Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Coverdill, James E.
and
Finlay, William
1995.
Understanding Mills via Mill-type methods: An application of qualitative comparative analysis to a study of labor management in southern textile manufacturing.
Qualitative Sociology,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
457.
King, Desmond
1995.
Book Reviews.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
475.
Pontusson, Jonas
1995.
Explaining the Decline of European Social Democracy: The Role of Structural Economic Change.
World Politics,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 4,
p.
495.
Beck, Nathaniel
and
Katz, Jonathan N.
1995.
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 89,
Issue. 3,
p.
634.
Tang, Kwong‐leung
1996.
DETERMINANTS OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEVELOPMENT IN HONG KONG: A TIME‐SERIES STUDY.
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
1.
SCHMIDT, MANFRED G.
1996.
When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 2,
p.
155.
Peters, B. Guy
1997.
Policy transfers between governments: The case of administrative reforms.
West European Politics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 4,
p.
71.
Hicks, Alexander
and
Kenworthy, Lane
1998.
Cooperation and Political Economic Performance in Affluent Democratic Capitalism.
American Journal of Sociology,
Vol. 103,
Issue. 6,
p.
1631.
Kunkel, Christoph
and
Pontusson, Jonas
1998.
Corporatism versus social democracy: Divergent fortunes of the Austrian and Swedish labour movements.
West European Politics,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 2,
p.
1.
Glatzer, Wolfgang
and
Ostner, Ilona
1999.
Deutschland im Wandel.
p.
7.
MICHALOWSKI, RAYMOND J.
and
CARLSON, SUSAN M.
1999.
UNEMPLOYMENT, IMPRISONMENT, AND SOCIAL STRUCTURES OF ACCUMULATION: HISTORICAL CONTINGENCY IN THE RUSCHE‐KIRCHHEIMER HYPOTHESIS*.
Criminology,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 2,
p.
217.
Goodin, Robert E.
and
Smitsman, Anneloes
2000.
Placing welfare states: The Netherlands as a crucial test case.
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
p.
39.
Whiteley, Paul F.
2000.
Economic Growth and Social Capital.
Political Studies,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 3,
p.
443.
Quadagno, Jill
2000.
Promoting Civil Rights through the Welfare State: How Medicare Integrated Southern Hospitals.
Social Problems,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1,
p.
68.
Goodin, Robert E.
2001.
FALSE PRINCIPLES OF WELFARE REFORM.
Australian Journal of Social Issues,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
189.
Lieberman, Evan S.
2002.
Taxation data as indicators of state-society relations: Possibilities and pitfalls in cross-national research.
Studies in Comparative International Development,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 4,
p.
89.
Schmid, Josef
2002.
Wohlfahrtsstaaten im Vergleich.
p.
27.
Swidorski, Carl
2003.
From the Wagner Act to the Human Rights Watch Report: Labor and Freedom of Expression and Association, 1935-2000*.
New Political Science,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 1,
p.
55.
Munck, Gerardo L.
2003.
Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft.
p.
129.
Gough, Ian
Wood, Geof
Barrientos, Armando
Bevan, Philippa
Davis, Peter
and
Room, Graham
2004.
Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America.