Aaboe, Asger. 1955. “On the Babylonian Origin of Some Hipparchan Parameters.” Centaurus 4: 122–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aaboe, Asger 1964. “On Period Relations in Babylonian Astronomy.” Centaurus 10: 213–31.Google Scholar

Aaboe, Asger 1980. “Observation and Theory in Babylonian Astronomy.” Centaurus 24: 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aaboe, Asger 2001. Episodes from the Early History of Astronomy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agassi, Joseph. 1963. Towards an Historiography of Science. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz. 1934. “Das Weltbild und die Begriffsapparatur.” Erkenntnis 4: 259–87. Reprinted as “The World-Picture and the Conceptual Apparatus,” in Ajdukiewicz 1978, 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajdukiewicz, Kazimierz 1978. Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz: The Scientific World-Perspective and Other Essays 1931–1963, edited by Giedymin, Jerzy, 35–65. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alberti, Benjamin, Fowles, Severin, Holbraad, Martin, Marshall, Yvonne, and Witmore, Christopher. 2011. “Worlds Otherwise: Archaeology, Anthropology and Ontological Difference.” Current Anthropology 52: 896–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, R. E. 1984. The Dialogues of Plato. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Alvargonzález, David. 2013. “Is the History of Science Essentially Whiggish?” History of Science 51: 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amin, Samir. 1989. Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Aspers, Patrik. 2015. “Performing Ontology.” Social Studies of Science 45: 449–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Augé, Marc. 2006. “The Near and the Elsewhere.” In Anthropology in Theory: Issues in Epistemology, edited by Moore, Henrietta L. and Sanders, Todd, 587–97. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Beaulieu, Paul-Alain. 1999. “The Babylonian Man in the Moon.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 51: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaulieu, Paul-Alain, Frahm, Eckart, Horowitz, Wayne, and Steele, John. 2018. The Cuneiform Uranology Texts: Drawing the Constellations. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society Press.Google Scholar

Ben-Dov, Jonathan. 2008. The Head of All Years: Astronomy and Calendars at Qumran in Their Ancient Context. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Dov, Jonathan 2014. “A Jewish Parapegma? Reading 1 Enoch 82 in Roman Egypt.” In Time, Astronomy, and Calendars in the Jewish Tradition, edited by Stern, Sacha and Burnett, Charles, 1–25. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Ben-Dov, Jonathan 2018. “Babylonian Astral Sciences in West-Semitic Sources: The Case of Qumran.” In The Interactions of Ancient Astral Science, by Brown, David, with contributions by Ben-Dov, Jonathan, Falk, Harry, Lloyd, Geoffrey, et al., 138–86. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar

Ben-Dov, Jonathan and Sanders, Seth. 2014. Ancient Jewish Sciences and the History of Knowledge in Second Temple Literature. New York: New York University Press and Institute for the Study of the Ancient World.Google Scholar

Benthall, Jonathan. 2021. “The Critique of Ethnocentrism in Retrospect.” Anthropology Today 37: 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1982. Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Bernal, Martin. 1992. “Animadversions on the Origins of Western Science.” Isis 83: 596–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berthelot, Marcellin and Ruelle, Charles-Émile. 1887–88. Collection des anciens alchemistes grecs. Paris: Georges Steinheil.Google Scholar

Bezold, Carl and Boll, Franz. 1911. Reflexe astrologischer Keilinschriften bei griechischen Schriftsteller. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar

Biggs, Robert D. 1971. “An Archaic Sumerian Version of the Kesh Temple Hymn from Tell Abū Ṣalābīkh.” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 61: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biggs, Robert D. 1990. “Medizin.” Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 3: 625–26.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. 2005. Truth: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blackburn, Simon 2010. “Conceptual Schemes.” In Relativism: A Contemporary Anthology, edited by Krausz, Michael, 164–82. New York: Columbia University Press. First published in Truth: A Guide, pp. 199–204.Google Scholar

Böck, Barbara. 2009. “On Medical Technology in Ancient Mesopotamia.” In Advances in Mesopotamian Medicine from Hammurabi to Hippocrates: Proceedings of the International Conference “Oeil malade et mauvais oeil,” Collège de France, Paris, June 23, 2006, edited by Attia, Annie and Buisson, Gilles, 105–28. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Böck, Barbara 2011. “Sourcing, Organizing, and Administering Medicinal Ingredients.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture, edited by Radner, Karen and Robson, Eleanor, 690–705. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Böck, Barbara 2015. Shaping Texts and Text Genres: On the Drug Lore of Babylonian Practitioners of Medicine. Barcelona: Editorial Ausa.Google Scholar

Boghossian, Paul A. 2006. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohak, Gideon and Geller, Mark. 2013. “Babylonian Astrology in the Cairo Genizah.” In Envisioning Judaism: Studies in Honor of Peter Schäfer on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, edited by Boustan, Raʻanan S., Herrmann, Klaus, Leicht, Reimund, Reed, Annette Yoshiko, and Veltri, Giuseppe, 607–22. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Borrelli, Noemi and Escobar, Eduardo A.. 2022. “Crafting Purity in Assyro-Babylonian Procedures: Time, Space, and the Material World.” Arys. Antigüedad: religiones y sociedades 20: 27–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowen, Alan C. 2007. “The Demarcation of Physical Theory and Astronomy by Geminus and Ptolemy.” Perspectives on Science 15: 327–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowen, Alan C. 2013. “Three Introductions to Celestial Science in the First Century BC.” In Writing Science: Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece, edited by Asper, Markus, 299–327. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowen, Alan C. and Rochberg, Francesca, eds. 2020. Hellenistic Astronomy: The Science in Its Contexts. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. 2009. “Rethinking Jewish Christianity: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category.” Jewish Quarterly Review 99: 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis. 1969. “On the Construction of Column B in System A of the Astronomical Cuneiform Texts.” Centaurus 14: 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 1980. “Some Investigations on the Ephemerides of the Babylonian Moon Texts, System A.” Centaurus 24: 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 1990. “On the Babylonian Lunar Theory A: Construction of Column Φ from Horizontal Observations.” Centaurus 33: 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 1997. Zur Entstehung der babylonischen Mondtheorie: Beobachtung und theoretische Berechnung von Mondphasen. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 1999. “Goal Year Tablets: Lunar Data and Predictions.” In Ancient Astronomy and Celestial Divination, edited by Swerdlow, Noel M., 149–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2003. “The Path of the Moon, the Rising Points of the Sun, and the Oblique Great Circle on the Celestial Sphere.” Centaurus 45: 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2005. “The ‘Days in Excess’ from MUL.APIN: On the ‘First Intercalation’ and ‘Water Clock’ Schemes from MUL.APIN.” Centaurus 47: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2007. “The 360-Day Year in Mesopotamia.” In Calendars and Years: Astronomy and Time in Ancient Mesopotamia, edited by Steele, John M., 83–100. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2010a. “Prediction of Days and Pattern of the Babylonian Lunar Six.” Archiv für Orientforschung 52: 156–78.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2010b. “Methods for Understanding and Reconstructing Babylonian Predicting Rules.” In Writings of Early Scholars in the Ancient Near East, Egypt, Rome, and Greece, edited by Imhausen, Annette and Pommerening, Tanja, 277–97. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2016. “Otto Neugebauer’s Visits to Copenhagen and His Connection to Denmark.” In A Mathematician’s Journeys: Otto Neugebauer and the Modern Transformations of Ancient Science, edited by Jones, Alexander, Proust, Christine, and Steele, John M., 107–26. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2021. “The Babylonian Dodecatemoria and Calendar Texts: Inverse Schemes for Determining Position and Times for the Schematic Sun and Moon.” Aestimatio 2, no. 1: 43–64.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis 2022. “Babylonian House Numbers and Squares of Zodiacal Signs: The Origin of the Quadruplicities, Part I.” Aestimatio 2, no. 2: 43–58.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis and Hunger, Hermann. 2002. “TU 11: A Collection of Rules for the Prediction of Lunar Phases and of Month Lengths.” SCIAMVS 3: 3–90.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis and Hunger, Hermann 2008. “BM 42282+42294 and the Goal-Year Method.” SCIAMVS 9: 3–23.Google Scholar

