Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T22:10:33.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Focusing Circle Errors in X-Ray Residual Stress Measurements of Nickel-Based Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

E. B. S. Pardue ,
M. R. James  and
R. W. Hendricks
E. B. S. Pardue
Affiliation:
Technology for Energy Corporation Knoxville, Tennessee
M. R. James
Affiliation:
Rockwell International Thousand Oaks, California
R. W. Hendricks
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia
Get access

Extract

An unexplained anomalous sin2ψ split in x-ray stress measurements has consistently resulted from the use of Cr Kα radiation with nickel and austenitic stainless steels. Both, materials have diffraction peaks at low back-reflection angles for this radiation (nickel: 20 ⋍ 134°, austenitic stainless steel: 20 ⋍ 128°). The anomalous split is not evident when the measurements are made using Cr Kβ radiation, In an attempt to explain the errors produced by the Cr Kα radiation, focusing circle effects were analyzed and compared to experimental measurements made with both Cr Kα and Cr Kβ radiation on nickel-based samples,

Information

Type
III. X-Ray Stress/Strain Determination, Fractography, Diffraction, Line Broadening Analysis
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 31: Thirty-Sixth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 3-7, 1987 , 1987 , pp. 205 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Zantopulos, H. and Jatczak, C., “Systematic Errors in X-Ray Diffractometer Stress Measurements Due to Specimen Geometry and Beam Divergence,” Advances in X-Ray Analysis, 14, 360–376 1970.Google Scholar
2. James, M.R. and Cohen, J.B., “Geometrical Problems with a Position- Sensitive Detector Employed on a Diffractometer,” J. Appl, Crystallogr. 12, 339–445 1979.Google Scholar
3. Hendricks, R.W., to be published.Google Scholar
4. Pardue, S.E.B., Research and Development Program to Develop a Nondestructive Evaluation Instrument (X-Ray Diffraction) for Measuring Residual Stresses in a Wide Range of Naval Aviation Material, Final Report, TEC Report R-87-015, April 1987, Contract No. N00019-85-C-0419.Google Scholar
5. Noyan, I.C. and Cohen, J.B., “Determining Stresses in the Presence of Nonlinearities in the Interplanar Spacings Versus Sin2ifi, Adv. in X-Ray Analysis, 27, pp. 129–148.(1984).Google Scholar
6. James, M.R., “The Use of Oscillation on PSD-Based Instruments for X-Ray Measurement of Residual Stress,” Exp, Mech., 27, June 1987, No. 2, pp. 164–167.Google Scholar
7. S, E.B.. Pardue et al., “X-Ray Stress Analysis of Nickel-Plated Components,” Proceedings of the 1987 SEM Spring Conference on Experimental Mechanics, pp. 703–710.Google Scholar