, NASA TP-2914, 1989, Washington, DC, US.Google Scholar
21. Rao, A.V. User's Manual for GPOPS Version 4.0, August 2011, Florida, US.Google Scholar
22. Garg, D., Patterson, M.A., Hager, W.W., Rao, A.V., Benson, D.A. and Huntington, G.T. A unified framework for the numerical solution of optimal control problems using pseudospectral methods, Automatica, 2010, 46, pp. 1843–1851.Google Scholar