Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T02:14:57.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Notes on Ultrasoft X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis—10 to 100 Å Region*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Burton L. Henke
Burton L. Henke*
Affiliation:
Pomona College Claremont, California
Get access

Abstract

Methods and instrumentation have heen developed for the extension of X-ray fluorescence analysis into the light element region, magnesium through beryllium. Examples of current values for the minimum detectable limits for these elements and associated instrumental parameters are presented. Some specific techniques are described for the use of an ultrasoft X-ray vacuum spectrograph, for the development of large d-spacing multilayer analyzers, and for the construction of thin window systems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 8: Thirteenth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 12-14, 1964 , 1964 , pp. 269 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

This work is supported by trie U.S. Air Forte Office of Scientific Research under Grant AFOSR 62-415.

References

1. Henke, B. L., “Microanalysis with Ultrasoft X-Radiations,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 5, William M. Mueller (éd.), University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
2. Henke, B. L., “Sodium and Magnesium Analysis—Method,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 6, William M. Mueller and Marie Fay (eds.), University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
3. Henke, B. L., “X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis for Sodium, Fluorine, Oxygen, Nitrogen, Carbon, and Boron,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 7, William M. Mueller, Gavin R. Mallett, and Marie J. Fay (eds.), University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
4. Ong, S. P., “Light Elements Analysis with an Electron Microprobe,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 5, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1965, pp. 341–351.Google Scholar
5. Bauri, W. L. and Fischer, D. W., “The Effect of Valence and Coordination on K Series Diagram and Nondiagram Lines of Magnesium, Aluminum, and Silicon,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 8, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1965, pp. 371–383.Google Scholar
6. Holiday, J. E., “Soft X-Ray Emission Spectroscopy in the 13 to 44 A Region,” J. Appl. Phys. 33: 3259, 1962.Google Scholar
7. Nicholson, J., “The Effect of Grating Blaze Angle on the Diffraction Efficiency of Ultra-Soft X-Ray Radiation,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol, 8, University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1965, pp. 301–314.Google Scholar
8. Henke, B. L., White, R., and Lundberg, B., “Semi-Empirical Determination of the Mass Absorption Coefficients for the 5 to 50 A Region,” J. Appl. Phys. 28: 98, 1957.Google Scholar
9. Ogier, W. T., Lucas, G. John, and Park, Raymond L., “Ultrasoft X-Ray Absorption Coefficients of Al, Be, C, O, and F,” Appl. Phys. Letters 5: 146, 1964.Google Scholar
10. Baird, A. K., McIntyre, D. B., and Welday, E. E., “Sodium and Magnesium Analysis—Application to Silicate Rock,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 6, William R. Mueller and Marie Fay (eds.), University of Denver, Plenum Press, New York, 1963.Google Scholar
11. Baird, A. K. and Henke, B. L., “Oxygen Determination in Silicate Rocks by Soft X-Ray Spectroscopy,” Anal. Chem. 37, May, 1965.Google Scholar