Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English

Andrew Radford

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511811319

References

Abney, S. P. (1987) ‘The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect’, PhD diss., MIT

Ackema, P. (2001) ‘On the relation between V-to-I and the structure of the inflectional paradigm’, The Linguistic Review 18: 233–63

Acquaviva, P. (2002) ‘The morphological dimension of polarity licensing’, Linguistics 40: 925–59

Adger, D. (2003) Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Agbayani, B. (2000) ‘Wh-subjects in English and the Vacuous Movement Hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 703–13

Aissen, J. (1996) ‘Pied-piping, abstract agreement and functional projections in Tzotzil’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 447–91

Akmajian, A. and Heny, F. (1975) An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Alexiadou, A. and Anagnostopoulou, E. (2001) ‘The subject-in-situ generalization and the role of case in driving computations’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193–231

Alexopoulou, T. and Kolliakou, D. (2002) ‘On Linkhood, Topicalisation and Clitic Left Dislocation’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 193–245

Antony, L. and Hornstein, N. (2002) Chomsky and His Critics, Blackwell, Oxford

Aronoff, M. (1976) Word Formation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Aronoff, M. and Fuhrhop, N. (2002) ‘Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–90

Atkinson, M. (2003) Unpublished course handouts, University of Essex

Authier, J.-M. (1991) ‘V-governed expletives, case theory and the projection principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 721–40

Baker, C. L. (1970) ‘Notes on the description of English questions: the role of an abstract question morpheme’, Foundations of Language 6: 197–219

Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Baltin, M. (1995) ‘Floating quantifiers, PRO and predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 199–248

Baltin, M. (2002) ‘Movement to the higher V is remnant movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 653–9

Baltin, M. and Collins, C. (eds.) (2001) The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford

Barss, A. (2001) ‘Syntactic reconstruction effects’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), pp. 670–96

Basilico, D. (2003) ‘The topic of small clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 1–35

Bejar, S. and Massam, D. (1999) ‘Multiple case checking’, Syntax 2: 65–79

Belletti, A. (1988) ‘The case of unaccusatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 1–34

Belletti, A. and Rizzi, L. (1988) ‘Psych-verbs and θ-theory’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6: 291–352

Bernstein, J. B. (2001) ‘The DP hypothesis: identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.) pp. 536–61

Bobaljik, J. (1995) ‘Morphosyntax: the Syntax of Verbal Inflection’, PhD diss., MIT

Bobaljik, J. D. (2000) ‘The rich agreement hypothesis in review’, draft manuscript, McGill University (http://www.msgill.ca/Linguistics/faculty/bobaljik/)

Bobaljik, J. (2002) ‘A-chains at the PF-interface: copies and “covert” movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 197–267

Boeckx, C. (2000) ‘A note on Contraction’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 357–66

Boeckx, C. (2001) ‘Scope reconstruction and A-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 503–48

Boeckx, C. and Stjepanović, S. (2001) ‘Head-ing towards PF’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 345–55

Borsley, R. (2002) ‘Wh-phrases in Minimalism’, unpublished paper, University of Essex

Bošković, Ž. (1997) ‘On certain violations of the superiority condition, AgrO and economy of derivation’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 227–54

Bošković, Ž. (2001) On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena, Elsevier, Amsterdam

Bošković, Ž. (2002a) ‘On multiple wh-fronting’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–83

Bošković, Ž. (2002b) ‘A-Movement and the EPP’, Syntax 5: 167–218

Bowerman, M. (1988) ‘The “no negative evidence” problem: how do children avoid an overly general grammar?’, in J. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining Language Universals, Blackwell, Oxford

Bowers, J. (1993) ‘The syntax of predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656

Bowers, J. (2002) ‘Transitivity’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 183–224

Braine, M. D. S. (1971) ‘Three suggestions regarding grammatical analyses of children's language’, in C. A. Ferguson and D. I. Slobin (eds.), Studies of Child Language Development, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 421–9

Branigan, P. (1992) ‘Subjects and Complementisers’, PhD diss., MIT

Branigan, P. and MacKenzie, M. (2002) ‘Altruism, A-movement and object agreement in Innu-aim∘un’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 385–407

Brody, M. (1995) A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Brown, K. (1991) ‘Double modals in Hawick Scots’, in P. Trudgill and J. K. Chambers (eds.), Dialects of English, Longman, London, pp. 74–103

Brown R., Cazden, C. and Bellugi, U. (1968) ‘The child's grammar from I to III’, in J. P. Hill (ed.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Development, vol. 2, pp. 28–73

Brown, R. and Hanlon, C. (1970) ‘Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech’, in J. R. Hayes (ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language, Wiley, New York, pp. 11–53

