Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:54:15.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2024

James Q. Whitman
James Q. Whitman
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
From Masters of Slaves to Lords of Lands
The Transformation of Ownership in the Western World
 , pp. 395 - 434
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abels, Richard. “The Historiography of a Construct: ‘Feudalism’ and the Medieval Historian,” History Compass 7, no. 3 (2009): 1008–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, James. “Private Land and Common Oceans: Analysis of the Development of Property Regimes,” Current Anthropology 56 (2015): 28–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, James M. and Gardner, Roy J.. “Strategies, Conflict, and the Emergence of Territoriality: The Case of the Maine Lobster Industry,” American Anthropologist 106 (2004): 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Julia and Charrad, Mounira M.. “Introduction,” in Adams and Charrad, Patrimonial Capitalism and Empire. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 2015, 1–6.Google Scholar
Adams Holland, Louise. “Qui terminus exarasset,” American Journal of Archeology 31 (1933): 549–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adiele, Pius Onyemechi. The Popes, the Catholic Church, and the Transatlantic Enslavement of Black Africans, 1418–1839. Hildesheim: Olms, 2017.Google Scholar
Albu, Emily. “The Battle of the Maps in the Christian Empire,” in Claudia Rapp and H. A. Drake, eds., The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 202–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, Susan E. Graecia Capta: The Landscapes of Roman Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Alföldi, Andreas. “Die Ausgestaltung des monarchischen Zeremoniells,” in Mitteilungen des Deutschen archäologischen Instituts, römische Abteilung 49 (1934): 3–118.Google Scholar
Allard, Paul. La Persécution de Dioclétien. Paris: Lecoffre, 1900.Google Scholar
Ambrosino, Rodolfo. “Le applicazioni innovative della ‘mancipatio,’” in Studi in memoria di Emilio Albertario. Milan: Giuffrè, 1953, 2, 575–617.Google Scholar
Amelotti, Mario “Reichsrecht, Volksrecht, Provinzialrecht,” Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 65 (1995): 211–215.Google Scholar
Amirante, Luigi. Captivitas e postliminium. Naples: Jovene, 1950.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: NLB, 1974.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford. “Aliens, Ambassadors and the Integrity of Empire,” Law and History Review 26 (2008): 491–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, Clifford. “Legal Pluralism in Practice,” in Paul du Plessis, Clifford Ando, and Kaius Tuori, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, Clifford. Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in the Context of Empire. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, Clifford and Jörg Rüpke, eds., Religion and Law in Classical and Christian Rome. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2006.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon., [Une Société de Gens de Lettres]. Grand vocabulaire françois. Paris: De Thou, 1773.Google Scholar
Ardrey, Robert. The Territorial Imperative: A Personal Enquiry into the Animal Origins of Property and Nations. New York: Atheneum, 1966.Google Scholar
Arnaud, André-Jean Les origines doctrinales du Code civil français. Paris: LGDJ, 1969.Google Scholar
Arnaud, André-Jean “Reflexions sur l’occupation du droit romain,” Revue historique du droit 46 (1968): 183–210.Google Scholar
Arnaud, P. “Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa and His Geographical Work,” in M. R. Cataudella and H.-J. Gehrke, eds., Brill’s Companion to Ancient Geography: The Inhabited World in the Greek and Roman Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 2016, 205–222.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jeanne E. “The Archaeology of Complex Hunter-Gatherers,” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 3 (1996): 77–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Quentin D. and Whitehouse, Harvey. “The Cultural Morphospace of Ritual Form: Examining Modes of Religiosity Cross-culturally.” Evolution and Human Behavior 12 (2011): 50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, Saint. De Civitate Dei, Libri I-X, Corpus Christianorum, series Latina 47. Turnhout: Brepols, 1955.Google Scholar
Badian, Ernst. Foreign Clientelae (264–70 b.c.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Bagge, Sverre, Michael H. Gelting, and Thomas Lindkvist, eds. Feudalism: New Landscapes of Debate. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar
Bailey, Robert. The Behavioral Ecology of Efe Pygmy Men in the Ituri Forest, Zaire, Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 86. Minneapolis: University of Michigan Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubaldi, Baldus degli. In primam Digesti Veteris partem commentaria. Venice: n.p. 1599.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. and Levinson, Sanford. “The Dangerous Thirteenth Amendment,” Columbia Law Review 112 (2012): 1459–1500.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart. How the Indians Lost Their Land: Law and Power on the Frontier. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart. “Two Properties, One Land: Law and Space in Nineteenth-Century New Zealand,” Law and Social Inquiry 24 (1999): 807–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, Benjamin. “Home as a Legal Concept.” Santa Clara Law Review 46 (2006): 255–306.Google Scholar
Barthélemy, Dominique. La mutation féodale, a-t-elle eu lieu? Paris: Fayard, 1997.Google Scholar
Basdevant-Gaudemet, Brigitte. Aux origines de l’état moderne: Charles Loyseau, 1562–1627, théoricien de la puissance publique. Paris: Economica, 1977.Google Scholar
Baudy, Gerhard J. “Hierarchie, oder: die Verteilung des Fleisches,” in Burkhard Gladigow and Hans J. Kippenberg, eds., Neue Ansätze in der Religionswissenschaft. Munich: Kösel, 1983, 131–174.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard. Human Rights in Ancient Rome. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Christopher. The Scythian Empire: Central Eurasia and the Birth of the Classical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Behrends, Okko. “Bodenhoheit und privates Bodeneigentum im Grenzwesen Roms,” in Behrends and Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi, eds., Die römische Feldmesserkunst. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 1992, 192–284.Google Scholar
Bell, David A. “When the Levée Breaks,” World Affairs 170 (2008): 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Sinclair and Paul du Plessis, eds. Roman Law before the Twelve Tables: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Bellen, Heinz. “Hans Volkmann,” Gnomon 18 (1976): 426–431.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. Law in Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. They Called It Peace: Worlds of Imperial Violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2024.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren and Richard Ross, eds. Legal Pluralism in Empires, 1500–1850. New York: New York University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren and Straumann, Benjamin. “Acquiring Empire by Law: From Roman Doctrine to Early Modern European Practice,” Law and History Review 28 (2010): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercé, Yves-Marie. “Conclusion,” in Ghislaine Brunel and Serge Brunei, eds., Haro sur le seigneur! Les luttes anti-seigneuriales dans l’Europe mediévale et moderne. Toulouse: Presses universitaires du Mirail, 2009, 202–209.Google Scholar
Berdan, Frances. The Aztecs of Central Mexico: An Imperial Society. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982.Google Scholar
Birks, Peter. “The Roman Law Concept of Dominium and the Idea of Absolute Ownership,” Acta juridica (1985): 1–37.Google Scholar
Birr, Christiane. “Dominium in the Indies: Juan López de Palacios Rubios’ Libellus de insulis oceanis quas vulgus indias appelat (1512–1516).” Rechtsgeschichte 26 (2018): 264–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book I: Of the Rights of Persons, ed. David Lemmings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book II: Of the Rights of Things, ed. Simon Stern. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Blaufarb, Rafe. The Great Demarcation: The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleicken, Jochen. Prinzipat und Dominat: Gedanken zur Periodisierung der römischen Kaiserzeit. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1978.Google Scholar
Bloch, Marc. “Comment et pourquoi finit l’esclavage antique,” Annales: économies, sociétés, civilisations 2 (1947): 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Marc. Feudal Society, trans. L. Manyon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Bodel, John. “Slave Labour and Roman Society,” in John Bodel and Paul Cartledge, eds., The Cambridge World History of Slavery, Vol. 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 311–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Jean. Les six livres de la République. Paris: Fayard, 1986.Google Scholar
Boehm, Christopher. Hierarchy in the Forest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfante, Pietro. Corso di diritto romano. Rome: Sampaolesi, 1926.Google Scholar
Bonfante, Pietro. Storia del diritto romano. Milan: Giuffrè, 1958.Google Scholar
Bonnassie, Pierre. “Survie et extinction du régime esclavagiste dans l’Occident du haut moyen âge (IVe–XIe s.),” Cahiers de civilisation médiévale 28 (1985): 307–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borah, Woodrow. Justice by Insurance: The General Indian Court of Colonial Mexico and the Legal Aides of the Half-Real. Berkeley: California, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis. “The Analytic Language of John Wilkins,” in Borges, , Other Inquisitions, 1937–1952, trans. Ruth L. C. Simmons. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968.Google Scholar
Botteri, Paula. “La définition de l’ager occupatorius,” Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 3 (1992): 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Constance. “Three Counties, One Lineage, and Eight Heiresses: Nevers, Auxerre, and Tonnerre, Eleventh to Thirteenth Centuries,” Medieval Prosopography 31 (2016): 25–46.Google Scholar
Boutruche, Robert. Seigneurie et féodalité. Paris: Fernand Aubier–Éditions Montaigne, 1959.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. W. Fiction as History: Nero to Julian. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Bowes, Kim. “‘… Nec sedere in villam’: Villa-Churches, Rural Piety and the Priscillianist Controversy,” in Urban Centers and Rural Contexts in Late Antiquity. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2001, 323–378.Google Scholar
Bowes, Kim and Gutteridge, Adam. “Rethinking the Later Roman Landscape,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 18 (2005): 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Keith. “Animalizing the Slave: The Truth of Fiction,” Journal of Roman Studies 90 (2000): 110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Keith. Apuleius and Antonine Rome: Historical Essays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, Keith. “The Regular, Daily Traffic in Slaves: Roman History and Contemporary History,” Classical Journal 87 (1991–1992): 125–138.Google Scholar
Bradley, Keith. “Roman Slavery and Roman Law,” Historical Reflections 15 (1988): 477–495.Google Scholar
Bradley, Keith. “Slavery in the Roman Republic,” in John Bodel and Paul Cartledge, eds., The Cambridge World History of Slavery, Vol. 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenberger, David and Mikhail Zelenov, eds. Stalin’s Master Narrative. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. “Histoire et sciences sociales: la longue durée,” Annales: économies, sociétés, civilisations 13 (1958): 725–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretone, Mario. “Sesto Elio et le Dodici Tavole,” Labeo 41 (1995): 66–82.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel. Changes of State: Nature and the Limits of the City in Early Modern Natural Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Brett, Annabel. Liberty, Right and Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Brewer, Holly. “Slavery, Sovereignty, and ‘Inheritable Blood’: Reconsidering John Locke and the Origins of American Slavery,” American Historical Review 122 (2017): 1038–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brilliant, Richard. “‘Let the Trumpets Roar!’ The Roman Triumph,” Studies in the History of Art 56, Symposium Papers 34: The Art of Ancient Spectacle (1999): 220–229.Google Scholar
Brodersen, Kai. “Mapping (in) the Ancient World,” Journal of Roman Studies 94 (2004): 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brogiolo, Gian Pietro and Bryan Ward-Perkins, eds. The Idea and Ideal of the Town between Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Brown, Elizabeth A. R. “The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe,” American Historical Review 79 (1974): 1063–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Jerram. “The Evolution of Diversity in Avian Territorial Systems,” Wilson Bulletin 76, no. 2 (1964): 160–169.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. “Two Great Roman Landowners,” Latomus 34 (1975): 619–635.Google Scholar
Bryen, Ari Z. “Histories of Violence: Notes from the Roman Empire,” in Roderick Campbell, ed., Violence and Civilization: Studies of Social Violence in History and Prehistory. Oxford and Oakville: Oxbow, 2014, 125–151.Google Scholar
Bücher, Karl. Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Tübingen: Laupp, 1922.Google Scholar