Brack-Bernsen, Lis and Steele, John M.. 2004. “Babylonian Mathemagics: Two Mathematical Astronomical-Astrological Texts.” In Studies in the History of the Exact Sciences in Honour of David Pingree, edited by Burnett, Charles, Hogendijk, Jan P., Plofker, Kim, and Yano, Michio, 95–125. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breger, Gil. 2022. “Ziqpu-Stars and Cuneiform Knowledge: Meaning, Applications, Contexts.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Brentjes, Sonja. 2010. The Mathematical Sciences in Safavid Iran: Questions and Perspectives.” In Muslim Cultures in the Indo-Iranian World during the Early-Modern and Modern Periods, edited by Hermann, Denis, 325–402. Berlin: F. Speziale.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brentjes, Sonja 2018. Teaching and Learning the Sciences in Islamicate Societies (800–1700). Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brentjes, Sonja and Renn, Jürgen, eds. 2016. Globalization of Knowledge in the Post-Antique Mediterranean, 700–1500. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bretelle-Establet, Florence, ed. 2010. Looking at It from Asia: The Processes That Shaped the Sources of History of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P. 1987. “The Structure and Parameters of Column φ.” In From Ancient Omens to Statistical Mechanics: Essays on the Exact Sciences Presented to Asger Aaboe, edited by Lennart Berggren, John and Goldstein, Bernard R., 23–26. Copenhagen: University Library.Google Scholar

Britton, John P. 1989. “An Early Function for Eclipse Magnitudes in Babylonian Astronomy.” Centaurus 32: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P. 1990. “A Tale of Two Cycles: Remarks on Column φ.” Centaurus 33: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P. 1993a. “Scientific Astronomy in Pre-Seleucid Babylon.” In Die Rolle der Astronomie in den Kulturen Mesopotamiens, edited by Galter, Hannes D., 61–76. Graz: GrazKult.Google Scholar

Britton, John P. 1993b. “A Table of Fourth Powers and Related Texts from Seleucid Babylon.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 43–45: 71–88.Google Scholar

Britton, John P. 1998. “Planetary Theory in Babylon.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 29: 381–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P. 2002. “Treatments of Annual Phenomena in Cuneiform Sources.” In Under One Sky: Astronomy and Mathematics in the Ancient Near East, edited by Steele, John M. and Imhausen, Annette, 21–78. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.Google Scholar

Britton, John P. 2007a. “Calendars, Intercalations and Year-Lengths in Mesopotamian Astronomy.” In Calendars and Years: Astronomy and Time in the Ancient Near East, edited by Steele, John M., 115–32. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

Britton, John P. 2007b. “Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part I. Empirical Elements for Modeling Lunar and Solar Anomalies.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 61: 83–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P. 2008. “Remarks on Strassmaier Cambyses 400.” In From the Banks of the Euphrates: Studies in Honor of Alice Slotsky, edited by Ross, Micah, 7–33. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

Britton, John P. 2009. “Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part II. Treatments of Lunar Anomaly.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63: 357–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P. 2010. “Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part III. The Introduction of the Uniform Zodiac.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 64: 617–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P., Proust, Christine, and Shnider, Steve. 2011. “Plimpton 322: A Review and a Different Perspective.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 65: 519–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britton, John P. and Walker, C. B. F.. 1991. “A Fourth Century Babylonian Model for Venus: BM 33552.” Centaurus 34: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, David. 2000. Mesopotamian Planetary Astronomy-Astrology. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, David, Ben-Dov, Jonathan, Falk, Harry, et al. 2018. The Interactions of Ancient Astral Science. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar

Brown, David, Fermor, John, and Walker, Christopher. 1999/2000. “The Water-Clock in Mesopotamia.” Archiv für Orientforschung 46/47: 130–48.Google Scholar

Brown, Donald E. 1991. Human Universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Donald E. 2004. “Human Universals, Human Nature, and Human Culture.” Daedalus 133: 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnet, John. 1908. Early Greek Philosophy. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar

Butterfield, Herbert. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell.Google Scholar

Bury, Robert Gregg. 1929. Plato: Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus, Epistles. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Candea, Matei. 2010. “For the Motion.” Critique of Anthropology 30, no. 2: 172–79.Google Scholar

Carrithers, Michael, Candea, Matei, Sykes, Karen, Holbraad, Martin, and Venkatesan, Soumhya, eds. 2010. “Ontology Is Just Another Word for Culture: Motion Tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory, University of Manchester.” Critique of Anthropology 30, no. 2: 152–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. (1946) 1953. Language and Myth. Translated by Susanne Langer. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Cat, Jordi. 2021. “The Unity of Science.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Fall 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/scientific-unity.Google Scholar

Chang, Hasok. 2012. Is Water H2O?: Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Hasok 2022. Realism for Realistic People: A New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chemla, Karine. 2012. The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chicago Assyrian Dictionary. 1956–2010. Vols. 1–21. Chicago: University of Chicago, Oriental Institute.Google Scholar

Chumley, Lily. 2017. “Qualia and Ontology: Language, Semiotics, and Materiality; An Introduction.” Signs and Society 5, no. S1: S1–S20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Civil, Miguel. 1969. The Series lú = ša and Related Texts: Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon (MSL), XII. With the collaboration of R. D. Biggs, Hans G. Güterbock, Hans J. Nissen, and E. Reiner. Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar

Cladis, Mark S. 1991. “Durkheim, Goodman, Rorty, and Mild-Mannered Pragmatism: French and American Style.” Stanford French Review 15: 139–63.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1945. The Idea of Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Harry. 2008. “Actors’ and Analysts’ Categories in the Social Analysis of Science.” In Clashes of Knowledge. Knowledge and Space, vol. 1, edited by Meusburger, Peter, Welker, Michael, and Wunder, Edgar, 101–10. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Conant, James and Haugeland, John, eds. 2000. The Road since Structure: Thomas S. Kuhn. Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cooke, Roger L. 1997. The History of Mathematics: A Brief Course. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copenhaver, Brian. 1988. “Natural Philosophy: Astrology and Magic.” In The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, edited by Schmitt, Charles B., Skinner, Quentin, Kessler, Eckhard, and Kraye, Jill, 264–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisostomo, Jay. 2018. “Language, Translation, and Commentary in Cuneiform Scribal Practice.” Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History 5: 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisostomo, Jay 2019. Translation as Scholarship: Language, Writing, and Bilingual Education in Ancient Babylonia. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cruse, D. A. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cumont, Franz, Boll, Franz, and Kroll, Wilhelm, eds. 1898–1953. Catalogus Codicum Astrologorum Graecorum. 12 vols. Brussels: Lamertin.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine. 2016. “History of Science without ‘Structure.’” In Kuhn’s “Structure of Scientific Revolutions” at Fifty: Reflections on a Science Classic, edited by Richards, Robert J. and Daston, Lorraine, 115–32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1973. “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” Proceedings and Addresses by the American Philosophical Association 43: 5–20.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald 2005. Truth, Language and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dear, Peter. 2005. “What Is the History of Science the History Of? Early Modern Roots of the Ideology of Modern Science.” Isis 96: 390–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dear, Peter 2012. “Science Is Dead: Long Live Science.” Osiris 27: 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Declos, Alexandre. 2019. “Goodman’s Many Worlds.” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 7: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Jong, Teije. 2016. “The Players and the Field.” In A Mathematician’s Journeys: Otto Neugebauer and the Modern Transformations of Ancient Science, edited by Jones, Alexander, Proust, Christine, and Steele, John M., 265–302. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Jong, Teije 2019. “A Study of Babylonian Planetary Theory i: The Outer Planets.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 73: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Zorzi, Nicla. 2014. La Serie Teratomantica Šumma Izbu: Testo, Tradizione, Orizzonti Culturali, 2 vols. Padua: S.A.R.G.O.N. Editrice e Libreria.Google Scholar

