Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-ktsnh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-21T08:14:24.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eastern Philosophy and Classical Theism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2025

Tyler Dalton McNabb
Affiliation:
Saint Francis University
Erik Baldwin
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Northwest

Summary

Arguably, Classical Theism endorses the following theses: (1) God exists, (2) God is metaphysically simple, (3) God is impassible, and (4) God is wholly immutable. These theses often, though not always, lead to an endorsement of the view that God is wholly ineffable. Classical Theists, then, often see themselves as apophatic theologians. Ineffability and apophatic theology are not unknown in the great Eastern religious and philosophical traditions. In this Element, the authors explore to what extent the metaphysics of Classical Theism are consistent with the metaphysics of various Eastern traditions. After surveying each tradition, the authors argue that there is not only room for consistency, but that some of the traditions surveyed are plausibly read as endorsing Classical Theism, or at least, something not far off.
Get access

Information

Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009660495
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 30 October 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Element purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abe, Masao. “Non-Being and Mu: The Metaphysical Nature of Negativity in the East and the West.” In Zen and Western Thought, edited by LaFleur, William R., 127. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1985.10.1007/978-1-349-06994-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abe, MasaoSunyata as Formless Form: Plato and Mahayana Buddhism.” In Zen and Comparative Studies, edited by Heine, Steven, 139. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 1997.10.1057/9780230375994_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Sarah. “The Great One, Water, and the Laozi: New Light from Guodian.” T’oung Pao, Second Series 89, no. 4/5 (2003): 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Roger. Confucian Role of Ethics: A Vocabulary. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2011.10.2307/j.ctt1p9wqgmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Roger, and Rosemont, Henry. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Random House, 1999.Google Scholar
Anderson, James. Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of Its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status. Milton Keynes: Paternoster, 2007.Google Scholar
Anselm. Monologion; and, Proslogion: With the Replies of Gaunilo and Anselm. Translated by Thomas Williams. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1996.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica: Complete English Edition in Five Volumes. Westminster: Christian Classics, 1981.Google Scholar
Aristotle. Metaphysics. With introduction and notes by Reeve, C. D. C.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2016.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Erik. Fully Informed Reasonable Disagreement and Tradition Based Perspectivalism. Bristol, CT: Peeters-Leuven, 2016.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Erik, and McNabb, Tyler Dalton. Plantingian Religious Epistemology and World Religions: Problems and Prospects. Lanham: Lexington Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Justin. Science, Religion, and Theology: From Human Minds to Divine Minds. Philadelphia: Templeton Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Michael. “Skeptical Theism and the Problem of Evil.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, edited by Flint, Thomas and Rea, Michael, 377378. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Brown, Joshua. Aquinas and Early Chinese Masters: Chinese Philosophy and Catholic Theology. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2024.Google Scholar
Burns, Elizabeth. Continental Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Burton, David. Buddhism: A Contemporary Philosophical Investigation. Basingstoke: Taylor & Francis, 2017.Google Scholar
Casti, Filippo and Hewitt, Simon. “Grammatical Thomism: An Introduction.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 85 (2024): 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Kelly James, and Winslett, Justin. A Spiritual Geography of Early Chinese Thought: Gods, Ancestors, and Afterlife. London: Bloomsbury, 2023.Google Scholar
Cline, Eric. The Analects: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, William Lane. Time and Eternity: Exploring God’s Relationship to Time. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creel, Herrlee Clessner. “Was Confucius and Agnostic?T’oung Pao 29 (1932): 5599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, Sheryl. Everyday Is a Winding Road: Sheryl Crow. Hollywood: A&M Records, 1996, track 9.Google Scholar
Davies, Brian. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil. London: Continuum Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Davies, BrianLetters from America.” New Blackfriars 84 (2003): 371384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ettore, Domenic. Analogy After Aquinas: Logical Problems, Thomistic Answers. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2019, 3360.10.2307/j.ctvbd8hwt.8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVito, Michael, and McNabb, Tyler Dalton. “Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom: Embracing the Paradox.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 90 (2021): 93107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dölpopa, Gyaltsen. The Buddha from Dolpo: A Study on the Life and Thought of the Tibetan Master Dölpopa Sherab Gyaltsen. Translated by Cyrus Stearns. Ithaca: Snow Lion Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Duby, Steven J. Divine Simplicity: A Dogmatic Account. New York: T&T Clark, 2016.Google Scholar