Bücher, Karl. Die Entstehung der Volkswirtschaft. Tübingen: Laupp, 1893.Google Scholar
Bücher, Karl. Die Entstehung der Volkswirtschaft: Vorträge und Versuche. Tübingen: Laupp, 1910.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. Roman Law of Slavery: The Condition of the Slave in Private Law from Augustus to Justinian. New York: AMS, 1969.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. A Text-Book of Roman Law, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. and Arnold D., McNair. Roman Law and Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Buckle, Stephen. Natural Law and the Theory of Property: Grotius to Hume. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002.Google Scholar
Buffière, Félix. Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris: Belles Lettres, 1956.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. The Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology in Early Religions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. Homo necans: Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen, 2nd ed. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, Walter. “Zum altgriechischen Mitleidsbegriff,” diss. Erlangen, 1955.Google Scholar
Burton, G. P. “Was There a Long Term Trend to Centralisation of Authority in the Roman Empire?” Revue de philologie 72 (1998): 7–24.Google Scholar
Busbequius, Augerius Gislenius. Epistola quatuor. Hanover: Typis Wechelianis, 1605.Google Scholar
Bush, M. I., ed. Serfdom and Slavery: Studies in Legal Bondage. New York: Longman, 1996.Google Scholar
Bynkershoek, Cornelis van. Opuscula. Leiden: Luchtmans, 1752.Google Scholar
Calasso, Francesco “Diritto volgare, diritti romanzi, diritto comune,” in Introduzione al diritto commune, Milan: Giuffrè, 1951, 207–232.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi. “Alcuni problem di storia romana arcaica: ager publicus, gentes e clienti,” Bolletino dell’Istituto di diritto romano 12 (1980): 29–65.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi. “Dominium e possessio nell’Italia Romana,” in Ennio Cortese, ed., La proprietà e le proprietà. Milan: Giuffrè, 1988, 141–182.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi. “Ownership and Power in Roman Law,” trans. Thomas Roberts, in Paul J. DuPlessis, Clifford Ando, and Kaius Tuori, eds., Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 524–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi. Proprietà e signoria in Roma antica, 2nd ed. Rome: La Sapienza, 1994.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi. “Le regime de la terre à l’époque républicaine,” in Terre et paysans dépendants dans les sociétés antiques (Paris: Éditions du CNRS, 1979), 313–388.Google Scholar
Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi. La struttura della proprietà e la formazione dei “iura praediorum” nell’età repubblicana. Milan: Giuffrè, 1969–1976.Google Scholar
Cardilli, Riccardo. “Il problema della libertà naturale in diritto romano,” Derecho animal/Forum of Animal Law Studies 10, no. 3 (2019): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Bridget, Milgram, Anne, Kim, Kathleen, and Warnath, Stephen. Human Trafficking Law and Policy. Durham: Carolina Academic, 2014.Google Scholar
Caseau, Béatrice. “Sacred Landscapes,” in G. W. Bowersock, Peter Brown, and Oleg Grabar, eds., Interpreting Late Antiquity: Essays on the Postclassical World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001, 21–59.Google Scholar
Cashdan, Elizabeth. “Territoriality among Human Foragers: Ecological Models and an Application to Four Bushman Groups,” Current Anthropology 24 (1983): 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashdan, Elizabeth. “Territoriality,” in David Levinson and Melvin Ember, eds., Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology (1996) 4:1301–1305.Google Scholar
Cassi, Aldo Andrea. Ius commune tra Vecchio e Nuovo Mondo: mari, terre, oro nel diritto della Conquista. Milan: Giuffrè, 2004.Google Scholar
Cauvin, Jacques, The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture, trans. Trevor Watkins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Chabot-Hanowell, Benjamin and Alden Smith, Eric. “Territorial and Non-territorial Routes to Power: Reconciling Evolutionary Ecological, Social Agency, and Historicist Approaches,” in James Osborne and N. Parker Van Valkenburgh, eds., Territoriality in Archaeology. Washington, D.C.: Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 2015, 72–86.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Robert S. Castilian Backgrounds of the Repartimiento-Encomienda. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institute, 1939.Google Scholar
Chanock, Martin. Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann, 1998.Google Scholar
Chapais, Bernard. “Competence and the Evolutionary Origins of Status and Power,” Human Nature 26 (2015): 161–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapoutot, Johann. “The Denaturalization of Nordic Law: Germanic Law and the Reception of Roman Law,” in Kaius Tuori and Heta Björklund, eds., Roman Law and the Idea of Europe. London: Bloomsbury, 2019, 113–126.Google Scholar
Cherry, David. Frontier and Society in Roman North Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomel, Noel. Supplement au Dictionnaire œconomique. Commercy: Thomas, 1741.Google Scholar
Chouquer, Gérard. La terre dans le monde romain: anthropologie, droit, géographie. Paris: Errance, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, Karl. Römische Geschichte und deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft. Munich: Beck, 1982.Google Scholar
Clark, E. G. “Pastoral Care: Town and Country in Late Antique Preaching,” in Thomas S. Burns and John W. Eadie, eds., Urban Centers and Rural Contexts in Late Antiquity. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 265–284.Google Scholar
Coleman, Anthony P. Lactantius and the Doctrine of Providence. Piscataway, N.J.: Gorgias, 2017.Google Scholar
Coleman, Janet. “Dominium in Thirteenth- and Fourteenth-Century Political Thought and Its Seventeenth-Century Heirs: John of Paris and Locke,” Political Studies 33 (1985): 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, Linda. The Gun, the Ship and the Pen: Warfare, Constitutions and the Making of the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Connolly, Serena. Lives behind the Laws: The World of the Codex Hermogenianus. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Cooper, Kate. “Closely Watched Households: Visibility, Exposure and Private Power in the Roman ‘Domus.’” Past & Present 197 (2007): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Kate. The Fall of the Roman Household. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Kate. “Relationships, Resistance, and Religious Change in the Early Christian Household,” in John Doran, Charlotte Methuen, and Alexandra Walsham, eds., Religion and the Household. Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 2014, 5–22.Google Scholar
Corbin, Arthur L. “Legal Analysis and Terminology,” Yale Law Journal 29 (1919): 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, Simon. The Empire of the Tetrarchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corni, Gustavo and Horst Gies, eds. Blut und Boden: Rassenideologie und Agrarpolitik im Staat Hitlers. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner, 1994.Google Scholar
Cottrol, Robert. The Long Lingering Shadow: Slavery, Race and the Law in the American Hemisphere. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. “Nomos and Narrative,” Harvard Law Review 97 (1982): 4–68.Google Scholar
Crawford, Michael. “‘Pecunia’ in the Twelve Tables,” in Martin Price, Andrew Burnett, and Roger Bland, eds., Essays in Honour of Robert Carson and Kenneth Jenkins. London: Spink, 1993, 135–138.Google Scholar
Crawford, Michael. Roman Statutes. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 1996.Google Scholar
Creighton, J. N. Narrative of the Siege and Capture of Bhurtpore in the Province of Agra, Upper Hindoostan. London: n.p., 1830.Google Scholar
Crifò, G. “Per una prospettiva romanistica die diritti dell’uomo,” in Klaus Girardet and Ulrich Nortmann, eds., Menschenrechte und europäische Identität: die antiken Grundlagen. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2005, 240–269.Google Scholar
Cronon, William. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists and the Ecology of New England. New York: Hill and Wang, 1983.Google Scholar
Cursi, Maria Floriana. La struttura del “postliminium” nelle Repubblica e nel Principato. Naples: Jovene, 1996.Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert. Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. Bern: Francke, 1948.Google Scholar
Dalrymple, William. The Anarchy: The East India Company, Corporate Violence, and the Pillage of an Empire. New York: Bloomsbury, 2019.Google Scholar
Davis, David Brion. Inhuman Bondage: The Rise of Fall of Slavery in the New World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen. Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Davis, Natalie Z. The Return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Fuente, Alejandro and Gross, Ariela. “Comparative Studies of Law, Slavery, and Race in the Americas,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6 (2010): 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de las Casas, Bartolomé. Historia de las Indias. Madrid: Ginesta, 1875.Google Scholar
de Soto, Domingo. De iustitia et iure. Lyons: Jacob, 1569.Google Scholar
de Soto, Domingo. Relecciones y opusculos, ed. Jaime Brufau Prats. Salamanca: San Esteban, 1995.Google Scholar
de Souza, Philip. Piracy in the Graeco-Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
de Stefani, Paolo. “The Liber Paradisus: A Vision of Good Governance,” in Markku Suksi, Kalliope Agapios-Josephides, Jean-Paul Lehners, and Manfred Nowak, eds., First Fundamental Rights Documents in Europe. Cambridge, Antwerp, and Portland, OR: Intersentia, 2015, 39–55.Google Scholar
de Zulueta, Francis, ed. and trans. The Institutes of Gaius. Oxford: Clarendon, 1946.Google Scholar
Delgado, Mariano. “Die Indios als Sklaven von Natur? Aristoteles-Rezeption in der Amerika-Kontroverse im Schatten der spanischen Expansion,” in Günter Frank and Andreas Speer, eds., Der Aristotelismus in frühen Neuzeit: Kontinuität oder Wiederaneignung? Wiesbaden: Harassowitz, 2007, 353–382.Google Scholar
Demandt, Alexander. Geschichte der Spätantike. Munich: Beck, 1989.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” American Economic Review 57 (1967): 347–359.Google Scholar
DePalma Digeser, Elizabeth. The Making of a Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Deslandres, Dominique. “Et loing de France,” Revue d’histoire de l’Amérique française 64 (2011): 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewald, Jonathan and Vardi, Liana. “The Peasantries of France,” in Tom Scott, ed., Peasantries of Europe from the Fourteenth to the Eighteenth Centuries. London: Longman, 1994, 21–47.Google Scholar
Dey, Hendrik. The Afterlife of the Roman City: Architecture and Ceremony in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, Nicola and Michael Maas, eds. Empires and Exchanges in Eurasian Late Antiquity: Rome, China and the Steppe ca. 250–750. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. “ΚΥΡΙΕ, ΔΕΣΠΟΤΑ, DOMINE: Greek Politeness in the Roman Empire,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 121 (2001): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilcher, Gerhard. “Römisches Recht oder Deutsches Recht?” in Dilcher, , Die Germanisten und die historische Rechtsschule: bürgerliche Wissenschaft zwischen Romantik, Realismus und Rationalisierung. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2017, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diósdi, György. “Familia pecuniaque,” Acta antiqua Academiae scientarum hungaricae 12 (1964): 87–105.Google Scholar
Diósdi, György. Ownership in Ancient and Pre-Classical Roman Law. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1970.Google Scholar
Domar, Evsey. “The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom: A Hypothesis.” Journal of Economic History 30 (1970): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domat, Jean. Les loix civiles dans leur ordre naturel, 2nd ed. Paris: Coignard, 1695.Google Scholar
Dowling, J. H. “Individual Ownership and the Sharing of Game in Hunting Societies,” American Anthropologist 70 (1968): 502–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, Seymour. Abolition: A History of Slavery and Anti-Slavery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drescher, Seymour. Econocide: British Slavery in the Era of Abolition, 2nd ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Drews, Carlos. “The Concept and Definition of Dominance in Animal Behaviour,” Behaviour 125 (1993): 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Plessis, Paul and Borkowski, Andrew. Borkowski’s Textbook on Roman Law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducos, Michèle. “Les juristes romains et le domaine agraire,” in Ella Hermon, ed., La question agraire à Rome: droit romain et société. Como: New Press, 1999, 121–129.Google Scholar
Dukeminier, Jesse, Krier, James, Alexander, Gregory, Schill, Michael, and Strahilevitz, Lior. Property, 10th ed. New York: Aspen, 2022Google Scholar
Dulckeit, Gerhard. “Zur Lehre vom Rechtsgeschäft im klassischen Römischen Recht,” in Festschrift Fritz Schulz. Weimar: Böhlau, 1951, 1:148–190.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. L’héritage indo-européen à Rome. Paris: Gallimard, 1949.Google Scholar
Duplessis, . Traitez de Monsieur Duplessis sur la Coutume de Paris. Paris: Gosselin, 1699.Google Scholar