De Zorzi, Nicla 2017. “Teratomancy at Tiguananum: Structure, Hermeneutics and ‘Weltanschauung’ of a Northern Mesopotamian Omen Corpus.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 69: 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaporte, François, ed. 2000. A Vital Rationalist: Selected Writings from Georges Canguilhem. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Delnero, Paul. 2010. “Sumerian Literary Catalogues and the Scribal Curriculum.” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 100: 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descola, Philippe. [1986] 1994. In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia. Translated by Scott, Nora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Descola, Philippe 2010. “Cognition, Perception and Worlding.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 35: 334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descola, Philippe 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Translated by Lloyd, Janet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descola, Philippe 2014. “Modes of Being and Forms of Predication.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4: 271–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descola, Philippe and Pálsso, Gísli, eds. 1996. Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Diakonoff, Igor M. 1961. “More on Assyriology.” Current Anthropology 2: 390–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drawnel, Henryk. 2011. The Aramaic Astronomical Book (4Q208–4Q211) from Qumran: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Drower, Ethel Stefana. 1949. The Book of the Zodiac (Sfar Malwasia). London: Brill.Google Scholar

Dutra, Bruce P. 1999. “The Problem of Conflicting Truths and Nelson Goodman’s Ontological Pluralism.” PhD diss., Purdue University.Google Scholar

Elgin, Catherine Z. 1984. “Goodman’s Rigorous Relativism.” Journal of Thought 19: 36–45.Google Scholar

Elgin, Catherine Z. 2000. “Worldmaker: Nelson Goodman.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, Brian David. 1985. “What Science Aims to Do.” In Images of Science, edited by Churchland, Paul M. and Hooker, Clifford A., 48–74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian David. 1988. “Internal Realism.” Synthese 76: 409–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellison, Ralph. 1952. Invisible Man. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Epping, Joseph, and Strassmaier, Johann. 1889. Astronomisches aus Babylon, oder das Wissen der Chaldäer über den gestirnten Himmel: Stimmen aus Maria-Laach. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder’sche Verlagshandlung.Google Scholar

Escobar, Eduardo A. 2017. “Technology as Knowledge: Cuneiform Technical Recipes and the Material World.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Escobar, Eduardo A. 2018. “Bricoleurs in Babylonia: The Scribes of Enūma Anu Enlil.” In “The Scaffolding of Our Thoughts”: Essays on Assyriology and the History of Science in Honor of Francesca Rochberg, edited by Jay Crisostomo, C., Escobar, Eduardo A., Tanaka, Terri, and Veldhuis, Niek, 264–85. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Escobar, Eduardo A. 2019a. “Glassmaking as Scribal Craft.” In A Wonder to Behold: Craftsmanship and the Creation of Babylon’s Ishtar Gate, edited by Amrhein, Anastasia, Fitzgerald, Clare, and Knott, Elizabeth, 119–125. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Escobar, Eduardo A. 2019b. “Number Culture: Old Babylonian Mathematics at Yale.” In Ancient Mesopotamia Speaks: Highlights of the Yale Babylonian Collection, edited by Lassen, Agnete W., Frahm, Eckart, and Wagensonner, Klaus, 185–91. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Escobar, Eduardo A. 2022. “Colour and Cultural Maintenance in Ancient Babylonia: Contextualizing Wool Dye Recipe BM 62788 + BM 82978.” Technai 13: 67–84.Google Scholar

Escobar, Eduardo A. 2023. “Tappūtī-Bēlet-Ekallim (fl. 1200 bce): A Cuneiform Tablet on Middle Assyrian Perfumery (c. 1200 bce).” In Women in the History of Science: A Sourcebook, edited by Wills, Hannah, Harrison, Sadie, Jones, Erika, Lawrence-Mackey, Farrah, and Martin, Rebecca, 15–22. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ETCSL project. 2006. “Enki and the World Order.” http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/etcsl.cgi?text=t.1.1.3#.Google Scholar

Evans, James C. 2020. “The Ptolemaic Planetary Hypotheses.” In Hellenistic Astronomy: The Science in Its Contexts, edited by Bowen, Alan C. and Rochberg, Francesca, 112–24. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Evans, James C., and Berggren, J. Lennart. 2006. Geminos’s Introduction to the Phenomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Survey of Astronomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fincke, Jeanette C. 2004. “The British Museum’s Ashurbanipal Library Project.” Iraq 66: 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkel, Irving L. 1988. “Adad-apla-iddina, Esagil-kīn-apli and the Series SA.GIG.” In A Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, edited by Liechty, Erle, Ellis, Maria de J., and Gerardi, Pamela, 143–59. Philadelphia: University Museum.Google Scholar

Finkel, Irving L. 2000. “On Late Babylonian Medical Training.” In Wisdom, God and Literature: Studies in Assyriology in Honor of W. G. Lambert, edited by George, Andrew R. and Finkel, Irving L., 137–224. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

Finkel, Irving L. 2019. “Assurbanipal’s Library: An Overview.” In Libraries before Alexandria: Ancient Near Eastern Traditions, edited by Ryholt, Kim and Barjamovic, Gojko, 367–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finkel, Irving L., and Geller, Markham J., eds. 2007. Disease in Babylonia. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkel, Irving L., and Reade, Julian E.. 1996. “Assyrian Hieroglyphs.” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 86: 244–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkel, Irving L., and Seymour, Michael J., eds. 2009. Babylon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, J. J. 1962. “Mesopotamia.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 21: 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleck, Ludwik. 1935. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Edited and with a foreword by Schäfer, Lothar and Schnelle, Thomas. Basel: Benno Schwabe.Google Scholar

Fleck, Ludwik 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact, edited by Trenn, Thaddeus J. and Merton, Robert K.. Translated by Bradley, Fred and Trenn, Thaddeus J.. Foreword by Kuhn, Thomas S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Forster, E. M. 1923. Pharos and Pharillion. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Frahm, Eckart. 2005. “A Note on Nabû-zuqup-kenu.” N.A.B.U. 1.Google Scholar

Frahm, Eckart 2011a. Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries: Origins of Interpretation. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.Google Scholar

Frahm, Eckart 2011b. “Keeping Company with Men of Learning: The King as Scholar.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture, edited by Radner, Karen and Robson, Eleanor, 508–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Frede, Michael, and Charles, David. 2001. Aristotle Metaphysics Lambda. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Friberg, Jöran. 2007. A Remarkable Collection of Babylonian Mathematical Texts. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friberg, Jöran 2008. “A Remarkable Collection of Babylonian Mathematical Texts.” Notices of the American Mathematical Society 55: 1076–86.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. (1973) 2000. Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford (1983) 2000. Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 1984. “Distinguished Lecture: Anti-Anti-Relativism.” American Anthropologist 86: 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 1986. “The Uses of Diversity.” Michigan Quarterly Review 25, no. 1: 105–23. Also printed in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 7: 253–75.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 2000. Available Light. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 2005. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” Daedalus 134: 56–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 2010. Life among the Anthros, and Other Essays, edited by Inglis, Fred. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gehlken, Erlend. 2005. “Die Adad-Tafeln der Omenserie Enuma Anu Enlil. Teil 1: Einführung.” Baghdader Mitteilungen 36: 235–73.Google Scholar

Geller, Markham J. 1999–2000. “The Landscape of the Netherworld.” In Landscapes: Territories, Frontiers and Horizons in the Ancient Near East. Papers Presented to the XLIV Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Venezia, 7–11 July 1997, edited by Milano, L., Martino, S. de, Fales, F. M., and Lanfranchi, G. B., 41–49. Padua: Sargon.Google Scholar

Geller, Markham J. 2000. Review of Alice Slotsky, The Bourse of Babylon: Market Quotations in the Astronomical Diaries of Babylonia, 1997. Orientalische Literaturzeichnung 95: 410–12.Google Scholar

Geller, Markham J. 2010. Ancient Babylonian Medicine: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geller, Markham J. 2018. “The Exorcist’s Manual (KAR 44).” In Assyrian and Babylonian Scholarly Text Catalogues: Medicine, Magic and Divination, edited by Steinert, Ulrike, 292–304. Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geller, Markham J. 2020. “An Apothecary’s Handbook.” Le journal des medecines cuneiformes 35: 1–33.Google Scholar

Geller, Markham J. 2022. “Second Order Lexicography.” Archiv für Orientforschung 55: 87–95.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest. 1974. Legitimation of Belief. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest 1979. Spectacles and Predicaments: Essays in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest 1982. “Relativism and Universals.” In Rationality and Relativism, edited by Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven, 188–200. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gellner, Ernest 1985. Relativism and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

George, Andrew R. 2010. “The Epic of Gilgamesh.” In The Cambridge Companion the the Epic, edited by Bates, Catherine, 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

George, Andrew R., and Al-Rawi, Farouk N. H.. 1991. “Enūma Anu Enlil XIV and Other Early Astronomical Tables.” Archiv für Orientforschung 38/39: 52–73.Google Scholar

Geminus, . 2006. Geminos’ Introduction to the Phenomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Survey of Astronomy. Edited and translated by Evans, James and Berggren, J. Lennart. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

George, Andrew. 1986. Sennacherib and the Tablet of Destinies. Iraq 48: 133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Andrew 1992. Babylonian Topographical Texts. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

George, Andrew 1999a. The Epic of Gilgamesh: The Babylonian Epic Poem and Other Akkadian and Sumerian Texts. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

George, Andrew 1999b. “E-SANGIL and E-TEMEN-ANKI, the Archetypal Cult-Centre.” In Babylon: Focus mesopotamischer Geschichte, Wiege früher Gelehrsamkeit, Mythos in der Moderne, edited by Renger, Johannes, 1–14. Saarbrücken: SDV Saarbrücken.Google Scholar

Getachew, Adom. 2019. Worldmaking after the Rise and Fall of Self-Determination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann. 2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goetze, Albrecht. 1959. “The 38th Tablet of the Series á-A-naqu.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 13: 120–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Bernard R. 1967. “The Arabic Version of Ptolemy’s Planetary Hypotheses.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 57: 3–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Bernard R. 1980. “The Status of Models in Ancient and Medieval Astronomy.” Centaurus 24: 132–47.Google Scholar

Goldstein, Bernard R. 1997. “Saving the Phenomena: The Background to Ptolemy’s Planetary Theory.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 28: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Bernard R. 2003. “Ancient and Medieval Values for the Mean Synodic Month.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 34: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, C. 2000. “Egypt and Mesopotamia.” In Reader’s Guide to the History of Science, edited by Hessenbruch, Arne, 195–97. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar

Golinski, Jan. 2012. “Is It Time to Forget Science? Reflections on Singular Science and Its History.” Osiris 27, no. 1: 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gomperz, Theodor. (1893) 1911. Griechische Denker: Eine Geschichte der antiken Philosophie. 3 vols. 3rd ed. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson. (1951) 1977. The Structure of Appearance. 3rd ed. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Nelson (1954) 1983. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1960. “The Way the World Is.” The Review of Metaphysics 14: 48–56. Republished in Peter J. McCormick, ed., Starmaking: Realism, Anti-Realism, and Irrealism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1996), 3–10.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1968. Languages of Art. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson, ed. 1972. Problems and Projects. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson. 1975. “Words, Works, Worlds.” Erkenntnis 9: 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1983. “Notes on the Well-Made World.” Erkenntnis 19: 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1984. Of Mind and Other Matters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson (1989) 2010. “Just the Facts, Ma’am!” In Relativism: Interpretation and Confrontation, edited by Krausz, Michael, 80–85. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. Republished in Michael Krausz, ed., Relativism: A Contemporary Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press (2010), pp. 80–85.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1993. “On Some Worldly Worries.” Synthese 96: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1996a. “On Starmaking.” In Starmaking: Realism, Anti-Realism and Irrealism, edited by McCormick, Peter J., 143–47. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson 1996b. “The Way the World Is.” In Starmaking: Realism, Anti-Realism and Irrealism, edited by McCormick, Peter J., 3–10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson, and Elgin, Catherine Z.. 1988. Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson, and Willard von Orman, Quine. 1947. “Steps toward a Constructive Nominalism.” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 12: 105–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goody, Jack. (1977) 1995. Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gosselin, Mia. 1990. Nominalism and Contemporary Nominalism: Ontological and Epistemological Implications of the Work of W. V. O. Quine and of N. Goodman. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graeber, David. 2015. “Radical Alterity Is Just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’: A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony. 1999. Cardano’s Cosmos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gray, J. M. K., and Steele, John M.. 2008. “Studies on Babylonian Goal-Year Astronomy I: A Comparison between Planetary Data in Goal-Year Texts, Almanacs and Normal Star Almanacs.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 62: 553–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, J. M. K., and Steele, John M. 2009. “Studies on Babylonian Goal-Year Astronomy II: The Babylonian Calendar and Goal-Year Methods of Prediction.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63: 611–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenfield, Jonas, and Sokoloff, Alan. 1989. “Astrological and Related Omen Texts in Jewish Palestinian Aramaic.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 48: 201–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumplowicz, Ludwig. 1879. Das Recht der Nationalität und Sprachen in Oesterreich-Ungarn. Innsbruck: Wagner’sche Universitäts Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Güterbock, H. G. 1987. “Hittite Liver Models.” In Language, Literature, and History: Philological and Historical Studies Presented to Erica Reiner, edited by Rochberg-Halton, Francesca, 147–53. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Güterbock, H. G. 1988. “Bilingual Moon Omens from Boghazköy.” In A Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, edited by Leichty, Erle, Ellis, Maria de J., and Gerardi, Pamela, 161–74. Philadelphia: University Museum.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. Aristotle. VI. On the Heavens. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press and William Heinemman Ltd.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian. 1988. “The Participant Irrealist at Large in the Laboratory.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, Ian 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hallo, William H. 2010. The World’s Oldest Literature: Studies in Sumerian Belles-Lettres. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanegraaff, Wouter J. 2012. Esotericism and the Academy: Rejected Knowledge in Western Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanks, William F. and Severi, Carlo. 2014. “Translating Worlds: The Epistemological Space of Translation.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4, no. 14: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, Norwood Russell. 1958. Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hansson, Sven Ove. 2009. “Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 237–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hansson, Sven Ove. 2013. “Defining Pseudoscience and Science.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Pigliucci, Massimo and Boudry, Maarten, 61–78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism as a Site of Discourse on the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14: 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, Oren, and Métraux, Alexandre, eds. 2013. “Approaches, Styles and Narratives: Reflections on Doing History of Science.” Science in Context 26: 553–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Peter. 2006. “Disjoining Wisdom and Knowledge: Science, Theology, and the Making of Western Modernity.” In Wisdom or Knowledge? Science, Theology, and Cultural Dynamics, edited by Drees, Willem B., Meisinger, Hubert, and Liana, Zbigniew, 51–72. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar

Harrison, Peter 2017. “Science and Secularization.” Intellectual History Review 27: 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Peter 2019. “Introduction.” In Science without God? Rethinking the History of Scientific Naturalism, edited by Harrison, Peter and Roberts, Jon H., 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Peter, and Roberts, Jon H., eds. 2019. Science without God? Rethinking the History of Scientific Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haubold, Johannes, Steele, John, and Stevens, Kathryn. 2019. Keeping Watch in Babylon: The Astronomical Diaries in Context. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heeßel, Nils P. 2000. Babylonisch-Assyrische Diagnostik. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.Google Scholar

Heeßel, Nils P. 2005. “Stein, Pflanze und Holz: Ein neuer Text zur ‘medizinischen Astrologie.’” Orientalia 74: 1–22.Google Scholar

Heeßel, Nils P. 2008. “Astrological Medicine in Babylonia.” In Astro-Medicine, Astrology and Medicine, East and West, edited by Akasoy, Anna, Burnett, Charles, and Yoeli-Tlalim, Ronit, 1–16. Florence: Sismel–Edizioni del Galluzzo.Google Scholar

Heeßel, Nils P. 2021. Divinatorische Texte III: Astrologische Omina. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar

Heimpel, Wolfgang. 1986. “The Sun at Night and the Doors of Heaven in Babylonian Texts.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 38: 127–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellman, Geoffrey. 1977. Introduction to Nelson Goodman, The Structure of Appearance, 3rd ed., xix–xlvii. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Henare, Amiria, Holbraad, Martin, and Wastell, Sari, eds. 2007. Thinking through Things: Theorizing Artefacts Ethnographically. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henning, W. B. 1942. “An Astronomical Chapter of the Bundahishn.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 74: 229–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hessenbruch, Arne. 2000. Reader’s Guide to the History of Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heywood, Paolo. 2012. “Anthropology and What There Is: Reflections on ‘Ontology.’” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 30: 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heywood, Paolo 2022. “The Ontological Turn.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn.Google Scholar

Hiley, David R., Bohman, James, and Shusterman, Richard. 1991. The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary S.. 1997. Substance: Its Nature and Existence. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holbraad, Martin. 2012. Truth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holbraad, Martin, and Pedersen, Morten Axel. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Brooke. 2019. “On Stoic Sympathy: Cosmobiology and the Life of Nature.” In Antiquities beyond Humanism, edited by Bianchi, Emanuela, Brill, Sara, and Holmes, Brooke, 239–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Wayne. 1994. “Two New Ziqpu-Star Texts and Stellar Circles.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 46: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horowitz, Wayne. (1998) 2017. Mesopotamian Cosmic Geography. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Wayne. 2000. “Astral Tablets in the Hermitage Saint Petersburg.” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 90: 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horowitz, Wayne. 2014. The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts. Vienna: Institut für Orientalistik der Universität Wien.Google Scholar

Horton, Robin. 1967a. “African Traditional Thought and Western Science. Part i: From Tradition to Science.” Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 37: 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horton, Robin 1967b. “African Traditional Thought and Western Science. Part ii: The ‘Closed’ and ‘Open’ Predicaments.” Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 37: 155–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horton, Robin 1982. “Tradition and Modernity Revisited.” In Rationality and Relativism, edited by Hollis, Martin and Lukes, Steven, 201–60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Horton, Robin 1997. Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West: Essays on Magic, Religion and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hoskin, Michael. 1998. “Olaf Pedersen 1920–1998.” Astronomy and Geophysics 39, no. 5: 5.33–5.34.Google Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 1990. “Kuhn’s Conception of Incommensurability.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21: 481–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyningen-Huene, Paul 1993. Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hoyrup, Jens. 1990. “Algebra and Naive Geometry: An Investigation of Some Basic Aspects of Old Babylonian Mathematical Thought i.” Altorientalische Forschungen 17: 27–69.Google Scholar

Hoyrup, Jens 2017. Algebra in Cuneiform: Introduction to an Old Babylonian Geometrical Technique. Berlin: Edition Open Access, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.Google Scholar

Hsia, Florence C. 2009. Sojourners in a Strange Land: Jesuits and Their Scientific Missions in Late Imperial China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hsia, Florence C. 2017. “Astronomy after the Deluge.” In Science in the Archives: Pasts, Presents, Futures, edited by Daston, Lorraine, 17–52. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, R. I. G. 1997. “Models and Representation.” Philosophy of Science 64, no. S4: S325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunger, Hermann. 1968. Babylonische und Assyrische Kolophone. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Verlag Butzon & Bercker Kevelaer.Google Scholar

Hunger, Hermann 1976. “Astrologische Wettervorhersagen.” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 66: 234–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunger, Hermann 1992. Astrological Reports to Assyrian Kings. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar

Hunger, Hermann 1999. “Non-Mathematical Astronomical Texts and Their Relationships.” In Ancient Astronomy and Celestial Divination, edited by Swerdlow, Noel M., 77–96. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hunger, Hermann 2001. Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia. Vol. 5: Lunar and Planetary Texts. Vienna: Österreichische Akkademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Hunger, Hermann 2006. Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia. Vol. 6: Goal Year Texts. Vienna: Österreichische Akkademie der Wissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunger, Hermann 2022. Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia. Vol. 4: Undated Diaries and Addenda, Including Materials by A. J. Sachs.Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Hunger, Hermann, and de Jong., Teije 2014. “Almanac W22340A from Uruk: The Last Datable Cuneiform Tablet.” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und Vorderasiatische Archäologie 104: 182–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunger, Hermann, and Pingree, David. 1999. Astral Sciences in Mesopotamia. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunger, Hermann, and Sachs, Abraham J.. 2001. Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia. Vol. 5: Lunar and Planetary Texts. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien.Google Scholar

Hunger, Hermann, and Steele, John. 2019. The Babylonian Astronomical Compendium MUL.APIN. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hyspicles, . Anaphorikos. 1966. Edited and translated by Falco, Vittorio de and Krause, Max with Neugebauer, Otto. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, Katerina. 2006. “Stoic Logic.” In A Companion to Ancient Philosophy, edited by Louise Gill, Mary and Pellegrin, Pierre, 505–29. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Imhausen, Annette, and Pommerening, Tanja, eds. 2010. Writings of Early Scholars in the Ancient Near East, Egypt, Rome, and Greece. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Imhausen, Annette, and Pommerening, Tanja 2016. Translating Writings of Early Scholars in the Ancient Near East, Egypt, Greece and Rome: Methodological Aspects with Examples. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglis, David, and Bone, John. 2006. “Boundary Maintenance, Border Crossing and the Nature/Culture Divide.” European Journal of Social Theory 9: 272–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jacobus, Helen. 2014. “Greco-Roman Zodiac Sundials and Their Links to a Qumran Calendar (4Q208–4Q209).” Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 14: 67–81.Google Scholar

Jardine, Nicholas. 1986. The Fortunes of Inquiry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Jardine, Nicholas 2000. “Uses and Abuses of Anachronism in the History of Science.” History of Science 38: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jardine, Nicholas 2019. “Turning to Ontology in Studies of Distant Sciences.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9: 172–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Peter. 1890. Die Kosmologie der Babylonier. Strasbourg: K. J. Trübner.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. Cale, and Stavru, Alessandro, eds. 2019. Visualizing the Invisible with the Human Body: Physiognomy and Ekphrasis in the Ancient World. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Alexander. 1991. “The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy.” Isis 82: 440–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Alexander 1996. “On Babylonian Astronomy and Its Greek Metamorphoses.” In Tradition, Transmission, and Transformation, edited by Rajep, F. Jamil and Rajep, Sally P., with Livesey, Steven, 139–55. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jones, Alexander 1999. Astronomical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus. Vols. 1–2. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Jones, Alexander 2016. “Translating Greek Astronomy: Theon of Smyrna on the Apparent Motions of the Planets.” In Translating Writings of Early Scholars in the Ancient Near East, Egypt, Greece and Rome: Methodological Aspects with Examples, edited by Imhausen, Annette and Pommerening, Tanja, 465–505. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Alexander, Proust, Christine, and Steele, John M., eds. 2016. A Mathematician’s Journeys: Otto Neugebauer and the Modern Transformations of Ancient Science. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Alexander and Steele, John M.. 2011. “A New Discovery of a Component of Greek Astrology in Babylonian Tablets: The ‘Terms.’” ISAW Papers 1. http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/1.Google Scholar

