Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Coming soon
  • Show more authors
  • Select format
  • Publisher:
    Cambridge University Press
    ISBN:
    9781009689519
    9781009689540
    Dimensions:
    (216 x 140 mm)
    Weight & Pages:
    276 Pages
    Dimensions:
    Weight & Pages:
Selected: Digital
Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

Book description

For centuries, Christians believed that the biblical letters of 1, 2, and 3 John were penned by a disciple of Jesus. Today, scholars speculate that the three are artifacts of a lost 'Johannine Community.' In this groundbreaking study, however, Hugo Méndez challenges both paradigms, meticulously laying out the evidence that the Epistles are, instead, a series of falsely authored works. The texts position themselves as works by a single author. In reality, they were penned by three different writers in a chain of imitation, creative adaptation, and invention. Through incisive, close readings of the Epistles, Méndez clarifies their meaning and purpose, demystifying their most challenging sections. And by placing these works in dialogue with Greco-Roman pseudo-historical writing, he uncovers surprising links between Classical and early Christian literature. Bold, comprehensive, and deeply original, this book dismantles older scholarly views while proposing new and exciting approaches to these enigmatic texts.

Reviews

‘This bold, original, and courageous reappraisal of The Johannine Epistles will forever change how we read these texts.'

Candida Moss - Edward Cadbury Professor of Theology, University of Birmingham, UK

‘Combining meticulous attention to textual details, reception history, and ancient pseudepigraphy, Hugo Méndez persuasively argues that the Johannine epistles are not works of any known early Christian, but literary creations with distinctive interpretations of John and its mysterious author. A provocative and engaging read!'

Harold Attridge - Sterling Professor of Divinity Emeritus, Yale University

‘Rejecting the notion of a Johannine community, Méndez argues that the Johannine epistles represent a lineage of falsely authored works, each with its own compositional aims. As he canvasses the ancient evidence, Méndez mounts an argument with tremendous substance and explanatory power. A work of rare scholarly imagination and importance.’

Christopher Skinner - Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity, Loyola University Chicago

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Accessibility standard: Missing or limited accessibility features

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation

Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Index navigation

Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order and Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order

You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.

Visualised data also available as non‐graphical data

You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information

You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Use of high contrast between text and background colour

You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.