Dyson-Hudson, Rada and Alden Smith, Eric. “Human Territoriality: An Ecological Reassessment,” American Anthropologist 80 (1978): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eck, Werner. “Die Neuorganisation der Provinzen und Italiens unter Diokletian,” in Eck and Salvatore Puliatti, eds., Diocleziano: la frontiera giuridica dell’impero. Pavia: Pavia University Press, 2018, 111–151.Google Scholar
Eck, Werner, Cabbalos, Antonio, and Fernández, Fernando. Das senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre. Munich: Beck, 1996.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Arthur M. “Brigands, Emperors, and Anarchy,” International History Review 22 (2000): 862–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, Dan. On the Spirit of Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egío García, José Luis. “Matías de Paz and the Introduction of Thomism in the Asuntos de Indias: A Conceptual Revolution,” Rechtsgeschichte 26 (2018): 236–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egío García, José Luis and Birr, Christiane. “Before Vitoria: Expansion into Heathen, Empty, or Disputed Lands in Late-Mediaeval Salamanca Writings and Early 16th-Century Juridical Treatises,” in Jörg Tellkamp, ed., A Companion to Early Modern Spanish Imperial Political and Social Thought. Leiden: Brill, 2020, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen. Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1913.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. A History of Religious Ideas, trans. Willard Trask. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion, trans. Willard R. Trask. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1959.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert. “Property in Land,” Yale Law Journal 102 (1993): 1315–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elm, Susanna. “Church–Festival–Temple: Reimagining Civic Topography in Late Antiquity,” in Claudia Rapp and H. A. Drake, eds., The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engbring-Romang, Udo. Karl Rodbertus (1805–1875). Pfaffenweiller: Centaurus, 1990.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigenthums, und des Staats. Hottingen-Zürich: Schweizerische Volksbuchhandlung, 1884.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. Herrn Eugen Dühring’s Umwälzung der Wissenschaft, 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Dietz, 1894.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. “Vorwort,” in Marx, Karl, Das Kapital, Band II: Das Circulationsprocess des Kapitals. Hamburg: Meissner, 1885, iii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley. “Some Considerations Relating to Property Rights in Man,” Journal of Economic History 33 (1973): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Stephen. Speaking of Slavery: Color, Ethnicity and Human Bondage in Italy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, Paul. “Beyond the Limits of the ‘Consumer City’: A Model of the Urban and Rural Economy in the Roman World,” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 50 (2001): 332–356.Google Scholar
Erdkamp, Paul, Verboven, Koenraad, and Zuiderhoek, Arian. “Introduction,” in Erdkamp, Verboven, and Zuiderhoek, eds., Capital, Investment and Innovation in the Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred and Meillet, Alfred. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksieck, 2001.Google Scholar
Ernst, Wolfgang. “Fritz Schulz (1879–1957),” in Jack Beatson and Reinhard Zimmermann, eds., Jurists Uprooted: German-Speaking Émigré Lawyers in Twentieth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 105–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewald, William. “Comparative Jurisprudence (I): What Was It Like to Try a Rat?” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143 (1995): 1889–2149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fales, Frederick Mario. Guerre et paix en Assyrie: réligion et impérialisme. Paris: École pratique des hautes études, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farge, James K. “John Mair: An Historical Introduction,” in John Slotemaker and Jeffrey Witt, eds., A Companion to the Theology of John Mair. Leiden: Brill, 2015, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedele, Dante. The Medieval Foundations of International law: Baldus de Ubaldis (1327–1400). Leiden: Brill, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, Robert. “Les origines du dominium utile chez les glossateurs,” in Feenstra, , Fata iuris romani: études d’histoire du droit. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 1974, 234–239.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert. “Der Eigentumsbegriff bei Hugo Grotius im Licht einiger mittelalterlicher und spätscholastischer Quellen,” in Okko Behrends, Malte Dießelhorst, Hermann Lange, Detlef Liebs, Joseph Georg Wolf, and Christian Wollschläger, eds., Festschrift für Franz Wieacker zum 70. Geburtstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1978, 209–234.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert. “Histoire du droit savant, expropriation et dominium eminens chez Grotius,” in L’expropriation, Recueils de la Société Jean Bodin 67. Brussels: De Boeck Université, 1999, 133–153.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert. “Historische aspecten van de private eigendom als rechtsinstituut,” Rechtsgelehrd Magazin Themis (1976): 249–54.Google Scholar
Feuvrier-Prévotat, Claire. “Le concept de la familia pecuniaque dans la loi des XII Tables,” in Ella Hermon, ed., La question agraire à Rome: droit romain et société. Como: New Press, 1979, 59–79.Google Scholar
Filmer, Robert. Patriarcha and Other Writings, ed. Robert Sommerville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. “The Ancient City: From Fustel de Coulanges to Max Weber and Beyond,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 19 (1977), 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, M. I. The Ancient Economy, ed. Walter Scheidel and Sitta von Reden. New York: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. Ancient Slavery and Modern Ideology, expanded ed., ed. Brent Shaw. New York: Wiener, 1998.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I., ed. Studies in Roman Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Finley, M. I. The World of Odysseus, new ed. New York: NYRB, 2002.Google Scholar
Fisher, Elaine. “Fascist Scholars, Fascist Scholarship: The Quest for Ur-Fascism and the Study of Religion,” in Christian Wedemeyer and Wendy Doniger, eds., Hermeneutics, Politics, and the History of Religions: The Contested Legacies of Joachim Wach and Mircea Eliade. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, William. Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. Sovereignty, Property and Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent and Marcus, Joyce. The Creation of Inequality: How Our Prehistoric Ancestors Set the Stage for Monarchy, Slavery and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flückiger, Felix. Geschichte des Naturrechts. Zurich: Evangelischer Verlag, 1954.Google Scholar
Flynn, Maureen. Sacred Charity: Confraternities and Social Welfare in Spain, 1400–1700. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell Universtiy Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fögen, Marie-Therèse. Römische Rechtsgeschichten: über Ursprung und Evolution eines sozialen Systems. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2002.Google Scholar
Forde, Steven. “The Charitable John Locke,” Review of Politics 71 (2009): 428–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowden, Garth. Empire to Commonwealth: Consequences of Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth and Genovese, Eugene, The Mind of the Master Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franciosi, Gennaro. “Gentiles familiam habento,” in Franciosi, ed., Ricerche sulla organizzazione gentilizia romana. Naples: Jovene, 1995, 5–49.Google Scholar
Franciosi, Gennaro. Studi sulle servitù prediali. Naples: Jovene, 1967.Google Scholar
Frazer, James George. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. New York: MacMillan, 1941.Google Scholar
Fried, Morton. The Evolution of Political Society: An Essay in Political Anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.Google Scholar
Frier, Bruce. “Bees and Lawyers,” Classical Journal 78 (1982–1983): 105–114.Google Scholar
Frier, Bruce. The Rise of the Roman Jurists: Studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frier, Bruce and McGinn, Thomas. A Casebook on Roman Family Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fynn-Paul, Jeffrey. “Empire, Monotheism and Slavery in the Greater Mediterranean Region from Antiquity to the Early Modern Era,” Past & Present 205 (2009): 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabba, Emilio and Pasquinucci, Marinella. Strutture agrarie e allevamento transumante nell’Italia romana (III–I sec. a.C.). Pisa: Giardini, 1979.Google Scholar
Gallo, Filippo. “Osservazioni sulla signoria del ‘paterfamilias,’” in Studi in onore di Pietro de Francisci. Milan: Giuffrè, 1956, 2:195–236.Google Scholar
Ganshof, Jean-Louis. Feudalism, trans. Philip Grierson, 3rd ed. New York: Harper, 1961.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter. Ideas of Slavery from Aristotle to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Garnsey, Peter. Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnsey, Peter and Saller, Richard, The Roman Empire: Society, Economy and Culture, 2nd ed. Berkeley: California, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudemet, Jean. “Le monde antique et les droits de l’homme – quelques observations,” in Huguette Jones, ed., Le monde antique et les droits de l’homme. Brussels: Centre de droit comparé et d’histoire du droit, 1998, 175–183.Google Scholar
Geary, Patrick. The Myth of Nations: The Medieval Origins of Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gehl, Walther. Geschichte: 6. Klasse. Oberschulen/Gymnasien und Oberschulen in Aufbauform. Bresau: Hirt, 1940.Google Scholar
Ghachem, Malick. The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Edward. History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. New York: Harper, 1893.Google Scholar
Giglio, Francesco. “The Concept of Ownership in Roman Law,” Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 135 (2018): 76–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Philippe. Haiti: The Tumultuous History – from Pearl of the Caribbean to Broken Nation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Giltaij, Jacob. “Mensenrechten in het Romeinse Recht?” diss. Rotterdam, 2011.Google Scholar
Giltaij, Jacob and Tuori, Kaius. “Human Rights in Antiquity? Revisiting Anachronism and Roman Law,” in Pamela Slotte and Miia Halme-Tuomisaari, eds., Revisiting the Origins of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert. “The Evolution of Private Property,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 64 (2006): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordanengo, Gérard. Le droit féodal dans les pays de droit écrit: l’exemple de la Provence et du Dauphiné, XIIe–début XIVe siècle. Rome: École française de Rome, 1988.Google Scholar
Girard, Paul Frédéric. Manuel élémentaire du droit romain, 3rd ed. Paris: Rousseau, 1901.Google Scholar
Gledhill, John. Power and Its Disguises: Anthropological Perspectives on Politics. Boulder: Westview, 1994.Google Scholar
Godefroy, Denys, ed. Corpus iuris civilis a Dio. Gothofredo recognitum. [Geneva]: Stoer, 1614.Google Scholar
Godelier, Maurice. “Territory and Property in Primitive Society,” in Cranach, M. von, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies, and D. Ploog, eds., Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, 133–155.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. Technology, Tradition and the State in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Gordley, James. “Myths of the French Civil Code,” American Journal of Comparative Law 42 (1994): 459–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govind, Rahul. “The King’s Plunder, the King’s Justice: Sovereignty in British India, 1756–1776,” Studies in History 33 (2017): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Mark. News and Frontier Consciousness in the Late Roman Empire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, Allan. Property and Dispossession: Natives, Empires and Land in Early Modern North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Cam. “Contextualizing Colonatus: The Origo of the Late Roman Empire,” Journal of Roman Studies 97 (2007) 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jakob. Von der Poesie im Recht. Darmstadt: Gentner, 1957.Google Scholar
Grossi, Paolo. Le situazioni reali nell’esperienza giuridica medievale. Padova: CEDAM, 1968.Google Scholar
Groten, Andreas. Corpus und Universitas. Römisches Körperschafts- und Gesellschaftsrecht: zwischen griechischer Philosophie und römischer Politik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. De jure belli ac pacis, ed. Jean Barbeyrac. Utrecht: Schoonhoven, 1773.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. De jure praedae commentarius, ed. Robert Fruin. repr. Clark, N.J.: Lawbook Exchange, 2003.Google Scholar
Guerreau, Alain. Le féodalisme: un horizon théorique. Paris: Sycomore, 1980.Google Scholar
Gursky, M. “Die criminal-soziologische Schule als Kämpferin für die Interessen der herrschenden Klassen,” Die neue Zeit: Wochenschrift der Deutschen Sozialdemokratie 22, no. 2 (1903–1904): 641–648.Google Scholar
