Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-19T03:24:09.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control-oriented six-degree-of-freedom modeling of distributed propulsion vehicle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2025

Z. Dong Open the ORCID record for Z. Dong [Opens in a new window] ,
B. Liu ,
X. Da Open the ORCID record for X. Da [Opens in a new window]  and
W. Yu
Z. Dong
Affiliation:
China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, High Speed Aerodynamics Research Institute, Mianyang, China
B. Liu
Affiliation:
China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, High Speed Aerodynamics Research Institute, Mianyang, China
X. Da*
Affiliation:
China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, High Speed Aerodynamics Research Institute, Mianyang, China
W. Yu
Affiliation:
China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, High Speed Aerodynamics Research Institute, Mianyang, China
*
Corresponding author: Xingya Da; Email: daxingya@cardc.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dynamic model of the distributed propulsion vehicle faces significant challenges due to several factors. The primary difficulties arise from the strong coupling between multiple power units and aerodynamic rudder surfaces, the interaction between thrust and vehicle dynamics, and the complexity of the aerodynamic model, which includes high-dimensional and high-order variables. To address these challenges, wind tunnel tests are conducted to analyse the aerodynamic characteristics and identify variables affecting the aerodynamic coefficients. Subsequently, a deep neural network is employed to investigate the influence of the power system and aerodynamic rudder on the aerodynamic coefficients. Based on these findings, a multi-dynamic coupled aerodynamic model is developed. Furthermore, a control-oriented nonlinear dynamics model for the distributed propulsion vehicle is established, and a flight controller is designed. Finally, closed-loop simulations for the climb, descent and turn phases are performed, validating the effectiveness of the established model.