Burton, S. and Grimshaw, J. (1992) ‘Coordination and VP-internal subjects’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 305–13

Burzio, L. (1986) Italian Syntax, Reidel, Dordrecht. Carnie, A. (2000) ‘On the definition of X° and XP’, Syntax 3: 59–106

Carrier, J. and Randall, J. H. (1992) ‘The argument structure and syntactic structure of resul tatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 173–234

Carstens, V. (2000) ‘Concord in Minimalist Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 319–55

Carstens, V. (2001) ‘Multiple agreement and case deletion: against -(in)completeness’, Syntax 4: 147–63

Cheng, L. (1997) On the Typology of Wh-Questions, Garland, New York. Cheng, L. and Rooryck, J. (2000) ‘Licensing Wh-in-situ’, Syntax 3: 1–19

Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Chomsky, N. (1968) Interview with S. Hamshire in The Listener, May 1968

Chomsky, N. (1970) ‘Remarks on nominalisation’, in R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, Mass, pp. 184– 221

Chomsky, N. (1972) Language and Mind (enlarged edition), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York

Chomsky, N. (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht

Chomsky, N. (1982) Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Chomsky, N. (1986a) Knowledge of Language: its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York

Chomsky, N. (1986b) Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Chomsky, N. (1993) ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory’, in Hale and Keyser (eds.), pp. 1–52 (reprinted as chapter 3 of Chomsky 1995)

Chomsky, N. (1995) The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Chomsky, N. (1998) Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, no. 15 (also published in R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.) (2000) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 89–155)

Chomsky, N. (1999) Derivation by Phase, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, no. 18 (also published in M. Kenstowicz (ed.) (2001) Ken Hale: a Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 1–52)

Chomsky, N. (2001) ‘Beyond Explanatory Adequacy’, unpublished manuscript, MIT

Chomsky, N. (2002) On Nature and Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1977) ‘Filters and Control’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504

Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. (1995) ‘The theory of principles and parameters’, in Chomsky 1995, pp. 13–127

Chung, S. (1994) ‘Wh-agreement and “Referentiality” in Chamorro’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 1–45

Chung, S. (1998) The Design of Agreement: Evidence from Chamorro, University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Cinque, G. (1994) ‘Evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP’, in G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard Kayne, Georgetown University Press, Washington DC, pp. 85–110

Cinque, G. (1999) Adverbs and Functional Heads, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Citko, B. (2002) ‘(Anti)reconstruction effects in free relatives: a new argument against the Comp account’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 507–11

Cole, P. (1982) Imbabura Quechua, North-Holland, The Hague

Cole, P. and Hermon, G. (2000) ‘Partial wh-movement: evidence from Malay’, in Lutz, Müuller and von Stechow (eds.), pp. 101–30

Collins, C. (1997) Local Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Collins, C. and Branigan, P. (1997) ‘Quotative Inversion’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 1–41

Contreras, H. (1986) ‘Spanish bare NPs and the ECP’, in I. Bordelois, H. Contreras and K. Zagona (eds.), Generative Studies in Spanish Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 25–49

Contreras, J. (1987) ‘Small clauses in Spanish and English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 225–44

Cormack, A. and Smith, N. (1999) ‘Where is a sign merged?’, Glot International 4, 6: 21

Cormack, A. and Smith, N. (2000a) ‘Head Movement and negation in English’, Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 49–85

Cormack, A. and Smith, N. (2000b) ‘Fronting: the Syntax and Pragmatics of “Focus” and “Topic”’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 20: 387–417

Cornilescu, A. (2001) ‘Romanian nominalizations: case and aspectual structure’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 467–501

Costa, J. (2001) ‘Postverbal subjects and agreement in unaccusative contexts in European Portuguese’, The Linguistic Review 18: 1–17

Crain, S. and Pietroski, P. (2002) ‘Why language acquisition is a snap’, The Linguistic Review 19: 163–83

Culicover, P. (1991) ‘Topicalization, inversion and complementiser in English’, in D. Delftto, M. Everaert, A. Evers and F. Stuurman (eds.), OTS Working Papers: Going Romance and Beyond, University of Utrecht, pp. 1–45

Culicover, P. and Jackendoff, R. (2001) ‘Control is not movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 493–512

Culicover, P. and Levine, R. D. (2001) ‘Stylistic Inversion in English: a reconsideration’, Natural Language and Linguisitc Theory 19: 283–310

Curtiss, S. (1977) Genie: a Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern Day ‘Wild Child’, Academic Press, London

Davies, W. and Dubinsky, S. (2003) ‘On extraction from NPs’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 1–37

Dayal, V. (2002) ‘Single-pair versus multiple-pair answers: wh-in-situ and scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 512–20

Déchaine, R.-M. and Wiltschko, M. (2002) ‘Decomposing pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–42

Dikken, M. (2001) ‘Pluringulars, pronouns and quirky agreement’, The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41

Dikken, M. and Giannakidou, A. (2002) ‘From hell to polarity: “Aggressively non-D-linked” wh-phrases as polarity items’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 31–61

Denham, K. (2000) ‘Optional wh-movement in Babine-Witsuwit'en’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 199–251

Dixon, R. M. W. (2000) ‘Categories of the Noun Phrase in Jarawara’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 487–510

Drubig, H. N. (2003) ‘Toward a typology of focus and focus constructions’, Linguistics 41: 1–50

Dukes, M. (2000) ‘Agreement in Chamorro’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 575–88

du Plessis, H. (1977) ‘Wh-movement in Afrikaans’, Linguistic Inquiry 8: 211–22

Embick, D. and Noyer, R. (2001) ‘Movement operations after Syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555–95

Epstein, S. and Seeley, D. (1999) ‘Specifying the GF “subject”, eliminating A-chains and the EPP with a derivational model’, ms. University of Michigan

Ernst, T. (1991) ‘On the scope principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 750–6

Fabb, N. (1988) ‘English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 527–39

Fanselow, G. and Mahajan, A. (2000) ‘Towards a minimalist theory of wh-expletives, whcopying and successive cyclicity’, in Lutz, Müuller and von Stechow (eds.), pp. 195–230

Fasold, R. (1980) ‘The relation between black and white speech in the south’, ms., School of Languages and Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington DC

Felser, C. (1999a) Verbal Complement Clauses: a Minimalist Study of Direct Perception Constructions, Benjamins, Amsterdam

Felser, C. (1999b) ‘Perception and control: A Minimalist analysis of English direct perception complements’, Journal of Linguistics 34: 351–85

Felser, C. (2001) ‘Wh-copying, phases and successive cyclicity’, draft ms, University of Essex

Fillmore, C. J. (1968) ‘The case for case’, in E. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 1–88

Fillmore, C. J. (1972) ‘Subjects, speakers and roles’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht. Fitzpatrick, J. M. (2002) ‘On Minimalist approaches to the locality of movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 443–63

Fodor, J. D. and Crowther, C. (2002) ‘Understanding stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 105–45

Fox, D. (2000) Economy and Semantic Interpretation, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Frampton, J. and Gutmann, S. (1999) ‘Cyclic computation, a computationally effcient minimalist syntax’, Syntax 2: 1–27

Frank, R. and Vijay-Shanker, K. (2001) ‘Primitive c-command’, Syntax 4: 164–204

Freidin, R. and Vergnaud, J. R. (2001) ‘Exquisite connections: some remarks on the evolution of linguistic theory’, Lingua 111: 639–66

Fu, J., Roeper, T. and Borer, H. (2001) ‘The VP within process nominals: evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do so’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 549–82

Goodall, G. (1999) ‘Accusative case in passives’, Linguistics 37: 1–12

Green, L. (1998) ‘Semantic and syntactic patterns in African American English’, ms., University of Massachusetts

Grewendorf, G. (2001) ‘Multiple wh-fronting’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 87–122

Grimshaw, J. (1993) ‘Minimal Projection, Heads, and Optimality’, draft ms., Rutgers University

Groat, E. and O'Neil, J. (1996) ‘Spell-out at the LF interface’, in W. Abraham, S. D. Epstein, H. Thráinsson and C. J.-W. Zwart (eds.), Minimal Ideas, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 113–39

Gruber, J. S. (1965) ‘Studies in Lexical Relations’, PhD diss., MIT

Gruber, J. S. (1976) Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam

Guasti, M. T. (2002) Language Acquisition: the Growth of Grammar, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Guasti, M. T., Thornton, R. and Wexler, K. (1995) ‘Negation in children's questions: the case of English’, in B. MacLaughlin and S. McEwen (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, Mass, pp. 228–39

Guilfoyle, E. (1983) ‘Habitual aspect in Hiberno-English’, McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 22–32

Guilfoyle, E., Hung, H. and Travis, L. (1992) ‘Spec of IP and spec of VP: two subjects in Austronesian languages’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 375–414

Haegeman, L. (1992) Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: a Case Study of West Flemish, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Haegeman, L. (1994, 2nd edition) Introduction to Government and Binding Theory, Blackwell, Oxford

Haegeman, L. (1995) The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Haegeman, L. (2000) ‘Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP’, Transactions of the Philological Society 98: 121–60

Hagstrom, P. A. (1998) ‘Decomposing Questions’, PhD diss, MIT

Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1991) On the Syntax of Argument Structure, Lexicon Project Working Papers, MIT, Center for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, Mass

Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1993a) ‘On argument structure and the lexical expression of semantic relations’, in Hale and Keyser (eds.), pp. 53–109

Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1993b) (eds.) The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Hale, K. and Keyser, S. J. (1994) ‘Constraints on argument structure’, in B. Lust, M. Su ~ner and J. Whitman (eds.), Heads, Projections and Learnability, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ vol. 1, pp. 53–71

Halle, M. and Marantz, A. (1993) ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’, in Hale and Keyser (eds.), pp. 111–76

Han, C.-H. (2001) ‘Force, negation and imperatives’, The Linguistic Review, 18: 289–325

Harris, J. (1986) ‘Expanding the superstrate: habitual aspect markers in Atlantic Englishes’, English World-Wide 7: 171–99

Hawkins, J. A. (2001) ‘Why are categories adjacent?’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 1–34

Henry, A. (1995) Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter-Setting, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Hiemstra, I. (1986) ‘Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian’, North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 8: 97–110

Holmberg, A. (2000) ‘Am I unscientifc? A reply to Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 837–42

Hornstein, N. (1995) Logical Form: from GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Oxford

Hornstein, N. (2000) ‘On A-chains: a reply to Brody’, Syntax 3: 129–43

Hornstein, N. and Lightfoot, D. (eds.) (1994) Verb Movement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Huang, C.-T. J. (1982) ‘Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar’, PhD diss., MIT

Huang, C.-T. J. (1993) ‘Reconstruction and the structure of VP: some theoretical consequences’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 103–38

Hurford, J. (1991) ‘The evolution of the critical period for language acquisition’, Cognition 40: 159–201

Hyams, N. (1986) Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters, Reidel, Dordrecht

Hyams, N. (1992) ‘A reanalysis of null subjects in child language’, in J. Weissenborn, H. Goodluck and T. Roeper (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition, Erlbaum, London, pp. 249–67

Ingham, R. (2000) ‘Negation and OV order in Late Middle English’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 13–38

Jackendoff, R. S. (1972) Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Jaeggli, O. and Safir, K. (1989) The Null Subject Parameter, Kluwer, Dordrecht

Johnson, K. (1991) ‘Object positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577–636

Johnson, K. (2002) ‘Restoring exotic co-ordinations to normalcy’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 97–156

Jones, M. A. (1994) Sardinian Syntax, Routledge, London

Julien, M. (2001) ‘The syntax of complex tenses’, The Linguistic Review 18: 125–67

Kathol, A. (2001) ‘Positional effects in a monostratal grammar of German’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 35–66

Kayne, R. S. (1984a) Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht

Kayne, R. S. (1984b) ‘Principles of particle constructions’, in J. Guéron et al. (eds.) Grammatical Representation, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 101–40

Kayne, R. S. (1989) ‘Facets of Romance past participle agreement’, in P. Benincà (ed.), Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 85–103

Kayne, R. S. (1994) The Antisymmetry of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Kennedy, C. (2002) ‘Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax’, Natural Language andLinguistic Theory 20: 553–621

Kennedy, C. and Merchant, J. (2000) ‘Attributive comparative deletion’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146

Keyser, S. J. and Roeper, T. (1992) ‘Re: the abstract clitic hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89–125

Kimball, J. and Aissen, J. (1971) ‘I think, you think, he think’, Linguistic Inquiry 2: 241–6

Kishimoto, H. (1992) ‘LF pied piping: evidence from Sinhala’, Gengo Kenkyu 102: 46–87

Kishimoto, H. (2000) ‘Indefinite pronouns and overt N-raising’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 557–66

Kitagawa, Y. (1986) ‘Subjects in English and Japanese’, PhD diss., University of Massachusetts

Klima, E. S. (1964) ‘Negation in English’, in J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 246–323

Koeneman, O. (2000) ‘The Flexible Nature of Verb Movement’, PhD diss., University of Utrecht

Koizumi, M. (1993) ‘Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 99–148

Koizumi, M. (1995) ‘Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax’, PhD diss., MIT

Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. (1991) ‘The position of subjects’, Lingua 85: 211–58

Kuroda, Y. (1988) ‘Whether we agree or not’, Lingvisticae Investigationes 12: 1–47

Labov, W. (1969) ‘Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula’, Language 45: 715–62

Landau, I. (1999) ‘Elements of Control’, PhD diss., MIT

Landau, I. (2001) ‘Control and Extraposition: the case of Super-Equi’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 109–52

Landau, I. (2002) ‘(Un)interpretable Neg in Comp’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 465–92

Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. and Johnson, D. E. (2000a) ‘Topic … comment: the structure of unscientifc revolutions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 665–71

Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. and Johnson, D. E. (2000b) ‘The revolution confused: a response to our critics’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 873–90

Lappin, S., Levine, R. D. and Johnson, D. E. (2001) ‘The revolution maximally confused’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 901–19

Larson, R. (1988) ‘On the double object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91

Larson, R. (1990) ‘Double objects revisited: reply to Jackendoff’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 589–632

Larson, R. (1991) ‘Promise and the theory of control’, Linguistic Inquiry 2: 103–39

Lasnik, H. (1995) ‘Verbal Morphology: Syntactic Structures meets the Minimalist Program’, in H. Campos and P. Kempchinsky (eds.), Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory, Georgetown University Press, Georgetown, pp. 251–75

Lasnik, H. (1998) ‘Some reconstruction riddles’, in Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 83–98, Penn Linguistics Circle, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia

Lasnik, H. (1999) ‘Chains of arguments’, in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 189–215

Lasnik, H. (2000) Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (with M. Depiante and A. Stepanov)

Lasnik, H. (2001) ‘A note on the EPP’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 356–61

Lasnik, H. and Saito, M. (1991) ‘On the subject of infinitives’, Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 27: 324–43, University of Chicago

Lasnik, H. and Sobin, N. (2000) ‘The Who/Whom Puzzle: on the preservation of an archaic feature’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 343–71

Lasnik, H. and Uriagereka, J. (2002) ‘On the poverty of the challenge’, The Linguistic Review 19: 147–50

Lebeaux, D. (1991) ‘Relative clauses, licensing and the nature of derivation’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Academic Press, New York, pp. 209–39

Lebeaux, D. (1995) ‘Where does Binding Theory apply?’, University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 63–88

Lechner, W. (2001) ‘Reduced and phrasal comparatives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735

Legate, J. A. (2002) ‘Some interface properties of the phase’, unpublished paper, MIT

Legate, J. A. and Yang, C. D. (2002) ‘Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 151–62

Lenneberg, E. (1967) Biological Foundations of Language, Wiley, New York

Levin, B. and Rappaport Hovav, M. (1995) Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Lexical Semantic Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Longobardi, G. (1994) ‘Reference and proper names’, Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–66

Longobardi, G. (1996) ‘The syntax of N-raising: a minimalist theory’, OTS Working Papers no. 5, Research Institute for Language and Speech, Utrecht

Longobardi, G. (2001) ‘The structure of DPs: some principles, parameters and problems’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), pp. 562–603

López, L. (2001) ‘On the (non)complementarity of θ-Theory and Checking Theory’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 694–716

Lutz, U., M üuller, G. and von Stechow, A. (eds.) (2000) Wh-Scope Marking, Benjamins, Amsterdam

Lyons, C. (1999) Definiteness, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Martin, R. (2001) ‘Null case and the distribution of PRO’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 141–66

McCloskey, J. (2000) ‘Quantifier Float and Wh-Movement in an Irish English’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 57–84

McCloskey, J. (2001) ‘The morphosyntax of WH-extraction in Irish’, Journal of Linguistics 37: 67–100

McDaniel, D. (1989) ‘Partial and multiple wh-movement’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7: 565–604

McNally, L. (1992) ‘VP-coordination and the VP-internal subject hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 336–41

McNeill, D. (1966) ‘Developmental Psycholinguistics’, in F. Smith and G. A. Miller (eds.), The Genesis of Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 15–84

Marantz, A. (1984) On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Marcus, G. F. (1993) ‘Negative evidence in language acquisition’, Cognition 46: 53–85

Moore, J. and Perlmutter, D. M. (2000) ‘What does it take to be a dative subject?’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416

Morgan, J. L. and Travis, L. (1989) ‘Limits on negative information in language input’, Journal of Child Language 16: 531–52

Moro, A. (1997) The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Murasugi, K. and Saito, M. (1994) ‘Adjunction and cyclicity’, Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp. 302–17

Nakajima, H. (2001) ‘Verbs in locative constructions and the generative lexicon’, The Linguistic Review 18: 43–67

Namai, K. (2000) ‘Gender features in English’, Linguistics 38: 771–9

Nasu, N. (2001) ‘Associating EPP with ⊘-completeness’, Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 31: 351–67

Nasu, N. (2002) ‘Aspects of the Syntax of A-Movement: a Study of English Infinitival Contructions and Related Phenomena’, PhD diss., University of Essex

Nunes, J. (1999) ‘Linearization of chains and phonetic realisation of chain links’, in S. D. Epstein and N. Hornstein (eds.), Working Minimalism, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 217–49

Nunes, J. (2001) ‘Sideward movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 303–44

Nunes, J. and Uriagereka, J. (2000) ‘Cyclicity and extraction domains’, Syntax 3: 20–43

Ochi, M. (1999) ‘Multiple spell-out and PF-adjacency’, Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistic Society 29

Oya, T. (2002) ‘Reflexives and resultatives: some differences between English and German’, Linguistics 40: 961–86

Parker, S. (1999) ‘On the behaviour of definite articles in Chamicuro’, Language 75: 552–62

Pesetsky, D. (1987) ‘Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in E. J. Reuland and A. G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 98–129

Pesetsky, D. (1995) Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Pesetsky, D. (1997) ‘Optimality Theory and Syntax: Movement and Pronunciation’, in D. Archangeli and D. T. Langendoen (eds.), Optimality Theory: an Overview, Black well, Oxford, pp. 134–70

Pesetsky, D. (1998) ‘Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation’, in P. Barbosa

D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 337–83

Pesetsky, D. (2000) Phrasal Movement and Its Kin, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass

Pesetsky, D. and Torrego, E. (2001) ‘T-to-C movement: causes and consequences’, in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: a Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 355–426

Phillips, C. (2003) ‘Linear order and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37–90

Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (2000) ‘The metric of open-mindedness’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 859–62

Picallo, M. C. (1991) ‘Nominals and nominalization in Catalan’, Probus 3: 279–316

Platzack, C. and Holmberg, A. (1989) ‘The role of AGR and finiteness’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 101–17

Polinsky, M. and Potsdam, E. (2001) ‘Long-distance agreement and Topic in Tsez’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 583–646

Pollock, J.-Y. (1989) ‘Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424

Postal, P. M. (1966) ‘On so-called pronouns in English’, in F. Dinneen (ed.), Nineteenth Monograph on Language and Linguistics, Georgetown University Press, Washington DC (reprinted in D. Reibel and S. Schane (eds.) (1969) Modern Studies in English, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 201–24)

Postal, P. M. (1974) On Raising, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Potts, C. (2002) ‘The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 623–89

Pullum, G. K. and Scholz, B. C. (2002) ‘Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments’, The Linguistic Review 19: 9–50

Radford, A. (1981) Transformational Syntax, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Radford, A. (1988) Transformational Grammar, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Radford, A. (1993) ‘Head-hunting: on the trail of the nominal Janus’, in G. Corbett, N. M. Fraser and S. McGlashan (eds.), Heads in Grammatical Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 73–11

Radford, A. (1994) ‘The syntax of questions in child English’, Journal of Child Language 21: 211–36

Radford, A. (1997a) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Radford, A. (1997b) Syntax: a Minimalist Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Radford, A., Atkinson, M., Britain, D., Clahsen, H. and Spencer, A. (1999) Linguistics: an Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Ramat, P. (1999) ‘Linguistic categories and linguists’ categorizations', Linguistics 37: 157–80

Reintges, C. H, LeSourd, P. and Chung, S. (2002) ‘Movement, wh-agreement and apparent wh-in-situ’, paper presented to Workshop on Wh-Movement, University of Leiden, December 2002

Reuland, E. (2000) ‘Revolution, discovery and an elementary principle of logic’, NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory 18: 843–8

Reuland, E. (2001a) ‘Primitives of Binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 439–92

Reuland, E. (2001b) ‘Confusion compounded’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 879–85

Reuland, E. and Everaert, M. (2001) ‘Deconstructing Binding’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), pp. 634–70

Richards, N. (1997) ‘What moves where when in which language?’ PhD diss., MIT

Rickford, J. R. (1986) ‘Social contact and linguistic diffusion: Hiberno-English and New World Black English’, Language 62: 245–89

Ritter, E. (1991) ‘Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew’, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–62

Rizzi, L. (1992) ‘Early null subjects and root null subjects’, Geneva Generative Papers vol. 0, pp. 102–14

Rizzi, L. (1997) ‘The fne structure of the left periphery’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337

Rizzi, L. (2000) ‘Remarks on early null subjects’, in M.-A. Freidemann and L. Rizzi (eds.), The Acquisition of Syntax, London, Longman, pp. 269–92

Rizzi, L. (2001a) ‘Relativized minimality effects’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), pp. 89–110

Rizzi, L. (2001b) ‘On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause’, in G. Cinque and G. Salvi (eds.), Current Issues in Italian Syntax, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 287–96

Rizzi, L. (2003) ‘Locality and Left Periphery’, to appear in A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: the Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Roberts, I. (1993) Verbs and Diachronic Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht

Roberts, I. (1994) ‘Two types of head movement in Romance’, in Hornstein and Lightfoot (eds.), pp. 207–42

Roberts, I. (1997) ‘Restructuring, head movement and locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423–60

Roberts, I. (1998) ‘Have/Be Raising, Move F and Procrastinate’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 113–25

Roberts, I. (2000) ‘Caricaturing dissent’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 849–57

Roberts, I. (2001a) ‘Who has confused what? More on Lappin, Levine and Johnson’, NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory 19: 887–90

Roberts, I. (2001b) ‘Head Movement’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), pp. 113–47

Roberts, I. (2002) Paper on Verb Movement presented at visiting speaker seminar, University of Essex

Rohrbacher, B. (1999) Morphology-Driven Syntax: a theory of V-to-I raising and pro-drop, Benjamins, Amsterdam

Romero, M. (1997) ‘The correlation between scope reconstruction and connectivity effects’, in E. Curtiss, J. Lyle and G. Webster (eds.), Proceedings of the XVI West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics, CLSI, Stanford, pp. 351–65

Rosen, S. T. (1990) Argument Structure and Complex Predicates, Garland, New York

Ross, J. R. (1967) ‘Constraints on Variables in Syntax’, PhD diss., MIT (published as Infinite Syntax! by Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 1986)

Ross, J. R. (1970) ‘On declarative sentences’, in R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Waltham, Mass. pp. 222–72

Runner, J. (1998) Noun Phrase Licensing and Interpretation, Garland, New York

Rymer, R. (1993) Genie: a Scientifc Tragedy, Harper Perennial, New York

Sabel, J. (2002) ‘A minimalist analysis of syntactic islands’, The Linguistic Review 19: 271–315

Saddy, D. (1991) ‘Wh scope mechanisms in Bahasa Indonesia’, in L. Cheng and H. Demirdache (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 183–218

Sadock, J. M. (1984) ‘West Greenlandic’, in W. S. Chisholm (ed.), Interrogativity, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 189–214

Safir, K. (1986) Syntactic Chains, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Safir, K. (1993) ‘Perception, selection and structural economy’, Natural Language Semantics 2: 47–70

Sag, I. (1997) ‘English relative clause constructions’, Journal of Linguistics 33: 431–83

Sampson, G. (2002) ‘Exploring the richness of the stimulus’, The Linguistic Review 19: 73–104

Sauerland, U. (1998) ‘The Meaning of Chains’, PhD diss., MIT

Sauerland, U. and Elbourne, P. (2002) ‘Total reconstruction, PF movement and derivational order’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 283–319

Scholz, B. C. and Pullum, G. K. (2002) ‘Searching for arguments to support linguistic nativism’, The Linguistic Review 19: 185–223

Schüutze, C. (2001) ‘On the nature of default case’, Syntax 4: 205–38

Seppüanen, A. and Trotta, J. (2000) ‘The wh+that pattern in present-day English’, in J. M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 161–75

Shima, E. (2000) ‘A preference for Move over Merge’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 375–85

Sigurðsson, H. A. (1991) ‘Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–63

Sigurðsson, H. A. (1996) ‘Icelandic finite verb agreement’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 57: 1–46

Sigurðsson, H. A. (2002) ‘To be an oblique subject: Russian vs. Icelandic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 691–724

Smith, N. (1998) ‘Jackdaws, sex and language acquisition’, Glot International 3, 7: 7

Smith, N. (1999) Chomsky: Ideas and Ideals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Smith, N. and Cormack, A. (2002) ‘Indeterminacy, inference, iconicity and interpretation: aspects of the grammar-pragmatics interface’, in M. Makri-Tsilipakou (ed.), Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, pp. 38–53

Sobin, N. (2002) ‘The Comp-trace effect, the adverb effect, and minimal CP’, Journal of Linguistics 38: 527–60

Sorace, A. (2000) ‘Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs’, Language 76: 859–90

Speas, P. (1986) ‘Adjunction and Projections in Syntax’, PhD diss., MIT, Cambridge, Mass

Spencer, A. J. (1991) Morphological Theory, Blackwell, Oxford

Sportiche, D. (1988) ‘A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–49

Sportiche, D. (1998) ‘Movement, agreement and case’, in Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure, Routledge, London, pp. 88–243

Stepanov, A. (2001) ‘Late adjunction and minimalist phrase structure’, Syntax 4: 94–125

Stockwell, R., Schachter, P. and Hall Partee, B. (1973) The Major Syntactic Structures of English, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

Stowell, T. (1981) ‘Origins of Phrase Structure’, PhD dissertation, MIT

Stowell, T. (1982) ‘The tense of infinitives’, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 561–70

Stroik, T. (1990) ‘Adverbs as V-Sisters’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 654–61

Stroik, T. (2001) ‘On the light verb hypothesis’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 362–9

Su ~ner, M. (1994) ‘V-movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 335–72

Su ~ner, M. (2000) ‘The syntax of direct quotes with special reference to Spanish and English’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 525–78

Svenonius, P. (2002a) ‘Case is uninterpretable aspect’, http://www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/paperspage.html

Svenonius, P. (2002b) ‘Icelandic case and the structure of events’, http://www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/paperspage.html

Tallerman, M. O. (1993) ‘Case assignment and the order of functional projections in Welsh’, in A. Siewierska (ed.), Eurotyp Working Papers, Programme in Language Typology, European Science Foundation, pp. 1–41

Taraldsen, T. (1990) ‘D-projections and N-projections in Norwegian’, in M. Nespor and J. Mascarò (eds.), Grammar in Progress, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 419–31

Ten Hacken, P. (2001) Review of Radford 1997a/b, Natural Language Engineering 7/1

Thomas, M. (2002) ‘Development of the concept of “the poverty of stimulus”’, The LinguisticReview 19: 51–71

Thornton, R. (1995) ‘Referentiality and Wh-Movement in Child English: juvenile D-Link uency’, Language Acquisition 4: 139–75

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (1988) ‘The origins and development of periphrastic auxiliary do: a case of destigmatisation’, Dutch Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics 3: 1–30

Traugott, E. C. (1972) A History of English Syntax, Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York

Travis, L. (1984) ‘Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation’, PhD diss., MIT

Ura, H. (1993) ‘On feature-checking for wh-traces’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 243–80

Ura, H. (2001) ‘Local economy and generalized pied-piping’, The Linguistic Review 18: 169–91

Uriagereka, J. (1988) ‘On Government’, PhD diss., University of Connecticut

Uriagereka, J. (1998) Rhyme and Reason, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Uriagereka, J. (2000) ‘On the emptiness of “design” polemics’, Natural Language andLinguistic Theory 18: 863–71

Uriagereka, J. (2001) ‘Cutting derivational options’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 891–900

Vainikka, A. and Levy, Y. (1999) ‘Empty subjects in Finnish and Hebrew’, Natural Languageand Linguistic Theory 17: 613–71

Valois, D. (1991) ‘The Syntax of DP’, PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles

Vikner, S. (1995) Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in Germanic Languages, Oxford University Press, Oxford

Vikner, S. (1997) ‘V°-to-I° movement and inflection for person in all tenses’, in L. Haegeman (ed.), The New Comparative Syntax, Longman, London, pp. 189–213

Wakelin, M. F. (1977, 2nd edn.) English Dialects: an Introduction, Athlone, London

Watanabe, A. (2001) ‘Wh-in-situ languages’, in Baltin and Collins (eds.), pp. 203–25

Wexler, K. (1994) ‘Optional Infinitives, Head Movement and the Economy of Derivations’, in Hornstein and Lightfoot (eds.), pp. 305–50

Williams, E. (1994) Thematic Structure in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

Willis, D. (2000) ‘On the distribution of resumptive pronouns and wh-trace in Welsh’, Journal of Linguistics 36: 531–73

Wiltschko, M. (2001) ‘The syntax of pronouns: evidence from Halkomelem Salish’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 157–95

Wolfram, W. (1971) ‘Black-white speech differences revisited’, in W. Wolfram and N. H. Clark (eds.), Black-White Speech Relationships, Center For Applied Linguistics, Washington DC, pp. 139–61

Woolford, E. (1991) ‘VP-internal subjects in VSO and nonconfgurational languages’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 503–40

Xu, L. (2003) ‘Choice between the overt and the covert’, Transactions of the PhilologicalSociety 101: 81–107

Yang, C. D. (1999) ‘Unordered Merge and its linearization’, Syntax 1: 38–64

Zagona, K. (1987) Verb Phrase Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht

Zwart, C. J. -W. (2001) ‘Syntactic and phonological verb movement’, Syntax 4: 34–62

Zwicky, A. (2002) ‘I wonder what kind of construction that this kind of example illustrates’, in D. Beaver, L. D. Casillas Martínez, B. Z. Clark and S. Kaufmann (eds.), The Construction of Meaning, CSLI Publications, pp. 219–48

Minimalist Syntax

Exploring the Structure of English

This Book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Book description

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Contents

Frontmatter
pp i-vi

Contents
pp vii-x

Preface
pp xi-xiv

1 - Grammar
pp 1-32

2 - Words
pp 33-65

3 - Structure
pp 66-105

4 - Null constituents
pp 106-150

5 - Head movement
pp 151-187

6 - Wh-movement
pp 188-240

7 - A-movement
pp 241-280

8 - Agreement, case and movement
pp 281-326

9 - Split projections
pp 327-380

10 - Phases
pp 381-431

Glossary
pp 432-484

References
pp 485-497

Index
pp 498-512

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Book summary page views

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

Accessibility Information