Haarscher, Guy. “Le monde antique et les droits de l’homme,” in Huguette Jones, ed., Le monde antique et les droits de l’homme. Brussels: Centre de droit comparé et d’histoire du droit, 1998, 197–208.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter. Grotius et la doctrine de la guerre juste. Paris: PUF, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haivry, Ofir. John Selden and the Western Political Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbe, Albert. Eigentum als Verdienst: eine Kampfschrift gegen und für Alle. Breslau: Trewendt und Granier, 1931.Google Scholar
Hallaq, Wael. “Uṣūl al-Fiqh: Beyond Tradition,” Journal of Islamic Studies 3 (1992): 172–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hämäläinen, Pekka. The Comanche Empire. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hamerton-Kelly, Robert G., ed. Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Hammacher, Emil. Das philosophisch-ökonomische System des Marxismus. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1909.Google Scholar
Hardie, Philip. Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons,” Science (N.S.) 162 (1968): 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, Kyle. The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease and the End of an Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, Kyle. Plagues upon the Earth: Disease and the Course of Human History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Harper, Kyle. Slavery in the Late Roman World, ad 275–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, Jill. Imperial Rome, ad 204–363: The New Empire. Edinburgh: Edniburgh University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harries, Jill. “Lawyers and Citizens from Republic to Empire: Gaius on the Twelve Tables and Antonine Rome,” in Claudia Rapp and H. A. Drake, eds., The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, William. Roman Power: A Thousand Years of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Härtel, G. “Der ‘favor libertatis’ im Imperium Romanum und sein gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhang nach den Digesten im 2.–3. Jahrhundert u.Z.,” Index 5 (1974–1975): 282–302.Google Scholar
Haushofer, Heinz. Ideengeschichte der Agrarwirtschaft und Agrarpolitik. Munich, Bonn, and Vienna: Bayerischer Landwirtschaftsverlag, 1958.Google Scholar
Hausmaninger, Herbert and Gamauf, Richard, Casebook on Roman Property Law, available at https://global.oup.com/us/companion.websites/9780199838677.Google Scholar
Hazard, Paul. La crise de la conscience européenne (1680–1715). Paris: Fayard,n.d.Google Scholar
Heather, Peter and Moncur, David, trans. and ed. Politics, Empire and Philosophy in the Fourth Century: Select Orations of Themistius. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedemann, Justus Wilhelm. Die Fortschritte des Zivilrechts im XIX. Jahrhundert. 3 vols. Berlin: Haymann, 1910–1935.Google Scholar
Heirbaut, Dirk. “Feudal Law: The Real Ius Commune of Property in Europe, or: Should We Reintroduce Duplex Dominium?” European Review of Private Law 3 (2003): 301–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekster, Olivier. Rome and Its Empire, ad 193–284. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Heller, Henry. “Bodin on Slavery and Primitive Accumulation,” Sixteenth Century Journal 25 (1994): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Michael and Salzman, James. Mine! How the Hidden Rules of Ownership Control Our Lives. New York: Doubleday, 2021.Google Scholar
Henrys, Claude. Oeuvres, 6th ed. Paris: Libraires associés, 1772.Google Scholar
Hermon, Ella. “Approches historiographiques,” in Hermon, ed., La question agraire à Rome: droit romain et société. Como: New Press, 1979, 19–29.Google Scholar
Herrera Ortiz, Margarita. “La encomienda indiana y sus repercussiones,” in Derechos contemporáneos de los pueblos indios: justicia y derechos étnicos en México. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma, 1992, 131–142.Google Scholar
Heuss, Alfred. Barthold Georg Niebuhrs wissenschaftliche Anfänge. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1981.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. “The Norman Yoke,” in Puritanism and Revolution. New York: Schocken, 1964, 50–123.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian. “The Lady and the Seed,” in Mehmet Özdogan, Harald Hauptmann, and Nezih Basgelen, eds., From Village to Cities. Istanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınlar, 2003, 129–137.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian and Meskell, Lynn. “A ‘Curious and Sometimes a Trifle Macabre Artistry,’” Current Anthropology 52 (2011): 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoebel, E. Adamson. “Fundamental Legal Concepts as Applied in the Study of Primitive Law,” Yale Law Journal 51 (1942): 951–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoebel, E. Adamson. The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967 (orig. 1954).Google Scholar
Holbach, Paul Henri Thiry, Geschichte der menschlichen Ausartung und Verschlimmerung durch das gesellschaftliche Leben, trans. C. L. Paaltzow, 2 vols. Altona: Verlagsgesellschaft, 1795–1796.Google Scholar
Hölscher, Tonio. Visual Power in Ancient Greece and Rome: Between Art and Social Reality. Berkeley: California, 2018.Google Scholar
Honoré, Tony. “Fritz Pringsheim (1882–1967),” in Jack Beatson and Reinhard Zimmermann, eds., Jurists Uprooted: German-Speaking Émigré Lawyers in Twentieth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honoré, Tony. “Les droits de l’homme chez Ulpien,” in Huguette Jones, ed., Le monde antique et les droits de l’homme. Brussels: Centre de droit comparé et d’histoire du droit, 1998, 235–244.Google Scholar
Honoré, Tony. Ulpian: Pioneer of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honsell, Heinrich, Mayer-Maly, Theo, and Selb, Walter. Römisches Recht, 4th ed. Berlin: Springer, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Antony. “Property Rights and Empire Building: Britain’s Annexation of Lagos, 1861,” Journal of Economic History 40 (1980): 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. Conquerors and Slaves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. “Novel Evidence for Roman Slavery,” Past & Present 138 (1993): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. Sociological Studies in Roman History, ed. Christopher Kelly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. “Taxes and Trade in the Roman Empire (200 b.c.–a.d. 400),” Journal of Roman Studies 70 (1980): 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotman, François. Novus commentarius de verbis iuris. Basil: Nicolaus, 1563.Google Scholar
Howley, Joseph. “Why Read the Jurists? Aulus Gellius on Reading across Disciplines,” in Paul J. Du Plessis, ed., New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, John. “Anglo-Norman Land Law and the Origins of Property,” in Law and Government in Medieval England and Normandy: Essays in Honour of Sir James Holt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 198–222.Google Scholar
Hudson, John. “Imposing Feudalism on Anglo-Saxon England: Norman and Angevin Presentation of Pre-conquest Lordship and Landholding,” in S. Bagge, M. H. Gelting, and T. Lindkvist, eds., Feudalism: New Landscapes of Debate. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2011, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hülsen, Karin. “‘Tempelsklaverei’ in Kleinasien: ein Beitrag zum Tempeldienst in hellenistischer und römischer Zeit,” diss. Trier, 2007.Google Scholar
Hulsebosch, Daniel. “Somerset’s Case at the Bar: Securing the ‘Pure Air’ of English Jurisdiction within the British Empire,” Texas Wesleyan Law Review 13 (2006–2007): 699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. “Of the Populousness of Ancient Nations,” in Hume, , Political Discourses, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Fleming, 1752, 155–262.Google Scholar
Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Humfress, Caroline. “Law and Custom under Rome,” in Alice Rio, ed., Law, Custom, and Justice in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. London: King’s College, 2012, 23–46.Google Scholar
Humfress, Caroline. “Laws’ Empire: Roman Universalism and Legal Practice,” in Claudia Rapp and H. A. Drake, eds., The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Mark. Cities and the Meanings of Late Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, Sharon. “The Cattle of Money and the Cattle of Girls among the Nuer, 1930–83,” American Ethnologist 19 (1992): 294–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, Ronald. “The Neolithic Great Goddess: A Study in Modern Tradition,” Antiquity 71 (1997): 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibrahim, Muhammad. The Ship of Sulaiman, trans. John O’Kane. London: Routledge, 1972.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. The Appropriation of Nature: Essays on Human Ecology and Social Relations. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. “From the Master’s Point of View: Hunting Is Sacrifice,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21 (2015): 24–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Benjamin. Limits of Empire: The Roman Army in the East, rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Israeli, Yanay. “The Requerimiento in the Old World: Making Demands and Keeping Records in the Legal Culture of Late Medieval Castile,” Law and History Review 40 (2022): 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakab, Éva. “Property Rights in Ancient Rome,” in Paul Erdkamp, Koenraad Verboven, and Arjan Zuiderhoek, eds., Ownership and Exploitation of Land and Natural Resources in the Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 107–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jannot, Jean-René Religion in Ancient Etruria, trans. Jane Whitehead. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. Notes on the State of Virginia. Baltimore: Pechin, 1800.Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von. Der Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung, 5th ed. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel, 1891.Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von. Der Zweck im Recht, 6th–8th ed. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1923.Google Scholar
Jhering, Rudolf von. Law as a Means to an End, trans. Isaac Husik. Union, N.J.: The Lawbook Exchange, 1999.Google Scholar
Johannsen, Kirsten. “Die lex agraria des Jahres 111 v. Chr.,” diss. Munich, 1971.Google Scholar
John, Felix. Der Galaterbrief im Kontext historischer Lebenswelten im antiken Kleinasien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsen, William. “Mimetic Theory, the Wall Paintings, and the Domestication, De-domestication, and Sacrifice of Cattle at Çatalhöyük,” in Ian Hodder, ed., Violence and the Sacred in the Ancient Near East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. Political Writings, ed. Donald J. Greene, The Yale Edition of the Works of Samuel Johnson. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Johnson, Sarah. “Farewell to the German Ideology,” Journal of the History of Ideas 83 (2022): 143–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, David. “Epiclassical Law,” in Alan Bowman, Averil Cameron, and Peter Garnsey, eds., Cambridge Ancient History 12, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 200–211.Google Scholar
Jones, A. H. M. The Later Roman Empire, 284-602. repr. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1986.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, Anthony. The New Roman Empire: A History of Byzantium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Kamath, Ambika and Wesner, Ashton. “Animal Territoriality, Property and Access: A Collaborative Exchange between Animal Behaviour and the Socials Sciences,” Animal Behaviour 164 (2020): 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kames, Henry Home, , Lord. Essays upon Several Subjects Concerning British Antiquities … composed anno 1745, 2nd ed. London: Cooper, 1749.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Philosophy of Law, trans. W. Hastie. Edinburgh: Clark, 1887.Google Scholar
Kantor, Georgy. “Property in Land in Roman Provinces,” in Georgy Kantor, Tom Lambert, and Hannah Skoda, eds., Legalism: Property and Ownership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 55–74.Google Scholar
Kantor, Georgy, Tom Lambert, and Hannah Skoda, eds., Legalism: Property and Ownership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Karr, Susan Longfield. Jus Gentium in Humanist Jurisprudence: On Justice and Right. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaster, Robert, trans. “On Anger,” in Kaster and Martha C. Nussbaum, trans., Seneca: Anger, Mercy, Revenge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010), 28–157.Google Scholar
Karras, Ruth. Slavery and Society in Medieval Scandinavia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kaser, Max. Das römische Privatrecht. Munich: Beck, 1954–1959.Google Scholar
Kaser, Max. “Der Inhalt der Patria Potestas,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 53 (1938): 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaser, Max. Eigentum und Besitz im älteren römischen Recht. Weimar: Böhlau, 1943.Google Scholar
Kaser, Max. Römisches Recht als Gemeinschaftsordnung. Tübingen: Mohr, 1939.Google Scholar
Kaser, Max. “Über ‘relatives Eigentum’ im altrömischen Recht,” Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 102 (1985): 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaser, Max. “Zur Geschichte der Capitis Deminutio,” IURA 3 (1952): 48–89.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, John H. “On the Definitions and Functions of Dominance and Territoriality,” Biological Review 58 (1983): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keene, Edward. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kehoe, Dennis. Law and Rural Economy in the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiser, Thorsten. Eigentumsrecht in Nationalsozialismus und Fascismo. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2005.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. “Gaius Noster: Substructures of Western Social Thought,” American Historical Review 84 (1979): 619–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishigami, Nobuhiro. “A New Typology of Food-Sharing Practices among Hunter-Gatherers, with a Special Focus on Inuit Examples,” Journal of Anthropological Research 60 (2004): 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinheyer, Gerhard and Jan Schröder, eds. Deutsche und europäische Juristen aus Neun Jahrhunderten, 6th ed. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2017.Google Scholar
Kletzer, Christoph. “Custom and Positivity: An Examination of the Philosophical Ground of the Hegel–Savigny Controversy,” in Amanda Perreau Saussine and James Bernard Murphy, eds., The Nature of Customary Law: Legal, Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, 125–148.Google Scholar
Knoch, Stefan. Sklavenfürsorge im römischen Reich: Formen und Motive. Hildesheim: Olms, 2005.Google Scholar
Kolb, Frank. “La Tetrarchia: struttura, fondamento e ideologia del potere imperial,” in Werner Eck and Salvatore Puliatti, eds., Diocleziano: la frontiera giuridica dell’impero. Pavia: Pavia University Press, 2018, 3–43.Google Scholar
Kornbluth, Andrew. The August Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Kornhardt, Hildegard. “Postliminium in republikanischer Zeit,” Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 19 (1953): 1–37.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth: Legal Imagination and International Power, 1300–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotkin, Stephen. Stalin: Waiting for Hitler, 1929–1941. New York: Penguin, 2017.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System,” World Politics 39 (1986): 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuskowski, Ada. Vernacular Law-Writing and the Reinvention of Customary Law in Medieval France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerlöf, Nils-Petter. “Slavery and Other Property Rights,” Review of Economic Studies 76 (2009): 319–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantigua, David. Infidels and Empires in a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavan, Myles. Slaves to Rome: Paradigms of Empire in Roman Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavan, Myles. “The Spread of Roman Citizenship, 14–212 ce: Quantification in the Face of High Uncertainty,” Past & Present 230 (2016): 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leacock, Eleanor B. “The Montagnais ‘Hunting Territory’ and the Fur Trade,” American Anthropologist 56, no. 5, pt. 2, memoir no. 78 (October 1954).Google Scholar
Leadbetter, Bill. Galerius and the Will of Diocletian. New York: Routledge, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Richard B. and Irven DeVore, eds. Man the Hunter. Chicago: Aldine, 1968.Google Scholar
Lee, Richard B. and DeVore, Irven. “Problems in the Study of Hunters and Gatherers,” in Lee and DeVore, eds., Man the Hunter. Chicago: Aldine, 1968, 3–12.Google Scholar
Leigh, Matthew. Comedy and the Rise of Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemosse, Maxime. Le régime des relations internationales dans le Haut-Empire romain. Paris: Sirey, 1967.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendon, J. E. “The Legitimacy of the Roman Emperor,” in A. Kolb, ed., Herrschaftsstrukturen und Herrschaftspraxis. Berlin: Akademie, 2006, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenel, Otto. Palingenesia iuris civilis. repr. Frankfurt a.M.: Vico, 2004.Google Scholar
Lenhoff, Arthur. “The Development of the Concept of Eminent Domain,” Columbia Law Review 42 (1942): 596–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leppin, Hartmut. “Zur Geschichte der Erforschung der Tetrarchie,” in Dietrich Boschung and Werner Eck, eds., Die Tetrarchie: ein neues Regierungssystem und seine mediale Präsentation. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2006, 13–30.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, André. Le geste et la parole: technique et langage. Paris: Albin Michel, 1964.Google Scholar
Levy, Ernst. “Natural Law in the Roman Period,” Natural Law Institute Proceedings 2 (1949): 43–72.Google Scholar
Levy, Ernst. West Roman Vulgar Law: The Law of Property. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1951.Google Scholar
Lewis, Naphtali. “Judiciary Routines in Roman Egypt,” Bulletin of the American Society of Papyrologists 37 (2000): 83–93.Google Scholar
Leyhausen, Paul. “Dominance and Territoriality as Complemented in Mammalian Social Structure,” in A. H. Esser, ed., Behavior and Environment: The Use of Space by Animals and Men. New York: Plenum, 1971, 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Danny. “The First Amendment Weaponized: When Guns Become Public Discourse,” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 30 (2022): 925–961.Google Scholar
Lica, Vasile. “‘Clades Variana’ and ‘Postliminium,’” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 50 (2001): 496–501.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. The Decline and Fall of the Roman City. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. “Late Antiquity and the Concept of Decline,” Nottingham Medieval Studies 45 (2001): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebs, Detlef. “Strafrechtlicher Schutz der Sklaven gegen Willkür ihrer Herren,” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 85 (2017): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebs, Detlef. “Wenn Fachliteratur Gesetz wird,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 135 (2018): 395–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Bruce. Secrets, Lies and Consequences: A Great Scholar’s Hidden Past and His Protégé’s Unsolved Murder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Linklater, Wayne L. “Territorial Tuatara? – A Hypothesis Still to Be Tested,” New Zealand Journal of Ecology 35 (2011): 308–311.Google Scholar
Linnekin, Jocelyn. “The Hui Lands of Keanae: Hawaiian Land Tenure and the Great Mahele,” Journal of the Polynesian Society 92 (1983): 169–188.Google Scholar
Lintott, Andrew. Judicial Reform and Land Reform in the Roman Republic: A New Edition, with Translation and Commentary, of the Laws from Urbino. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Liverani, Mario. The Ancient Near East: History, Society and Economy, trans. Soraia Tabatabai. Abingdon: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Stefan. “Otto Seeck und die Spätantike,” Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 55 (2006): 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur. “The Communism of St. Ambrose,” Journal of the History of Ideas 3 (1942): 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loyseau, Charles. Traité des seigneuries. Chateaudun: L’Angelier, 1610.Google Scholar
Lund, Christian. Local Politics and the Dynamics of Property in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyall, Francis. Slaves, Citizens, Sons: Legal Metaphors in the Epistles. Grand Rapids: Academie, 1984.Google Scholar
Mack, Burton. “Introduction,” in Robert G. Hamerton-Kelly, ed., Violent Origins: Walter Burkert, René Girard and Jonathan Z. Smith on Ritual Killing and Cultural Formation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987, 1–70.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. Corruption and the Decline of Rome. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. Roman Social Relations, 50 b.c. to a.d. 284. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
MacMullen, Ramsay. Soldier and Civilian in the Later Roman Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962.Google Scholar
Maher, Christine R. and Lott, Dale F.. “Definitions of Territoriality Used in the Study of Variation in Vertebrate Spacing Systems,” Animal Behaviour 6 (1995): 1581–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, Lisa, Richter, Tobias, and Stock, Jay T.. “The Pre-Natufian Epipaleolithic: Long-Term Behavioral Trends in the Levant,” Evolutionary Anthropology 21 (2012): 69–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maier, Charles. Once within Borders: Territories of Power, Wealth and Belonging since 1500. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maine, Henry. Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and Its Relation to Modern Ideas, 10th ed. London: Murray, 1908.Google Scholar
Maitland, Frederic William. The Constitutional History of England, ed. H. A. L. Fisher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Harcourt, Brace, 1926.Google Scholar
Mannhardt, Wilhelm. Wald- und Feldkulte. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, 1875–1877.Google Scholar
Mannino, Vincenzo. Questioni di diritto. Milan: Giuffrè, 2007.Google Scholar
Mantovani, Dario. Les juristes écrivains de la Rome antique: les œuvres des juristes comme littérature. Paris: Docet Omnia, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantovani, . Le juriste “Historien,” available at https://books.openedition.org/lesbelleslettres/204?lang=en.Google Scholar
Marquardt, Joachim. Privatleben der Römer. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1879.Google Scholar
Marrou, Henri-Irénée. A History of Education in Antiquity, trans. George Lamb. London: Sheed and Ward 1956.Google Scholar
Marshall, Bridget. “Romanticism, Gothic and the Law,” in Kieran Dolin, ed., Law and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018, 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, Bk. 3, 2nd ed., ed. Friedrich Engels. Hamburg: Meissner, 1904; also in Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich, Werke. Berlin: Dietz, 1964.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx (Studies of Morgan, Phear, Maine, Lubbock), transcribed and ed. with an introduction by Krader, Lawrence. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1974.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. “Deutsche Ideologie: Manuskripte und Drucke,” in Karl Marx/Friedrich Engels Gesamtausgabe. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2017, Abt. 1, 5.1.Google Scholar
Massen, Jörg, van den Berg, Lisette, Spruit, Berry, and Sterk, Elizabeth. “Generous Leaders and Selfish Underdogs: Prosociality in Despotic Macaques,” PLoS One 5 (2010): e9734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastrocinque, Attilio. “Propriété foncière archaïque et modèles d’interprétation modernes,” in Ella Hermon, ed. La question agraire à Rome: droit romain et société. Como: New Press, 1979, 101–109.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaiques. Paris: PUF,n.d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzarino, Santo. “Sociologia del mondo etrusco e problemi della tarda etruscita.” Historia 6 (1957): 98–122.Google Scholar
McCormick, Michael. Origins of the European Economy: Communications and Commerce a.d. 300–900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Michael. “Slavery from Rome to Medieval Europe and Beyond,” in John Bodel and Walter Scheidel, eds., On Human Bondage: After Slavery and Social Death. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2017, 249–264.Google Scholar
McGinn, Thomas A. J. “The Sea Common to All in Plautus, Rudens: Social Norms and Legal Rules,” in Ioannis Ziogas and Erica Bexley, eds., Roman Law and Latin Literature. London: Bloomsbury, 2022, 169–188.Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne. The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Meissel, Franz-Stefan. “Deutsche Rechtsgeschichte im nationalsozialistischen Staat,” in Ulrike Davy, Helmut Fuchs, Herbert Hofmeister, Judith Marte, and Ilse Reiter, eds., Nationalsozialismus und Recht. Vienna: Orac, 1990, 412–426.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas. “The Property Strategy,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 160 (2012): 2061–2095.Google Scholar
Meskell, Lynn. “Goddesses, Gimbutas and New Age Archaeology,” Antiquity 69 (1995): 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuli, Karl. “Griechische Opferbräuche,” in Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Thomas Gelzer. Basel: Schwabe, 1975, 2:907–1021.Google Scholar
Miers, Suzanne and Kopytoff, Igor. Slavery in Africa: Historical and Anthropological Perspectives. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Miethke, Jürgen. Ockhams Weg zur Sozialphilosophie. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milazzo, Lorenzo. La Conquista attraverso il diritto: contributi sul discorso ispano-americano. Milan: Mimesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Millar, Fergus. The Emperor in the Roman World. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Miller, Joseph C. “Breaking the Historiographical Chains: Martin Klein and Slavery,” Canadian Journal of African Studies/Revue canadienne des études africaines 34 (2000): 512–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Richard E. “Ager publicus: Public Property and Private Wealth during the Roman Republic,” in Michael Hudson and Baruch Levine, eds., Privatization in the Ancient Near East and Classical World. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum, 1996, 253–291.Google Scholar
Mitteis, Ludwig. Reichsrecht und Volksrecht in den östlichen Provinzen des römischen Kaiserreichs. Leipzig: Teubner, 1891.Google Scholar
Mitteis, Ludwig. Römisches Privatrecht bis auf die Zeit Diokletians. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1908.Google Scholar
Miziur-Moździoch, Maja. “How a Sheep Turned into a Giraffe: The Case of Deuteronomy 14:5,” Vetus Testamentum 70 (2020): 753–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo. “The Disadvantages of Monotheism for a Universal State,” in Ottavo contributo alla storia degli studi classici e del mondo antico. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1987, 313–328.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo. “New Paths of Classicism in the Nineteenth Century,” in Momigliano, , Studies on Modern Scholarship, eds. G. W. Bowersock and T. J. Cornell. Berkeley: California, 1994, 223–285.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo. “The Origins of Rome,” in A. E. Astin, F. W. Walbank, M. W. Frederiksen, and R. M. Ogilvie, eds., Cambridge Ancient History 7.2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 52–112.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor. Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Weidmann, 1909.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor. Juristische Schriften. Berlin: Weidmann, 1905–1907.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor. Römisches Staatsrecht. Leipzig: Hirzel, 1871–1888.Google Scholar
Monier, Raymond. “Du mancipium au dominium: essai sur l’apparition et le développement de la notion de propriété en droit romain,” in “Cours de droit,” unpublished manuscript, 1947.Google Scholar
Monier, Raymond. “La date d’apparition du ‘dominium,’” in Studi in onore di Siro Solazzi. Naples: Jovene, 1948, 357–374.Google Scholar
Monoson, S. Sara. “Recollecting Aristotle: Pro-Slavery Thought in Antebellum America and the Argument of Politics Book I,” in Richard Alston, Edith Hall, and Justine McConnell, eds., Ancient Slavery and Abolition: From Hobbes to Hollywood. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 247–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Lewis Henry. Ancient Society, or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery, through Barbarism to Civilization. New York: Henry Holt, 1877.Google Scholar
Morley, Neville. “Slavery under the Principate,” in John Bodel and Paul Cartledge, eds., The Cambridge World History of Slavery, Vol. 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Ian. Foragers, Farmers and Fossil Fuels: How Human Values Evolve. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mouritsen, Henrik. The Freedman in the Roman World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, James. Empire and Order: The Concept of Empire, 800–1800. New York: St. Martin’s, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, James. “Papal Responsibility for the Infidel: Another Look at Alexander VI’s ‘Inter caetera,’” Catholic Historical Review 64 (1978): 168–184.Google Scholar
Nagy, Gregory. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1999.Google Scholar
Nehlsen, Hermann. Sklavenrecht zwischen Antike und Mittelalter: germanisches und römisches Recht in den germanischen Rechtsaufzeichnungen. Göttingen: Musterschmidt, 1972.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Barry. An Introduction to Roman Law, rev. and ed. Ernest Metzger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nicolai, Helmut. Die Rassengesetzliche Rechtslehre: Grundzüge einer nationalsozialistischen Rechtsphilosophie, 3rd ed. Munich: Eher, 1934.Google Scholar
Nicolet, Claude. Rome et la conquête du monde méditerranéen. Paris: PUF, 1979.Google Scholar
Nicolet, Claude. Space, Geography and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, Ugo. La proprietà: il principe e l’espropriazione per pubblica utilità. Milan: Giuffrè, 1940.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg. Römische Geschichte, neue Ausgabe. Berlin: Calvary, 1873.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Werke: historisch-kritische Ausgabe, ed. Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montanari. Charlottesville: Intelex, 1995.Google Scholar
Nippel, Wilfried. “Marx and Antiquity,” in Danielle Allen, Paul Christesen, and Paul Millet, eds., How to Do Things with History: New Approaches to Ancient Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, 185–208.Google Scholar
Nock, Arthur Darby. Conversion: The Old and the New in Religion from Alexander the Great to Augustine of Hippo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. “Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism,” Journal of Political Philosophy 5 (1997): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, Heiko. Dawn of the Reformation: Essays in Late Medieval and Early Reformation Thought. Edinburgh: Clark, 1986.Google Scholar
Oestreich, Gerhard. Geschichte der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten im Umriß. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1968.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsthoorn, Johan and van Apeldoorn, Laurens. “‘This Man Is My Property’: Slavery and Political Absolutism in Locke and the Classical Social Contract Tradition,” European Journal of Political Theory 21 (2022): 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Josiah. “Caesar and the Pirates: or How to Make (and Break) an Ancient Life,” Greece and Rome 57 (2010): 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östenberg, Ida. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen. The Transformation of the World, trans. P. Camiller. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ots y Capdequi, José Maria. España in America: el régimen de tierras en la época colonial. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1959.Google Scholar
Ottmann, Henning. “Herr und Knecht bei Hegel: Bemerkungen zu einer mißverstandenen Dialektik,” Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 35 (1981): 365–384.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony. The Fall of Natural Man: The American Indian and the Origins of Comparative Ethnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Palacios Rubios, Juan López de. De las islas del mar océano (Libellus de insulis oceanis), eds. Paulino Castañeda Delgado, José Carlos Martín de la Hoz, and Eduardo Fernández. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2013.Google Scholar
Parker, David. “Feudalism and Property Rights in the France of Louis XIV,” Past & Present 179 (2003): 60–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisse, Michel. “Histoire et sémantique: de servus à homo,” in Paul Freedman and Monique Bourin, eds., Forms of Servitude in Northern and Central Europe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2005, 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Orlando. Slavery and Social Death. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Paz, Matias de. Acerca del dominio sobre los indios (Libellus circa dominium super indos), ed. and trans. Paulino Castañeda Delgado, José Carlos Martín de la Hoz, and Eduardo Fernández. Salamanca: San Esteban, 2017.Google Scholar
Peabody, Sue. There Are No Slaves in France: The Political Culture of Race and Slavery in the Ancien Régime. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Peabody, Sue and Keila Grinberg, eds. Free Soil in the Atlantic World. New York: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
Pellecchi, Luigi. Per una lettura giuridica della Rudens di Plauto. Parma: Casanova, 2012.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth. “Law, Feudal,” in The Dictionary of the Middle Ages, Supplement I, ed. William Chester Jordan. New York: Scribner, 2004, 320–323.Google Scholar
Pérez de Tudela y Bueso, Juan. “Ideas juridicas y realizaciones politicas en la historia indiana,” in Annuario de la Asociación “Francisco de Vitoria” 13 (1960–1961): 137–171.Google Scholar
Pertile, Antonio. Storia de diritto italiano, 2nd ed. Turin: Unione Tipografico Editrice, 1894.Google Scholar
Pesante, Maria Luisa. Come servi: figure del lavoro salariato dal diritto naturale all’ economia politica. Milan: FrancoAngeli, 2013.Google Scholar
Peterson, Nicolas. “Demand Sharing: Reciprocity and the Pressure for Generosity among Foragers,” American Anthropologist 95 (1993): 860–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccaluga, Giulia. Terminus: i segni di confine nella religione romana. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1974.Google Scholar
Pierson, Christopher. Just Property: A History in the Latin West. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirenne-Delforge, Vivianne. Le polythéisme grec comme objet d’histoire. Paris: Collège de France, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pistor, Katharina. The Code of Capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Pleket, W. K. “Religious History as the History of Mentality,” in H. S. Versnel, ed., Faith, Hope and Worship: Aspects of Religious Mentality in the Ancient World. Leiden: Brill, 1981, 152–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plisecka, Anna. “Accessio and Specificatio Reconsidered,” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 74 (2006): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, 1944.Google Scholar
Poly, Jean-Pierre and Bournazel, Éric. La mutation féodale, Xe–XIIe siècle. Paris: PUF, 2004.Google Scholar
Portalis, Jean-Étienne-Marie. Discours préliminaire du premier project de Code civil, 1801, available at https://mafr.fr/IMG/pdf/discours_1er_code_civil.pdf.Google Scholar
Pospisil, Leopold. Anthropology of Law: A Comparative Theory. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar
Pothos, Emmanuel, Wills, Andy J., Paul Minda, John, and David Smith, J.. “Prototype Models of Categorization: Basic Formulation, Predictions, and Limitations,” in Emmanuel Pothos and Andy J. Wills, eds., Formal Approaches in Categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, 40–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potgieser, Joachim. De conditione et statu servorum apud Germanos. Cologne: Promper, 1707.Google Scholar
Premerstein, Anton von. Vom Wesen und Werden des Prinzipats, ed. Hans Volkmann. Munich: Beck, 1937.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, Fritz. “The Unique Character of Roman Law,” Journal of Roman Studies 34 (1944): 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, W. Kendrick. The Greek State at War. Berkeley: California, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. De jure naturae et gentium libri octo. [Amsterdam]: Junghans, 1672.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel. Of the Law of Nature and Nations, trans. anon. Oxford: Lichfield, 1703.Google Scholar
Pugliese, Giovanni. “‘Res corporales,’ ‘res incorporales,’” in Studi in onore di Vincenzo Arangio Ruiz. Naples: Jovene,n.d., 223–260.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. “Property and Personhood,” Stanford Law Review 34 (1982): 957–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahmatian, Andreas. Lord Kames: Political and Social Theorist. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ramin, Jacques and Veyne, Marie-Paul. “Droit romain et société: les hommes libres qui passent pour esclaves et l’esclavage volontaire,” Historia 30 (1981): 472–497.Google Scholar
Ranke, Leopold von. Geschichte der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1535. Leipzig and Berlin: Reimer, 1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Claudia and Drake, H. A., eds. The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Claudia and Drake, H. A.. “Polis–Imperium–Oikoumenē: A World Reconfigured,” in Claudia Rapp and H. A. Drake, eds., The City in the Classical and Post-Classical World: Changing Contexts of Power and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbone, D. W. “The Control and Exploitation of ager publicus in Italy under the Roman Republic,” in J.-J. Aubert, ed., Tâches publiques et entreprises privées dans le monde romain. Neuchâtel: Droz, 2003, 135–178.Google Scholar
Rawson, Elizabeth. Cicero: A Portrait. London: Allen Lane, 1975.Google Scholar
Rawson, Elizabeth. “The Ciceronian Aristocracy and Its Properties,” in M. I. Finley, ed., Studies in Roman Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reden, Sitta von. Money in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regnault, J. J. Le siècle de Louis Seize. Bar-le-Duc: Moucheron et Duval, 1791.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Susan. Before Eminent Domain: Toward a History of Expropriation for the Common Good. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Susan. Fiefs and Vassals: The Medieval Evidence Reinterpreted. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Susan. “Tenure and Property in Medieval England,” Historical Research 88 (2015): 563–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. S. “Imperium Romanum: Empire and the Language of Power,” Journal of Roman Studies 81 (1991): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, J. S. The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century bc to the Second Century ad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Daniel. “Cosmopolitanism,” in Richter and William A. Johnson, eds., Oxford Handbook to the Second Sophistic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickett, Dan. Separating Abram and Lot: The Narrative Role and Early Reception of Genesis 13. Leiden: Brill, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riese, Alexander. Geographi Latini minores. Heilbronn: Henninger, 1878.Google Scholar
Riess, Werner. Apuleius und die Räuber: ein Beitrag zur historischen Kriminalitätsforschung. Stuttgart: Steiner, 2001.Google Scholar
Rilinger, Ralf. “Domus und res publica: die politisch-soziale Bedeutung des aristokratischen ‘Hauses’ in der späten römischen Republik,” Historische Zeitschrift: Beihefte 23 (1997): 73–90.Google Scholar
Rivera-Pagán, Luis. “Freedom and Servitude: Indigenous Slavery and the Spanish Conquest of the Caribbean,” in J. Sued-Badillo, ed., General History of the Caribbean. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, 316–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rives, James. “Between Orthopraxy and Orthodoxy: Constantine and Animal Sacrifice,” in G. Bonamente, N. Lenski, and R. Lizzi Testa, eds., Costantino prima e dopo Costantino/Constantine before and after Constantine. Bari: Edipuglia, 2012, 153–163.Google Scholar
Robertson, William. History of the Reign of the Emperor Charles V, with a View of the Progress of Society in Europe, from the Subversion of the Roman Empire to the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century. London: Cadell, 1840.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jonathan. William of Ockham’s Early Theory of Property. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Robinson, Olivia. “Crime and Punishment and Human Rights in Ancient Rome,” in Huguette Jones, ed., Le monde antique et les droits de l’homme. Brussels: Centre de droit comparé et d’histoire du droit, 1998, 325–334.Google Scholar
Rodbertus, Johann Karl. “Zur Geschichte der römischen Tributsteuern,” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 4 (1865): 341–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, Matthew. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, Hilton. Network Origins of the Global Economy: East vs. West in a Complex Systems Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Carol. “Canons of Property Talk, or Blackstone’s Anxiety,” Yale Law Journal 108 (1998): 601–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Carol. “The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce, and Inherently Public Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 53 (1986): 711–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Carol. Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Roselaar, Saskia. Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of ager publicus in Italy, 396–89 b.c. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Hans-Jörg. Alfeni Digesta: eine Spätrepublikanische Juristenschrift. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roumy, Franck. “Lex consuetudinaria, jus consuetudinarium: recherche sur la naissance du concept de droit coutumier aux XIe et XIIe siècles,” Revue historique du droit français et étranger 79 (2001): 257–291.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discourse of the Origin of Inequality, trans. Donald Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.Google Scholar
Rudden, Bernard. “Things as Things and Things as Wealth,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 14 (1994): 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudorff, A. A. F. “Das Ackergesetz des Spurius Thorius,” Zeitschrift für geschichtliche Rechtswissenschaft 10 (1839): 1–194.Google Scholar
Rückert, Joachim, Michael Stolleis, and Dieter Simon, eds. Rechtsgeschichte im Nationalsozialismus: Beiträge zur Geschichte einer Disziplin. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1989.Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg. “Historians of Religion and the Space of Law,” in Salvo Randazzo, ed., Religione e diritto romano. Rome: Libellula,n.d. [2014], 43–49.Google Scholar
Russell, Frederick H. The Just War in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Sacchi, Osvaldo. Regime della terra e imposizione fondiaria nell’età dei Gracchi. Naples: Jovene, 2006.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. The New Science of the Enchanted Universe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. Stone Age Economics, new ed. New York: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Knopf, 1993.Google Scholar
Saller, Richard. “‘Familia, Domus,’ and the Roman Conception of the Family,” Phoenix 38 (1984): 336–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarris, Peter. “The Origins of the Manorial Economy: New Insights from Late Antiquity,” English Historical Review 119 (2004): 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl. System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Berlin: Veit, 1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Karl. Vermischte Schriften. repr. Aalen: Scientia, 1981.Google Scholar
Scanlan, Padraic X. Slave Empire: How Slavery Built Modern Britain. London: Robinson, 2020.Google Scholar
Scattola, Merio. “Die Grenze der Neuzeit: ihr Begriff in der juristischen und politischen Literatur der Antike und Frühmoderne,” in Markus Bauer and Thomas Rahn, eds., Die Grenze: Begriff und Inszenierung. Berlin: Akademie, 1997, 37–69.Google Scholar
Scheel, H. von. “Die wirtschaftlichen Grundbegriffe im Corpus Iuris Civilis,” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 6 (1866): 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheid, John. An Introduction to Roman Religion, trans. Janet Lloyd. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo. The Invention of Law in the West, trans. Jeremy Carden and Antony Shugaar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo. La storia spezzata: Roma antica e Occidente moderno. Bari: Laterza, 1996.Google Scholar
Schiller, Arthur A. “Custom in Classical Roman Law,” Virginia Law Review 24 (1938): 268–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich. Uber die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen, ed. Gideon Steinig. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.Google Scholar
Schlange-Schöningen, Heinrich. Die römische Gesellschaft bei Galen. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, Richard. Private Property: The History of an Idea. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Über die drei Arten des rechtswissenschaftlichen Denkens. Hamburg: Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt, 1934.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, trans. G. L. Ulmen. Candor, N.Y.: Telos, 2003.Google Scholar
Schmitthenner, Walter. “Über eine Formveränderung der Monarchie seit Alex. d. Gr.,” Saeculum 19 (1968): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, Richard. Wilhelm von Ockham als politischer Denker und sein “Breviloquium de Principatu tyrannico.” Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1952.Google Scholar
Schorr, David. “How Blackstone Became a Blackstonian,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10 (2009): 103–126.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz. The History of Roman Legal Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Schulz, Fritz. Prinzipien des römischen Rechts. Munich: Duncker & Humblot, 1934.Google Scholar
Seaford, Richard. Money and the Early Greek Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedano Onofri, Renato. “Roman Law as Pamphlet: Fritz Schulz and the Prinzipien des römischen Rechts between Cesar [sic] and Hitler,” História do direito 3 (2022): 3–36.Google Scholar
Seidl, Ursula. Die babylonischen Kudurru-Reliefs: Symbole mesopotamischer Gottheiten. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.Google Scholar
Selden, John. Mare Clausum, seu de Dominio Maris. Leiden: Maire, 1636.Google Scholar
Service, Elman. Primitive Social Organization: An Evolutionary Perspective, 2nd ed. New York: Random House, 1971.Google Scholar
Shaik, Carel P. van and Burkart, Judith. “Mind the Gap: Cooperative Breeding and the Evolution of Our Unique Features,” in Peter M. Kappeler and Joan B. Silk, eds., Mind the Gap: Tracing the Origins of Human Universals. Berlin: Springer, 2009, 477–496.Google Scholar
Sharfstein, Daniel. “Atrocity, Entitlement and Personhood in Property,” Virginia Law Review 98 (2012): 635–690.Google Scholar
Shaw, Brent. “Bandits in the Roman Empire,” Past & Present 105 (1984): 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Brent. “Raising and Killing Children: Two Roman Myths,” Mnemosyne Ser. 4, 54 (2001): 31–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shryock, Andrew and Smail, Daniel. Deep History: The Architecture of Past and Present. Berkeley: California, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Signer, Michael. Becoming Madison: The Extraordinary Origins of the Least Likely Founding Father. New York: Public Affairs, 2015.Google Scholar
Simpson, Lesley Byrd. The Encomienda in New Spain. Berkley: California, 1982.Google Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn. “The Colonate in Justinian’s Reign,” Journal of Roman Studies 98 (2008): 120–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn. “The Colonate in the Later Roman Empire,” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 90 (2022): 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn. “Noxa caput sequitur,” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 81 (2013): 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn. “Public Law,” in David Johnston, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirks, Boudewijn. “Reconsidering the Roman Colonate,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte (Romanistische Abteilung) 110 (1993): 331–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisani, Simone. L’ager publicus in età graccana. Rome: Quasar, 2015.Google Scholar
Skaff, Jonathan. Sui-Tang China and Its Turko-Mongol Neighbors: Culture, Power and Connections, 580–800. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smail, Daniel. On Deep History and the Brain. Berkeley: California, 2008.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Edwin Cannan. New York: Bantam, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, Christopher. “Becoming Political: Middle Republican Quandaries,” in Seth Bernard, Lisa Maria Mignone, and Dan-el Padilla Peralta, eds., Making the Middle Republic: New Approaches to Rome and Italy, c. 400–200 bce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023, 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry. “Exclusion and Property Rules in the Law of Nuisance,” Virginia Law Review 90 (2004): 965–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry. “Exclusion versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights,” Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2002): S453–S487.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry. “Intellectual Property as Property: Delineating Entitlements in Information,” Yale Law Journal 116 (2007): 1742–1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jonathan Z. “The Bare Facts of Ritual,” History of Religions 20 (1980): 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jonathan Z. “Morphology and History in Mircea Eliade’s ‘Patterns in Comparative Religion,’” History of Religions 39 (2000): 332–351.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael R. “Mesoamerican State Formation in the Postclassic Period,” in Benjamin Kedar and Merry Wiesner-Hanks, eds., Cambridge World History, Vol. 5: Expanding Webs of Exchange and Conflict, 500 ce–1500 ce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015) 610–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneath, David. The Headless State. New York: Columbia University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spieß, Karl-Heinz. “Lehnsgericht,” in Adalbert Erler and Ekkehard Kaufmann, Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgschichte. Frankfurt a.M.: Erich Schmidt, 1971–, 2: cols. 1714–1717.Google Scholar
Steiger, Heinhard. “Rechtliche Strukturen der europäischen Sttatsordnung 1648–1792,” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 59 (1999): 609–645.Google Scholar
Steinmetzer, Franz X. Die babylonischen Kudurru als Urkundenform. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1922.Google Scholar
Stern, Fritz. The Politics of Cultural Despair. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Stern, Stephanie. “Residential Protectionism and the Legal Mythology of Home,” Michigan Law Review 107 (2009): 1093–1144.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Guy. The End of Sacrifice: Religious Transformations in Late Antiquity, trans. Susan Emanuel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Summenhart, Konrad. Tractatus de contractis licitis atque illicitis, Venice: Ziletto, 1580.Google Scholar
Sweet, James H. “Defying Social Death: The Multiple Configurations of African Slave Family in the Atlantic World,” William and Mary Quarterly 70 (April 2013): 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syme, Ronald. The Roman Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939.Google Scholar
Tabuteau, Emily. Transfers of Property in Eleventh-Century Norman Law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Talamanca, Mario. “Considerazioni conclusive,” in Ennio Cortese, ed., La proprietà e le proprietà. Milan: Giuffrè, 1988, 183–200.Google Scholar
Talamanca, Mario. “L’antichità e i ‘diritti dell’uomo,’” Atti dei Convegni Lincei 174 (2001): 41–91.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, Frank. Slave and Citizen: The Negro in the Americas. New York: Vintage, 1946.Google Scholar
Tannous, Jack. The Making of the Medieval Middle East: Religion, Society and the Simple Believers. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. “The Labor Market of the Early Roman Empire,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34 (2004): 513–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testart, Alain. Éléments de classification des sociétés. Paris: Éditions Errance, 2005.Google Scholar
Testart, Alain. “Game Sharing Systems and Kinship Systems among Hunter-Gatherers,” Man (N.S.) 22 (1987): 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testart, Alain. “The Significance of Food Storage among Hunter-Gatherers: Residence Patterns, Population Densities, and Social Inequalities,” Current Anthropology 23 (1982): 523–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thapar, Romila. From Lineage to State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Thomas, Yan. Les opérations du droit, ed. Marie-Angèle Hermitte and Paolo Napoli. Paris: Seuil/Gallimard, 2011.Google Scholar
Thomas, Yan. “Origine” et “commune patrie”: étude de droit public romain (89 av. J.-C.–212 ap. J.-C.). Rome: École française de Rome, 1996.Google Scholar
Thomas, Yan. “Res, chose et patrimoine (note sur le rapport sujet–objet en droit romain),” Archives de philosophie du droit 25 (1980): 413–426.Google Scholar
Thomas, Yan. “Vitae necisque potestas,” in Thomas, ed., Du châtiment dans la cité: supplices corporels et peine de mort. Rome: École française de Rome, 1984, 499–548.Google Scholar
Thomson de Grummond, Nancy. “Prophets and Priests,” in de Grummond and Erika Simon, eds., The Religion of the Etruscans. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thormann, Karl Friedrich. Der doppelte Ursprung der mancipatio: ein Beitrag zur Erforschung des frührömischen Rechtes unter Mitberücksichtigung des nexum. Munich: Beck, 1943.Google Scholar
Thornton, John. Africa and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic World, 1400–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James. A Discourse on Property: John Locke and His Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaius. The Emperor of Law: The Emergence of Roman Imperial Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaius. Empire of Law: Nazi Germany, Exile Scholars and the Battle for the Future of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaius. “Legal Pluralism and the Roman Empire,” in J. W. Cairns and P. du Plessis, eds., Beyond Dogmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007, 39–52.Google Scholar
Turfa, Jean MacIntosh. Divining the Etruscan World: The Brontoscopic Calendar and Religious Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaan, Michiel de. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and Other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar
Valeri, Valerio. “Wild Victims: Hunting as Sacrifice and Sacrifice as Hunting in Huaulu,” History of Religions 34 (1994): 101–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valvo, Alfredo. La “Profezia di Vegoia”: proprietà fondiaria e aruspicina nel primo secolo a.C. Rome: Istituto italiano per la storia antica, 1988.Google Scholar
Vandendriessche, Sarah. Possessio und Dominium im postklassischen römischen Recht. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac, 2006.Google Scholar
Varkemaa, Jussi. Conrad Summenhart’s Theory of Individual Rights. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. “The Limitations of Marginal Utility,” Journal of Political Economy 17 (1909): 620–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: MacMillan, 1902.Google Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip. Vico’s New Science: A Philosophical Commentary. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verene, Donald Phillip. Vico’s Science of Imagination. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Verhulst, Adriaan and Bourin, Monique. “Europe carolingienne et Europe méridionale: le point de vue d’Adriaan Verhulst,” Mediévales 21 (1991): 55–61.Google Scholar
Verlinden, Charles. “L’origine de sclavus = esclave,” Bulletin Du Cange 17 (1943): 97–128.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion, Vol. 1. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista. La scienza nuova, ed. Paolo Rossi. Milan: Rizzoli, 1958.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de. Comentarios a la Secunda secundae de Santo Tomaso, ed. Vicente Beltran de Heredia. Salamanca: Biblioteca de Teólogos Españoles, 1932–.Google Scholar
Visscher, Fernand de. Études de droit romain public et privé, 3e série. Milan: Giuffrè, 1966.Google Scholar
Visscher, Fernand de. “Mancipium et res mancipi,” Studia et documenta historiae et iuris 2 (1936): 263–324.Google Scholar
Volkmann, Hans. Die Massenversklavungen der Einwohner eroberter Städte in der hellenistisch-römischen Zeit, 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1990.Google Scholar
Voltaire, François-Marie Arouet, ]. Commentaire sur l’esprit des lois de Montesquieu. Paris: Delaunay, 1819.Google Scholar
Vultejus, Hermann. In Institutiones juris civilis commentarius, new ed. Marburg: Egenolph, 1630.Google Scholar
Wagner, Adolph. Lehr- und Handbuch der politischen Ökonomie, 2nd ed. Leipzig: Winter, 1894.Google Scholar
Walde, Alois. Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, 3rd ed., ed. J. B. Hofmann. Heidelberg: Winter, 1938.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Back to M. I. Finley’s Ancient City: Town and Country, Landowners and the Rest at Pompeii,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 32 (2019): 718–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Domus and Insulae in Rome: Families and Households,” in David L. Balch and Carolyn Osiek, eds., Early Christian Families in Context. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003, 3–18.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. “Patronage in Roman Society,” in Wallace-Hadrill, ed., Patronage in Ancient Society. London: Routledge, 1989, 63–87.Google Scholar
Wallon, Henri. Histoire de l’esclavage dans l’antiquité. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1867.Google Scholar
Ward-Perkins, Bryan. “Continuists, Catastrophists and the Towns of Post-Roman Northern Italy,” Papers of the British School at Rome 65 (1997): 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, Sherwood and Lancaster, Chet. “The Evolution of Hunting,” in Richard B. Lee and Irven Devore, eds., Man the Hunter. Chicago: Aldine, 1968, 293–303.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1985.Google Scholar
Watkins, Thomas H. “Coloniae and ius italicum in the Early Empire,” Classical Journal 78 (1983): 319–326.Google Scholar
Watkins, Thomas H. “Roman Citizen Colonies and Italic Right,” in C. Deroux, ed., Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, I. Brussels: Collections Latomus, 1979: 59–99.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. The Law of Property in the Later Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon, 1968.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. “Roman Slave Law and Romanist Ideology,” Phoenix 37 (1983): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Alan. Rome of the XII Tables: Persons and Property. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Watson, James L. “Slavery as an Institution, Open and Closed Systems,” in Watson, ed., Asian and African Systems of Slavery. Berkeley: California, 1980, 1–15.Google Scholar
Wauters, Bart. “Property,” in Randall Lesaffer and Janne Nijman, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Hugo Grotius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. Die römische Agrargeschichte in ihrer Bedeutung für das Staats- und Privatrecht. Stuttgart: Enke, 1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. “Die sozialen Gründe des Untergangs der antike Kultur,” in Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Tübingen: Mohr, 1924, 289–311.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte. Tübingen: Mohr, 1924.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, ed. Johannes Winckelmann, 5th ed. Tübingen: Mohr, 1985.Google Scholar
Wellesley, K. “The Production Date of Plautus’ Captivi,” American Journal of Philology 76 (1955): 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werkmüller, Dieter. “Luft macht eigen – Luft macht frei,” in Adalbert Erler and Ekkehard Kaufmann, eds., Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgschichte. Frankfurt a.M.: Erich Schmidt, 1971–, 3: cols. 92–98.Google Scholar
White, K. D. “Latifundia,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 14 (1967): 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Richard. The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires and Republics in the Great Lakes Region, 1650–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Stephen D. “The Discourse of Inheritance in Twelfth-Century France: Alternative Models of the Fief in ‘Raoul de Cambrai,’” in George Garnett and John Hudson, eds., Law and Government in Medieval England and Normandy: Essays in Honour of Sir James Holt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 173–197.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “Aux origines du ‘monopole de la violence,’” in C. Colliot-Thélène and J.-F. Kervégan, eds., De la société à la sociologie. Lyons: ENS Éditions, 2002.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era: Historical Vision and Legal Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “Long Live the Hatred of Roman Law!” Rechtsgeschichte 2 (2003): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “The Seigneurs Descend to the Rank of Creditors: The Abolition of Respect, 1790,” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 6 (1994): 249–283.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty,” Yale Law Journal 113 (2004): 1151–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitman, James Q. The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. “The World-Historical Significance of European Legal History: An Interim Report,” in Heikki Pihlajamäki, Markus D. Dubber, and Mark Godfrey, eds., The Oxford Handbook of European Legal History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Wickham, Chris. Framing the Early Middle Ages: Europe and the Mediterranean, 400–800. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wickham, Chris. The Inheritance of Rome: Illuminating the Dark Ages, 400–1000. New York: Penguin, 2010.Google Scholar
Wickham, Chris. “Marx, Sherlock Holmes, and Late Roman Commerce,” Journal of Roman Studies 78 (1988): 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, Chris. “The Other Transition: From the Ancient World to Feudalism,” Past & Present 103 (1984): 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. Wandlungen der Eigentumsverfassung, Der deutsche Staat der Gegenwart 13, ed. Carl Schmitt. Hamburg: Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt, 1935.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz. Zivilistische Schriften (1934–1942), ed. Christian Wollschläger. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 2000.Google Scholar
Wieling, Hans, ed. Corpus der römischen Rechtsquellen zur antiken Sklaverei. Stuttgart: Steiner, 1999.Google Scholar
Wieling, H. J. Testamentsauslegung im römischen Recht. Munich: Beck, 1972.Google Scholar
Wilentz, Sean. No Property in Man: Slavery and Anti-slavery at the Nation’s Founding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Williams, Eric. Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Willoweit, Dietmar. Rechtsgrundlagen der Territorialgewalt: Landesobrigkeit, Herrschaftsrechte und Territorium in Rechtswissenschaft der Neuzeit. Cologne and Vienna: Böhlau, 1975.Google Scholar
Winichakul, Thongchai. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Winkel, Laurens. “Deux conceptions du droit naturel dans l’antiquité,” Revue historique du droit français et étranger 93 (2015): 341–350.Google Scholar
Winspeare, Davide. Storia degli abusi feudali. Naples: Erani, 1811.Google Scholar
Wirtschafter, Elise Kimerling. From Serf to Russian Soldier. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witschel, Christian. Krise–Rezession–Stagnation? Der Westen des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt a.M.: Marthe Klauss, 1999.Google Scholar
Wolff, Hans Julius. Roman Law: An Historical Introduction. Norman: University of Oklahoma, 1951.Google Scholar
Wood, Brian M. and Gilby, Ian C.. “From Pan to Man the Hunter: Hunting and Meat Sharing by Chimpanzees, Humans, and Our Common Ancestor,” in Martin Muller, Richard Wrangham, and David Pilbeam, eds., Chimpanzees and Human Evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017, 339–382.Google Scholar
Wood, Ellen Meiksinis. From Citizens to Lords: A Social History of Western Political Thought from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages. London: Verso, 2011.Google Scholar
Wrangham, Richard. “The Evolution of Coalitionary Killing,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 110 (1999): 1–30.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, Richard. The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution. New York: Vintage, 2019.Google Scholar
Yen, Alfred C. “Western Frontiers or Feudal Society? Metaphors and Perceptions of Cyberspace,” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 17 (2002): 1207–1263.Google Scholar
Zacour, Norman. Jews and Saracens in the Consilia of Oldradus de Ponte. Toronto: Pontifical Institute, 1990.Google Scholar
Zartaloudis, Thanos. The Birth of Nomos. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeder, Melinda. “Religion and the Revolution: The Legacy of Jacques Cauvin,” Paléorient 37 (2011): 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Karl-Heinz. Fata iuris gentium: kleine Schriften zur Geschichte des europäischen Völkerrechts. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Karl-Heinz. “Grenze,” in Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum. Stuttgart: Hiersemann, 1950–2022, 12: cols. 1095–1107.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Reinhard. “Hero auf dem Felsenturme,” Rechtsgeschichte 30 (2022): 294–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zunz, Oliver. The Man Who Understood Democracy: The Life of Alexis de Tocqueville. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Zyl, D. H. van. History and Principles of Roman Private Law. Durban: Butterworths, 1983.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • James Q. Whitman, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: From Masters of Slaves to Lords of Lands
  • Online publication: 28 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009497541.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • James Q. Whitman, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: From Masters of Slaves to Lords of Lands
  • Online publication: 28 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009497541.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • James Q. Whitman, Yale University, Connecticut
  • Book: From Masters of Slaves to Lords of Lands
  • Online publication: 28 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009497541.012
Available formats
×