Slingerland, Edward. The Essential Analects: Selected Passages with Traditional Commentary. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2006.Google Scholar
Eno, Robert. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and Defense of Ritual Mastery. New York: SUNY Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Feser, Edward. Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Neunkirchen-Seelscheid: Editiones Scholasticiae, 2014.Google Scholar
Feser, Edward. “The Neo-Classical Challenge to Classical Theism.” Philosophy Compass 17, no. 8 (2022): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, Jessica. Hindu Worldviews: Theories of Self, Ritual, and Reality. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.Google Scholar
Garfield, Jay L. Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1956.Google Scholar
Granet, Marcel. La Pensée Chinoise. Paris: Albin Michel, 1934.Google Scholar
Hall, David, and Ames, Roger. Thinking through Confucius. New York: SUNY Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Harrison, Victoria. Eastern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Harrison, Victoria Eastern Philosophy: The Basics. New York: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Hart, David Bentley. The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Herbert, Frank. Dune. Philadelphia: Chilton Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Simon 2020. Negative Theology and Philosophical Analysis: Only the Splendour of Life London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirota, Dennis, trans. The Collected Works of Shinran, Vol. II. Kyoto: Jodo Shinshu Hongwanji, 1997.Google Scholar
Hornbeck, Ryan, Barrett, Justin, and Kang, Madeleine. Religious Cognition in China: “Homo Religiosus” and the Dragon. Switzlerand: Springer, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Hsüan. The Sixth Patriarch’s Dharma Jewel Platform Sutra: Liuzu Da Shi Fa Bao Tan Jing, ed. Martin, Verhoeven. Ukiah, CA: Buddhist Text Translation Society, 2014.Google Scholar
Ivanhoe, Philip. “Heaven as a Source for Ethical Warrant in Early Confucianism.” Dao 6, (2007): 211220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, John. “Aquinas on Divine Simplicity.” The Monist 80, no. 4 (1997): 521538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lao, Tzu. Tao Te Ching. Translated by Gia-Fu Feng and Jane English. London: Wildwood House, 1991.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm Die philosophischen Schriften. 7 vols. Edited by Gerhardt, C. I.. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1965.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays. Translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1989.Google Scholar
Legge, James. The Religions of China. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1881.Google Scholar
Mathes, Klaus-Dieter. “Taranatha’s ‘Twenty-One Differences with Regard to the Profound Meaning’: Comparing the Views of the Two Gzan Ston Masters Dol Po Pa and Sakya MChog.” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 27 (2004): 285328.Google Scholar
McNabb, Tyler Dalton, and Baldwin, Erik. Classical Theism and Buddhism: Connecting Metaphysical and Ethical Systems. London: Bloomsbury, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNabb, Tyler Dalton. “The Shentong Tradition and Classical Theism: A Synthesis?” Philosophy East and West (forthcoming).Google Scholar
McNabb, Tyler Dalton. “The Problem of Evil for Buddhists: Developing Transcendental Responses.” Agatheos: European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1, no. 2 (2024): 4653.Google Scholar
McNabb, Tyler Dalton and Baldwin, Erik. “The Stigmata, Rainbow Bodies, and Hume’s Argument against Miracles.” Journal of Philosophy and Religion Society of Thailand 19, no. 1 (2024): 8393.Google Scholar
Mencius. Mencius, trl. Irene Bloom. New York: Colombia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Michelson, Jared. “Thomistic Divine Simplicity and Its Analytic Detractors: Can One Affirm Divine Aseity and Goodness without Simplicity?The Heythrop Journal 63, no. 6, (2022): 11401162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, Hans-Georg. Daoism Explained: From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory. Chicago: Open Court Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mullins, Ryan T. The End of the Timeless God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755180.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ñāṇamoli, Bhikku and Bhikku, Bodhi. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima NikāYa. Boston: Wisdom Publications in association with the Barre Center for Buddhist Studies, 1995.Google Scholar
Patil, Parimal. Against a Hindu God: A Buddhist Philosophy of Religion in India. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peckham, John C. Divine Attributes: Knowing the Covenantal God of Scripture. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2021.Google Scholar
Peckham, John C.Classical Theism and Theological Method: A Critical Inquiry.” Religions 15, no. 8 (2024): 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. Does God Have a Nature. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 2007, 47.Google Scholar
Plato. The Republic, 509b. In Plato: Complete Works, edited by Cooper, John M., 9711223. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar
Prabhavananda, Swami, and Isherwood, Christopher. Shankara’s Crest Jewel of Discrimination. Hollywood: Vedanta Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Panchuk, Michelle. “The Simplicity of Divine Ideas: Theistic Conceptual Realism and the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity.” Religious Studies 57, no. 3 (2021): 385402. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412519000301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, Gregory J.Reconsidering the Necessary Beings of Aquinas’s Third Way.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4, no. 1 (2012): 219241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambachan, Anatanand. A Hindu Theology of Liberation: Not-Two Is Not-One. New York: SUNY Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rooney, James. “Unknowing: Christian and Buddhist Soteriological Epistemology.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Rowe, William L.The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16, no. 4 (1979): 335341.Google Scholar
Shankara, Adi. Shankara’s Crest Jewel of Discrimination. Hollywood: Vedanta Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Shankaracharya, Adi. Aparokshanubhuti: Or Self-Realization of Sri Sankaracharya. Translated by Swami Vimuktananda. Hollywood: Vedanta Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin. The World Thought in Ancient China. Cambrdge: Belknap Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Joseph C., and Mullins, Ryan T.The Aloneness Argument against Classical Theism.” Religious Studies 58, no. 2, (2022): 401419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotus, Duns. Vol. III: Ordinatio I, Distinctio 3 (Città del Vaticano, 1954).Google Scholar
Schmidt-Leukel, Perry. The Celestial Web: Buddhism and Christianity: A Different Comparison. Translated by David West. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 2024.Google Scholar
Sheehy, Michael, and Mathes, Klaus-Dieter, eds. The Other Emptiness: Rethinking the Zhentong Buddhist Discourse in Tibet. Albany: SUNY Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinran. The Collected Works of Shinran, Vol. I. Translated by Dennis Hirota. Kyoto: Jodo Shinshu Hongwanji, 1997.Google Scholar
Swami, Shree, and Butler, Yeats William . trans. “Chhandogya-Upanishad.” In The Ten Principal Upanishads. New Delhi: Rupa Publications, 2003.Google Scholar
Sijuwade, Joshua Reginald. “The Metaphysics of Theism: A Classical and Neo-Classical Synthesis. Religions.” 12, no. 11 (2021): 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12110967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soars, Daniel. The World and God Are Not-Two: A Hindu and Christian Conversation. New York: Fordham Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Stoker, Valarie. “Madhva (1238–1317).” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed January 6, 2025. https://iep.utm.edu/madhva/.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Thanissaro, Bhikku. The Mind Like Fire Unbound. Barrie: Dhamma Dana Publications, 2016.Google Scholar
Tilakaratne, Asanga. “The Ultimate Buddhist Religious Goal, Nirvana, and its Implications for Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging.” In Buddhist-Christian Dual Belonging: Affirmations, Objections, and Explorations, edited by D’Costa, Gavin and Thompson, Ross, 100101. Farnham: Ashgate, 2016.Google Scholar
Tennent, Timothy. Christianity at the Religious Roundtable: Evangelical in Conversation with Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2002.Google Scholar
Tomaszewski, Christopher. “Collapsing the Modal Collapse Argument: On an Invalid Argument against Divine Simplicity.” Analysis 79, no. 2 (2019): 275284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhikkhu Ñāṇamoli, Trl and Bodhi, Bhikkhu. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha. Somerville: Wisdom Publications, 2015.Google Scholar
Wahlberg, Åke. “God’s Necessary Existence: A Thomistic perspective.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 95, no. 2 (2024): 131152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Bi. “Commentary.” In A Chinese Reading of the Daodejing: Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Laozi with Critical Text and Translation, edited by Wagner, Rudolf, 107118. Albany: SUNY Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. Religion and Revelation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerhoff, Jan. Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, Jan. The Golden Age of Indian Buddhist Philosophy. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Paul. An Unexpected Way: On Converting from Buddhism to Catholicism. London: T&T Clark, 2002.Google Scholar
Yang, Fenggang. “Confucianism as Civil Religion.” In Confucianism, A Habit of the Heart: Bellah, Civil Religion, and East Asia, edited by Ivanhoe, Philip J. and Kim, Sungmoon, 30. New York: SUNY Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Yagi, Seiichi, and Swidler, Leonard. A Bridge to Buddhist-Christian Dialogue. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Chun-Fang, Yu. “Eye on Religion: Miracles in the Chinese Buddhist Tradition.” Southern Medical Journal 100 (2007): 12431250.Google Scholar
Zappulli, Davide. “The Metaphysics of Creation in the Daodejing.” Ergo (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this Element complies with version 2.1 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved user experiences and achieves the intermediate (AA) level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Eastern Philosophy and Classical Theism
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Eastern Philosophy and Classical Theism
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Eastern Philosophy and Classical Theism
Available formats
×