Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T15:05:15.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect sizes III: differences on repeated measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic*
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of NSW, Kensington, NSW, Australia Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia
*
Mr Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic, Black Dog Institute Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hospital Road, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia Tel: +61 2 9382 3716; Fax: +61 2 9382 3712; E-mail: d.hadzi-pavlovic@unsw.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Statistically Speaking
Information
Acta Neuropsychiatrica , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 48 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. Effect sizes I: differences between means. Acta Neuropsychiatrica 2007;19:318–320. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, RD, Hedeker, DR, Davis, JM. Estimation of effect size from a series of experiments involving paired comparisons. J Educ Stat 1993;18:271–279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, WP, Cortina, JM, Vaslow, JB, Burke, MJ. Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychol. Methods 1996;1:170–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oljenik, S, Algina, J. Measures of effect size for comparative studies: applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemp Educ Psychol 2000;25:241–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar