Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 48
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      September 2009
      February 2006
      ISBN:
      9780511482632
      9780521640336
      9780521104685
      Dimensions:
      (228 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.543kg, 252 Pages
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.38kg, 252 Pages
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    Given its brevity, Plato's Meno covers an astonishingly wide array of topics: politics, education, virtue, definition, philosophical method, mathematics, the nature and acquisition of knowledge and immortality. Its treatment of these, though profound, is tantalisingly short, leaving the reader with many unresolved questions. This book confronts the dialogue's many enigmas and attempts to solve them in a way that is both lucid and sympathetic to Plato's philosophy. Reading the dialogue as a whole, it explains how different arguments are related to one another and how the interplay between characters is connected to the philosophical content of the work. In a new departure, this book's exploration focuses primarily on the content and coherence of the dialogue in its own right and not merely in the context of other dialogues, making it required reading for all students of Plato, be they from the world of classics or philosophy.

    Reviews

    'Dominic Scott's new monograph on Plato's Meno is a tour de force. Readers of Plato in general, and this extensively-mined dialogue in particular, will be aware of how high the standards have now been set for writing about Plato as both literary genius and philosophical pioneer, by Taylor, Cornford, Vlastos and others. They will be correspondingly impressed by how successfully Scott's beautifully written work equals and sometimes surpasses these standards, while admirably avoiding both the fanciful and the anachronistic.'

    Source: Journal of Hellenic Studies

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    ×

    Contents

    References
    Adkins, A. W. H. (1960) Merit and Responsibility: a Study in Greek Values. Oxford
    Annas, J. (1981) An Introduction to Plato's Republic. Oxford
    Anscombe, G. E. M. (1979) ‘Understanding proofs: Meno, 85d9–86c2, continued’, Philosophy 54: 149–58
    Barnes, J. (1972) ‘Mr. Locke's darling notion’, Philosophical Quarterly 22: 193–214
    Barnes, J. (1980) ‘Socrates and the jury: paradoxes in Plato's distinction between knowledge and true belief’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 54, 193–206
    Bedu-Addo, J. T. (1984) ‘Recollection and the argument “from a hypothesis” in Plato's Meno’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 104: 1–14
    Benson, H. H. (1990) ‘The priority of definition and the Socratic elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 8: 19–65
    Benson, H. H. (2000) Socratic Wisdom. Oxford
    Benson, H. H. (2002) ‘The method of hypothesis in the Meno’, Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 95–126
    Berti, E. (1981) ed. Aristotle's Posterior Analytics. Padua
    Beversluis, J. (1987) ‘Does Socrates commit the Socratic fallacy?’, American Philosophy Quarterly 24: 211–23
    Blondell, R. (2002) The Play of Character in Plato's Dialogues. Cambridge
    Bluck, R. S. (1961) Plato's Meno. Cambridge
    Bostock, D. (1986) Plato's Phaedo. Oxford
    Brague, R. (1978) Le Restant: Supplément aux Commentaires du Ménon de Platon. Paris
    Brickhouse, T. C. and Smith, N. D. (1994) Plato's Socrates. Oxford
    Brown, L. (1991) ‘Connaissance et réminiscence dans le Ménon’, Revue Philosophique 181: 603–19
    Brown, M. S. (1967) ‘Plato disapproves of the slave-boy's answer’, Review of Metaphysics 20: 57–93
    Brumbaugh, R. (1975) ‘Plato's Meno as form and as content of secondary school courses in philosophy’, Teaching Philosophy 1: 107–15
    Brunschwig, J. (1991) ‘Pouvoir enseigner la vertue?’, Revue Philosophique 181: 591–602
    Burnet, J. (1900–7) ed. Platonis Opera. 5 vols. Oxford
    Burnet, J. (1908) Early Greek Philosophy. 2nd edn. London
    Burnyeat, M. F. (1977) ‘Examples in epistemology: Socrates, Theaetetus and G. E. Moore’, Philosophy 52: 381–98
    Burnyeat, M. F. (1980) ‘Socrates and the jury: paradoxes in Plato's distinction between knowledge and true belief’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 54: 173–91
    Burnyeat, M. F. (1981) ‘Aristotle on understanding knowledge’, in Berti (1981) ed. 97–139
    Burnyeat, M. F. (1987) ‘Wittgenstein and Augustine De Magistro’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society suppl. vol. 61: 1–24
    Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) ‘First words: a valedictory lecture’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 3rd series, 43: 1–20
    Burnyeat, M. F. (2003) ‘By the dog’, Review of Blondell (2002), London Review of Books, vol. 25, no. 15: 23–24
    Bury, R. G. (1932) The Symposium of Plato. 2nd edn. Cambridge
    Calvert, B. (1974) ‘Meno's paradox reconsidered’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 12: 143–52
    Calvert, B. (1984) ‘The politicians of Athens in the Gorgias and Meno’, History of Political Thought 5: 1–16
    Canto, M. (1987) Platon: Gorgias. Paris
    Canto-Sperber, M. (1991) Platon: Ménon. Paris
    Carcopino, J. (1927) La Basilique Pythagoricienne. Paris
    Cherniss, H. (1947) ‘Some war-time publications concerning Plato’, American Journal of Philology 68: 113–46
    Cook Wilson, J. (1903) ‘On the geometrical problem in Plato's Meno, 86E sqq.’, Journal of Philology 28: 222–40
    Cooper, J. M. (1997) ed. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis
    Cottingham, J., Stoothof, R. and Murdoch, D. (1984–91) eds. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 3 vols. Cambridge
    Cowie, F. (1999) What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford
    Croiset, A. and Bodin, L. (1923) Platon: Gorgias et Ménon. Paris
    Crombie, I. M. (1963) An Examination of Plato's Doctrines. 2 vols. London
    Day, J. M. (1994) ed. Plato's Meno in Focus. London
    Desjardins, R. (1985) ‘Knowledge and virtue: paradox in Plato's Meno’, Review of Metaphysics 39: 261–81
    Devereux, D. T. (1978) ‘Nature and teaching in Plato's Meno’, Phronesis 23: 118–26
    Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (1985) eds. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 3 vols. 6th edn. Zürich and Hildesheim. (Cited as DK)
    Dodds, E. R. (1959) Plato's Gorgias. Oxford
    Dover, K. J. (1974) Greek Popular Morality. Oxford
    Ebert, T. (1973) ‘Plato's theory of recollection reconsidered: an interpretation of Meno 80a–86c’, Man and World 6: 163–81
    Ebert, T. (1974) Meinung und Wiṡsen in der Philosophie Platons. Berlin
    Everson, S. (1990) ed. Epistemology (Companions to Ancient Thought I). Cambridge
    Fine, G. (1990) ‘Knowledge and belief in Republicv–vii’, in Everson (1990) 85–115
    Fine, G. (1992) ‘Inquiry in the Meno’, in Kraut (1992) ed. 200–26
    Fine, G. (1999) ed. Plato (Oxford Readings in Philosophy) 2 vols. Oxford
    Fine, G. (2003) Plato on Knowledge and Forms. Oxford
    Fine, G. (2004) ‘Knowledge and true belief in the Meno’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27: 41–81
    Fowler, H. N. (1926) trans. Plato: Cratylus, Parmenides, Greater Hippias, Lesser Hippias. Loeb translation. Vol iv. Cambridge, Mass.
    Franklin, L. (2001) ‘The structure of dialectic in the Meno’, Phronesis 46: 413–39
    Friedländer, P. (1945) Review of Robinson (1941). Classical Philology 40: 253–9
    Friedländer, P. (1958) Plato I: An Introduction. London
    Friedländer, P. (1964) Plato II: The Dialogues (First Period). London
    Gaiser, K. (1963) Review of Bluck (1961). Gymnasium 70: 440–2
    Geach, P. T. (1966) ‘Plato's Euthyphro: an analysis and commentary’, Monist 50: 369–82
    Gedike, F. (1780) ed. Platonis Dialogi IV: Meno, Krito, Alcibiades uterque. Berlin
    Gomperz, T. (1905) A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. ii. London
    Gordon, J. (1999) Turning Toward Philosophy. Pennsylvania
    Gulley, N. (1962) Plato's Theory of Knowledge. London
    Gulley, N. (1969) Review of Klein (1965). Classical Review, new series, 19 no. 2: 162–3
    Guthrie, W. C. K. (1956) trans. Plato: Protagoras and Meno. Penguin Translation. Harmondsworth
    Guthrie, W. C. K. (1971) The Sophists. Cambridge
    Hackforth, R. (1952) Plato's Phaedrus. Cambridge
    Hackforth, R. (1955) Plato's Phaedo. Cambridge
    Hacking, I. (1975) Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?Cambridge
    Hall, R. W. (1981) Plato. London
    Heath, T. E. (1921) A History of Greek Mathematics, vol. i. Oxford
    Hobbs, A. (2000) Plato and the Hero: Courage, Manliness and the Impersonal Good. Cambridge
    Hoerber, R. G. (1960) ‘Plato's Meno’, Phronesis 5: 78–102
    Irwin, T. (1977) Plato's Moral Theory. Oxford
    Irwin, T. (1979) Plato: Gorgias. Oxford
    Irwin, T. (1995) Plato's Ethics. Oxford
    Jolley, N. (1984) Leibniz and Locke. Oxford
    Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge
    Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd edn. Cambridge
    Klein, J. (1965) A Commentary on Plato's Meno. Chicago
    Knorr, W. R. (1986) The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. Boston
    Korsgaard, C. M. (1983) ‘Two distinctions in goodness’, Philosophical Review 92: 169–95
    Kraut, R. (1984) Socrates and the State. Princeton
    Kraut, R. (1992) ed. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge
    Lamb, W. R. M. (1924) trans. Plato: Laches, Protagoras, Meno, Euthydemus. Loeb translation. Cambridge, Mass.
    Lloyd, G. E. R. (1992) ‘Plato and the mysteries of mathematics’, Phronesis 37: 166–83
    McCabe, M. M. (1994) Plato's Individuals. Princeton
    Menn, S. (2002) ‘Plato and the method of analysis’, Phronesis 47: 193–223
    Mill, J. S. (1979) Essays on Philosophy and the Classics, in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. xi, Robson, J. M. ed. Toronto
    Moline, J. (1969) ‘Meno's paradox?’, Phronesis 14: 153–61
    Moravcsik, J. (1978) ‘Learning as recollection’, in Vlastos (1978) ed. 53–69 [repr. in Day (1994) ed. 112–28]
    Moser, P. K. (1987) A Priori Knowledge (Oxford Readings in Philosophy). Oxford
    Mueller, I. (1992) ‘Mathematical method and philosophical truth’, in Kraut (1992) ed. 170–99
    Nakhnikian, G. (1973) ‘The first Socratic paradox’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 11: 1–17 [repr. in Day (1994) ed. 129–51]
    Nehamas, A. (1985) ‘Meno's paradox and Socrates as a teacher’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 3: 1–30 [repr. in Day (1994) ed. 221–48]
    Nehamas, A. (1987) ‘Socratic intellectualism’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2: 275–316
    Newman, W. L. (1887) The Politics of Aristotle. 4 vols. Oxford
    Nussbaum, M. (1980) ‘Aristophanes and Socrates on learning practical wisdom’, Yale Classical Studies 26: 43–97
    O'Brien, M. J. (1967) The Socratic Paradoxes and the Greek Mind. Chapel Hill
    Parkinson, G. H. R. (1973) ed. Leibniz: Philosophical Writings. London
    Penner, T. (1973) ‘The unity of virtue’, Philosophical Review 82: 35–68
    Phillips, B. (1948) ‘The significance of Meno's paradox’, Classical Weekly 42: 87–91
    Popper, K. R. (1966) The Open Society and its Enemies. 5th edn. London
    Prior, W. J. (1998) ‘Plato and the Socratic fallacy’, Phronesis 43: 97–113
    Rackham, H. (1959) trans. Aristotle: Politics. Loeb translation. Cambridge, Mass
    Remnant, P. and Bennett, J. (1982) eds. G. W. Leibniz: New Essays on Human Understanding. Cambridge
    Reuter, M. (2001) ‘Is goodness really a gift from god? Another look at the conclusion of Plato's Meno’, Phoenix 55: 77–97
    Robinson, R. (1941) Plato's Earlier Dialectic. 1st edn. Ithaca
    Robinson, R. (1953) Plato's Earlier Dialectic. 2nd edn. Oxford
    Robinson, T. M. (1995) Plato's Psychology. 2nd edn. Toronto
    Rose, L. (1970) ‘Plato's Meno 86–9’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 8: 1–8
    Ryle, G. (1976) ‘The Meno: many things are odd about our Meno’, Paideia (Special Plato Issue) 5: 1–9
    Santas, G. (1972) ‘The Socratic fallacy’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 10: 127–41
    Santas, G. (1979) Socrates. London
    Santas, G. (2001) Goodness and Justice: Plato, Aristotle and the Moderns. Blackwell
    Saunders, T. J. (1995) Aristotle: Politics, Books I and II. Oxford
    Savile, A. (1972) ‘Leibniz's contribution to the theory of innate ideas’, Philosophy 47: 113–24
    Scolnicov, S. (1988) Plato's Metaphysics of Education. London and New York
    Scott, D. (1988) ‘Innatism and the Stoa’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 3rd series, 33: 123–53
    Scott, D. (1991) ‘Socrate prend-il au sérieux le paradoxe de Ménon?’, Revue Philosophique 181: 627–41
    Scott, D. (1995) Recollection and Experience. Cambridge
    Scott, D. (1999) ‘Platonic pessimism and moral education’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 15–36
    Sedley, D. (1999) ‘The ideal of godlikeness’, in Fine (1999) ed., vol. II, 309–28
    Sedley, D. (2004) Plato's Cratylus. Cambridge
    Seeskin, K. (1987) Dialogue and Discovery: a Study in Socratic Method. Albany, New York
    Sharples, R. (1985) Plato's Meno. Warminster
    Shorey, P. A. (1909) ‘Φύσις, μελέτη, ἔπιστήμη’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 40: 184–201
    Shorey, P. A. (1930) Plato: Republic. Loeb translation. 2 vols. Cambridge, Mass.
    Sternfeld, R. and Zyskind, H. (1976) ‘Plato's Meno 89c: “Virtue is knowledge” – a hypothesis?’, Phronesis 21: 130–4
    Sternfeld, R. and Zyskind, H. (1978) Plato's Meno: a Philosophy of Man as Acquisitive. Carbondale and London
    Stock, St. G. (1904) The Meno of Plato. 3rd edn. Oxford
    Tarrant, H. (2003) Review of Gordon (1999). Ancient Philosophy 23: 435–9
    Taylor, A. E. (1926) Plato: The Man and His Work. London
    Thomas, J. E. (1980) Musings on the Meno. The Hague
    Thompson, E. S. (1901) The Meno of Plato. London
    Umphrey, S. (1990) Zetetic Skepticism. Wakefield, New Hampshire
    Verdenius, M. J. (1957) ‘Notes on Plato's Meno’, Mnemosyne, 4th series, 10: 289–99
    Vlastos, G. (1965) ‘Anamnesis in the Meno’, Dialogue 4: 143–67 [repr. in Vlastos (1995) vol. II: 147–65]
    Vlastos, G. (1969) ‘Socrates on acrasia’, Phoenix 23: 71–88 [repr. in Vlastos (1995) vol. II: 43–59]
    Vlastos, G. (1978) ed. Plato I: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Notre Dame
    Vlastos, G. (1980) ed. Socrates: a Collection of Critical Essays. Notre Dame
    Vlastos, G. (1991) Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge
    Vlastos, G. (1994) Socratic Studies. Cambridge
    Vlastos, G. (1995) Studies in Greek Philosophy. 2 vols. Princeton
    Weiss, R. (2001) Virtue in the Cave: Moral Inquiry in Plato's Meno. Oxford
    West, M. L. (1983) The Orphic Poems. Oxford
    White, N. P. (1974) ‘Inquiry’, Review of Metaphysics 28: 289–310 [repr. in Day (1994) ed. 152–71]
    White, N. P. (1976) Plato on Knowledge and Reality. Indianapolis
    Wilkes, K. V. (1979) ‘Conclusions in the Meno’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61: 143–53 [repr. in Day (1994) ed. 208–20]
    Wittgenstein, L. (1967) Philosophical Investigations. 3rd edn. Oxford
    Woodruff, P. (1987) ‘Expert knowledge in the Apology and Laches: what a general needs to know’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 3: 79–115

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.