Keywords

distributed propulsion vehicledynamics modeldeep learning

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Isikveren, A.T., Seitz, A., Bijewitz, J., Mirzoyan, A., Isyanov, A., Grenon, R., Atinault, O., Godard, J.L. and Stückl, S. Distributed propulsion and ultra-high by-pass rotor study at aircraft level, Aeronaut. J., 2015, 119, (1221), pp 1327–1376.10.1017/S0001924000011295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isikveren, A.T., Seitz, A., Bijewitz, J., Hornung, M., Mirzoyan, A., Isyanov, A., Godard, J.L., Stückl, S. and Van Toor, J. Recent advances in airframe-propulsion concepts with distributed propulsion, in 29th Congrees of the International Council of the Aerautical Sciences (ICAS 2014), Sept. 2014, Saint-Pétersbourg, Russia. hal-01079572.Google Scholar
Steiner, H.J., Seitz, A., Wieczorek, K., Plötner, K., Isikveren, A.T. and Hornung, M. Multi-disciplinary design and feasibility study of distributed propulsion systems, in 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, September 2012, pp 403 –414, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Nasoulis, C.P., Protopapadakis, G., Ntouvelos, E.G., Gkoutzamanis, V.G. and Kalfas, A.I. Environmental and techno-economic evaluation for hybrid-electric propulsion architectures, Aeronaut. J., 2023, 127, pp 1904–1926.10.1017/aer.2023.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pornet, C., Gologan, C., Vratny, P.C., Seitz, A., Schmitz, O., Isikveren, A.T. and Hornung, M. Methodology for sizing and performance assessment of hybrid energy aircraft, J. Aircr,, 2015, 52, (1), pp 341–352.10.2514/1.C032716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohardani, A.S., Doulgeris, G. and Singh, R. Challenges of future aircraft propulsion: a review of distributed propulsion technology and its potential application for the all electric commercial aircraft, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2011, 47, (5), pp 369–391.10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fard, M.T., He, J., Huang, H. and Cao, Y. Aircraft distributed electric propulsion technologies-a review, IEEE Trans. Transport. Electrif., 2022, 8, (4), pp 4067–4090.10.1109/TTE.2022.3197332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohardani, A.S. A synergistic glance at the prospects of distributed propulsion technology and the electric aircraft concept for future unmanned air vehicles and commercial/military aviation, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 2013, 57, pp 25–70.10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, A.M., Stilson, E.V., Bevirt, J. and Pei, P.P. Conceptual design of the Joby S2 electric VTOL PAV, AIAA Paper 2014-2407, June 2014.10.2514/6.2014-2407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finger, D.F., Braun, C. and Bil, C. A review of configuration design for distributed propulsion transitioning VTOL aircraft, Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology-APISAT, 2017, pp 3–5, Seoul, Korea, Corpus ID: 116176552.Google Scholar
Seitz, A. and Gologan, C. Parametric design studies for propulsive fuselage aircraft concepts, CEAS Aeronaut. J., 2015, 6, pp 69–82.10.1007/s13272-014-0130-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, G., Atinault, O., Grenon, R. and Verbecke, C. Numerical and experimental aerodynamic investigations of boundary layer ingestion for improving propulsion efficiency of future air transport, AIAA Paper 2013-2406, June 2013.10.2514/6.2013-2406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seitz, A., Bijewitz, J., Kaiser, S. and Wortmann, G. Conceptual investigation of a propulsive fuselage aircraft layout, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol.: Int. J., 2014, 86, (6), pp 464–472.10.1108/AEAT-06-2014-0079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., Zhang, X. and Zhong, Y. Sizing method and sensitivity analysis for distributed electric propulsion aircraft, J. Aircr., 2020, 57, (4), pp 730–741.10.2514/1.C035581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D.K., Huang, A.C., Uranga, A., Greitzer, E.M., Drela, M. and Sato, S. Boundary layer ingestion propulsion benefit for transport aircraft, J. Propul. Power, 2017, 33, (5), pp 1118–1129.10.2514/1.B36321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoll, A.M., Bevirt, J., Moore, M.D., Fredericks, W.J. and Borer, N.K. Drag reduction through distributed electric propulsion, 14th AIAA Aviat. Technol. Integr. Operat. Conf., 2014, 33, (5), p 2851.Google Scholar
Felder, J., Kim, H. and Brown, G. Turboelectric distributed propulsion engine cycle analysis for hybrid-wing-body aircraft, AIAA Paper 2009–1132, Jan. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothhaar, P.M., Murphy, P.C., Bacon, B.J., Gregory, I.M., Grauer, J.A., Busan, R.C. and Croom, M.A. NASA Langley distributed propulsion VTOL tilt-wing aircraft testing, modeling, simulation, control, and flight test development, AIAA Paper 2014–2999, Jun. 2014.10.2514/6.2014-2999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mike, F.K. Aero-propulsive coupling of an embedded, distributed propulsion system, AIAA Paper 2015–3162, Jun. 2015.Google Scholar
Willis, J.B. and Beard, R.W. Pitch and thrust allocation for full-flight-regime control of winged eVTOL UAVs, IEEE Control Syst. Lett., 2021, 6, pp 1058–1063.10.1109/LCSYS.2021.3089130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, J.T., Serrani, A., Yurkovich, S., Bolender, M.A. and Doman, D.B. Control-oriented modeling of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 2007, 30, (3), pp 856–869.10.2514/1.27830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B.M. and Murphy, P.C. Aero-propulsive modeling for tilt-wing, distributed propulsion aircraft using wind tunnel data, J. Aircr., 2022, 59, (9), pp 1–17.10.2514/1.C036351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, K., Kou, J.Q. and Zhang, W.W. Deep learning for multifidelity aerodynamic distribution modeling from experimental and simulation data, AIAA J., 2022, 60, (7), pp 4413–4427.10.2514/1.J061330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.H., Zhang, J. and Yang, L.Y. Weighted pseudo-inverse based control allocation of heterogeneous redundant operating mechanisms for distributed propulsion configuration, Energy Proc., 2019, 158, (2), pp 1718–1723.10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.D., Perry, A.T. and Ansell, P.J. A review of distributed electric propulsion concepts for air vehicle technology, AIAA 2018-4998, July 2018.10.2514/6.2018-4998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weng, L.H., Zhang, X., Yao, T.K., Bu, F.F. and Li, H. A thrust cooperative control strategy of multiple propulsion motors for distributed electric propulsion aircraft, World Electr. Veh. J., 2021, 12, (4), p 199.10.3390/wevj12040199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deere, K.A., Viken, J.K., Viken, S., Carter, M.B., Wiese, M. and Farr, N. Computational analysis of a wing designed for the X-57 distributed electric propulsion aircraft, AIAA Paper 2017-3923, June 2017.10.2514/6.2017-3923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Z.H., Li, Y.H., Lv, M.L. and Zuo, R.W. Adaptive accurate tracking control of HFV in the presence of dead-zone and hysteresis input nonlinearities, Chin. J. Aeronaut., 2021, 34, (5), pp 642–651.10.1016/j.cja.2020.10.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Z.H., Li, Y.H., Lv, M.L., Zhao, Z.L. and Pei, B.B. Fuzzy adaptive prescribed performance fault-tolerant control for HFV with fixed-time convergence guarantee, Int. J. Aerosp. Eng., 2022, 2022, p 2438657.10.1155/2022/2438657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Z.H., Li, Y.H., Zheng, W.J., Zhou, C. and Wu, P.W. Optimization control for aircraft based on manifold theory, J. Aircr., 2018, 55, (6), pp 2549–2553.10.2514/1.C034997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suiçmez, E.C. and Kutay, A.T. Full envelope nonlinear flight controller design for a novel electric VTOL (eVTOL) air taxi, Aeronaut. J., 2024, 128, pp 966–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J.L. and Klunk, G.T. Dynamic flight simulation of spanwise distributed electric propulsion for directional control authority, AIAA Paper 2018-4997, July 2018. 10.2514/6.2018-4997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van, E.N., Alazard, D., Döll, C. and Pastor, P. Co-design of aircraft vertical tail and control laws using distributed electric propulsion, IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 52, (12), pp 514–519.10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van, E.N., Alazard, D., Döll, C. and Pastor, P. Co-design of aircraft vertical tail and control laws with distributed electric propulsion and flight envelop constraints, CEAS Aeronaut. J., 2021, 12, pp 101–113.Google Scholar
Kou, P., Wang, J. and Liang, D.L. Powered yaw control for distributed electric propulsion aircraft: a model predictive control approach, IEEE Trans. Transport. Electrif., 2021, 7, (4), pp 3006–3020.10.1109/TTE.2021.3068724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Z.H., Li, Y.H. and Lv, M.L. Adaptive nonsingular fixed-time control for hypersonic flight vehicle considering angle of attack constraints, Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, 2023, 33, (12), pp 6754–6777.10.1002/rnc.6722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, B., He, Y.Q., Zhang, G.Y., Gu, F., Yang, L.Y. and Xu, W.L. Wind disturbance rejection for unmanned aerial vehicle susing acceleration feedback enhanced H- $\infty $ ∞ method, Autonom. Robots, 2020, 44, (7), pp 1271–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, B.L. and Lewis, F.L. Aircraft Control and Simulation. John Wiley & Son, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 1992.Google Scholar