Jones, Alexander and Steele, John M. 2018. “Diodorus on the Chaldeans.” In “The Scaffolding of Our Thoughts”: Essays on Assyriology and the History of Science in Honor of Francesca Rochberg, edited by Crisostomo, C. Jay, Escobar, Eduardo A., Tanaka, Terri, and Veldhuis, Niek, 333–52. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Jordheim, Helge and Shaw, David Gary. 2020. “History of Knowledge.” Special issue, History and Theory 59, no. 4.Google Scholar

Katz, Dina. 2003. The Image of the Netherworld in the Sumerian Sources. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, Donald R. (2002) 2017. The Descent of Ideas: The History of Intellectual History. Farnham: Ashgate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, L. W. 1901. Cuneiform Texts from Babylonian Tablets in the British Museum, Vol. 13. London: The Trustees of the British Museum.Google Scholar

King, L. W. 1902. The Seven Tablets of Creation, or The Babylonian and Assyrian Legends concerning the Creation of the World and of Mankind. London: Luzac.Google Scholar

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M.. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, Johannes. 1989. Neue Untersuchungen zur Topographie des babylonischen Fixternhimmels. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar

Koch, Ulla Susanne. 2005. Secrets of Extispicy: The Chapter Multābiltu of the Babylonian Extispicy Series and Niṣirti Bārûti Texts Mainly from Aššurbanipal’s Library. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.Google Scholar

Koch-Westenholz, Ulla. 1993. “Mesopotamian Astrology at Hattusas.” In Die Rolle der Astronomie in den Kulturen Mesopotamiens, edited by Galter, Hannes D., 231–46. Graz: GrazKult.Google Scholar

Koch-Westenholz, Ulla 1995. Mesopotamian Astrology: An Introduction to Babylonian and Assyrian Celestial Divination. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

Koch-Westenholz, Ulla 2000. Babylonian Liver Omens: The Chapters Manzazu, Padanu and Pan Takalti of the Babylonian Extispicy Series Mainly from Assurbanipals’s Library. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar

Köcher, Franz. 1963–. Die babylonisch-assyrische Medizin in Texten und Untersuchungen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kohn, Eduardo. 2014. “How Dogs Dream: Amazonian Natures and the Politics of Transspecies Engagement.” American Ethnologist 34: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kondo, Dorinne. 2018. Worldmaking: Race, Performance, and the Work of Creativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Koyré, Alexandre. 1957. From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Kugler, F. X. 1900. Die Babylonische Mondrechnung: Zwei Systeme der Chaldäer über den Lauf des Mondes und der Sonne. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder’sche Verlagshandlung.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1957. The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962) 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1989) 2000. “Possible Worlds in History of Science.” In Possible Worlds in Humanities, Arts and Sciences: Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 65, edited by All, Stureén, 9–32. Berlin: De Gruyter. Republished in James Conant and John Haugeland, eds., The Road since Structure: Thomas S. Kuhn. Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, pp. 58–89.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1991) 2000a. “The Road Since Structure.” Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 3–13.Republished in James Conant and John Haugeland, eds., The Road since Structure: Thomas S. Kuhn. Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, pp. 90–104.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. (1991) 2000b. “The Natural and the Human Sciences.” In The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture, edited by Hiley, David, Bohman, James, and Shusterman, Richard, 17–24. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Republished in James Conant and John Haugeland, eds., The Road since Structure: Thomas S. Kuhn. Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, pp. 216–23.Google Scholar

Labat, René. 1988. Manuel d’epigraphie akkadienne. 6th ed. Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar

Ladyman, James. 2013. “Toward a Demarcation of Science from Pseudoscience.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Pigliucci, Massimo and Boudry, Maarten, 345–60. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 1960. Babylonian Wisdom Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 1975. “The Cosmology of Sumer and Babylon.” In Ancient Cosmologies, edited by Blacker, Carmen and Loewe, Michael, 42–65. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 1998. “The Qualifications of Babylonian Diviners.” In Tikip Santakki Mala Bašmu: Festschrift für Rykle Borger, edited by Maul, Stefan M., 141–58. Groningen: Styx Publications.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 1999–2000. “The Apsû.” In Landscapes: Territories, Frontiers and Horizons in the Ancient Near East. Papers Presented to the XLIV Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Venezia, 7–11 July 1997, edited by Milano, L., Martino, S. de, Fales, F. M., and Lanfranchi, G. B., 76–77. Padua: Sargon.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 2013. Babylonian Creation Myths. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

Lambert, Wilfrid G., Millard, Alan R., and Civil, Miguel. 1969. Atra-hasis: The Babylonian Story of the Flood. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Landsberger, Benno. 1926. “Die Eigenbegrifflichkeit der babylonischen Welt.” Islamica 2: 355–72. Reprinted as Leistung und Grenze sumerischer und babylonischer Wissenschaft. With Wolfram von Soden. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1974.Google Scholar

Landsberger, Benno 1937. Materialien zum sumerischen Lexikon: Die Serie ana ittišu. Vol. 1. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute.Google Scholar

Landsberger, Benno 1957. Materialien zum sumerischen Lexikon. Vol. 5: The Series HAR-ra = hubullu. Tablets i–vi. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute.Google Scholar

Landsberger, Benno, Reiner, Erica, and Civil, Miguel. 1970. Materialien zum sumerischen Lexikon. Vol. 10: The Series HAR-ra = hubullu. Tablets xvi, xvii, xix and Related Texts. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute.Google Scholar

Laporte, Joseph. 2004. Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Postmodern? No, Simply Amodern! Steps towards an Anthropology of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 21: 145–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno [1991] 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno 2004. Politics of Nature. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno 2009. “Perspectivism: Type or Bomb?” Anthropology Today 25, no. 2: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. (1979) 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry. (1981) 1984. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49. Republished in Jarrett Leplin, ed., Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984, 218–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry 1983. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” In The Demarcation between Science and Pseudo-science, edited by Lauden, Rachel, 7–35. Blacksburg: Virginia Tech Center for the Study of Science in Society. Also published in R. S. Cohen and L. Laudan, eds., Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983, 111–27.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry 1996. Beyond Positivism and Relativism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Lazaris, Stavros, ed. 2020. A Companion to Byzantine Science. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeten, Lars. 2012. “What Is ‘Critique of Worldmaking?’ Nelson Goodman’s Conception of Philosophy.” Enrahonar 49: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leggatt, Stuart. 1995. Aristotle: On the Heavens i–ii. Warminster, PA: Aris & Phillips.Google Scholar

Lehoux, Daryn. 2012. What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lehoux, Daryn 2019. “‘All Things Are Full of Gods’: Naturalism in the Classical World.” In Science without God? Rethinking the History of Scientific Naturalism, edited by Harrison, Peter and Roberts, Jon H., 19–36. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leichty, E. 2011. The Royal Inscription of Esarhaddon, King of Assyria (680–669 bc). Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar

Lenzi, Alan. 2008. Secrecy and the Gods: Secret Knowledge in Ancient Mesopotamia and Biblical Israel. Helsinki: Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project.Google Scholar

Lescher, J. H. 1999. “Early Interest in Knowledge.” In The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, edited by Long, A. A., 225–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. (1983) 1992. The View from Afar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, David. (1986) 2001. On the Plurality of Worlds. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, Martin W., and Wigen, Kären E. 1997. The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lindberg, David C. and Westman, Robert S., eds. 1990. Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lipton, Peter. 2005. “The Medawar Lecture 2004: The Truth about Science.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 1259–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Livingstone, Alisdair. 1986. Mystical and Mythological Explanatory Works of Assyrian and Babylonian Scholars. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Livingstone, Alisdair 1989. Assyrian Court Poetry and Literary Miscellanea. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar

Livingstone, Alisdair 2007. “Ashurbanipal: Literate or Not?” Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 97: 98–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1966. Polarity and Analogy: Two Types of Argumentation in Early Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1968. Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1970. Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1973. Greek Science after Aristotle. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1978. Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1979. Magic Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origin and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1983. Science, Folklore and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1987. The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1990. Demystifying Mentalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1991. Methods and Problems in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1992. “Methods and Problems in the History of Ancient Science: The Greek Case.” Isis 83: 564–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1996. Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2004. Ancient Worlds, Modern Reflections: Philosophical Perspectives on Greek and Chinese Science and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2005. The Delusions of Invulnerability: Wisdom and Morality in Ancient Greece, China and Today. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2006. Principles and Practices in Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2007. Cognitive Variations: Reflections on the Unity and Diversity of the Human Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2008. “The Varying Agenda of the Study of the Heavens: Mesopotamia, Greece, China.” In Star Gazing, Fire Phasing, and Healing in China: Essays in Honor of Nathan Sivin, edited by Nylan, Michael, 69–88. Taipei: Academica Sinica, Institute of History and Philology.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2010. “History and Human Nature: Cross-Cultural Universals and Cultural Relativities.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 35: 201–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2011. “Multidimensional Reality.” Common Knowledge 17: 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2012. Being, Humanity, and Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2019. “The Clash of Ontologies and the Problems of Translation and Mutual Intelligibility.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9: 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2020. Intelligence and Intelligibility: Cross-Cultural Studies of Human Cognitive Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2021a. Expanding Horizons in the History of Science: The Comparative Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 2021b. “Introduction.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 46: 215–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., and Sivin, Nathan. 2003. The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., and Vilaça, Aparecida. 2020. Science in the Forest, Science in the Past. Chicago: HAU Books. First published HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9 (2019): 36–182.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., and Vilaça, Aparecida 2023. Of Jaguars and Butterflies: Metalogues on Issues in Anthropology and Philosophy. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loison, Laurent. 2016. “Forms of Presentism in the History of Science: Rethinking the Project of Historical Epistemology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 60: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, Michael. 2013. “Ontography: Investigating the Production of Things, Deflating Ontology.” Social Studies of Science 43: 444–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magdalino, Paul, and Mavroudi, Maria. 2006. The Occult Sciences in Byzantium. Geneva: La Pomme d’or.Google Scholar

Magnus, P. D. 2012. Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahner, Martin. 2007. “Demarcating Science from Non-Science.” In Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Vol. 1: General Philosophy of Science—Focal Issues, edited by Kuipers, Theo A. F., 515–75. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Mahner, Martin 2013. “Science and Pseudoscience: How to Demarcate after the (Alleged) Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Pigliucci, Massimo and Boudry, Maarten, 29–44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mak, Bill M. 2013a. “The Date and Nature of Sphujidhvaja’s Yavanajātaka Reconsidered in the Light of Some Newly Discovered Materials.” History of Science in South Asia 1: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mak, Bill M. 2013b. “The Last Chapter of Sphujidhvaja’s Yavanajātaka Critically Edited with Notes.” SCIAMVS 14: 59–148.Google Scholar

Mak, Bill M. 2014. “The ‘Oldest Indo-Greek Text in Sanskrit’ Revisited: Additional Readings from the Newly Discovered Manuscript of the Yavanajātaka.” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 62: 37–41.Google Scholar

Mak, Bill M. 2019. “Greco-Babylonian Astral Science in Asia: Patterns of Dissemination and Transformation.” In East–West Encounter in the Science of Heaven and Earth, edited by Takeda, Tokimasa and Mak, Bill M., 14–34. Kyoto: Institute for Research in Humanities, Kyoto University.Google Scholar

Malachowski, Alan, ed. 2020. A Companion to Rorty. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marya, Deepika. 2017. “Postcolonial Literature in the Time of World Literature.” In Postcolonial Gateways and Walls: Under Construction, edited by Tunca, Daria and Wilson, Janet, 165–80. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Mates, Benson. 1996. The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus’ Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maul, Stefan M. 1994. Zukunftsbewältigung: Eine Untersuchung altorientalischen Denkens anhand der babylonisch-assyrischen Löserituale (Namburbi). Mainz: Philipp von Zabern.Google Scholar

Maul, Stefan M. 2013. Die Wahrsagekunst im Alten Orient: Zeichen des Himmels und der Erde. Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Willard, Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R., and Vilaça, Aparecida, eds. (2021) 2022. Science in the Forest, Science in the Past: Further Interdisciplinary Explorations. Milton Park: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCormick, Peter J., ed. 1996. Starmaking: Realism, Anti-Realism, and Irrealism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKie, Douglas. 1958. Science and History: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered at University College, London, 22 May 1958. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan. 1984a. “The Goals of Natural Science.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Society 58: 37–54.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan 1984b. “A Case for Scientific Realism.” In Scientific Realism, edited by Leplin, Jarrett, 8–40. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minsky, Marvin. 1965. “Matter, Mind, and Models.” In Information Processing 1965: Proceedings of the IFIP [International Federation for Information Processing] Congress, 1965, edited by Kalenich, W. A.. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar

Misiewicz, Zoë. 2018. “The Importance of Experts: Agents in the Transfer of Knowledge between Hellenistic Mesopotamia and the Greek-Speaking World.” In “The Scaffolding of Our Thoughts”: Essays on Assyriology and the History of Science in Honor of Francesca Rochberg, edited by Crisostomo, C. Jay, Escobar, Eduardo A., Tanaka, Terri, and Veldhuis, Niek, 317–32. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Misiewicz, Zoë 2019. “John Lydus and Mesopotamian Celestial Omens in Late Antiquity,” PhD diss. Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, NYU.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Sandra D. 2002. “Integrative Pluralism.” Biology and Philosophy 17: 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. 1986. “How Good Is Nelson Goodman?” Poetics Today 7: 111–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mizrahi, Moti. 2016. “The History of Science as a Graveyard of Theories: A Philosophers’ Myth?” International Studies in Philosophy of Science 30, no. 3: 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mizrahi, Moti, ed. 2018. The Kuhnian Image of Science: Time for a Decisive Transformation? London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Momigliano, Arnaldo. 1990. Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Montelle, Clemency. 2011. Chasing Shadows: Mathematics, Astronomy, and the Early History of Eclipse Reckoning. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montelle, Clemency, and Plofker, Kim. 2018. Sanskrit Astronomical Tables. Cham: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morenz, L. D. 2003. “Neuassyrische visuell-poetische Bilder-Schrift und ihr Vor-Bild.” In Herrscherpräsentation und Kulturkontake. Ägypten–Levante–Mesopotamien, edited by Morenz, L. D. and Bosshard-Nepustil, E., 197–229. Münster: Ugarit Verlag.Google Scholar

Morrison, Margaret. 2007. “Where Have All the Theories Gone?” Philosophy of Science 74: 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto. 1942. “On Some Astronomical Papyri and Related Problems of Ancient Geography.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 32, no. 2: 251–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1945. “The History of Ancient Astronomy: Problems and Methods.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 4: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1947. “A Table of Solstices from Uruk.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 1: 143–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1951. “The Study of Wretched Subjects.” Isis 42: 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto (1955) 1983. Astronomical Cuneiform Texts. 3 vols. 2nd ed. London: Lund Humphries.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1963. “The Survival of Babylonian Methods in the Exact Sciences of Antiquity and Middle Ages.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107: 528–35.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1969. The Exact Sciences in Antiquity. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1975. A History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy. 3 vols. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1988. “A Babylonian Lunar Ephemeris from Roman Egypt.” In A Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, edited by Leichty, Erle, Ellis, Maria DeJ., and Gerardi, Pamela, 301–4. Philadelphia: University Museum.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, Otto 1989. “From Assyriology to Renaissance Art.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 133: 391–403.Google Scholar

