Element contents
Monotheism and Creation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 November 2025
Summary
This Element discusses the idea of creation ex nihilo as an expression of monotheistic belief mainly with reference to Jewish and Christian traditions. It outlines the philosophical and theological discussion about monotheism and creation, considering key historical figures such as Philo, Irenaeus, Augustine, and Aquinas as well as contemporary thinkers. It reviews key topics such as divine sovereignty, the goodness of creation, pantheism, process, and feminist thinking on creation. It argues for creation ex nihilo over other models. In particular, it examines the notion of 'creaturehood' as an overlooked and under-developed dimension in contemporary debates about the relationship between created humanity and the one God. The doctrine of creation does not just address the question of origins, it also serves to affirm the finite or immanent aspects of life.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009357395Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 11 December 2025
References
Aquinas, Thomas (1996). Commentary on the Book of Causes of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translation by Vincent A. Guagliardo, Charles R. Hess, and Richard C. Taylor. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1923a). Summa Contra Gentiles: The Second Book. London: Burns, Oates and Washbourne.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1923b). Summa Contra Gentiles: The Third Book. London: Burns, Oates and Washbourne.Google Scholar
Attridge, Harold (1989). The Epistle to the Hebrews: A Commentary. Edited by Helmut Koester. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Augustine (2003). City of God, Book XI.10. Translated by Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Augustine (1995). De natura et gratia. In McGrath, Alister (ed.) The Christian Theology Reader. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
Augustine (1982). The Literal Meaning of Genesis Vol. 1. Translated by John H. Taylor, S. J. New York:Newman Press.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl (1958). Church Dogmatics III. Edited by Bromiley, Geoffrey and Torrance, Thomas. Edinburgh: T and T Clark.Google Scholar
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich (1967). Letters and Papers: Enlarged Edition, edited by Bethge, Eberhard, translated by Reginald Fuller. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Brierley, Michael (2004). Naming a Quiet Revolution: The Panentheistic Turn in Modern Theology. In Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur (eds.), In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Burrell, David (2013). Creatio Ex Nihilo Recovered. Modern theology, 29/2, pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, David (2004). Faith and Freedom: An Interfaith Perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, David (1994). Freedom and Creation in Three Traditions. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Cheetham, David (2020). Creation and Religious Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheetham, David (2016). Ways of Meeting and the Theology of Religions. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Philip (2001). Panentheist Internalism. Dialog: A Journal of Theology, 40/3, pp. 208–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Philip (2011). Panentheism. In Ian McFarland, Karen Kilby, David Fergusson and Iain Torrance (eds.), Cambridge Dictionary of Christian Theology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365–367.Google Scholar
Clifford, Richard (2021). Creatio ex nihilo in the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible. In Anderson, Gary A. and Bockmuehl, Markus (eds.), Creation ex nihilo: Origins, Development, Contemporary Challenges. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann (1995). Religion of Reason: Out of the Sources of Judaism. Translated by Simon Kaplan. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Oliver (2004). The Creativity of God: World, Eucharist, Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmond, William (2005). Is There a Sabbath for Thought? Between Religion and Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin (1959). Finite and Infinite: A Philosophical Essay, 2nd ed. London: Dacre Press.Google Scholar
Ford, David (2007). Christian Wisdom: Desiring God and Learning in Love. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregerson, Niels (2004). Three Varieties of Pantheism. In Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur (eds.), In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Griffin, David (1981). Creation out of Nothing, Creation out of Chaos, and the Problem of Evil. In Stephen, Davis (ed.), Encountering Evil: Live Options in Theodicy. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, pp. 108–124.Google Scholar
Gunton, Colin (1997). The Doctrine of Creation. In Gunton, Colin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Christian Doctrine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunton, Colin (2002). The Christian Faith: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hardy, David (2003). Creation and Eschatology. In Gunton, Colin (ed.), The Doctrine of Creation: Essays in Dogmatics, History and Philosophy. London: T&T Clark, pp. 105–134.Google Scholar
Hart, David Bentley (2003). The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hart, David Bentley (2019). That All Shall Be Saved. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, David Bentley (2022). You Are Gods: On Nature and Supernature. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauerwas, Stanley (1983). Work as Co-Creation: a Critique of a Remarkably Bad Idea. In Houck, John W. and Williams, Oliver F., (eds.) Co-Creation and Capitalism: John Paul II’s Laborem Exercens. Washington: University Press of America, pp. 42–58.Google Scholar
Heschel, Abraham (1951). The Sabbath: It’s Meaning for Modern Man. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Irenaeus, (1990). Adversus Haereses, IV. Xxxviii.2–3 in Bettenson, H., editor and translator, The Early Christian Fathers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irenaeus, Dominic (2012). Against the Heresies, Book 2. Translated by D. J Unger, (revised by Dhillon, D. J). New York: The Newman Press.Google Scholar
Jenson, Robert (2004). Aspects of a Doctrine of Creation. In Gunton, Colin (ed.), The Doctrine of Creation: Essays in Dogmatics, History and Philosophy. London: T&T Clark, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
Keller, Catherine (2003). The Face of the Deep: A Theology of Becoming. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, David (2009). Eccentric Existence: A Theological Anthropology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Soren (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Edited and translated by Hong, Howard V. and Hong, Edna H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Soren (2012). The Essential Kierkegaard. Edited and translated by Hong, Edna H. and Hong, Howard V.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kolnai, Aurel (1995). The Utopian Mind and Other Papers, Edited by Dunlop, F.. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, Lawrence M. (2012). A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is Something Rather Than Nothing. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Leidenhag, Joanna (2020). Creation and Ecology: Why the Doctrine of Creation ex nihilo Matters Today. Cambridge: Grove Books.Google Scholar
Leidenhag, Joanna (2021). Minding Creation: Theological Panpsychism and the Doctrine of Creation. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, Jon (1994). Creation and the Persistence of Evil: The Jewish Drama of Divine Omnipotence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levering, Matthew (2017). Engaging the Doctrine of Creation: Cosmos, Creatures and the Wise and Good Creator. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Levine, Michael (1994). Pantheism: A non-theistic concept of deity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew (2020). Book Review: That All Shall Be Saved: Heaven, Hell and Universal Salvation by David Bentley Hart. Journal of Orthodox Christian Studies, 3/2, p. 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Gerhard (2006). Monotheism and Creation. In Mitchell, M. M. and Young, F. M. (eds.), Cambridge History of Christianity Vol.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 434–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFague, Sallie (1987). Models of God: Theology for an Ecological Nuclear Age. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, Ian (2014). From Nothing: A Theology of Creation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
McRandal, Janice (2015). Christian Doctrine and the Grammar or Difference. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (2012 [1945]). Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Jürgen (1985). God and Creation: An Ecological Doctrine of Creation. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Mras, (ed.). (2016). Eusebius Werke. Bd.8: Die Praeparatio Evangelica (GCS, 43, 1–2) in de Vos, ‘Aristobulus and the Universal Sabbath’. In Brooke, George and van Hecke, Pierre (eds.), Goochem in Mokum, Wisdom in Amsterdam. Leiden: Brill, pp. 138–154.Google Scholar
Norris, Richard (1966). God and World in Early Christian Theology: A Study of Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian and Origen. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, Thomas (1985). Creation and the Teaching of the Qur’ān. Rome: Biblical Institute Press.Google Scholar
Philo (1989). De Mutatione nominum. 4.27, in Philo - Volume V, Loeb Classical Library. Translated by Francis H. Colson and George H. Whitaker. Cited in Soskice, Why Creatio ex nihilo for Theology Today?, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 53.Google Scholar
Pieper, Josef (1957). The Silence of St Thomas: Three Essays. Translated by Daniel O’Connor. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Plato, (1892). The Dialogues of Plato Vol 3: The Timaeus. Translation by Benjamin Jowett. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pohier, Jacques (1985). Dieu Fractures (Paris: Editions de Seuil, 1985). Translated by John Bowden, God in Fragments. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Schillebeeckx, Edward (1982). Interim Report on the Books Jesus and Christ. Trans. John Bowden. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (1974) [1851]. Parerga and Paralipomena. Translated by Eric F. J. Payne, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur (2008). World as Will and Representation. Vols. 1 & 2. Translated by Richard Aquila and Corus, David. London: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Schwöbel, Christoph (2004). God, Creation and Christian Community: The Dogmatic Basis for a Christian Ethics of Createdness. In Gunton, Colin (ed.), The Doctrine of Creation. London: T&T Clark, pp. 149–176.Google Scholar
Scott, Peter (2007). Creation. In Scott, Peter and Cavanaugh, William T. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Political Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 333–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shulevitz, Judith (2010). The Sabbath World: Glimpses of a Different Order of Time. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert (1982). The God of Faith and Reason: Foundations of Christian Theology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Soskice, Janet (2021). In Why Creatio ex nihilo for Theology Today? In Anderson, Gary A. and Bockmuehl, Markus (eds.), Creation ex nihilo: Origins, Development, Contemporary Challenges. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
Stenmark, Mikael (2019). Panentheism and its Neighbours. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 85, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn (1988). God and Creation in Christian Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Theophilus of Antioch (1970). Ad Autolycum. Text and translation by Grant, Robert M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, Alan (2004). Creatio ex nihilo and the Spatio-Temporal Dimensions, with special reference to Jürgen Moltmann and D. C. Williams. In Gunton, Colin (ed.), The Doctrine of Creation: Essays in Dogmatics, History and Philosophy. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
Tweed, Thomas (2015). After the Quotidian Turn: Interpretive Categories and Scholarly Trajectories in the Study of Religion since the 1960s. Journal of Religion, 95/3, pp. 361–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Keith (2004). The World as the Body of God: A Panentheistic Metaphor. In Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur (eds.), In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pp. 62–72.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis (1994). Text, Church and World: Biblical Interpretation in Theological Perspective. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Webster, John (2013). Love Is also a Lover of Life: Creatio Ex Nihilo and Creaturely Goodness. Modern Theology, 29/2, pp. 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Stuart (2016). The Place and Limit of Wisdom Revisited. In Jarick, John (ed.), Perspectives on Israelite Wisdom. London: Continuum, pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
White, Lynn (1967). The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis. Science, 155/3767, pp. 1203–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred (1978). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology Corrected, Edited by Griffin, David R. and Sherburne, Donald W.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jonathan (2013). God’s Good World: Reclaiming the Doctrine of Creation. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Zimmerli, Walther (1964). The Place and Limit of the Wisdom in the Framework of the Old Testament Theology. Scottish Journal of Theology, 17/2, pp. 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The PDF of this Element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.