Element contents
Series: Elements in Christian Doctrine
Life after Death after Marx
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 March 2025
Summary
Karl Marx's criticism of religion, as applied to afterlife belief, needs to be taken seriously by Christian theologians. After outlining that belief, the author examines a picture of heaven implicit in much Christian belief and practice which is susceptible to that critique. he sets out an alternative eschatology, centred on the Kingdom of God and the resurrection of the body, which is somewhat less susceptible. He then explores whether a doctrine of the intermediate state can be sustained in the light of Marx's criticisms. He goes on to examine the politics of remembrance in the light of Marxist criticism, and to ask whether Christianity can help compensate for the tragic character of Marxism. A constant theme is that Christian theology should exist in tension with Marx's criticisms, never assuming that it has overcome them completely.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Christian DoctrineOnline ISBN: 9781009526852Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 17 April 2025
References
Augustine, . 2012. The Confessions. Translated by Maria Boulding. San Francisco, Ignatius Press. (Confessions).Google Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. 1988. Dare We Hope That All Men Will Be Saved? With a Short Discourse on Hell. San Francisco, Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. 2001. Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth Century: Its Background and History. London, SCM Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. (1940) 2005. On the Concept of History. Translated by Dennis Redmond. www.marxists.org/reference/archive/benjamin/1940/history.htm.Google Scholar
Coblentz, Jessica. 2020. ‘Depressive Suffering as Tragic Suffering: Theological Insights and Trajectories’ in Kilby, Karen and Davies, Rachel (eds.), Suffering and the Christian Life. Edinburgh, T&T Clark, pp. 155–62.Google Scholar
Corrin, Jay P. 2013. Catholic Progressives in England after Vatican II. Notre Dame, Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Brian. In press. ‘Does the Problem of Evil Rest on a Mistake?’ in International Journal of Philosophy and Theology.Google Scholar
Dyke, Christina van. 2012. ‘I See Dead People: Disembodied Souls and Aquinas’ “Two Person Problem”’ in Marebon, John (ed.), Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 2006. ‘Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching’ in London Review of Books 28(20). www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n20/terry-eagleton/lunging-flailing-mispunching.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 2010. Reason, Faith and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Ludwig. (1843) 1972. The Essence of Christianity. Second edition. Translated by Zawar Hanfi. www.marxists.org/reference/archive/feuerbach/works/essence/index.htm.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. (1917) 1952. Mourning and Melancholia. Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, volume 14. London, Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Gebara, Ivone and Bingemer, Maria Clara. 1989. Mary, Mother of God, Mother of the Poor. Maryknoll, Orbis.Google Scholar
Gorringe, Timothy. 1999. Karl Barth: Against Hegemony. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez, Gustavo. 1996. Selected Writings. Edited by Nickoloff, James B.. London, SCM.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Simon. 2016. ‘Review of Adrian Pabst, “Metaphysics: the Creation of Hierarchy”’ in Journal of Theological Studies 69(10), pp. 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Simon. 2020. Church and Revolution: Continuing the Conversation between Christianity and Marxism. Durham, Sacristy Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt, Simon. 2022. ‘Aquinas on the Immortality of the Soul: Some Reflections’ in Heythrop Journal 64(1), pp. 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, Simon. 2024. ‘McCabe on Marx’ in International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 85(1–2), pp. 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insole, Christopher. 2004. The Politics of Human Frailty: A Theological Defence of Political Liberalism. London, SCM.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter E. 2018. ‘Karl Marx and the Language Sciences: Critical Encounters – Introduction to the Special Issue’ in Language Sciences 70,, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klass, Dennis and Steffen, Edith (eds.). 2018. Continuing Bonds in Bereavement: New Directions in Research and Practice. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Klopenborg, John S. and Verheyden, Joseph (eds.). 2014. The Elijah-Elisha Narrative in the Composition of Luke. Edinburgh, T&T Clark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lash, Nicholas. 1981. A Matter of Hope: A Theologian’s Reflections on the Thought of Karl Marx. London, Darton, Longman & Todd.Google Scholar
Leech, Kenneth. 2001. Through Our Long Exile: Contextual Theology and Urban Experience. London, Darton, Longman & Todd.Google Scholar
Lennon, Kathleen. 2019. ‘Feminist Perspectives on the Body’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/feminist-body/.Google Scholar
Lowy, Michael. 2005. Fire Alarm: Reading Walter Benjamin’s ‘On the Concept of History’. London, Verso.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1843) 2003. On the Jewish Question. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/jewish-question/.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1844) 1970. Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Introduction. Translated by Joseph O’Malley. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Critique_of_Hegels_Philosophy_of_Right.pdf.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1845) 2002. Theses on Feuerbach. Translated by Cyril Smith. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/index.htm.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. (1852) 1937. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Moscow, Progress Press. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-brumaire/.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. (1845) 1932. The German Ideology. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/index.htm.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1848. The Communist Manifesto. www.marxists.org/admin/books/manifesto/Manifesto.pdf.Google Scholar
McCabe, Herbert. 2000. The Teaching of the Catholic Church: A New Catechism of Christian Doctrine. London, Darton, Longman & Todd.Google Scholar
McCabe, Herbert. 2002. ‘The God of Truth’ in God Still Matters. London, Continuum, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
Metz, Johann-Baptist. 2007. Faith in History and Society: Toward a Practical Fundamental Theology. Translated by J. Matthew Ashley. New York, Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
Miranda, José. 1974. Marx and the Bible: A Critique of the Philosophy of Oppression. London, SCM.Google Scholar
Neocleous, Mark. 2005. The Monstrous and the Dead: Burke, Marx, Fascism. Cardiff, University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. 1978. Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity. Translated by William V. Dych. New York, Crossroad.Google Scholar
Schillebeeckx, Edward. 1963. Christ the Sacrament of Encounter with God. London, Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Schillebeeckx, Edward. 1987. Jesus in Our Western Culture: Mysticism, Ethics and Politics. Translated by John Bowden. London, SCM.Google Scholar
Scott, Peter. 2022. ‘Theology After Marxism?’ in Kirkpatrick, Graeme, McMylor, Peter and Fadaee, Simin (eds.), Marxism, Religion and Emancipatory Politics. London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Galen. 2004. ‘Against Narrativity’ in Ratio: An International Journal of Analytic Philosophy 17(4), pp. 428–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. 2004. God and Creation in Christian Theology: Tyranny and Empowerment? Minneapolis, Augsburg Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Denys. 1987. ‘Feuerbach, Marx and Reductivism’ in Davies, Brian (ed.), Language, Meaning and God: Essays in Honour of Herbert McCabe OP. London, Geoffrey Chapman, pp. 92–103.Google Scholar
Turner, Denys . 2022. Dante the Theologian. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, Stephen. 2017. Between Death and Resurrection: A Critical Response to Recent Catholic Debate Concerning the Intermediate State. London, Bloomsbury.Google Scholar