Neugebauer, O., and van Hoesen, H. B.. 1959. Greek Horoscopes. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Nickles, Thomas. 2013. “The Problem of Demarcation.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Pigliucci, Massimo and Boudry, Maarten, 101–20. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Noegel, Scott B. 2017. “God of Heaven and Sheol: The ‘Unearthing’ Creation.” Hebrew Studies 58: 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

North, John D. 1998. “Olaf Pedersen (1920–1997).” Journal for the History of Astronomy 29, no. 2: 212–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oldfather, C. H. 1998. Diodorus Siculus, Library of History Books i–ii.34. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Olen, Peter. 2019. “Ajdukiewicz and Sellars on World-Perspectives.” In Wilfrid Sellars and Twentieth-Century Philosophy, edited by Brandt, Stefan and Breunig, Anke, 55–74. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oliveira, J. C. Pinto de. 2012. “Kuhn and the Genesis of the ‘New Historiography of Science.’” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 43: 115–21.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, A. Leo. 1960. “Assyriology – Why and How?” Current Anthropology 1: 409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, A. Leo. (1965) 1977. Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization. Rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheim, A. Leo. 1967. Letters from Mesopotamia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, A. Leo. 1974. “A Babylonian Diviner’s Manual.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 33: 197–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ossendrijver, Mathieu. 2011a. “Exzellente Netzwerke: Die Astronomen Von Uruk.” In The Empirical Dimension of Ancient Near Eastern Studies, edited by Selz, Gebhard J. and Wagensonner, Klaus, 631–44. Vienna: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar

Ossendrijver, Mathieu. 2011b. “Science in Action: Networks in Babylonian Astronomy.” In Proceedings of the Conference “Babylon–Wissenskultur Zwischen Orient und Okzident,” Pergamon Museum, Berlin 26–28/6/2008, edited by Cancik-Kirschbaum, Eva, Ess, Margarete van, and Marzahn, Joachim, 213–21. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Ossendrijver, Mathieu. 2012. Babylonian Mathematical Astronomy: Procedure Texts. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ossendrijver, Mathieu. 2021a. “Astral Science in Uruk during the First Millennium bce: Libraries, Communities and Transfer of Knowledge.” In Uruk-altorientalische Metropole und Kulturzentrum: 8. Internationales Colloquium der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 25. und 26. April 2013, Berlin, edited by van Ess, Margarete, 319–42. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar

Ossendrijver, M., ed. 2021b. “Scholars, Priests, and Temples: Babylonian and Egyptian Science in Context.” Special Issue, JANEH 8, nos. 1–2.Google Scholar

Ossendrijver, Mathieu. 2024. Babylonian Mathematical Astronomy: Planetary Tables. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Paleček, Martin, and Risjord, Mark. 2012. “Relativism and the Ontological Turn within Anthropology.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panaino, Antonio C. D. 2021. A Walk through the Iranian Heavens: Spherical and Non-Spherical Cosmographic Models in the Imagination of Ancient Iran and Its Neighbors. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Park, Peter K. J. 2013. Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon 1780–1830. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Parpola, Simo. 1970. Letters from Assyrian Scholars to the Kings Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal, Vol. 1. Kevelaer: Butzon & Bercker.Google Scholar

Parpola, Simo. 1993. Letters from Assyrian and Babylonian Scholars. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Moten Axel. 2012. “Common Sense: A Review of Certain Reviews of the ‘Ontological Turn.’” Anthropology of This Century 5. http://aotcpress.com/articles/common_nonsense/#sthash.1yvGKe2k. dpuf.Google Scholar

Pedersen, Olaf. (1974) 1993. Early Physics and Astronomy. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew. 2017. “The Ontological Turn: Taking Different Worlds Seriously.” Special Issue: Multiple Nature-Cultures, Diverse Anthropologies. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology 61: 134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, Massimo. 2013. “The Demarcation Problem: A (Belated) Response to Laudan.” In Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem, edited by Pigliucci, Massimo and Boudry, Maarten, 9–28. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pigliucci, Massimo, and Boudry, Maarten, eds. 2013. Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pina-Cabral, João de. 2014a. “World: An Anthropological Examination (part 1).” Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4: 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pina-Cabral, João de 2014b. “World: An Anthropological Examination (part 2).” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4: 149–84.Google Scholar

Pingree, David, ed. 1974. Hephaestionis Thebani Apotelesmaticorum Libri Tres. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Pingree, David 1976. Dorothei Sidonii Carmen Astrologicum. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Pingree, David. 1978. The Yavanajātaka of Sphujidhvaja. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pingree, David 1982. “Mesopotamian Astronomy and Astral Omens in Other Civilizations.” In Mesopotamien und seine Nachbarn: Politische und kulturelle Wechselbezeihungen im Alten Vorderasien vom 4. bis 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr, edited by Nissen, Hans and Renger, Johannes, 613–31. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Pingree, David, ed. 1986. Vettii Valentis Antiocheni Anthologiarum Libri Novem. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Pingree, David. 1987. “Venus Omens in India and Babylon.” In Language, Literature, and History: Philological and Historical Studies Presented to Erica Reiner, edited by Rochberg-Halton, Francesca, 293–315. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Pingree, David 1992a. “Hellenophilia versus the History of Science.” Isis 83: 554–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pingree, David 1992b. “Mesopotamian Omens in Sanskrit.” In La circulation des biens, des personnes et des idées dans le Proche-Orient ancien: Actes de la XXXVIIIe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Paris, 8–10 juillet 1991, edited by Charpin, Dominique and Joannès, Francis, 375–79. Paris: Edité par Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations.Google Scholar

Pingree, David 1997. From Astral Omens to Astrology: From Babylon to Bikaner. Rome: Istituto Italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente.Google Scholar

Pingree, David 1998. “Legacies in Astronomy and Celestial Omens.” In The Legacy of Mesopotamia, edited by Dalley, Stephanie, 125–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pingree, David 2003. “The Logic of Non-western Science: Mathematical Discoveries in Medieval India.” Daedalus 132: 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pisano, Raffaela, Agassi, Joseph, and Drozdova, Daria, eds. 2018. Hypotheses and Perspectives in the History and Philosophy of Science: Homage to Alexandre Koyré 1892–1964. Cham: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plofker, Kim. 2008. Mathematics in India: 500 bce–1800 ce. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pope, Alexander. 1905. An Essay on Man: Moral Essays and Satires. With an Introduction by Henry Morley. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. (1935) 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Vienna: Julius Springer. [Translated by Hutchinson. English translation: 1959; Routledge 1992. Reissued by Routledge 2002].Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1953) 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl (1963) 2004. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary 1982. “Why There Isn’t a Ready-Made World.” Synthese 51: 141–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Hilary (1987) 1989. “Truth and Convention: On Davidson’s Refutation of Conceptual Relativism.” Dialectica 41: 69–77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Quack, Joachim. 2018a. Eine magische Stele aus dem Badischen Landesmuseum Karlsruhe (Inv. H 1049). Heidelberg: Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Quack, Joachim 2018b. “Egypt as Astronomical Astrological Centre between Mesopotamia and India.” In The Interactions of Ancient Astral Science, by David Brown, with contributions by Jonathan Ben-Dov, Harry Falk, Geoffrey Lloyd, Raymond Mercier, Antonio Panaino, Joachim Quack, Alexandra von Lieven, and Michio Yano, 69–123. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar

Quack, Joachim 2022. “Ein frühdemotischer Weisheitstext: Papyrus Berlin 23504.” In One Who Loves Knowledge: Studies in Honor of Richard Jasnow, edited by Bryan, Betsy, Smith, Mark, Cerbo, Christina di, Escolano-Poveda, Marina, and Waller, Jill S., 323–33. Columbus, GA: Lockwood Press.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard von Orman. 1948. “On What There Is.” The Review of Metaphysics 2: 21–38.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard von Orman 1951. “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, Willard von Orman 1953. From a Logical Point of View. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard von Orman 1968. “Ontological Relativity.” The Journal of Philosophy 65: 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quine, Willard von Orman 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar